PDF
Abstract
Objective: Orthopedic implants may need to be removed for various reasons. There is little data on the appropriate handling of implants after their removal from patients. This study aimed to analyze how orthopedic surgeons handle removed implants and their underlying philosophies, using data collected from a survey.
Methods: This study, conducted between May 2024 and June 2024, utilized an online survey targeting orthopedic surgeons and residents in Turkey to investigate practices and views regarding removed implants. A total of 205 participants completed an 11-question online survey via Google Forms. The survey covered hospital types, professional experience, protocols for handling removed implants, practices for archiving and disposing of implants, and perspectives on current practices and future direction.
Results: Participants' professional experience varied widely. None of the participants followed a specific protocol for managing removed implants. Opinions on giving implants to patients were diverse: 17.1% would never give the implant to the patient, 32.2% would comply with the patient's request, and 50.7% had no definitive approach. A minority (2.9%) systematically archived implants, while others archived selectively or disposed of them as medical waste. The primary motivations for archiving included medicolegal protection (21%) and professional curiosity (75.2%). Only 2.9% had experience with legal requests for removed implants, and 80% supported establishing regulations for handling removed implants.
Discussion: Orthopedic surgeons' legal and ethical perceptions regarding removed implants, as well as their preference of handling, vary widely. Establishing a standardized approach can reduce this variability in practice and ensure uniformity in healthcare.
Keywords
device
/
implant
/
removal
/
removed
/
survey
Cite this article
Download citation ▾
Ali Engin Daştan, Arman Vahabi, Hüseyin Günay, Kemal Aktuğlu.
Diverse Views and Practices on the Handling of Explanted Hardware Highlights the Need for Standardized Management.
Orthopaedic Surgery, 2025, 17(5): 1447-1453 DOI:10.1111/os.14327
| [1] |
A. K. AlOmran, N. Alosaimi, A. A. Alshaikhi, et al., “Burden of Routine Orthopedic Implant Removal a Single Center Retrospective Study,” World Journal of Orthopedics 15 (2024): 139-146.
|
| [2] |
E. A. Barcak, M. J. Beebe, and J. C. Weinlein, “The Role of Implant Removal in Orthopedic Trauma,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America 49 (2018): 45-53.
|
| [3] |
R. B. Minkowitz, S. Bhadsavle, M. Walsh, et al., “Removal of Painful Orthopaedic Implants After Fracture Union,” Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 89 (2007): 1906-1912.
|
| [4] |
M. D. Riedel, P. K. Cronin, P. B. Kaiser, et al., “A Compatibility Guide for the Orthopaedic Surgeon Planning to Perform Hardware Removal Surgery,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 27 (2019): E92-E95.
|
| [5] |
B. Hanson, C. Van Der Werken, and D. Stengel, “Surgeons' Beliefs and Perceptions About Removal of Orthopaedic Implants,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 9 (2008): 9.
|
| [6] |
M. L. Busam, R. J. Esther, and W. T. Obremskey, “Hardware Removal: Indications and Expectations,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 14 (2006): 113-120.
|
| [7] |
P. J. Kellam, J. Harrast, M. Weinberg, D. F. Martin, N. P. Davidson, and C. L. Saltzman, “Complications of Hardware Removal,” Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 103 (2021): 2089-2095.
|
| [8] |
G. Reith, V. Schmitz-Greven, K. O. Hensel, et al., “Metal Implant Removal: Benefits and Drawbacks—A Patient Survey,” BMC Surgery 15 (2015): 96.
|
| [9] |
L. Lidgren, D. B. Raina, M. Tägil, et al., “Recycling Implants: A Sustainable Solution for Musculo Skeletal Research,” ActaOrthop 91 (2020): 125.
|
| [10] |
K. Staats, B. Kayani, and F. S. Haddad, “The Impact of the European Union's Medical Device Regulation on Orthopaedic Implants, Technology, and Future Innovation,” Bone and Joint Journal 106-B (2024): 303-306.
|
| [11] |
S. Mavrommatis, D. C. Postema, and P. A. Cole, “The Ethics of Explanted Orthopaedic Hardware Return to Requesting Patients,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 36 (2022): 371-374.
|
| [12] |
N. R. Black, W. J. Winslade, R. W. Lindsey, and Z. Gugala, “The Legal, Ethical, and Scientific Considerations for Returning Explanted Orthopaedic Hardware to the Patient,” Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 104 (2022): E37.
|
| [13] |
M. M. Khair, “The Ethical Implications of Hardware Removal: Commentary on an Article by Natalie R. Black, MD, et al.: “The Legal, Ethical, and Scientific Considerations for Returning Explanted Orthopaedic Hardware to the Patient”,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 104 (2022): E41.
|
| [14] |
S. O. Hansson, “The Ethics of Explantation,” BMC Medical Ethics 22 (2021): 22.
|
| [15] |
M. M. Morlock, E. Gomez-Barrena, D. C. Wirtz, A. Hart, and J. P. Kretzer, “Explant Analysis and Implant Registries are Both Needed to Further Improve Patient Safety,” EFORT Open Reviews 7 (2022): 344-348.
|
| [16] |
W. M. Mihalko, “Retrieval Studies in Orthopaedic Surgery: Editorial Comment: Learning Every Implant's Story,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 470 (2012): 1803.
|
| [17] |
R. Magetsari, C. R. Hilmy, J. R. Van Horn, et al., “Use and Re-Use of Orthopedic Implants in Developing Countries,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials 69 (2004): 249-250.
|
| [18] |
L. G. M. Friedman and M. Suk, “The Ethical Implications of Reusing External Fixation Systems: A Used Car or a Plastic Water Bottle?,” Journal of Orthopaedic Experience & Innovation 2 (2021): 1-5, https://doi.org/10.60118/001c.25910.
|
| [19] |
F. Aguilar-Chavez, P. Jorba-Elguero, M. A. Cruz-Cortés, and F. González-González, “Reuse of Orthopedic Implants in a Peri-Implant Fracture of Both Forearm Bones in an Adolescent: A Case Report,” Journal of Musculoskeletal Surgery and Research 8 (2024): 66-70.
|
| [20] |
E. Ebramzadeh, F. E. Sharpe, and S. N. Sangiorgio, “The Cost of Reducing Waste in Orthopaedic Surgery,” JBJS Reviews 12 (2024): e23.00249.
|
| [21] |
D. J. Beck and D. Seligson, “External Fixator Parts Should Not be Reused,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 20 (2006): 39-42.
|
| [22] |
V. Danesi, L. Cristofolini, S. Stea, et al., “Re-Use of Explanted Osteosynthesis Devices: A Reliable and Inexpensive Reprocessing Protocol,” Injury 42 (2011): 1101-1106.
|
RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS
2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.