Fracture Line Morphology and a Novel Classification of Pilon Fractures

Abstract

Objective: Currently, there is no research that includes a comprehensive three-dimensional fracture mapping encompassing all types of Pilon fractures. Moreover, the existing classification systems for Pilon fractures exhibit only moderate to fair consistency and reproducibility. Additionally, some of these classification systems fail to accurately depict the morphological characteristics of the fractures. This study aimed to create a fracture map encompassing all types of Pilon fractures by three-dimensional fracture mapping. In addition, this study conducted a finite element analysis of the normal ankle joint, and based on the distribution of fracture lines and the stress distribution at the distal tibia, proposed a new classification for Pilon fractures.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of Pilon fractures in our hospital from January 2018 to January 2024 was performed. A total of two hundred forty-four Pilon fractures were included, and their fracture lines were transcribed onto the tibia and fibula templates, and fracture maps and heat maps were created. A nonhomogeneous model of the ankle joint was constructed and verified, and the stress distribution on the distal tibia articular surface was measured and analyzed in three models (neutral, dorsiflexed, and plantarflexed model). Based on the fracture map and stress distribution, a five-column classification system for Pilon fractures was proposed, and the intraobserver and interobserver reliability was calculated using Cohen and Fleiss k statistics.

Result: The fracture line on the distal tibia articular surface showed a V-shaped distribution. One branch extended from the junction of the medial malleolar articular surface and the inferior tibial articular surface toward the medial malleolus. The other branch extended from the middle of the fibular notch to the posterior part of the medial ankle, toward the tibial shaft. The fibula fracture line mainly extended from the anterior and lower part of the lateral malleolus to the posterior and upper part. As evidenced by the neutral, dorsiflexed, and plantar flexion models, the stress on the posterolateral articular surface (posterolateral column) was low, while the majority of the stress was concentrated in the center. Three-column fractures were the most common, followed by two-column fractures. Using the five-column classification, the K-weighted values of interobserver and intraobserver analysis were 0.653 (p < 0.001) and 0.708 (p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions: In this study, the fracture line and morphological characteristics of Pilon fractures were analyzed in detail by three-dimensional mapping. In addition, this study conducted a finite element analysis of the stress distribution on the distal tibial joint surface of the normal ankle joint. Moreover, a novel classification system was proposed to reflect these findings. The new classification not only exhibits greater consistency, facilitating accurate communication of fracture characteristics among surgeons, but also aids in understanding the mechanisms of injury and formulating surgical strategies.

Keywords

classification / computed tomography / finite element analysis / fracture mapping / pilon fractures

References

[1] L. Flett, J. Adamson, E. Barron, et al., “A Multicentre, Randomized, Parallel Group, Superiority Study to Compare the Clinical Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of External Frame Versus Internal Locking Plate for Complete Articular Pilon Fracture Fixation in Adults,” Bone & Joint Open 2, no. 3 (2021): 150–163.

[2] A. Bedi, T. T. Le, and M. A. Karunakar, “Surgical Treatment of Nonarticular Distal Tibia Fractures,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 14, no. 7 (2006): 406–416.

[3] C. J. Topliss, M. Jackson, and R. M. Atkins, “Anatomy of Pilon Fractures of the Distal Tibia,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume 87, no. 5 (2005): 692–697.

[4] C. Mauffrey, G. Vasario, B. Battiston, C. Lewis, J. Beazley, and D. Seligson, “Tibial Pilon Fractures: A Review of Incidence, Diagnosis, Treatment, and Complications,” Acta Orthopaedica Belgica 77, no. 4 (2011): 432–440.

[5] X. Tang, P. F. Tang, M. Y. Wang, et al., “Pilon Fractures: A New Classification and Therapeutic Strategies,” Chinese Medical Journal, Peking 125, no. 14 (2012): 2487–2492.

[6] T. Yeramosu, J. Satpathy, P. W. Perdue, Jr., et al., “Risk Factors for Infection and Subsequent Adverse Clinical Results in the Setting of Operatively Treated Pilon Fractures,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 36, no. 8 (2022): 406–412.

[7] L. S. Wilson, Jr., M. S. Mizel, and J. D. Michelson, “Foot and Ankle Injuries in Motor Vehicle Accidents,” Foot & Ankle International 22, no. 8 (2001): 649–652.

[8] D. Leonetti and D. Tigani, “Pilon Fractures: A New Classification System Based on CT-Scan,” Injury 48, no. 10 (2017): 2311–2317.

[9] Y. Liu, H. Lu, H. Xu, et al., “Characteristics and Classification of Medial Malleolar Fractures,” Bone & Joint Journal 103-b, no. 5 (2021): 931–938.

[10] Y. Quan, H. Lu, H. Xu, et al., “The Distribution of Posterior Malleolus Fracture Lines,” Foot & Ankle International 42, no. 7 (2021): 959–966.

[11] P. A. Cole, R. K. Mehrle, M. Bhandari, and M. Zlowodzki, “The Pilon Map: Fracture Lines and Comminution Zones in OTA/AO Type 43C3 Pilon Fractures,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 27, no. 7 (2013): e152–e156.

