PDF
Abstract
Objective: High-grade dysplastic spondylolisthesis (HGDS) is a relatively rare condition mainly involving the L5/S1 segment of the spine and occurring in children and adolescents. Whether surgical fixation should be L5–S1 monosegmental or extended up to L4 remains controversial. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes and the risk of adjacent segment spondylolisthesis between L5–S1 monosegmental fixation and L4–S1 double-segmental fixation for pediatric HGDS.
Methods: This is a retrospective control study Pediatric patients diagnosed with HGDS between March 2007 and October 2022 at our hospital were followed up, and their data were analyzed. The study involved 39 HGDS patients (average slip, 70.0%) divided into two groups: the L5–S1 monosegmental reduction and fusion group (L5 group, 16 patients) and the L4–S1 double-segmental reduction and fusion group (L4 group, 23 patients). Radiographic parameters and patient-reported outcomes were collected before surgery and at follow-up and compared between the two groups. Additionally, the prevalence of adjacent segment spondylolisthesis and instability (ASS/ASI) was compared between the groups at the last follow-up. Independent sample t-tests were employed to compare normally distributed data between the two groups. Paired sample t-tests were employed to compare preoperative data with postoperative data. The chi-square test was utilized to compare rates.
Results: The average age was (12.5 ± 2.3) years. The L4 group had a greater slip percentage (77.6% vs. 59.2%; p < 0.001), a smaller Dub-LSA (60.3° vs. 69.7°; p = 0.022), and a higher slip grade (p = 0.002) than the L5 group, indicating more severe spondylolisthesis in the L4 group. Clinical parameters, namely the visual analog scale, Oswestry disability index, and Japanese Orthopedic Association-29 score, did not significantly differ between the two groups. The L5 group had a higher rate of ASS/ASI than the L4 group (6/16, 37.5% vs. 0/23, 0%; p = 0.002). Of all the ASS/ASI patients, one underwent a second surgery due to L4 spondylolisthesis 2 years after the primary surgery. The remaining five exhibited no symptoms or mild symptoms.
Conclusions: For pediatric HGDS, both L5–S1 monosegmental fixation and L4–S1 fixation can achieve satisfactory outcomes. However, there is a higher risk of ASS/ASI following L5–S1 fixation than following L4–S1 fixation.
Keywords
adjacent segment spondylolisthesis
/
developmental spondylolisthesis
/
dysplastic spondylolisthesis
/
high-grade
/
lumbosacral kyphosis
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Xinhu Guo, Zhaoqing Guo, Weishi Li, Zhongqiang Chen, Qiang Qi, Chuiguo Sun, Woquan Zhong, Bin Su.
Increased Risk of Adjacent Segment Spondylolisthesis or Instability Following L5–S1 Versus L4–S1 Fixation for L5–S1 High-Grade Dysplastic Spondylolisthesis in Children.
Orthopaedic Surgery, 2025, 17(4): 1133-1142 DOI:10.1111/os.14367
| [1] |
J. Perra, “Wiltse and Marchetti-Bartolozzi Classifications of Spondylolisthesis—Guidelines for Treatment,” in Bridwell and Dewald's Textbook of Spinal Surgery, 4th ed., eds. M. C. Gupta and K. H. Bridwell (Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2019), 579-585.
|
| [2] |
R. J. Hoel, R. M. Brenner, and D. W. Polly, “The Challenge of Creating Lordosis in High-Grade Dysplastic Spondylolisthesis,” Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 29, no. 3 (2018): 375-387, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2018.03.006.
|
| [3] |
K. Martikos, T. Greggi, and C. Faldini, “High Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis; Can Reduction Always Re-Align the Unbalanced Pelvis?,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 20, no. 1 (2019): 499, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-019-2865-9.
|
| [4] |
J. M. Mac-Thiong, M. T. Hresko, A. Alzakri, et al., “A Surgical Treatment Algorithm for Restoring Pelvic Balance and Health-Related Quality of Life in High-Grade Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis: Prospective Multicenter Cohort of 61 Young Patients,” Clinical Spine Surgery 36, no. 10 (2023): E442-E452, https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001499.
|
| [5] |
D. W. Polly, J. J. Haselhuhn, P. B. O. Soriano, K. Odland, and K. E. Jones, “Management of High-Grade Dysplastic Spondylolisthesis,” Neurosurgery Clinics of North America 34, no. 4 (2023): 567-572, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nec.2023.06.003.
