Biomechanical Evaluation of Clival Screw Fixation for Occipitocervical Instablity: A Finite Element Analysis

Abstract

Objective: The clivus is trapezoidal in shape with uneven bone structure, the optimal number and position of screws for clival fixation are not clear. Therefore, this study aims to explore the optimization clival screw fixation method for occipitocervical instability using finite element analysis.

Methods: Seven finite element models were developed to evaluate biomechanical properties of clival screw fixation for treating occipitocervical stability, including (i) one clival screw fixation A1 and A2 models; (ii) two clival screws fixation B1 and B2 models; (iii) three clival screws fixation C1 and C2 models; (iv) four clival screws fixation D1 model. Loads of 1.5 Nm were applied to the model fRoM different directions to induce flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation movements.

Results: The regular triangle C1 type three clival screws fixation exhibited great stability, with RoM of 4.20° in flexion, 5.80° in extension, 0.85° in lateral bending, and 1.60° in axial rotation. The peak stress on the internal fixation devices were relatively low, with maximum screw stress of 194 MPa in flexion, 276 MPa in extension, 180 MPa in lateral bending, and 213 MPa in axial rotation; the maximum plate stress were 126, 554, 426, and 378 MPa, respectively. The areas with higher stress were mainly concentrated at the robust neck section of the plate.

Conclusion: The triangular configuration of three clival screws fixation represented the optimized anterior occipitocervical fixation method through the clivus, offering superior biomechanical stability, lower stress on the devices and dispersed stress distribution in the occipitocervical region.

Keywords

anterior internal fixation / biomechanics / finite element analysis / occipitocervical fusion / upper cervical spine

References

[1] A. J. Lopez, J. K. Scheer, K. E. Leibl, Z. A. Smith, B. J. Dlouhy, and N. S. Dahdaleh, “Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Occipitocervical Junction,” Neurosurgical Focus 38 (2015): E2.

[2] W. Ji, S. Lin, M. Bao, et al., “Anatomical Analysis of the Occipital Bone in Patients With Basilar Invagination: A Computed Tomography-Based Study,” Spine Journal 20 (2020): 866–873.

[3] W. Ji, X. Liu, W. Huang, et al., “Feasibility of C2 Vertebra Screws Placement in Patient With Occipitalization of Atlas: A Tomographic Study,” Medicine (Baltimore) 94 (2015): e1492.

[4] M. Zhou, H. Li, S. Gu, Z. Sun, Y. Xu, and Y. Rui, “Congenital Absence of the Posterior Arch of the Atlas,” Spine Journal 15 (2015): 200–201.

[5] S. Wang, C. Wang, M. Yan, et al., “Novel Surgical Classification and Treatment Strategy for Atlantoaxial Dislocations,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38 (2013): E1348–E1356.

[6] W. Ji, X. Y. Wang, H. Z. Xu, et al., “The Anatomic Study of Clival Screw Fixation for the Occipitocervical Region,” European Spine Journal 21 (2012): 1483–1491.

[7] W. Ji, G. G. Kong, M. H. Zheng, X. Y. Wang, J. T. Chen, and Q. A. Zhu, “Computed Tomographic Morphometric Analysis of Pediatric Clival Screw Placement at the Occipitocervical Junction,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40 (2015): E259–E265.

[8] W. Ji, J. Tong, Z. Huang, et al., “A Clivus Plate Fixation for Reconstruction of Ventral Defect of the Occipitocervical Junction: A Novel Fixation Device for Occipitocervical Instability,” European Spine Journal 24 (2015): 1658–1665.

[9] W. Ji, J. Tong, Z. Huang, et al., “Stabilization of the Occipitocervical Junction With Clivus Plate Constructs: Biomechanical Comparison With Conventional Technique,” World Neurosurgery 94 (2016): 42–49.

[10] W. Ji, Z. Huang, R. Li, et al., “A Clival-Cervical Plate Fixation for the Occipitocervical Instability: A Biomechanical Study,” Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics 42 (2022): 722–729.

[11] H. W. Ng and E. C. Teo, “Nonlinear Finite-Element Analysis of the Lower Cervical Spine (C4-C6) Under Axial Loading,” Journal of Spinal Disorders 14 (2001): 201–210.

[12] Q. H. Zhang, E. C. Teo, H. W. Ng, and V. S. Lee, “Finite Element Analysis of Moment-Rotation Relationships for Human Cervical Spine,” Journal of Biomechanics 39 (2006): 189–193.

[13] M. Panjabi, J. Dvorak, J. Duranceau, et al., “Three-Dimensional Movements of the Upper Cervical Spine,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 13 (1988): 726–730.

[14] M. Panjabi, “Cervical Spine Models for Biomechanical Research,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23 (1998): 2684–2700.

[15] X. H. Cai, Z. C. Liu, Y. Yu, M. C. Zhang, and W. B. Huang, “Evaluation of Biomechanical Properties of Anterior Atlantoaxial Transarticular Locking Plate System Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis,” European Spine Journal 22 (2013): 2686–2694.

[16] X. Cai, Y. Yu, Z. Liu, M. Zhang, and W. Huang, “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Occipitocervical Fixation Using an Anterior Occiput-To-Axis Locking Plate System: A Pilot Study,” Spine Journal 14 (2014): 1399–1409.

[17] N. S. Dahdaleh, N. El-Tecle, M. B. Cloney, et al., “Functional Anatomy and Biomechanics of the Occipitocervical Junction,” World Neurosurgery 175 (2023): 165–171.

[18] N. Yoganandan, S. Kumaresan, L. Voo, and F. A. Pintar, “Finite Element Applications in Human Cervical Spine Modeling,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21 (1996): 1824–1834.

[19] F. Kandziora, N. Schulze-Stahl, C. Khodadadyan-Klostermann, R. Schröder, and T. Mittlmeier, “Screw Placement in Transoral Atlantoaxial Plate Systems: An Anatomical Study,” Journal of Neurosurgery 95 (2001): 80–87.

[20] D. J. Enepekides and P. J. Donald, “Transoral Approaches to the Clivus and Nasopharynx,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 34 (2001): 1105–1121.

[21] J. Imamura, Y. Ikeyama, E. Tsutida, et al., “Transoral Transclival Approach for Intradural Lesions Using a Protective Bone Baffle to Block Cerebrospinal Fluid Pulse Energy—Two Case Reports,” Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica (Tokyo) 41 (2001): 222–226.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.