Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Adults With Improved Biplane Double-Supported Screw Fixation and Femoral Neck System: Complications and Surgical Techniques

Xiaolong Zhang , Xiwen Feng , Lingfei Ouyang , Shan Shu , Lebin Zhuang , Weichao Gui , Sheng Zhang , Zilong Yao , Gang Wang , Hua Liao , Jijie Hu

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4) : 1057 -1066.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2025, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (4) : 1057 -1066. DOI: 10.1111/os.14353
CLINICAL ARTICLE

Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Adults With Improved Biplane Double-Supported Screw Fixation and Femoral Neck System: Complications and Surgical Techniques

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objectives: Treating femoral neck fractures remains a significant challenge for orthopedic surgeons and imposes a substantial economic burden on developing regions. Current novel internal fixation methods demonstrate excellent biomechanical performance. However, these new internal fixation methods are still associated with various complications. This study aimed to report the clinical complications of femoral neck system (FNS) and biplane double-supported screw fixation (BDSF) treatments for femoral neck fractures at our institution and provide directions for selecting cost-effective internal fixation methods.

Methods: A retrospective case–control study of adult patients with femoral neck fractures treated with BDSF or FNS was conducted at Nanfang Hospital from April 2019 to April 2022. General medical records were collected both preoperatively and intraoperatively. Primary complication measures included osteonecrosis of the femoral head, nonunion, screw-out, and subtrochanteric fractures, along with femoral neck shortening. The primary functional measure evaluated was the Harris hip score. This study employed t-test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and chi-square test to statistically analyze the data.

Results: Statistically significant differences were observed between the BDSF and FNS groups in terms of surgery duration (60.8 ± 12.6 min vs. 71.0 ± 12.0 min), incision length (5.5 ± 1.2 cm vs. 9.1 ± 1.6 cm) and hospitalization costs (39563.8 ± 9086.4 RMB vs. 24960.4 ± 10154.4 RMB). No statistically significant differences between the BDSF and FNS groups were found in the baseline data, blood loss or hospital stay. Moderate femoral neck shortening was significantly less common in the BDSF group than in the FNS group (27.1% vs. 61.5%, p = 0.016). Postoperatively, no statistically significant differences in complication rates, such as femoral head necrosis, nonunion, subtrochanteric fractures or screw-out, were observed between the BDSF and FNS groups.

Conclusions: This study revealed no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications such as femoral head necrosis, nonunion or screw cut-out between BDSF and FNS. Although BDSF has drawbacks, such as a long learning curve and the potential to cause subtrochanteric fractures, it is cost-effective and better maintains the length of the femoral neck. The modified BDSF technique may be more suitable for developing regions with limited health care budgets.

Keywords

biplane double-supported screw fixation / complications / femoral neck fracture / femoral neck system / surgical techniques

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Xiaolong Zhang, Xiwen Feng, Lingfei Ouyang, Shan Shu, Lebin Zhuang, Weichao Gui, Sheng Zhang, Zilong Yao, Gang Wang, Hua Liao, Jijie Hu. Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Adults With Improved Biplane Double-Supported Screw Fixation and Femoral Neck System: Complications and Surgical Techniques. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2025, 17(4): 1057-1066 DOI:10.1111/os.14353

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

H. Hu, J. Cheng, M. Feng, Z. Gao, J. Wu, and S. Lu, “Clinical Outcome of Femoral Neck System Versus Cannulated Compression Screws for Fixation of Femoral Neck Fracture in Younger Patients,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 16 (2021): 370, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02517-z.

[2]

Y. Nibe, T. Matsumura, T. Takahashi, T. Kubo, Y. Matsumoto, and K. Takeshita, “A Comparison Between the Femoral Neck System and Other Implants for Elderly Patients With Femoral Neck Fracture: A Preliminary Report of a Newly Developed Implant,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science 27 (2022): 876-880, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2021.04.016.

[3]

Y. Xia, W. Zhang, H. Hu, L. Yan, S. Zhan, and J. Wang, “Biomechanical Study of Two Alternative Methods for the Treatment of Vertical Femoral Neck Fractures - A Finite Element Analysis,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 211 (2021): 106409, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106409.

[4]

D. Saul, J. Riekenberg, J. C. Ammon, D. B. Hoffmann, and S. Sehmisch, “Hip Fractures: Therapy, Timing, and Complication Spectrum,” Orthopaedic Surgery 11, no. 6 (2019): 994-1002, https://doi.org/10.1111/os.12524.

[5]

P. Augat, E. Bliven, and S. Hackl, “Biomechanics of Femoral Neck Fractures and Implications for Fixation,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 33, no. S1 (2019): S27-S32, https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001365.

[6]

Z. Wang, Y. Yang, G. Feng, et al., “Biomechanical Comparison of the Femoral Neck System Versus InterTan Nail and Three Cannulated Screws for Unstable Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture,” Biomedical Engineering Online 21 (2022): 34, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-022-01006-6.

[7]

X. Jiang, K. Liang, G. Du, Y. Chen, Y. Tang, and K. Geng, “Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Internal Fixation Methods Based on Finite Element Analysis for Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture,” Injury 53 (2022): 3115-3123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.08.038.

[8]

X. Xu, J. Fan, F. Zhou, et al., “Comparison of Femoral Neck System to Multiple Cancellous Screws and Dynamic Hip Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures,” Injury 54 (2023): S28-S35, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2022.03.041.

