The Bony Density of the Pedicle Plays a More Significant Role in the Screw Anchorage Ability Than Other Regions of the Screw Trajectory

Abstract

Objective: Osteoporosis is a crucial risk factor for screw loosening. Our studies indicate that the bone mineral density (BMD) in the screw trajectory is a better predictor of screw loosening than the BMD of the lumbar spine or the screw insertion position. Research has shown that anchorage on the screw tip is the most significant factor for screw anchorage ability, while others argue that decreased bony quality in the pedicle poses a significant risk for screw loosening. This study aimed to determine whether the bony quality of the screw tip, pedicle, or screw-anchored vertebral body plays the most significant role in screw anchorage ability.

Methods: A total of 73 patients who underwent single–segment bilateral pedicle screw fixation, along with posterior and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF and TLIF), from March 2019 to September 2020 were included in this retrospective study. The Hounsfield unit (HU) value of the fixed vertebral bodies, the entire screw trajectory, screw tip, screw–anchoraged vertebral body, and pedicles were measured separately. Data from patients with and without screw loosening were compared, and regression analyses were conducted to identify independent risk factors. Additionally, the area under the curve (AUC) values were computed to assess the predictive performance of different parameters. Furthermore, fixation strength was calculated in numerical models with varying bony densities in different regions.

Results: HU values were found to be significantly lower in the loosening group across most measuring methods (HU values in the pedicle, 148.79 ± 97.04, 33.06 ± 34.82, p < 0.001). Specifically, the AUC of screw loosening prediction was notably higher when using HU values of the pedicle compared to other methods (AUC in the pedicle > 0.9 and in the screw insertion position > 0.7). Additionally, computational results for fixation strength revealed a clear decline in screw anchorage ability in models with poor BMD in the pedicle region.

Conclusions: Pedicle bone quality plays a more significant role in screw anchorage ability than that in other regions. The innovation of bony augmentation strategies should pay more attention to this region to optimize the screw anchorage ability effectively.

Keywords

fixation strength computation / Hounsfield-unit value / pedicle / screw anchorage ability / screw loosening

References

[1] M. Athanasakopoulos, A. F. Mavrogenis, G. Triantafyllopoulos, S. Koufos, and S. G. Pneumaticos, “Posterior Spinal Fusion Using Pedicle Screws,” Orthopedics 36, no. 7 (2013): e951–e957.

[2] B. D. Elder, S. F. Lo, C. Holmes, et al., “The Biomechanics of Pedicle Screw Augmentation With Cement,” Spine Journal 15, no. 6 (2015): 1432–1445.

[3] L. Marie-Hardy, H. Pascal-Moussellard, A. Barnaba, R. Bonaccorsi, and C. Scemama, “Screw Loosening in Posterior Spine Fusion: Prevalence and Risk Factors,” Global Spine Journal 10, no. 5 (2020): 598–602.

[4] M. H. Pelletier, N. Bertollo, D. Al-Khawaja, and W. R. Walsh, “The Contribution of the Cortical Shell to Pedicle Screw Fixation,” Journal of Spine Surgery (Hong Kong) 3, no. 2 (2017): 184–192.

[5] J. C. Li, T. H. Xie, Z. Zhang, Z. T. Song, Y. M. Song, and J. C. Zeng, “The Mismatch Between Bony Endplates and Grafted Bone Increases Screw Loosening Risk for OLIF Patients With ALSR Fixation Biomechanically,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 10 (2022): 862951.

[6] H. K. Chang, J. Ku, J. Ku, et al., “Correlation of Bone Density to Screw Loosening in Dynamic Stabilization: An Analysis of 176 Patients,” Scientific Reports 11, no. 1 (2021): 17519.

[7] J. J. Schreiber, P. A. Anderson, and W. K. Hsu, “Use of Computed Tomography for Assessing Bone Mineral Density,” Neurosurgical Focus 37, no. 1 (2014): E4.

[8] O. Johnell and J. Kanis, “Epidemiology of Osteoporotic Fractures,” Osteoporosis International 16, no. S2 (2005): S3–S7.

[9] N. E. Lane, “Epidemiology, Etiology, and Diagnosis of Osteoporosis,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 194, no. S2 (2006): S3–S11.

[10] A. P. Launonen, V. Lepola, A. Saranko, T. Flinkkilä, M. Laitinen, and V. M. Mattila, “Epidemiology of Proximal Humerus Fractures,” Archives of Osteoporosis 10 (2015): 209.

[11] A. F. Mavrogenis, C. Vottis, G. Triantafyllopoulos, P. J. Papagelopoulos, and S. G. Pneumaticos, “PEEK Rod Systems for the Spine,” European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology 24, no. S1 (2014): S111–S116.

