Measured Resection as Gap Balance Method in Mobile-Bearing Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Objective: Gap balancing is a vital process during mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (MB-UKA). However, this process commonly depends on the surgeon’s experience and lacks specific unified standards. This study aimed to propose and evaluate a novel “measured resection” method for gap balance in MB-UKA.

Methods: This prospective study included 49 consecutive patients (52 knees) who underwent MB-UKA from February 1, 2023, to September 1, 2023. Gap balance was achieved by the traditional “two-finger” method (Group 1, 26 knees) or the measured resection method (Group 2, 26 knees). The novel “measured resection” method was performed by measuring the thickness of the resected posterior femoral condyle and resected medial posterior tibial plateau to assess proper meniscal bearing thickness. Data were collected at baseline and the 6-month follow-up. Prosthetic angles, range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS) score, Oxford knee score (OKS), and Global Perceived Scale (GPE) were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. Independent samples t-test and Mann–Whitney U test were used to compare the differences.

Results: There were significant improvements in all measured outcomes at the 6-month follow-up from baseline in both groups (p < 0.01). Patients using measured resection method showed better ROM (130° vs. 120°, p = 0.007), VAS score (1 vs. 2, p = 0.013), and OKS scores (39.9 vs. 38.1, p = 0.013) at 6-month follow-up than the traditional “two-finger” method group. The prosthetic angles, ROM improvement, and GPE showed no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions: The measured resection method is a reliable method for assisting surgeons in choosing the ideal meniscal bearing thickness in MB-UKA to achieve proper gap balance and gain better clinical outcomes.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03815448)

Keywords

clinical outcome / gap balance / meniscal bearing thickness / mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty / resected bone pieces

References

[1] F. Falez, “Knee Arthroplasty Today,” International Orthopaedics 38, no. 2 (2014): 221–225,

[2] L. Sharma, “Osteoarthritis of the Knee,” New England Journal of Medicine 384, no. 1 (2021): 51–59,

[3] A. D. Liddle, A. Judge, H. Pandit, and D. W. Murray, “Adverse Outcomes After Total and Unicompartmental knee Replacement in 101, 330 Matched Patients: A Study of Data From the National Joint Registry for England and Wales,” Lancet 384, no. 9952 (2014): 1437–1445,

[4] B. Pongcharoen, P. Liengwattanakol, and K. Boontanapibul, “Comparison of Functional Recovery Between Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 105, no. 3 (2023): 191–201,

[5] T. O. Smith, C. B. Hing, L. Davies, and S. T. Donell, “Fixed Versus Mobile Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: A Meta-Analysis,” Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Surgery and Research: OTSR 95, no. 8 (2009): 599–605,

[6] M. L. Roemhildt, B. D. Beynnon, A. E. Gauthier, M. Gardner-Morse, F. Ertem, and G. J. Badger, “Chronic In Vivo Load Alteration Induces Degenerative Changes in the Rat Tibiofemoral Joint,” Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 21, no. 2 (2013): 346–357,

[7] H. Wynn Jones, W. Chan, T. Harrison, T. O. Smith, P. Masonda, and N. P. Walton, “Revision of Medial Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement to a Total Knee Replacement: Similar to a Primary?,” Knee 19, no. 4 (2012): 339–343,

[8] M. Citak, K. Dersch, A. F. Kamath, C. Haasper, T. Gehrke, and D. Kendoff, “Common Causes of Failed Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasty: A Single-Centre Analysis of Four Hundred and Seventy One Cases,” International Orthopaedics 38, no. 5 (2014): 961–965,

[9] R. H. Emerson, W. C. Head, and P. C. Peters, “Soft-Tissue Balance and Alignment in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 74, no. 6 (1992): 807–810,

[10] “Oxford^® Partial Knee Microplasty^®,” Instrumentation Surgical Technique, https://www.zimmerbiomet.com/content/dam/zb-corporate/en/education-resources/surgical-techniques/specialties/knee/oxford-partial-knee/oxford-partial-knee-microplasty-instrumentation-surgical-technique1.pdf.

[11] X. Sun, P. Hernigou, Q. Zhang, et al., “Sensor and Machine Learning-Based Assessment of Gap Balancing in Cadaveric Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasty Surgical Training,” International Orthopaedics 45, no. 11 (2021): 2843–2849,

[12] T. Suzuki, K. Ryu, K. Kojima, et al., “Evaluation of Spacer Block Technique Using Tensor Device in Unicompartmental Knee arthroplasty,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 135, no. 7 (2015): 1011–1016.

[13] S. Nan, Z. Cao, Y. Song, X. Kong, H. Li, and W. Chai, “Can Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Achieve Natural Gap-Balancing? An Observational Study With a Novel Pressure Sensor,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 17, no. 1 (2022): 407.

[14] K. Takayama, T. Matsumoto, H. Muratsu, et al., “Joint Gap Assessment With a Tensor Is Useful for the Selection of Insert Thickness in Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty,” Clinical Biomechanics 30, no. 1 (2015): 95–99.

