Surgical Outcomes of Full-Endoscopic Degenerative Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis Decompression Through an Interlaminar Approach

Abstract

Objective: The conventional open decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar lateral recess stenosis (DLLRS) yields definitive therapeutic outcomes; however, it confronts numerous challenges, including extensive surgical trauma and iatrogenic spinal instability. The purpose of this study is to investigate the surgical outcomes of full-endoscopic DLLRS decompression by an interlaminar approach.

Methods: A consecutive cohort of 275 patients, including 148 males and 127 females, with an average age of 64.62 (55–82) years, with DLLRS between July 2021 and December 2022, was reviewed in this retrospective study. The involved segments were L4/5 in 126 patients and L5/S1 in 149 patients. The computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the lumbar were examined before and after surgery to evaluate the degree of decompression. The VAS score of back and leg pain and the ODI scale were recorded preoperatively, 1 day, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery, and at the last follow-up. The modified Macnab score was determined at the last follow-up. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the VAS and ODI scores of back/leg pain at various time points before and after surgery.

Results: All of the patients underwent surgery successfully. The average duration of surgery was 84.90 min, the average blood loss was 47.33 mL, and the length of hospitalization was 3–4 (3.31 ± 0.46) days, with no nerve injury, infections, or other complications. One-way ANOVA results showed significantly improved VAS and ODI scores for back/leg pain at each time point after surgery compared to those preoperatively (p < 0.05). The mean follow-up was 23.6 ± 2.3 (range, 15–32) months; at the last follow-up, the modified Macnab was excellent in 143 patients, good in 102 patients, fair in 18 patients, and poor in 12 patients.

Conclusion: Full-endoscopic lumbar lateral recess decompression through an interlaminar approach is a safe and effective approach for DLLRS.

Keywords

decompression / degenerative lumbar lateral recess stenosis / endoscopic / interlaminar approach / transforaminal approach

References

[1] B. Wu, C. Xiong, B. Huang, et al., “Clinical Outcomes of Transforaminal Endoscopic Lateral Recess Decompression by Using the Visualized Drilled Foraminoplasty and Visualized Reamed Foraminoplasty: A Comparison Study,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 21, no. 1 (2020): 829.

[2] H. Li, Y. Ou, F. Xie, W. Liang, G. Tian, and H. Li, “Linical Efficacy of Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients: A Retrospective Study,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 15, no. 1 (2020): 441.

[3] S. Meng, D. Xu, S. Han, et al., “Fully Endoscopic 360° Decompression for Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Combined With Disc Herniation: Technical Note and Preliminary Outcomes of 39 Cases,” Journal of Pain Research 15 (2022): 2867-2878.

[4] D. Guha, R. F. Heary, and M. F. Shamji, “Iatrogenic Spondylolisthesis Following Laminectomy for Degenerative Lumbar Stenosis: Systematic Review and Current Concepts,” Neurosurgical Focus 39, no. 4 (2015): E9.

[5] B. Zhang, Q. Kong, Y. Yan, and P. Feng, “Degenerative Central Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Is Endoscopic Decompression Through Bilateral Transforaminal Approach Sufficient?,” BioMed Research International 21, no. 1 (2020): 714.

[6] X. F. Li, L. Y. Jin, Z. D. Lv, et al., “Efficacy of Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression Treatment for Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis With Spinal Stenosis in Elderly Patients,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 19, no. 2 (2020): 1417-1424.

[7] I. Škoro, M. Stančić, M. Kovačević, and K. S. Đurić, “Long-Term Results and Efficacy of Laminectomy With Fusion Versus Young Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Degenerative Spinal Stenosis,” World Neurosurgery 89 (2016): 387-392.

[8] P. Feng, Q. Kong, B. Zhang, J. Liu, J. Ma, and Y. Hu, “Percutaneous Full Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Symptomatic Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion in Elderly Patients,” Orthopedic Surgery 15, no. 7 (2023): 1749-1755.

[9] Y. Niu, Z. Shen, and H. Li, “Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Discectomy Versus Microendoscopic Discectomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine 2022 (2022): 7667463, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7667463.

[10] T. Y. Wang, G. Nayar, C. R. Brown, L. Pimenta, I. O. Karikari, and R. E. Isaacs, “Bony Lateral Recess Stenosis and Other Radiographic Predictors of Failed Indirect Decompression via Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion: Multi-Institutional Analysis of 101 Consecutive Spinal Levels,” World Neurosurgery 106 (2017): 819-826.

[11] C. Y. Ou, T. C. Lee, T. H. Lee, and Y. H. Huang, “Impact of Body Mass Index on Adjacent Segment Disease After Lumbar Fusion for Degenerative Spine Disease,” Neurosurgery 76, no. 4 (2015): 396-401.

