Different Internal Fixation Methods for Sanders Type II and III Calcaneal Fractures: A 5-Year Retrospective Study and Finite Element Analysis

Abstract

Objective: Soft tissue defects and postoperative wound healing complications related to calcaneus fractures may result in significant morbidity. The aim of this study was to investigate whether percutaneous minimally invasive screw internal fixation (PMISIF) can change this situation in the treatment of calcaneal fractures, and aimed to explore the mechanical effects of different internal fixation methods on Sanders type III calcaneal fractures through finite element analysis.

Methods: This retrospective analysis focused on 83 patients with Sanders II and III calcaneal fractures from March 2017 to March 2022. Among them, 32 patients underwent PMISIF, 24 patients underwent tarsal sinus incision plate internal fixation (TSIPIF), and 27 patients underwent extended lateral incision plate internal fixation (ELIPIF). The present study aimed to compare various parameters, including the perioperative hospital stay, intraoperative blood loss, operative time, postoperative drainage volume, incidence of postoperative wound complications, and Gissane angle and Bohler angle data before surgery, after surgery, and at the last follow-up, among the three treatment groups. Additionally, three different finite element models were created to simulate Sanders III calcaneal fractures treated with PMISIF, TSIPIF, and ELIPIF. The models were subjected to longitudinal stresses of 350 and 700 N, and the displacement and stress distribution were analyzed to compare the stability of each model.

Results: Compared with ELIPIF and TSIPIF, PMISIF has several advantages, including shorter operative times, smaller incisions, shorter hospital stays, and lower incidences of postoperative complications. At the 12-month time point after the operation, the percentages of patients with excellent and good American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) functional scores were 96.9%, 91.7%, and 96.2%, respectively, for the three methods, demonstrating similar outcomes. Intraoperative blood loss in the PMISIF group was comparable to that in the TSIPIF group and lower than that in the ELIPIF group. There were no significant differences in the Gissane or Bohler angles among the three groups before or after the operation. However, the differences in the Gissane and Bohler angles after the operation within each group were statistically significant compared with those before the operation. Finite element analysis revealed that stress in all three internal fixation models was primarily concentrated on the subtalar articular surface, whereas displacement was mainly observed on the medial side of the subtalar articular surface. The peak stress and displacement of bone fragments and implants in the PMISIF model were lower than those in both the TSIPIF and ELIPIF models.

Conclusion: PMISIF can achieve excellent and good rates comparable to those of TSIPIF and ELIPIF. Additionally, this approach offers the advantages of reduced operative trauma, a lower incidence of complications, and shorter preoperative preparation and hospitalization times. Furthermore, this approach can achieve a similar level of biomechanical stability.

Keywords

AOFAS / calcaneal fractures / finite element analysis / Sanders

References

[1] T. Taha, K. Mahmoud, A. K. Attia, and M. M. Mekhaimar, “Delayed Soft Tissue Necrosis in an Atypical Closed Calcaneal Fracture: A Case Report,” Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports 9, no. 2 (2019): 11–14.

[2] Q. Yu, Z. Li, J. Li, et al., “Calcaneal Fracture Maps and Their Determinants,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 17, no. 1 (2022): 39.

[3] G. Zhang, S. Ding, and Z. Ruan, “Minimally Invasive Treatment of Calcaneal Fracture,” Journal of International Medical Research 47, no. 8 (2019): 3946–3954.

[4] L. H. Li, Y. Z. Guo, H. Wang, et al., “Less Wound Complications of a Sinus Tarsi Approach Compared to an Extended Lateral Approach for the Treatment of Displaced Intraarticular Calcaneal Fracture: A Randomized Clinical Trial in 64 Patients,” Medicine (Baltimore) 95, no. 36 (2016): e4628.

[5] N. Rawicki, R. Wyatt, N. Kusnezov, E. Kanlic, and A. Abdelgawad, “High Incidence of Post-Operative Infection After ‘Sinus Tarsi’ Approach for Treatment of Intra-Articular Fractures of the Calcaneus: A 5 Year Experience in an Academic Level One Trauma Center,” Patient Safety in Surgery 9 (2015): 25.

[6] A. Y. Eltabbaa, M. A El-Rosasy, M. R. El-Tabbakh, and M. N. Elfakhrany, “Minimally Invasive K-Wire Fixation of Displaced Intraarticular Calcaneal Fractures Through a Minimal Sinus Tarsi Approach,” Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 24, no. 1 (2023): 4.

[7] T. Alajmi, A. F. Sharif, M. A. Majoun, F. S. Alshehri, A. M. Albaqami, and M. Alshouli, “Minimally Invasive Sinus Tarsi Approach for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Calcaneal Fractures: Complications, Risk Factors, and Outcome Predictors,” Cureus 14, no. 1 (2022): e21791.