|
| [6] |
P. K. Sudarshan, H. R. Suthar, V. K. Varma, A. Krishnan, and S. K. Hegde, “Long-Term Experience With Reduction Technique in High-Grade Spondylolisthesis in the Young,” International Journal of Spine Surger 12, no. 3 (2018): 399-407, https://doi.org/10.14444/5047.
|
| [7] |
R. Koucheki, B. Rocos, R. Gandhi, S. J. Lewis, and D. E. Lebel, “Surgical Management of High-Grade Paediatric Spondylolisthesis: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review,” European Spine Journal 32, no. 2 (2023): 436-446, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07408-3.
|
| [8] |
J. Štulík, G. Geri, and B. M. Klézl, “High-Grade High-Dysplastic Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis in Children Treated With Complete Reduction and Single-Level Circumferential Fusion: A Prospective Case Series,” Brain and Spine 29, no. 2 (2022): 100871, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bas.2022.100871.
|
| [9] |
K. Min, T. Liebscher, and D. Rothenfluh, “Sacral Dome Resection and Single-Stage Posterior Reduction in the Treatment of High-Grade High Dysplastic Spondylolisthesis in Adolescents and Young Adults,” European Spine Journal 21, no. Suppl 6 (2012): S785-S791, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1949-5.
|
| [10] |
M. Rezvani, M. Sabouri, M. Mahmoodkhani, A. Mokhtari, and D. S. Tehrani, “A Comparative Study of L4-L5-S1 and L5-S1 Vertebral Fusion in High-Grade L5-S1 Spondylolisthesis,” Journal of Craniovertebral Junction and Spine 12, no. 2 (2021): 202-208, https://doi.org/10.4103/jcvjs.jcvjs_41_21.
|
| [11] |
R. Lengert, Y. P. Charles, A. Walter, S. Schuller, J. Godet, and J. P. Steib, “Posterior Surgery in High-Grade Spondylolisthesis,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 100, no. 5 (2014): 481-484, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2014.03.018.
|
| [12] |
J. Jiao, X. Ye, D. Guo, et al., “Is It Necessary to Extend Fusion to L4 When Correcting Pediatric L5-S1 Spondylolisthesis?,” Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine 40, no. 5 (2024): 545-550, https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.11.SPINE231035.
|
| [13] |
B. Bouyer, M. Bachy, A. Courvoisier, E. Dromzee, P. Mary, and R. Vialle, “High-Grade Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis Reduction and Fusion in Children Using Transsacral Rod Fixation,” Child's Nervous System 30, no. 3 (2014): 505-513, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-013-2260-z.
|
| [14] |
J. M. Mac-Thiong and H. Labelle, “A Proposal for a Surgical Classification of Pediatric Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis Based on Current Literature,” European Spine Journal 15, no. 10 (2006): 1425-1435, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-006-0101-4.
|
| [15] |
J. Dubousset, “Treatment of Spondylolysis and Spondylolisthesis in Children and Adolescents,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 337 (1997): 77-85, https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199704000-00010.
|
| [16] |
P. Glavas, J. M. Mac-Thiong, S. Parent, J. A. de Guise, and H. Labelle, “Assessment of Lumbosacral Kyphosis in Spondylolisthesis: A Computer-Assisted Reliability Study of Six Measurement Techniques,” European Spine Journal 18, no. 2 (2009): 212-217, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0818-3.
|
| [17] |
A. C. Disch, W. Schmoelz, G. Matziolis, S. V. Schneider, C. Knop, and M. Putzier, “Higher Risk of Adjacent Segment Degeneration After Floating Fusions: Long-Term Outcome After Low Lumbar Spine Fusions,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 21, no. 2 (2008): 79-85, https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3180577259.
|
| [18] |
A. Leone, G. Guglielmi, V. N. Cassar-Pullicino, and L. Bonomo, “Lumbar Intervertebral Instability: A Review,” Radiology 245, no. 1 (2007): 62-77, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2451051359.
|
| [19] |
C. Lamartina, “A Square to Indicate the Unstable Zone in Severe Spondylolisthesis,” European Spine Journal 10, no. 5 (2001): 444-448, https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860100284.
|
| [20] |
C. Lamartina, J. M. Zavatsky, M. Petruzzi, and N. Specchia, “Novel Concepts in the Evaluation and Treatment of High-Dysplastic Spondylolisthesis,” European Spine Journal 18, no. Suppl_1 (2009): 133-142, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-0984-y.
|
| [21] |
M. Ruf, H. Koch, R. P. Melcher, and J. Harms, “Anatomic Reduction and Monosegmental Fusion in High-Grade Developmental Spondylolisthesis,” Spine 31, no. 3 (2006): 269-274, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000197204.91891.eb.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.