The Influence of Zero-Profile Implant Selection on the Outcomes of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Abstract

Objectives: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has been widely used in the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD). Previous studies have demonstrated that the size of implants in ACDF determines radiological and clinical outcomes. However, the principles of choosing an appropriate implant size in ACDF remain controversial. The study aimed to elucidate the influence of the cage size of Zero-profile implant system and offer proposals on the selection of implant size during ACDF.

Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 109 patients who underwent single-level ACDF from March 2011 to April 2020 with the Zero-profile implant system. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the preoperative mean height of adjacent segments (Hm). Clinical outcomes included the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS). In addition, radiographical analysis encompassed cervical lordosis (CL), functional spinal unit (FSU) angle, range of motion (ROM) of the total cervical spine and the FSU, anterior and posterior FSU height, C1–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), C2–C7 SVA, the center of gravity of the head (CGH)-C7 SVA as well as T1 slope (T1S) measurements. Besides, bone fusion rates, anterior bone loss, subsidence, and adjacent segment degeneration were also recorded.

Results: Overall, 37 patients in Group A had an implant size ≥ Hm while 72 patients in Group B had an implant size < Hm. The preoperative general data and radiological parameters were comparable between the groups. At the last follow-up, both groups had satisfactory clinical outcomes. As for radiological outcomes, the anterior and posterior FSU heights were significantly higher in Group A compared to Group B (p < 0.05) after ACDF. Besides, both groups corrected and maintained the CL and FSU. However, the average C1–C7 SVA and C2–C7 SVA at the last follow-up were significantly higher in the Group B than in the Group A (C1–C7 SVA: 27.42 ± 9.23 mm vs. 31.76 ± 10.68 mm, p = 0.038; C2–C7 SVA: 14.65 ± 7.27 mm vs. 19.64 ± 8.68, p = 0.003). Additionally, the fusion rates were significantly higher in Group A at the first two follow-up visits.

Conclusion: Our study showed that an appropriate size of Zero-profile implant system is crucial to achieving favorable clinical and radiological outcomes after performing ACDF. Implants with a larger height but not oversize could maintain the cervical sagittal balance and FSU height and achieve early bone fusion. Therefore, a larger height might be a better choice for achieving a satisfactory long-term prognosis if Zero-profile implants of adjacent size both fit the disc space properly.

Keywords

anterior cervical discectomy and fusion / cervical sagittal alignment balance / implant height / implant selection / Zero-profile implant

References

[1] M. Oglesby, S. J. Fineberg, A. A. Patel, M. A. Pelton, and K. Singh, “Epidemiological Trends in Cervical Spine Surgery for Degenerative Diseases Between 2002 and 2009,” Spine 38, no. 14 (2013): 1226–1232.

[2] R. B. Cloward, “The Anterior Approach for Removal of Ruptured Cervical Disks,” Journal of Neurosurgery 15, no. 6 (1958): 602–617.

[3] G. W. Smith and R. A. Robinson, “The Treatment of Certain Cervical-Spine Disorders by Anterior Removal of the Intervertebral Disc and Interbody Fusion,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) 40-A, no. 3 (1958): 607–624.

[4] E. Chong, M. H. Pelletier, R. J. Mobbs, and W. R. Walsh, “The Design Evolution of Interbody Cages in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review,” BioMed Central Musculoskeletal Disorders 16 (2015): 99.

[5] M. G. Kaiser, R. W. Haid, Jr., B. R. Subach, B. Barnes, and G. E. Rodts, Jr., “Anterior Cervical Plating Enhances Arthrodesis After Discectomy and Fusion With Cortical Allograft,” Neurosurgery 50, no. 2 (2002): 229; discussion 36-8–236.

[6] A. S. Vaishnav, P. Saville, S. McAnany, et al., “Predictive Factors of Postoperative Dysphagia in Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion,” Spine 44, no. 7 (2019): E400–E407.

[7] H. Abudouaini, C. Huang, H. Liu, et al., “Change in the Postoperative Intervertebral Space Height and Its Impact on Clinical and Radiological Outcomes After ACDF Surgery Using a Zero-Profile Device: A Single-Centre Retrospective Study of 138 Cases,” BioMed Central Musculoskeletal Disorders 22, no. 1 (2021): 543.

