Characteristics of Resection Parameters in Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty With the Ligament Balancing Workflow

Abstract

Objective: Robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a novel orthopedic technique. The workflow of robotic-assisted TKA is quite different from that of traditional manual TKA and may result incompletely different resection parameters. Understanding these parameters may help surgeons better perform robotic-assisted TKA. This study aims to analyze the specific resection parameters of robotic-assisted TKA.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 85 MAKO-assisted TKA surgeries performed by three surgeons at our institution between May 2021 and November 2023. All patients had unilateral primary knee arthritis, and a Triathlon PS (Stryker) knee prosthesis was used. Intraoperative resection plan, radiological outcomes, and clinical outcomes were collected among them. The angle between the transepicondylar axis (TEA) and the femoral prosthesis axis was defined as rTEA, the angle between the posterior condylar axis (PCA) and the femoral prosthesis axis was defined as rPCA. The t-test and the Chi-square test (or Fisher’s exact probability test) were used to determine differences in categorical variables.

Results: rTEA averaged 2.7° (range, 0°–6.7°), and rPCA averaged 4.9° (range, 0.2°–9.6°). The mean resection of the medial distal femur was 7.7 mm (range, 3.0–12.5), that of the lateral tibial plateau was 6.4 mm (range, 1.5–13.0), and that of the medial posterior condyle of the femur was 10.6 mm (range, 6.5–17.5), whereas that of the lateral posterior condyle of the femur was 6.7 mm (range, 2.0–13.0).

Conclusion: Robotic-assisted TKA using the ligament balancing workflow generally resulted in greater external rotation than reported reference values for conventional manual TKA within the existing literature, with reference to both the TEA and PCA. In addition, tibial resection was generally less, and the joint line was generally shifted upwards.

Keywords

femoral prosthesis rotation / robotic-assisted / total knee arthroplasty

References

[1] A. J. Price, A. Alvand, A. Troelsen, et al., “Knee Replacement,” Lancet 392, no. 10158 (2018): 1672–1682.

[2] M. H. Liow, Z. Xia, M. K. Wong, K. J. Tay, S. J. Yeo, and P. L. Chin, “Robot-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Accurately Restores the Joint Line and Mechanical Axis. A Prospective Randomised Study,” Journal of Arthroplasty 29, no. 12 (2014): 2373–2377.

[3] E. L. Hampp, M. Chughtai, L. Y. Scholl, et al., “Robotic-Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty Demonstrated Greater Accuracy and Precision to Plan Compared With Manual Techniques,” Journal of Knee Surgery 32, no. 3 (2019): 239–250.

[4] E. K. Song, J. K. Seon, J. H. Yim, N. A. Netravali, and W. L. Bargar, “Robotic-Assisted TKA Reduces Postoperative Alignment Outliers and Improves Gap Balance Compared to Conventional TKA,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 471, no. 1 (2013): 118–126.

[5] S. Oussedik, M. P. Abdel, J. Victor, M. W. Pagnano, and F. S. Haddad, “Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Bone and Joint Journal 102-b, no. 3 (2020): 276–279.

[6] J. Insall, W. N. Scott, and C. S. Ranawat, “The Total Condylar Knee Prosthesis. A Report of Two Hundred and Twenty Cases,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) 61, no. 2 (1979): 173–180.

[7] MAKO Surgical Corp, “MAKO TKA Surgical Guide,” (2016), https://www.strykermeded.com/media/2223/mako-tka-surgical-guide.pdf.

[8] S. Lustig, E. Sappey-Marinier, C. Fary, E. Servien, S. Parratte, and C. Batailler, “Personalized Alignment in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Current Concepts,” SICOT-J 7 (2021): 19.

[9] R. A. Berger, H. E. Rubash, M. J. Seel, W. H. Thompson, and L. S. Crossett, “Determining the Rotational Alignment of the Femoral Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Epicondylar Axis,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 286 (1993): 40–47.

[10] P. L. Poilvache, J. N. Insall, G. R. Scuderi, and D. E. Font-Rodriguez, “Rotational Landmarks and Sizing of the Distal Femur in Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 331 (1996): 35–46.

[11] X. Li, H. Cai, Z. Yu, et al., “Correlation Between Femorotibial Pressure and Joint Gap in Osteoarthritis Patients With Varus Deformity: An Intraoperative Measurement Using Sensor Device in Primary Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Annals of Translational Medicine 8, no. 21 (2020): 1387.

[12] K. Hao, M. Wei, G. Ji, Y. Jia, and F. Wang, “Comparison of the Imaging and Clinical Outcomes Among the Measured Resection, Gap Balancing, and Hybrid Techniques in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Orthopaedic Surgery 15, no. 1 (2023): 93–102.

[13] Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, J. N. Sun, L. An, X. Y. Chen, and S. Feng, “Comparison of Outcomes Between Gap Balancing and Measured Resection Techniques for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial,” Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 55, no. 3 (2021): 239–245.

[14] T. Tsukeoka and Y. Tsuneizumi, “Postoperative Femoral Component Rotation Using Posterior Condylar Referencing Is Difficult to Predict Preoperatively in Total Knee Arthroplasty,” Knee 41 (2023): 380–388.

[15] A. J. Nedopil, S. M. Howell, and M. L. Hull, “Deviations in Femoral Joint Lines Using Calipered Kinematically Aligned TKA From Virtually Planned Joint Lines Are Small and Do Not Affect Clinical Outcomes,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 28, no. 10 (2020): 3118–3127.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2025 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.