Biomechanical Analysis and Solution Suggestions of Screw Replacement Scenarios in Femoral Neck Fracture Surgeries: Finite Element Method

Abstract

Objective: Despite several surgical options, there has yet to be a consensus on the best treatment for femoral neck fracture (FNF) due to higher complication rates compared to other bone fractures. This study aims to examine the possible consequences and solution suggestions of changing screws during surgery for various reasons in FNF surgical treatment from a biomechanical perspective.

Method: FNF and treatment materials were analyzed biomechanically using a package program based on the finite element method (FEM). This study created a solid model with images of femur bone tomography. Dynamic hip screws (DHS), cannulated screws (CCS), and medial buttress plates (MBP) were obtained by making three-dimensional designs. The required elements for the models were assigned, and the material properties of the elements were defined. The solutions were obtained as crack distance and deformation results after defining the boundary conditions and applying the necessary loading.

Results: The strain and crack distance values created by six models on the fracture line under different parameters were obtained, and the numerical results were evaluated. The DHS and CCS models produced the highest crack distance and deformation values when all screws were loose. The lowest values were obtained in the intact-85 model when all CCS were tight. When the results are evaluated, it is seen that the MBP has a decreasing effect on the results. Mechanical evaluation of six different options used in femoral neck fractures was performed. 85 mm CCS applied to our standard model gave the best results, while the use of 80 mm CCS in the same model showed promising results compared to other models. It is understood that CCS have the best stability even in loosening models with the medial support plate. Different models are from intact-85 mm DHS+1CS+MBP to DHS+1CS, which was worked with LSR+USR-2, according to decreasing stability.

Conclusion: This study offers various biomechanical solutions to possible intraoperative problems in FNF treatment. The following results were obtained from the study data. When the CCS needs to be lengthened or replaced, it is appropriate to use the CCS with the MBP. A single anti-rotation screw is sufficient for lag screw extensions of the DHS plate, and the MBP may be a savior procedure in surgery.

Keywords

biomechanics / femoral neck fracture / finite element method / medial buttress plates / screw

References

[1] B. Gullberg, O. Johnell, and J. A. Kanis, “World-Wide Projections for Hip Fracture,” Osteoporosis International 7, no. 5 (1997): 407–413.

[2] D. Zhao, Z. Ma, B. Liu, et al., “A New Method to Protect Blood Supply in The Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: Bidirectional Compression Porous Tantalum Screws,” OrthopSurg 14, no. 9 (2022): 1964–1971.

[3] Y. Ye, J. Hao, C. Mauffrey, E. M. Hammerberg, P. F. Stahel, and D. J. Hak, “Optimizing Stability in Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation,” Orthopedics 38, no. 10 (2015): 625–630.

[4] X. B. Wu, J. Q. Wang, X. Sun, et al., “Guidance for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture With Precise Minimally Invasive Internal Fixation Based on the Orthopaedic Surgery Robot Positioning System,” Orthopaedic Surgery 11, no. 3 (2019): 335–340.

[5] X. Sun, Z. Han, D. Cao, et al., “Finite Element Analysis of Six Internal Fixations in the Treatment of Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture,” Orthopaedic Surgery 16, no. 7 (2024): 1695–1709.

[6] Fixation Using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip Fractures (FAITH) Investigators, “Fracture Fixation in the Operative Management of Hip Fractures (FAITH): An International, Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial,” Lancet 389, no. 10078 (2017): 1519–1527.

[7] H. Sun, L. Y. Shu, M. C. Sherrier, et al., “Decreased Complications but a Distinctive Fixation Loosening Mechanism of Fully Threaded Headless Cannulated Screw Fixation for Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Adults,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 16, no. 1 (2021): 234.

[8] G. Okcu, N. Özkayın, S. Erkan, H. Koray Tosyali, and K. Aktuğlu, “Should Full Threaded Compression Screws be Used in Adult Femoral Neck Fractures?,” Injury 46, no. 2 (2015): 24–28.

[9] Y. Tang, Z. Zhang, L. Wang, et al., “Femoral Neck System Versus Inverted Cannulated Cancellous Screw for the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Adults: a Preliminary Comparative Study,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 16, no. 1 (2021): 504.

[10] Z.-y. Huang, Y.-h. Su, Z.-p. Huang, et al., “Medial Buttress Plate and Allograft Bone-Assisted Cannulated Screw Fixation for Unstable Femoral Neck Fracture With Posteromedial Comminution: A Retrospective Controlled Study,” Orthopaedic Surgery 14 (2022): 911–918.

[11] C. A. Collinge, P. Harris, H. C. Sagi, et al., “Comparative Analysis of Supplemental Medial Buttress Plate Fixation for High-Energy Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Young Adults,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 37, no. 5 (2023): 207–213.