[8] F. Xinbin, Z. Bo, W. Liang, et al., “Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Tarsal Sinus Incision With Percutaneous Cannulated Screws for Treatment of Sanders Type II and III Calcaneal Fractures,” International Journal of Orthopaedics 42, no. 4 (2021): 252–257.

[9] G. Jiang, J. Li, X. Zhang, et al., “Limb Reconstruction System Assisted Reduction and Internal Fixation for Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: A New Application,” Orthopaedic Surgery 15, no. 10 (2023): 2540–2548.

[10] A. Gültekin, E. Acar, L. Uğur, A. Yıldız, and U. Serarslan, “The Importance of Bohler’s Angle in Calcaneus Geometry: A Finite Element Model Study,” Joint Diseases and Related Surgery 32, no. 2 (2021): 420–427.

[11] Q. J. Pang, X. Yu, and Z. H. Guo, “The Sustentaculum Tali Screw Fixation for the Treatment of Sanders Type II Calcaneal Fracture: A Finite Element Analysis,” Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences 30, no. 5 (2014): 1099–1103.

[12] M. Binyao, J. Xuewen, Z. Feirong, et al., “Study of Plantar Stress Distribution During Walking and Standing,” Orthopedic Journal of China 12 (2002): 68–70.

[13] B. Yu, W. C. Chen, P. Y. Lee, et al., “Biomechanical Comparison of Conventional and Anatomical Calcaneal Plates for the Treatment of Intraarticular Calcaneal Fractures – A Finite Element Study,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 19, no. 13 (2016): 1363–1370.

[14] S. K. Benirschke and B. J. Sangeorzan, “Extensive Intraarticular Fractures of the Foot. Surgical Management of Calcaneal Fractures,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 292 (1993): 128–134.

[15] K. R. Kamath, S. Mallya, and A. Hegde, “A Comparative Study of Operative and Conservative Treatment of Intraarticular Displaced Calcaneal Fractures,” Scientific Reports 11, no. 1 (2021): 3946.

[16] X. Hua, J. Zhang, H. Liu, Y. Guan, K. Chen, and Z. Qian, “Comparison of Two Surgical Strategies for Fractures of the Anterior Process of the Calcaneus With or Without Bridging Plate Fixation,” Journal of International Medical Research 51, no. 2 (2023): 3000605231154414.

[17] A. Kumar, S. Rastogi, Y. Haider, S. Kumar, S. Chauhan, and J. Passey, “Morphometric Variations of the Lateral Surface of Calcaneus: Can Standard Plate Sizes Fit All?,” Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma 13 (2021): 156–162.

[18] G. Khazen and C. K. Rassi, “Sinus Tarsi Approach for Calcaneal Fractures: The New Gold Standard?,” Foot and Ankle Clinics 25, no. 4 (2020): 667–681.

[19] J. H. Park, D. I. Chun, K. R. Park, et al., “Can Sural Nerve Injury Be Avoided in the Sinus Tarsi Approach for Calcaneal Fracture?: A Cadaveric Study,” Medicine (Baltimore) 98, no. 42 (2019): e17611.

[20] J. Wan, J. Feng, F. Li, J. Xu, M. J. Li, and T. Hu, “Therapeutic Advantages of Internal Fixation With Kirschner Wire and Bone Grafting via Limited Tarsal Sinus Incision Approach for Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures of Children,” Medical Science Monitor 24 (2018): 7862–7868.

[21] J. Wang, W. Han, Y. Su, J. Wang, and X. Jiang, “Comparison of Robot-Assisted Percutaneous Cannulated Screws Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation in Calcaneal Fractures,” Orthopaedic Surgery 15, no. 3 (2023): 724–730.

[22] K. A. Kirby, “Subtalar Joint Axis Location and Rotational Equilibrium Theory of Foot Function,” Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 91, no. 9 (2001): 465–487.

[23] H. W. Vogler and F. Bojsen-Møller, “Tarsal Functions, Movement, and Stabilization Mechanisms in Foot, Ankle, and Leg Performance,” Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association 90, no. 3 (2000): 112–125.

[24] A. Gültekin, E. Acar, L. Uğur, A. Yıldız, and U. Serarslan, “The Importance of Böhler’s Angle in Calcaneus Geometry: A Finite Element Model Study,” Joint Diseases and Related Surgery 32, no. 2 (2021): 420–427.

[25] J. P. P Saers, T. M. Ryan, and J. T. Stock, “Baby Steps Towards Linking Calcaneal Trabecular Bone Ontogeny and the Development of Bipedal Human Gait,” Journal of Anatomy 236, no. 3 (2020): 474–492.

[26] S. Liu, Y. Zhang, J. Cao, S. Fu, and A. Peng, “Bone Cemented K-Wire Fixation Versus Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing Fixation of Paediatric Proximal Humerus Fractures: A Prospective Cohort Study,” Medicine (Baltimore) 102, no. 6 (2023): e32959.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.