[12] S. Boriani, G. Tedesco, L. Ming, et al., “Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced PEEK Fixation System in the Treatment of Spine Tumors: A Preliminary Report,” European Spine Journal 27, no. 4 (2018): 874–881.

[13] D. Zou, W. Li, C. Deng, G. Du, and N. Xu, “The Use of CT Hounsfield Unit Values to Identify the Undiagnosed Spinal Osteoporosis in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Diseases,” European Spine Journal 28, no. 8 (2019): 1758–1766.

[14] D. Zou, Z. Sun, S. Zhou, W. Zhong, and W. Li, “Hounsfield Units Value is a Better Predictor of Pedicle Screw Loosening Than the T-Score of DXA in Patients With Lumbar Degenerative Diseases,” European Spine Journal 29, no. 5 (2020): 1105–1111.

[15] J. Bredow, C. K. Boese, C. M. Werner, et al., “Predictive Validity of Preoperative CT Scans and the Risk of Pedicle Screw Loosening in Spinal Surgery,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 136, no. 8 (2016): 1063–1067.

[16] E. B. Gausden, B. U. Nwachukwu, J. J. Schreiber, D. G. Lorich, and J. M. Lane, “Opportunistic Use of CT Imaging for Osteoporosis Screening and Bone Density Assessment: A Qualitative Systematic Review,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American Volume 99, no. 18 (2017): 1580–1590.

[17] J. Li, Y. Xie, S. Sun, et al., “Regional Differences in Bone Mineral Density Biomechanically Induce a Higher Risk of Adjacent Vertebral Fracture After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: A Case-Comparative Study,” International Journal of Surgery. London, England: International Journal of Surgery, vol. 109 (2023), 352–363.

[18] J. C. Li, Z. Q. Yang, T. H. Xie, Z. T. Song, Y. M. Song, and J. C. Zeng, “Deterioration of the Fixation Segment’s Stress Distribution and the Strength Reduction of Screw Holding Position Together Cause Screw Loosening in ALSR Fixed OLIF Patients With Poor BMD,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 10 (2022): 922848.

[19] J. Li, Z. Zhang, T. Xie, Z. Song, Y. Song, and J. Zeng, “The Preoperative Hounsfield Unit Value at the Position of the Future Screw Insertion is a Better Predictor of Screw Loosening Than Other Methods,” European Radiology 33 (2022): 1526–1536.

[20] H. Kanno, T. Aizawa, K. Hashimoto, and E. Itoi, “Novel Augmentation Technique of Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation Using Hydroxyapatite Granules in the Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Analysis,” European Spine Journal 30, no. 1 (2021): 71–78.

[21] H. Kanno, T. Aizawa, K. Hashimoto, and E. Itoi, “Enhancing Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Fixation With Hydroxyapatite Granules: A Biomechanical Study Using an Osteoporotic Bone Model,” PLoS One 14, no. 9 (2019): e0223106.

[22] D. Zou, A. Muheremu, Z. Sun, W. Zhong, S. Jiang, and W. Li, “Computed Tomography Hounsfield Unit-Based Prediction of Pedicle Screw Loosening After Surgery for Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease,” Journal of Neurosurgery Spine 32 (2020): 1–6.

[23] F. Xu, D. Zou, W. Li, et al., “Hounsfield Units of the Vertebral Body and Pedicle as Predictors of Pedicle Screw Loosening After Degenerative Lumbar Spine Surgery,” Neurosurgical Focus 49, no. 2 (2020): E10.

[24] Y. Tokuhashi, H. Matsuzaki, H. Oda, and H. Uei, “Clinical Course and Significance of the Clear Zone Around the Pedicle Screws in the Lumbar Degenerative Disease,” Spine 33, no. 8 (2008): 903–908.

[25] J. Mi, K. Li, X. Zhao, C. Q. Zhao, H. Li, and J. Zhao, “Vertebral Body Hounsfield Units Are Associated With Cage Subsidence After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation,” Clinical Spine Surgery 30, no. 8 (2017): E1130–E1136.

[26] J. Mi, K. Li, X. Zhao, C. Q. Zhao, H. Li, and J. Zhao, “Vertebral Body Compressive Strength Evaluated by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry and Hounsfield Units in Vitro,” Journal of Clinical Densitometry 21, no. 1 (2018): 148–153.

[27] M. S. Srivastava, “Estimation of the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient,” Annals of Human Genetics 57, no. 2 (1993): 159–165.

[28] J. J. Yue, M. E. Oetgen, J. J. la Torre, and R. Bertagnoli, “Does Vertebral Endplate Morphology Influence Outcomes in Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty? Part I: An Initial Assessment of a Novel Classification System of Lumbar Endplate Morphology,” SAS Journal 2, no. 1 (2008): 16–22.