[12] L. Z. Q Glen, J. Y. S. Wong, W. X. Tay, et al., “Weber Ankle Fracture Classification System Yields Greatest Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability Over AO/OTA and Lauge-Hansen Classification Systems Under Time Constraints in an Asian Population,” Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery 62, no. 3 (2023): 505–510.

[13] J. Palma, A. Villa, P. Mery, et al., “A New Classification System for Pilon Fractures Based on CT Scan: An Independent Interobserver and Intraobserver Agreement Evaluation,” Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 28, no. 5 (2020): 208–213.

[14] L. S. Ramos, H. M. Gonçalves, A. Freitas, M. P. Oliveira, D. M. S. Lima, and W. S. Carmargo, “Evaluation of the Reproducibility of Lauge-Hansen, Danis-Weber, and AO Classifications for Ankle Fractures,” Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia (Sao Paulo) 56, no. 3 (2021): 372–378.

[15] C. Krettek and S. Bachmann, “Pilon Fractures. Part 1: Diagnostics, Treatment Strategies and Approaches,” Der Chirurg 86, no. 1 (2015): 87–101, quiz 2-4.

[16] Q. Liu, K. Zhang, Y. Zhuang, Z. Li, B. Yu, and G. Pei, “Analysis of the Stress and Displacement Distribution of Inferior Tibiofibular Syndesmosis Injuries Repaired With Screw Fixation: A Finite Element Study,” PLoS One 8, no. 12 (2013): e80236.

[17] Z. J. Zhu, Y. Zhu, J. F. Liu, Y. P. Wang, G. Chen, and X. Y. Xu, “Posterolateral Ankle Ligament Injuries Affect Ankle Stability: A Finite Element Study,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 17 (2016): 96.

[18] O. F. Oken, A. O. Yildirim, and M. Asilturk, “Finite Element Analysis of the Stability of AO/OTA 43-C1 Type Distal Tibial Fractures Treated With Distal Tibia Medial Anatomic Plate Versus Anterolateral Anatomic Plate,” Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 51, no. 5 (2017): 404–408.

[19] D. D. Anderson, J. K. Goldsworthy, W. Li, M. James Rudert, Y. Tochigi, and T. D. Brown, “Physical Validation of a Patient-Specific Contact Finite Element Model of the Ankle,” Journal of Biomechanics 40, no. 8 (2007): 1662–1669.

[20] J. Y. Rho, M. C. Hobatho, and R. B. Ashman, “Relations of Mechanical Properties to Density and CT Numbers in Human Bone,” Medical Engineering & Physics 17, no. 5 (1995): 347–355.

[21] S. M. Thompson, D. Yohuno, W. N. Bradley, and A. D. Crocombe, “Finite Element Analysis: A Comparison of an All-Polyethylene Tibial Implant and Its Metal-Backed Equivalent,” Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 24, no. 8 (2016): 2560–2566.

[22] J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch, “The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data,” Biometrics 33, no. 1 (1977): 159–174.

[23] U. Spetzger, M. Frasca, and S. A. König, “Surgical Planning, Manufacturing and Implantation of an Individualized Cervical Fusion Titanium Cage Using Patient-Specific Data,” European Spine Journal 25, no. 7 (2016): 2239–2246.

[24] Q. H. Su, J. Liu, Y. Zhang, et al., “Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Mapping of Posterior Malleolar Fractures,” World Journal of Clinical Cases 8, no. 1 (2020): 29–37.

[25] T. Yu, Y. Zhang, H. Zhou, and Y. Yang, “Distribution of Posterior Malleolus Fracture Lines in Ankle Fracture of Supination-External Rotation,” Orthopaedics & Traumatology, Surgery & Research 107, no. 6 (2021): 103000.

[26] P. M. Mitchell, K. A. Harms, A. K. Lee, and C. A. Collinge, “Morphology of the Posterior Malleolar Fracture Associated With a Spiral Distal Tibia Fracture,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 33, no. 4 (2019): 185–188.

[27] L. Bian, P. Liu, Z. Yuan, and Y. Sha, “Stereo Information of Skeletal Data Based on CT Sequence Medical Images,” Journal of Infection and Public Health 13, no. 12 (2020): 2049–2054.

[28] J. L. Howard, J. Agel, D. P. Barei, S. K. Benirschke, and S. E. Nork, “A Prospective Study Evaluating Incision Placement and Wound Healing for Tibial Plafond Fractures,” Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma 22, no. 5 (2008): 299–305, discussion 305-306.

[29] B. A. Zelle, K. H. Dang, and S. S. Ornell, “High-Energy Tibial Pilon Fractures: An Instructional Review,” International Orthopaedics 43, no. 8 (2019): 1939–1950.

[30] J. Bear, N. Rollick, and D. Helfet, “Evolution in Management of Tibial Pilon Fractures,” Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine 11, no. 4 (2018): 537–545.

[31] O. Borens, P. Kloen, J. Richmond, G. Roederer, D. S. Levine, and D. L. Helfet, “Minimally Invasive Treatment of Pilon Fractures With a Low Profile Plate: Preliminary Results in 17 Cases,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 129, no. 5 (2009): 649–659.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.