[12] Y. Imajo, T. Taguchi, M. Neo, et al., “Complications of Spinal Surgery for Elderly Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in a Super-Aging Country: An Analysis of 8033 Patients,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science 22, no. 1 (2017): 10-15.

[13] C. Ren, Y. Song, L. Liu, and Y. Xue, “Adjacent Segment Degeneration and Disease After Lumbar Fusion Compared With Motion-Preserving Procedures: A Meta-Analysis,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 24, no. Suppl 1 (2014): S245-S253.

[14] A. Antoniadis, N. H. Ulrich, S. Schmid, M. Farshad, and K. Min, “Decompression Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis in Octogenarians; a Single Center Experience of 121 Consecutive Patients,” British Journal of Neurosurgery 31, no. 1 (2017): 67-71.

[15] T. A. Kosztowski, D. Choi, J. Fridley, et al., “Lumbar Disc Reherniation After Transforaminal Lumbar Endoscopic Discectomy,” Annals of Translational Medicine 6, no. 6 (2018): 106.

[16] G. Yin, B. Huang, C. Wang, and S. Q. Liu, “Therapeutic Effects of Full Endoscopic Spine Surgery via Transforaminal Approach in Elderly Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Clinical Study,” Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 55, no. 2 (2021): 166-170.

[17] F. Wu, W. Kong, W. Liao, et al., “Percutaneous Total Endoscopic Resection of Partial Articular Processes for Treatment of Lateral Crypt Stenosis and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: Technical Report and Efficacy Analysis,” BioMed Research International 2018 (2018): 9130182.

[18] Q. C. Song, Y. Zhao, D. Li, et al., “Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy for the Treatment of L5-S1 Lumbar Disc Herniation and the Influence of Iliac Crest Height on Its Clinical Effects,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 22, no. 2 (2021): 866.

[19] K. C. Choi and C. K. Park, “Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for L5-S1 Disc Herniation: Consideration of the Relation Between the Iliac Crest and L5-S1 Disc,” Pain Physician 19, no. 2 (2016): E301-E308.

[20] G. Krzok, A. E. Telfeian, R. Wagner, C. P. Hofstetter, and M. Iprenburg, “Contralateral Facet-Sparing Sublaminar Endoscopic Foraminotomy for the Treatment of Lumbar Lateral Recess Stenosis: Technical Note,” Journal of Spine Surgery 3, no. 2 (2017): 260-266.

[21] Y. Ahn, “Percutaneous Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis,” Expert Review of Medical Devices 11, no. 6 (2014): 605-616.

[22] Y. P. Cheng, X. K. Cheng, and H. Wu, “A Comparative Study of Percutaneous Endoscopic Interlaminar Discectomy and Transforaminal Discectomy for L5-S1 Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation,” BioMed Research International 23, no. 1 (2022): 244.

[23] W. K. Kwon, K. A. Kelly, M. McAvoy, et al., “Full Endoscopic Ligamentum Flavum Sparing Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Recess Decompression: Surgical Technique and Clinical Results,” Neurospine 19, no. 4 (2022): 1028-1038.

[24] B. Wu, C. Xiong, L. Tan, D. Zhao, F. Xu, and H. Kang, “Clinical Outcomes of MED and iLESSYS(®) Delta for the Treatment of Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis and Lateral Recess Stenosis: A Comparison Study,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine 20, no. 6 (2020): 252.

[25] X. Liu, S. Yuan, Y. Tian, et al., “Comparison of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy, Microendoscopic Discectomy, and Microdiscectomy for Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation: Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Results,” Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine 28, no. 3 (2018): 317-325.

[26] C. H. Lee, M. Choi, D. S. Ryu, et al., “Efficacy and Safety of Full-Endoscopic Decompression via Interlaminar Approach for Central or Lateral Recess Spinal Stenosis of the Lumbar Spine: A Meta-Analysis,” Spine 43, no. 24 (2018): 1756-1764.

[27] C. Liu, C. Yang, J. Liu, et al., “Error Assessment and Correction for Extrusion-Based Bioprinting Using Computer Vision Method,” International Journal of Bioprinting 9, no. 1 (2023): 644.

[28] C. Liu, J. Liu, C. Yang, et al., “Computer Vision-Aided 2D Error Assessment and Correction for Helix Bioprinting,” International Journal of Bioprinting 8, no. 2 (2022): 547.

[29] J. Chen, Y. Qin, Y. Du, et al., “Anatomical Study of the C6 Pedicle and Lateral Mass in Children Aged 0-14 Years Based on CT Imaging,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 19, no. 1 (2024): 468.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.