[9]

O. Filipov, “Biplane Double-Supported Screw Fixation (F-Technique): A Method of Screw Fixation at Osteoporotic Fractures of the Femoral Neck,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 21 (2011): 539-543, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-010-0747-9.

[10]

O. Filipov and B. Gueorguiev, “Unique Stability of Femoral Neck Fractures Treated With the Novel Biplane Double-Supported Screw Fixation Method: A Biomechanical Cadaver Study,” Injury 46 (2015): 218-226, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.11.013.

[11]

S. Gupta, V. Yadav, and M. Rao, “Biplanar Double-Supported Screw Fixation Method in Osteoporotic Neck of Femur Fractures,” Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences 8 (2019): 1251-1254, https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2019/278.

[12]

O. Filipov, K. Stoffel, B. Gueorguiev, and C. Sommer, “Femoral Neck Fracture Osteosynthesis by the Biplane Double-Supported Screw Fixation Method (BDSF) Reduces the Risk of Fixation Failure: Clinical Outcomes in 207 Patients,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 137 (2017): 779-788, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2689-8.

[13]

O. B. Filipov, “Biplane Double-Supported Screw Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures: Surgical Technique and Surgical Notes,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 27, no. 11 (2019): e507-e515, https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00117.

[14]

G. P. Slobogean, D. J. Stockton, B. Zeng, D. Wang, B. T. Ma, and A. N. Pollak, “Femoral Neck Fractures in Adults Treated With Internal Fixation: A Prospective Multicenter Chinese Cohort,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 25 (2017): 297-303, https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-15-00661.

[15]

S. Galal and M. Nagy, “Non-Parallel Screw Fixation for Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Adults,” Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma 8 (2017): 220-224, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.07.003.

[16]

M. Zlowodzki, O. Brink, J. Switzer, et al., “The Effect of Shortening and Varus Collapse of the Femoral Neck on Function After Fixation of Intracapsular Fracture of the Hip: A Multi-Centre Cohort Study,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume (London) 90 (2008): 1487-1494, https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.90B11.20582.

[17]

C. He, Y. Lu, Q. Wang, et al., “Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of a Femoral Neck System Versus Cannulated Screws in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 22 (2021): 994, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-021-04888-0.

[18]

M. Su, Z. He, N. Huang, X. Lin, K. Fang, and Z. Dai, “Superior Short-Term Outcomes of FNS in Combination With a Cannulated Screw in Treating Femoral Neck Fractures,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 24 (2023): 823, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06959-w.

[19]

R. C. Stassen, R. M. Jeuken, B. Boonen, B. Meesters, E. R. de Loos, and R. van Vugt, “First Clinical Results of 1-Year Follow-Up of the Femoral Neck System for Internal Fixation of Femoral Neck Fractures,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 142 (2022): 3755-3763, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-021-04216-0.

[20]

P. Tian, L. Kuang, Z. Li, G. Xu, and X. Fu, “Comparison Between Femoral Neck Systems and Cannulated Cancellous Screws in Treating Femoral Neck Fractures: A Meta-Analysis,” Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation 13 (2022): 1864547393, https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593221113533.

[21]

X. Q. Zhou, Z. Q. Li, R. J. Xu, et al., “Comparison of Early Clinical Results for Femoral Neck System and Cannulated Screws in the Treatment of Unstable Femoral Neck Fractures,” Orthopaedic Surgery 13 (2021): 1802-1809, https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13098.

[22]

S. Kale, A. Chalak, A. Vatkar, J. K. Dey, N. Mehta, and S. Das, “Limitations and Complications in Treating Femoral Neck Fractures With the Femoral Neck System: A Case Report,” Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports 14 (2024): 78-82, https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2024.v14.i03.4294.

[23]

Z. Jin, L. Chen, D. Wang, et al., “A Prediction Model for Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head After Internal Fixation With Multiple Cannulated Compression Screws for Adult Femoral Neck Fractures,” Joint Diseases and Related Surgery 35 (2024): 20-26, https://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2024.975.

[24]

A. Sami, R. Prabhakar, A. Kumar Yadav, and J. V. Kumar, “Biplane Double Supported Screw Fixation for Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study,” Journal of Orthopaedics 33 (2022): 117-123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2022.07.012.

[25]

A. Saad, M. K. Patralekh, V. K. Jain, S. Shrestha, R. Botchu, and K. P. Iyengar, “Femoral Neck System Reduces Surgical Time and Complications in Adults With Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma 30 (2022): 101917, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101917.

[26]

S. Zheng, D. Lin, P. Chen, et al., “Comparison of Femoral Neck Shortening After Femoral Neck System and Cannulated Cancellous Screw Fixation for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Adults,” Injury 55 (2024): 111564, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2024.111564.

[27]

J. Ni, X. Wang, Y. Yuang, H. Liu, and L. Zhou, “Letter to the Editor Concerning Femoral Neck Fracture Osteosynthesis by the Biplane Double-Supported Screw Fixation Method (BDSF) Reduces the Risk of Fixation Failure: Clinical Outcomes in 207 Patients,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 137 (2017): 1165, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-017-2710-2.

[28]

E. K. Crump, M. Quacinella, and B. K. Deafenbaugh, “Does Screw Location Affect the Risk of Subtrochanteric Femur Fracture After Femoral Neck Fixation? A Biomechanical Study,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 478 (2020): 770-776, https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000945.

[29]

L. Tianye, Y. Peng, X. Jingli, et al., “Finite Element Analysis of Different Internal Fixation Methods for the Treatment of Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 112 (2019): 108658, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108658.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

29

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/