Feasibility and Safety of the C1 “Zero Angle” Screw: A Novel “In–Out–In” Technique for Atlantoaxial Dislocation

Abstract

Objectives: To minimize the risk of V3 segment of vertebral artery (VA) injury in the atlantoaxial dislocation (AAD) patients with C1 pedicle height less than 4.0 mm and provide a strong toggle force in irreducible AAD and revision surgery. We evaluated the feasibility of C1 “Zero Angle” screw (C1ZAS) and safe entry point with “in–out–in” technique as an alternative option for C1 pedicle screw (PS) in cases with AAD.

Methods: Sixty-one patients with AAD or atlantoaxial instability (AAI) (45 male and 16 female) who underwent cervical computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging scans in our center between January 1, 2022 and December 31, 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Measurements were made around the ideal trajectory and entry point of C1ZAS using computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 61 patients. Radiographic measurements included (A) the distance from the recess to the transverse foramen (RTF); (B) the tricortical screw zone (TSZ); (C) the lateral mass height along the C1ZAS trajectory (LMH); (D) the screw length of C1ZAS (ZSL); (E) the screw length of C1 PS (PSL); (F) the distances from the recess to the dura (RD); (G) the distance from the recess to the spinal cord (RSC); (H) the distance from the inner of lateral mass to the spinal cord (ILMSC). During the period of January 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023, C1ZAS placement with “in–out–in” technique was used as an alternative option for C1 PS in 8 patients with AAD and unilateral/bilateral narrow C1 pedicles.

Results: The average RTF, TSZ, LMH, ZSL, RD, RSC, and ILMSC were 7.71, 6.14, 8.32, 33.23, 4.68, 10.02, and 2.91 mm respectively. The entry point of the C1ZAS was defined as the projection point of the inner of the recess to the posterior arch and the trajectory should be angled cephalad by 8.7° and medially by 0°. The 61 patients (122 sides) with AAD or AAI were classified into three groups: the low-risk (76 sides, 62%), the intermedial-risk (18 sides, 15%), and the high-risk (28 sides, 23%) groups. Satisfactory C1ZAS placement and atlantoaxial reduction were achieved in all eight patients with AAD and unilateral/bilateral narrow C1 pedicles. No instance of C1ZAS placement-related VA injury or dural laceration was observed.

Conclusions: When the placement of C1 PS is not feasible in patients with AAD and unilateral/bilateral narrow C1 pedicles, C1ZAS placement with “in–out–in” technique can be considered an effective alternative option, providing tricortical or quadricortical purchase for rigid fixation of the atlas.

Keywords

atlantoaxial dislocation / atlas / in–out–in / narrow pedicle / zero angle

References

[1] D. Gonzalez, A. F. Ardura, J. C. Sanjuan, et al., “C1-C2 Rotatory Subluxation in Adults “A Narrative Review”” Diagnostics (Basel) 12 (2022): 1615.

[2] Q. S. Yin and J. H. Wang, “Current Trends in Management of Atlantoaxial Dislocation,” Orthopaedic Surgery 7 (2015): 189–199.

[3] X. Y. Ma, Q. S. Yin, Z. H. Wu, et al., “C1 Pedicle Screws Versus C1 Lateral Mass Screws: Comparisons of Pullout Strengths and Biomechanical Stabilities,” Spine 34 (2009): 371–377.

[4] F. Fensky, R. A. Kueny, K. Sellenschloh, et al., “Biomechanical Advantage of C1 Pedicle Screws Over C1 Lateral Mass Screws: A Cadaveric Study,” European Spine Journal 23 (2014): 724–731.

[5] D. G. Huang, D. J. Hao, B. R. He, et al., “Posterior Atlantoaxial Fixation: A Review of all Techniques,” Spine Journal 15 (2015): 2271–2281.

[6] L. X. Qian, D. J. Hao, B. R. He, and Y. H. Jiang, “Morphology of the Atlas Pedicle Revisited: A Morphometric CT-Based Study on 120 Patients,” European Spine Journal 22 (2013): 1142–1146.

[7] J. M. Lin, J. A. Hipp, and C. A. Reitman, “C1 Lateral Mass Screw Placement via the Posterior Arch: A Technique Comparison and Anatomic Analysis,” Spine Journal 13 (2013): 1549–1555.

[8] X. Y. Ma, Q. S. Yin, Z. H. Wu, H. Xia, J. F. Liu, and S. Z. Zhong, “Anatomic Considerations for the Pedicle Screw Placement in the First Cervical Vertebra,” Spine 30 (2005): 1519–1523.

[9] M. Tan, H. Wang, Y. Wang, et al., “Morphometric Evaluation of Screw Fixation in Atlas via Posterior Arch and Lateral Mass,” Spine 28 (2003): 888–895.

[10] C. M. Zarro, S. C. Ludwig, A. H. Hsieh, C. N. Seal, and D. E. Gelb, “Biomechanical Comparison of the Pullout Strengths of C1 Lateral Mass Screws and C1 Posterior Arch Screws,” Spine Journal 13 (2013): 1892–1896.