[8] G. X. Lin, G. Rui, S. Sharma, A. Mahatthanatrakul, and J. S. Kim, “The Correlation of Intraoperative Distraction of Intervertebral Disc With the Postoperative Canal and Foramen Expansion Following Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” European Spine Journal 30, no. 1 (2021): 151–163.

[9] W. Xiong, J. Zhou, C. Sun, et al., “0.5-to 1-Fold Intervertebral Distraction Is a Protective Factor for Adjacent Segment Degeneration in Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion,” Spine 45, no. 2 (2020): 96–102.

[10] C. Wu, X. Yang, X. Gao, et al., “The Effects of Cages Implantation on Surgical and Adjacent Segmental Intervertebral Foramina,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 16, no. 1 (2021): 280.

[11] J. Wen, J. Xu, L. Li, et al., “Development of a Remodeled Caspar Retractor and Its Application in the Measurement of Distractive Resistance in an In Vitro Anterior Cervical Distraction Model,” Clinical Spine Surgery 30, no. 5 (2017): E592–E597.

[12] X. Q. Sheng, Y. Yang, C. Ding, et al., “Uncovertebral Joint Fusion Versus End Plate Space Fusion in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume) 105, no. 15 (2023): 1168–1174.

[13] W. Caspar, D. D. Barbier, and P. M. Klara, “Anterior Cervical Fusion and Caspar Plate Stabilization for Cervical Trauma,” Neurosurgery 25, no. 4 (1989): 491–502.

[14] X. Rong, J. Lou, H. Li, Y. Meng, and H. Liu, “How to Choose When Implants of Adjacent Height Both Fit the Disc Space Properly in Single-Level Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement,” Medicine 96, no. 29 (2017): e6954.

[15] X. F. Wang, Y. Meng, H. Liu, B. Y. Wang, and Y. Hong, “The Impact of Different Artificial Disc Heights During Total Cervical Disc Replacement: An In Vitro Biomechanical Study,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 16, no. 1 (2021): 12.

[16] K. M. Cheung, K. C. Mak, and K. D. Luk, “Anterior Approach to Cervical Spine,” Spine 37, no. 5 (2012): E297–E302.

[17] Y. W. Shen, Y. Yang, Y. Hong, et al., “Association of Craniocervical Sagittal Alignment With the Outcomes of Cervical Disc Replacement,” Global Spine Journal 14 (2022): 846–855.

[18] R. J. Hacker, J. C. Cauthen, T. J. Gilbert, and S. L. Griffith, “A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Clinical Evaluation of an Anterior Cervical Fusion Cage,” Spine 25, no. 20 (2000): 2646–2655.

[19] M. Cabraja, S. Oezdemir, D. Koeppen, and S. Kroppenstedt, “Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Comparison of Titanium and Polyetheretherketone Cages,” BioMed Central Musculoskeletal Disorders 13 (2012): 172.

[20] J. T. Robertson, S. M. Papadopoulos, and V. C. Traynelis, “Assessment of Adjacent-Segment Disease in Patients Treated With Cervical Fusion or Arthroplasty: A Prospective 2-Year Study,” Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine 3, no. 6 (2005): 417–423.

[21] D. C. Kieser, D. T. Cawley, T. Fujishiro, et al., “Risk Factors for Anterior Bone Loss in Cervical Disc Arthroplasty,” Journal of Neurosurgery. Spine 29, no. 2 (2018): 123–129.

[22] Y. Guo, H. Liu, Y. Meng, et al., “Does Early Postoperative T1 Slope Change Affect Clinical Results of Patients With Single-Level ACDF?,” Clinical Spine Surgery 34, no. 9 (2021): E552–E558.

[23] J. A. Tang, J. K. Scheer, J. S. Smith, et al., “The Impact of Standing Regional Cervical Sagittal Alignment on Outcomes in Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery,” Neurosurgery 71, no. 3 (2012): 662; discussion 9–669.

[24] S. Sun, X. Zhuang, and Y. Liu, “Radiological and Clinical Outcomes of a Disc-Limited Intervertebral Distraction Technique Applied in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion—A Proposed Method to Assist Cage Selection,” World Neurosurgery 142 (2020): e357–e363.