[29] H. Perazzo, F. F. Fernandes, J. C. Soares, et al., “Learning Curve and Intra/Interobserver Agreement of Transient Elastography in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients With or Without HIV Co-Infection,” Clinics and Research in Hepatology and Gastroenterology 40, no. 1 (2016): 73–82.

[30] Z. Xi, Y. Xie, S. Chen, et al., “The Cranial Vertebral Body Suffers a Higher Risk of Adjacent Vertebral Fracture due to the Poor Biomechanical Environment in Patients With Percutaneous Vertebralplasty,” Spine Journal 23 (2023): 1764–1777.

[31] C. Y. Ou, T. C. Lee, T. H. Lee, and Y. H. Huang, “Impact of body mass index on adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion for degenerative spine disease,” Neurosurgery 76, no. 4 (2015): 396–401.

[32] H. Wang, L. Ma, D. Yang, et al., “Incidence and Risk Factors of Adjacent Segment Disease Following Posterior Decompression and Instrumented Fusion for Degenerative Lumbar Disorders,” Medicine 96, no. 5 (2017): e6032.

[33] H. N. Mehmanparast, J. M Mac-Thiong, and Y. Petit, “Biomechanical Evaluation of Pedicle Screw Loosening Mechanism Using Synthetic Bone Surrogate of Various Densities,” Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 2014 (2014): 4346–4349.

[34] Y. Sakai, S. Takenaka, Y. Matsuo, et al., “Hounsfield Unit of Screw Trajectory as a Predictor of Pedicle Screw Loosening After Single Level Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” Journal of Orthopaedic Science 23, no. 5 (2018): 734–738.

[35] F. D. Zhao, P. Pollintine, B. D. Hole, M. A. Adams, and P. Dolan, “Vertebral Fractures Usually Affect the Cranial Endplate Because It is Thinner and Supported by Less-Dense Trabecular Bone,” Bone 44, no. 2 (2009): 372–379.

[36] J. T. Liu, H. Han, Z. C. Gao, et al., “CT Assisted Morphological Study of Lumbar Endplate,” China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology 31, no. 12 (2018): 1129–1135.

[37] C. L. Pan, B. Y. Zhang, Y. H. Zhu, et al., “Morphologic Analysis of Chinese Lumbar Endplate by Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography Reconstructions for Helping Design Lumbar Disc Prosthesis,” Medicine 100, no. 6 (2021): e24583.

[38] C. Xu, C. Huang, P. Cai, et al., “Biomechanical Effects of Pedicle Screw Positioning on the Surgical Segment in Models After Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An In-Silico Study,” International Journal of General Medicine 15 (2022): 1047–1056.

[39] C. Huang, Z. Liu, Z. Wei, et al., “Will the Adjustment of Insertional Pedicle Screw Positions Affect the Risk of Adjacent Segment Diseases Biomechanically? An In-Silico Study,” Frontiers in Surgery 9 (2022): 1004642.

[40] A. Tsouknidas, S. O. Sarigiannidis, K. Anagnostidis, N. Michailidis, and S. Ahuja, “Assessment of Stress Patterns on a Spinal Motion Segment in Healthy Versus Osteoporotic Bony Models With or Without Disc Degeneration: A Finite Element Analysis,” Spine Journal 15, no. S3 (2015): S17–S22.

[41] T. Lu and Y. Lu, “Comparison of Biomechanical Performance Among Posterolateral Fusion and Transforaminal, Extreme, and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis,” World Neurosurgery 129 (2019): e890–e899.

[42] S. Rastegar, P. J. Arnoux, X. Wang, and C. Aubin, “Biomechanical Analysis of Segmental Lumbar Lordosis and Risk of Cage Subsidence With Different Cage Heights and Alternative Placements in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion,” Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering 23, no. 9 (2020): 456–466.

[43] K. Matsukawa, Y. Yato, H. Imabayashi, et al., “Biomechanical Evaluation of Fixation Strength Among Different Sizes of Pedicle Screws Using the Cortical Bone Trajectory: What is the Ideal Screw Size for Optimal Fixation?,” Acta Neurochirurgica 158, no. 3 (2016): 465–471.

[44] K. Matsukawa, Y. Yato, H. Imabayashi, N. Hosogane, T. Asazuma, and K. Nemoto, “Biomechanical Evaluation of the Fixation Strength of Lumbar Pedicle Screws Using Cortical Bone Trajectory: A Finite Element Study,” Journal of Neurosurgery Spine 23, no. 4 (2015): 471–478.

[45] C. Ottardi, F. Galbusera, A. Luca, et al., “Finite Element Analysis of the Lumbar Destabilization Following Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy,” Medical Engineering & Physics 38, no. 5 (2016): 506–509.