[12] A. D. Duckworth, S. J. Bennet, J. Aderinto, et al., “Fixation of Intracapsular fractures of The Femoral Neck in Young Patients: Risk Factors for Failure,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 93, no. 6 (2011): 811–816.

[13] F. C. Dolatowski, M. Adampour, F. Frihagen, et al., “Preoperative Posterior Tilt of at Least 20° Increased the Risk of Fixation Failure in Garden-I and -II Femoral Neck Fractures,” Acta Orthopaedica 87, no. 3 (2016): 252–256.

[14] Y. K. Lee, B. H. Yoon, J. S. Hwang, Y. H. Cha, K. C. Kim, and K. H. Koo, “Risk Factors of Fixation Failure in Basicervical Femoral Neck Fracture: Which Device Is Optimal For Fixation?,” Injury 49, no. 3 (2018): 691–696.

[15] Y. Güvercin, M. Yaylacı, A. Dizdar, et al., “Biomechanical Analysis of Odontoid and Transverse Atlantal Ligament in Humans with Ponticulus Posticus Variation Under Different Loading Conditions: Finite Element Study,” Injury 53, no. 12 (2022): 3879–3886.

[16] Y. Güvercin, A. A. Abdioglu, A. Dizdar, et al., “Suture Button Fixation Method Used in the Treatment of Syndesmosis Injury: A Biomechanical Analysis of the Effect of the Placement of the Button on the Distal Tibiofibular Joint in the Mid-Stance Phase With Finite Elements Method,” Injury 53, no. 7 (2022): 2437–2445.

[17] H. Mimata, Y. Matsuura, S. Yano, S. Ohtori, and M. Todo, “Evaluation of Bone Healing Process After Intramedullary Nailing for Femoral Shaft Fracture by Quantitative Computed Tomography-Based Finite Element Analysis,” Clinical Biomechanics 100 (2022): 105790.

[18] T.-x. Li, Z.-q. Huang, Y. Li, et al., “Prediction of Collapse Using Patient-Specific Finite Element Analysis of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head,” Orthopaedic Surgery 11 (2019): 794–800.

[19] Z. Han, Q. Luo, G. Deng, et al., “Canceling Notch Improves the Mechanical Safety of Clavicle Locking Plate: A 3D Finite Element Study,” Orthopaedic Surgery 15 (2023): 2152–2156.

[20] M. Yan, T. Liang, H. Zhao, et al., “Model Properties and Clinical Application in the Finite Element Analysis of Knee Joint: A Review,” Orthopaedic Surgery 16 (2024): 289–302.

[21] Y. Zhang, Q. Weng, J. Chen, and Y. Yang, “Design and Biomechanical Finite Element Analysis of Spatial Weaving Infracalcaneal Fixator System,” Orthopaedic Surgery 16 (2024): 976–983.

[22] K. Huang, Q. Wang, X. Rong, et al., “Biomechanical Effects on the Prostheses and Vertebrae of Three-Level Hybrid Surgery: A Finite Element Study,” Orthopaedic Surgery 16 (2024): 2019–2029,

[23] M. Terzi, Y. Güvercin, S. M. Ateş, et al., “Effect of Different Abutment Materials on Stress Distribution in Peripheral Bone and Dental Implant System,” Sigma 38, no. 3 (2020): 1495–1507.

[24] G. N. Nişanci, Y. Güvercin, S. M. Ateş, et al., “Investigation of the Effect of Different Prosthesis Designs and Numbers on Stress, Strain and Deformation Distribution,” International Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences 12, no. 4 (2020): 138–152.

[25] Y. Liu, Z. Ren, H. Shao, et al., “Titanium Alloy Cannulated Screws and Biodegrade Ceramic Nails for Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: A Finite Element Analysis,” Injury 54, no. 8 (2023): 110841.

[26] N. Hinz, K. Stacenko, C. Lutz, A. P. Schulz, and R. Wendlandt, “Lateral Cortical Notching Facilitates Dynamization of Proximal Femoral Nailing—A Finite Element Analysis,” Injury 54, no. 11 (2023): 111009.

[27] Y. Güvercin, M. Yaylacı, H. Ölmez, et al., “Finite Element Analysis of The Mechanical Behavior of the Different Angle Hip Femoral Stem,” Biomaterials and Biomechanics in Bioengineering 6, no. 1 (2022): 29–46.

[28] Y. Güvercin and M. Yaylacı, “Comparison of Human and Sheep Femur With Finite Element Method,” Journal of Anatolian Environmental and Animal Sciences 6, no. 4 (2021): 599–603.

[29] Y. Güvercin and M. Yaylacı, “Biomechanical Investigation of the Effects of Various Treatment Options on the Talus in Supination External Rotation Type 4 Ankle Injuries With Ruptured Deltoid Ligament: Finite Element Analysis,” Sakarya Medical Journal 13, no. 1 (2023): 62–69.