[11] A. Goel, R. Rangnekar, A. Shah, S. Rai, and R. Vutha, “Mobilization of the Vertebral Artery-Surgical Option for C2 Screw Fixation in Cases With ‘High Riding’ Vertebral Artery,” Operative Neurosurgery 18 (2020): 648–651.

[12] Y. Q. Du, Y. H. Yin, G. Y. Qiao, et al., “C2 Medial Pedicle Screw: A Novel ‘In-Out-In’ Technique as an Alternative Option for Posterior C2 Fixation in Cases With a Narrow C2 Isthmus,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 33 (2020): 1–7.

[13] D. M. Sciubba, J. C. Noggle, A. K. Vellimana, et al., “Radiographic and Clinical Evaluation of Free-Hand Placement of C2 Pedicle Screws. Clinical Article,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 11 (2009): 15–22.

[14] B. Ni, W. Zhao, Q. Guo, et al., “Comparison of Outcomes Between C1-C2 Screw-Hook Fixation and C1-C2 Screw-Rod Fixation for Treating Reducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation,” Spine 42 (2017): 1587–1593.

[15] J. Guo-Xin and W. Huan, “Unilateral C-1 Posterior Arch Screws and C-2 Laminar Screws Combined With a 1-Side C1-2 Pedicle Screw System as Salvage Fixation for Atlantoaxial Instability,” Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine 24 (2016): 315–320.

[16] Z. Han, J. Yang, Q. Chen, et al., “C2 Pedicle Screws Combined With C1 Laminar Hooks for Reducible Atlantoaxial Dislocation: An Ideal Salvage Technique for C1-C2 Pedicle Screws,” Operative Neurosurgery 19 (2020): 150–156.

[17] B. Ni, Z. Zhu, F. Zhou, et al., “Bilateral C1 Laminar Hooks Combined With C2 Pedicle Screws Fixation for Treatment of C1-C2 Instability Not Suitable for Placement of Transarticular Screws,” European Spine Journal 19 (2010): 1378–1382.

[18] J. Xu, Q. Yin, H. Xia, et al., “New Clinical Classification System for Atlantoaxial Dislocation,” Orthopedics 36 (2013): e95–e100.

[19] Q. Yin, F. Ai, K. Zhang, et al., “Irreducible Anterior Atlantoaxial Dislocation: One-Stage Treatment With a Transoral Atlantoaxial Reduction Plate Fixation and Fusion. Report of 5 Cases and Review of the Literature,” Spine 30 (2005): E375–E381.

[20] X. Ma, X. Zou, Z. Chen, et al., “Surgical Failure and Revision Strategy for Atlantoaxial Dislocation: A Retrospective Study of 109 Cases,” Spine 49, no. 16 (2024): 1116–1124.

[21] M. Dvorak, S. MacDonald, K. R. Gurr, S. I. Bailey, and R. G. Haddad, “An Anatomic, Radiographic, and Biomechanical Assessment of Extrapedicular Screw Fixation in the Thoracic Spine,” Spine 18 (1993): 1689–1694.

[22] P. Xu, J. Lin, H. Xiao, et al., “Feasibility of C2 Pedicle Screw Fixation With the ‘In-Out-In’ Technique for Patients With Basilar Invagination,” Spine 49, no. 11 (2024): 798–804.

[23] H. He, B. Hu, L. Wang, Y. Gao, H. Yan, and J. Wang, “The Computed Tomography Angiography Study of the Spatial Relationship Between C1 Transpedicular Screw Trajectory and V3 Segment of Vertebral Artery,” Spine Journal 17 (2017): 120–128.

[24] J. S. Yeom, J. M. Buchowski, K. W. Park, B. S. Chang, C. K. Lee, and K. D. Riew, “Undetected Vertebral Artery Groove and Foramen Violations During C1 Lateral Mass and C2 Pedicle Screw Placement,” Spine 33 (2008): E942–E949.

[25] M. Neo, S. Fujibayashi, M. Miyata, M. Takemoto, and T. Nakamura, “Vertebral Artery Injury During Cervical Spine Surgery,” Spine 33 (2008): 779–785.

[26] Y. Dong, M. X. Hong, L. Jianyi, and M. Y. Lin, “Quantitative Anatomy of the Lateral Mass of the Atlas,” Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 (2003): 860–863.

[27] M. Neo, T. Sakamoto, S. Fujibayashi, and T. Nakamura, “The Clinical Risk of Vertebral Artery Injury From Cervical Pedicle Screws Inserted in Degenerative Vertebrae,” Spine 30 (2005): 2800–2805.

[28] J. D. Smith, M. M. Jack, N. R. Harn, J. R. Bertsch, and P. M. Arnold, “Screw Placement Accuracy and Outcomes Following o-Arm-Navigated Atlantoaxial Fusion: A Feasibility Study,” Global Spine Journal 6 (2016): 344–349.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.