[46] W. Fan, L. X. Guo, and M. Zhang, “Biomechanical Analysis of Lumbar Interbody Fusion Supplemented With Various Posterior Stabilization Systems,” European Spine Journal 30, no. 8 (2021): 2342–2350.

[47] D. V. Ambati, E. K. Wright, Jr., R. A. Lehman, Jr., D. G. Kang, S. C. Wagner, and A. E. Dmitriev, “Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation Provides Superior Biomechanical Stability in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Study,” Spine Journal 15, no. 8 (2015): 1812–1822.

[48] F. Y. Tsuang, C. H. Chen, L. C. Wu, Y. J. Kuo, S. C. Lin, and C. J. Chiang, “Biomechanical Arrangement of Threaded and Unthreaded Portions Providing Holding Power of Transpedicular Screw Fixation,” Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 39 (2016): 71–76.

[49] G. M. Blake and I. Fogelman, “The Role of DXA Bone Density Scans in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteoporosis,” Postgraduate Medical Journal 83, no. 982 (2007): 509–517.

[50] F. Galbusera, D. Volkheimer, S. Reitmaier, N. Berger-Roscher, A. Kienle, and H. J. Wilke, “Pedicle Screw Loosening: A Clinically Relevant Complication?,” European Spine Journal 24, no. 5 (2015): 1005–1016.

[51] C. W. Tu, K. F. Huang, H. T. Hsu, H. Y. Li, S. S. Yang, and Y. C. Chen, “Zoledronic Acid Infusion for Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Osteoporosis,” Journal of Surgical Research 192, no. 1 (2014): 112–116.

[52] R. A. Lindtner, R. Schmid, T. Nydegger, M. Konschake, and W. Schmoelz, “Pedicle Screw Anchorage of Carbon Fiber-Reinforced PEEK Screws Under Cyclic Loading,” European Spine Journal 27, no. 8 (2018): 1775–1784.

[53] Y. Amaritsakul, C. K. Chao, and J. Lin, “Biomechanical Evaluation of Bending Strength of Spinal Pedicle Screws, Including Cylindrical, Conical, Dual Core and Double Dual Core Designs Using Numerical Simulations and Mechanical Tests,” Medical Engineering & Physics 36, no. 9 (2014): 1218–1223.

[54] C. K. Chao, C. C. Hsu, J. L. Wang, and J. Lin, “Increasing Bending Strength and Pullout Strength in Conical Pedicle Screws: Biomechanical Tests and Finite Element Analyses,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 21, no. 2 (2008): 130–138.

[55] L. Weiser, G. Huber, K. Sellenschloh, et al., “Rescue Augmentation: Increased Stability in Augmentation After Initial Loosening of Pedicle Screws,” Global Spine Journal 11, no. 5 (2021): 679–685.

[56] W. Wang, G. R. Baran, H. Garg, R. R. Betz, M. Moumene, and P. J. Cahill, “The Benefits of Cement Augmentation of Pedicle Screw Fixation Are Increased in Osteoporotic Bone: A Finite Element Analysis,” Spine Deformity 2, no. 4 (2014): 248–259.

[57] K. J. Karami, L. E. Buckenmeyer, A. M. Kiapour, et al., “Biomechanical Evaluation of the Pedicle Screw Insertion Depth Effect on Screw Stability Under Cyclic Loading and Subsequent Pullout,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 28, no. 3 (2015): E133–E139.

[58] M. K. Hsieh, M. Y. Liu, J. K. Chen, et al., “Biomechanical Study of the Fixation Stability of Broken Pedicle Screws and Subsequent Strategies,” PLoS One 14, no. 6 (2019): e0219189.

[59] A. Bokov, A. Bulkin, A. Aleynik, M. Kutlaeva, and S. Mlyavykh, “Pedicle Screws Loosening in Patients With Degenerative Diseases of the Lumbar Spine: Potential Risk Factors and Relative Contribution,” Global Spine Journal 9, no. 1 (2019): 55–61.

[60] D. Grevenstein, M. J. Scheyerer, C. Meyer, et al., “Impact of Lumbar Pedicle Screw Positioning on Screw Stability—A Biomechanical Investigation,” Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon) 74 (2020): 66–72.

[61] K. Matsukawa, Y. Yato, R. A. Hynes, et al., “Cortical Bone Trajectory for Thoracic Pedicle Screws: A Technical Note,” Clinical Spine Surgery 30, no. 5 (2017): E497–E504.

[62] K. H. Chao, Y. S. Lai, W. C. Chen, et al., “Biomechanical Analysis of Different Types of Pedicle Screw Augmentation: A Cadaveric and Synthetic Bone Sample Study of Instrumented Vertebral Specimens,” Medical Engineering & Physics 35, no. 10 (2013): 1506–1512.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.