[30] X. Wang, X. Li, C. Wang, et al., “Stability of Three-Dimensional Printed Custom-Made Metaphyseal Cone for Tibial Bone Defects Reconstruction: A Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Study,” Orthopaedic Surgery 15 (2023): 2937–2946.

[31] C.-d. Liu, S.-j. Hu, S.-M. Chang, et al., “Importance of the Posterior Plate in Three-Column Tibial Plateau Fractures: A Finite Element Analysis and Clinical Validation,” Orthopaedic Surgery 16 (2024): 930–942.

[32] M. E. Zagane, A. Moulgada, M. Yaylaci, et al., “Numerical Simulation of the Total Hip Prosthesis Under Static and Dynamic Loading (For Three Activities),” Structural Engineering and Mechanics 86, no. 5 (2023): 635–645.

[33] A. Moulgada, M. E. S. Zagane, M. Yaylacı, et al., “Comparative Study by the Finite Element Method of Three Activities of a Wearer of Total Hip Prosthesis During the Postoperative Period,” Structural Engineering and Mechanics 87, no. 6 (2023): 575–583.

[34] “Mimics Innovation Suite 24.0 (Materialise, Belgium, Leuven)”.

[35] “3-Matic 16.0 (Materialise, Belgium, Leuven)”.

[36] “ANSYS 16.0, 2016. Swanson Analysis Systems Inc., Houston, PA, USA”.

[37] Y. Ye, K. Chena, D. Cao, et al., “Medial Buttress Plate Augmentation of Cannulated Screw Fixation in Vertically Unstable Femoral Neck Fractures: Surgical Technique and Preliminary Results,” Injury 48 (2017): 2189–2193,

[38] X. Sun, Z. Han, K. Tian, et al., “Finite Element Analysis of Six Internal Fixations in the Treatment of Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture,” Orthopaedic Surgery 16 (2024): 1695–1709,

[39] N. S. Taheri, A. S. Blicblau, and M. Singh, “Comparative Study of Two Materials for Dynamic Hip Screw during Fall and Gait Loading: Titanium Alloy and Stainless Steel,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science 16, no. 6 (2011): 805–813.

[40] K. Sitthiseripratip, H. Van Oosterwyck, J. VanderSloten, et al., “Finite Element Study of Trochanteric Gamma Nail for Trochanteric Fracture,” Medical Engineering & Physics 25, no. 2 (2003): 99–106.

[41] J. Li, M. Wang, L. Li, et al., “Finite Element Analysis of Different Configurations of Fully Threaded Cannulated Screw in The Treatment of Unstable Femoral Neck Fractures,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 13 (2018): 272.

[42] S. Samsami, S. Saberi, S. Sadiqhi, et al., “Comparison of Three Fixation Methods for Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults: Experimental and Numerical Investigations,” Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering 35 (2015): 566–579.

[43] W. P. Chen, C. L. Tai, C. H. Shih, P. H. Hsieh, M. C. Leou, and M. S. Lee, “Selection of Fixation Devices in Proximal Femur Rotational Osteotomy: Clinical Complications and Finite Element Analysis,” Clinical Biomechanics 19 (2004): 255–262.

[44] G. P. Slobogean, S. A. Sprague, T. Scott, and M. Bhandari, “Complications Following Young Femoral Neck Fractures,” Injury 46, no. 3 (2015): 484–491.

[45] R. Erivan, G. Fassot, G. Villatte, A. Mulliez, S. Descamps, and S. Boisgard, “Results of Femoral Neck Screw Fixation in 112 Under 65-Years-Old at a Minimum 2 Years’ Follow-Up,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 106, no. 7 (2020): 1425–1431.

[46] E. J. Lim, B. S. Kim, and C. H. Kim, “Parallel and Non-Parallel Cannulated Screw Fixation Complications in Femoral Neck Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 107, no. 6 (2021): 103005.

[47] T. Hiranaka, T. Tanaka, K. Okumura, et al., “Clinical Results of Dual SC Screw: A Mini-Sliding Hip Screw With an Anti-Rotating Screw for Femoral Neck Fractures,” Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 13, no. 4 (2021): 449–455.

[48] Y. Xia, W. Zhang, Z. Zhang, J. Wang, and L. Yan, “Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures: Sliding Hip Screw or Cannulated Screws? A Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 16, no. 1 (2021): 54.

[49] Z. Y. Fan, L. Y. Shu, Y. Z. Jin, et al., “Biomechanical Evaluation of Compression Buttress Screw and Medial Plate Fixation for the Treatment of Vertical Femoral Neck Fractures,” Injury 53, no. 12 (2022): 3887–3893.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.