[15] A. M. ten Ham, P. J. C. Heesterbeek, D. B. van der Schaaf, et al., “Flexion and Extension Laxity After Medial, Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison Between a Spacer-and a Tension-Guided Technique,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Official Journal of the ESSKA 21, no. 11 (2013): 2447–2452.

[16] X. Jiao, Y. Jiang, Z. Li, S. An, J. Huang, and G. Cao, “In Vitro Application of a Wireless Sensor in Flexion-Extension Gap Balance of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty,” Journal of Visualized Experiments 195 (2023): 64993.

[17] J. Ge, X. Sun, C. Liu, Q. Zhang, B. Wang, and W. Guo, “Intraoperative Sensor Technology Quantifies Inter-Prosthesis Pressure for Predicting Lower Limb Alignment After Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 11 (2023): 1210713.

[18] J. Ge, C. Liu, X. Sun, Q. Zhang, B. Ji, and W. Guo, “Gap Balance Difference of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Between Hanging Leg and Supine Leg Position: A Prospective Cohort Study,” International Orthopaedics 47, no. 3 (2023): 745–753.

[19] D. Emanuele, J. Lettner, M. Adriani, et al., “High Accuracy of Component Positioning and Restoration of Lower Limb Alignment Using Robotic Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy (2024): ksa.12484.

[20] J. Y. Jenny, “Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: A Comparison of Four Techniques Combining Less Invasive Approach and Navigation,” Orthopedics 31, no. 10 Suppl 1 (2008): 57.

[21] M. Innocenti, F. Leggieri, C. Theus-Steinman, J. Moya-Angeler, B. Christen, and T. Calliess, “Different Intraoperative Joint Laxity Patterns Do Not Impact Clinical Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Medial Unicompartmental Knee Replacement With 1-To-1 Surface Reconstruction,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 32 (2024): ksa.12415.

[22] J. H. Lonner, “Robotically Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty With a Handheld Image-Free Sculpting Tool,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America 47, no. 1 (2016): 29–40.

[23] R. Rout, S. McDonnell, P. Hulley, et al., “The Pattern of Cartilage Damage in Antero-Medial Osteoarthritis of the Knee and Its Relationship to the Anterior Cruciate Ligament,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research: Official Publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society 31, no. 6 (2013): 908–913,

[24] S. Nakagawa, Y. Kadoya, S. Todo, et al., “Tibiofemoral Movement 3: Full Flexion in the Living Knee Studied by MRI,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 82, no. 8 (2000): 1199–1200,

[25] S. C. Kozinn, C. Marx, and R. D. Scott, “A 4.5-6-Year Follow-Up Study With a Metal-Backed Tibial Component,” Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Journal of Arthroplasty 4, no. Suppl (1989): S1–S9,

[26] J. H. Kellgren and J. S. Lawrence, “Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 16, no. 4 (1957): 494–502,

[27] L. D. Case and W. T. Ambrosius, “Power and Sample Size,” Topics in Biostatistics 404 (2007): 377–408,

[28] W. Deng, H. Shao, Y. Zhou, H. Li, Z. Wang, and Y. Huang, “Reliability and Validity of Commonly Used Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) After Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty,” Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Surgery and Research: OTSR 108, no. 8 (2022): 103096,

[29] W. G. Hamilton, M. B. Collier, E. Tarabee, J. P. McAuley, C. A. Engh, Jr., and G. A. Engh, “Incidence and Reasons for Reoperation After Minimally Invasive Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty,” Journal of Arthroplasty 21, no. 6 Suppl 2 (2006): 98–107,

[30] H. R. Mohammad, A. Judge, and D. W. Murray, “The Influence of Surgeon Caseload and Usage on the Long-Term Outcomes of Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis of Data From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man,” Journal of Arthroplasty 38, no. 2 (2023): 245–251,

[31] L. Thoreau, D. Morcillo Marfil, and E. Thienpont, “Periprosthetic Fractures After Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 142, no. 8 (2022): 2039–2048.

[32] M. B. Collier, T. H. Eickmann, K. K. Anbari, and G. A. Engh, “Lateral Tibiofemoral Compartment Narrowing After Medial Unicondylar Arthroplasty,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 464 (2007): 43–52,

[33] T. J. Heyse, J. Slane, G. Peersman, P. Dworschak, S. Fuchs-Winkelmann, and L. Scheys, “Balancing Mobile-Bearing Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty In Vitro,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy: Official Journal of the ESSKA 25, no. 12 (2017): 3733–3740,

[34] F. Mancuso, C. A. Dodd, D. W. Murray, and H. Pandit, “Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in the ACL-Deficient Knee,” Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Official Journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 17, no. 3 (2016): 267–275,

[35] G. W. Keyes, A. J. Carr, R. K. Miller, and J. W. Goodfellow, “The Radiographic Classification of Medial Gonarthrosis. Correlation With Operation Methods in 200 Knees,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 63, no. 5 (1992): 497–501,

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.