[25] X. Wang, Y. Meng, H. Liu, H. Chen, B. Wang, and Y. Hong, “Cervical Sagittal Alignment After Prestige LP Cervical Disc Replacement: Radiological Results and Clinical Impacts From a Single-Center Experience,” BioMed Central Musculoskeletal Disorders 22, no. 1 (2021): 82.

[26] L. L. Hsueh, Y. C. Yeh, M. L. Lu, et al., “The Impact of Over-Distraction on Adjacent Segment Pathology and Cage Subsidence in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion,” Scientific Reports 13, no. 1 (2023): 18493.

[27] G. S. Goh, W. M. Yue, C. M. Guo, S. B. Tan, and J. L. Chen, “Does the Predominant Pain Location Influence Functional Outcomes, Satisfaction and Return to Work After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Cervical Radiculopathy?,” Spine 46, no. 10 (2021): E568–E575.

[28] B. A. Basques, P. K. Louie, J. Mormol, et al., “Multi-Versus Single-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Comparing Sagittal Alignment, Early Adjacent Segment Degeneration, and Clinical Outcomes,” European Spine Journal 27, no. 11 (2018): 2745–2753.

[29] S. J. Hyun, K. J. Kim, T. A. Jahng, and H. J. Kim, “Clinical Impact of T1 Slope Minus Cervical Lordosis After Multilevel Posterior Cervical Fusion Surgery: A Minimum 2-Year Follow Up Data,” Spine 42, no. 24 (2017): 1859–1864.

[30] K. Sakai, T. Yoshii, T. Hirai, Y. Arai, K. Shinomiya, and A. Okawa, “Impact of the Surgical Treatment for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy on the Preoperative Cervical Sagittal Balance: A Review of Prospective Comparative Cohort Between Anterior Decompression With Fusion and Laminoplasty,” European Spine Journal 26, no. 1 (2017): 104–112.

[31] R. Xie, J. Liu, M. Wang, Y. Dong, P. V. Mummaneni, and D. Chou, “The Effect of Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion on Cervical Sagittal Vertical Axis and Lordosis With Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up,” World Neurosurgery 150 (2021): e727–e734.

[32] C. Xu, Y. Zhang, M. Dong, et al., “The Relationship Between Preoperative Cervical Sagittal Balance and Clinical Outcome of Laminoplasty Treated Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Patients,” Spine Journal 20, no. 9 (2020): 1422–1429.

[33] J. C. Le Huec, W. Thompson, Y. Mohsinaly, C. Barrey, and A. Faundez, “Sagittal Balance of the Spine,” European Spine Journal 28, no. 9 (2019): 1889–1905.

[34] G. P. Pal and H. H. Sherk, “The Vertical Stability of the Cervical Spine,” Spine 13, no. 5 (1988): 447–449.

[35] X. F. Wang, Y. Meng, H. Liu, B. Y. Wang, and Y. Hong, “Incidence and Outcomes of Anterior Bone Loss in Single-Level Prestige LP Cervical Disc Replacement,” Chinese Medical Journal 134, no. 1 (2020): 109–111.

[36] C. Huang, H. Abudouaini, B. Wang, et al., “Comparison of Patient-Reported Postoperative Dysphagia in Patients Undergoing One-Level Versus Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion With the Zero-P Implant System,” Dysphagia 36 (2021): 743–753.

[37] T. Li, J. S. Yang, X. F. Wang, et al., “Can Zero-Profile Cage Maintain the Cervical Curvature Similar to Plate-Cage Construct for Single-Level Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion?,” World Neurosurgery 135 (2020): e300–e306.

[38] Z. Wang, W. Jiang, X. Li, et al., “The Application of Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion,” European Spine Journal 24, no. 1 (2015): 148–154.

[39] J. Wen, J. Xu, L. Li, et al., “Factors Affecting the Nonlinear Force Versus Distraction Height Curves in an In Vitro C5–C6 Anterior Cervical Distraction Model,” Clinical Spine Surgery 30, no. 5 (2017): E510–E514.

[40] E. Truumees, C. K. Demetropoulos, K. H. Yang, and H. N. Herkowitz, “Effects of Disc Height and Distractive Forces on Graft Compression in an Anterior Cervical Discectomy Model,” Spine 27, no. 22 (2002): 2441–2445.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.