Biomechanical Effects of Different Spacing Distributions Between the Cemented Superior Boundary and Surgical Vertebral Superior Endplates After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

Abstract

Objective: Patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) treated with vertebroplasty (PVP) are experiencing an increasing number of problems such as pain recurrence, mainly due to recompression fractures of the operated vertebral body within a certain period of time after the operation, which is closely related to the distribution of intraoperative bone cement. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of different spacing distributions between the upper boundary of the cement and the upper endplate of the operated vertebra on the biomechanics of the operated vertebra after percutaneous vertebroplasty for OVCF using finite element analysis (FEA).

Methods: One patient with L1 vertebral body OVCF was selected, and computed tomography (CT) of the thoracolumbar segment was performed. The CT data were extracted to establish an FEA model of the T12–L2 vertebral bodies. Bone cement was injected into the L1 vertebral body. Based on the spacing between the upper boundary of the bone cement and the vertebral body’s upper endplates, the model vertebrae were divided into 0, 2, 4, and 6 mm spacing groups, and the human body’s upright, flexion–extension, lateral flexion, and rotational positions were simulated. The biomechanical effects of different spacing distributions on the postoperative L1 vertebral body and the injected bone cement were evaluated.

Results: In this paper, we found that the Von Mises stress of the L1 vertebrae was the smallest when the spacing between the upper boundary of the bone cement and the vertebral body’s upper endplates was 0 mm. The larger the spacing in a certain range between the upper boundary of the bone cement and the vertebral body’s upper endplates, the greater the Von Mises stress of the L1 vertebrae. However, in the stress comparison of the injected bone cement, the Von Mises stress of the bone cement was greatest when the spacing between the upper boundary of the bone cement and the upper endplate of the vertebral body was 0 mm; the larger the spacing, the smaller the Von Mises stress.

Conclusion: When the contact spacing between the upper boundary of the bone cement and the upper endplate of the vertebral body is 0 mm, it can effectively eliminate and transfer the pressure caused by the load, thus reducing the stress on the cancellous bone and further reducing the risk of vertebral refracture after surgery.

Keywords

bone cement / finite element analysis / osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture / surgical vertebral refracture / vertebroplasty

References

[1] D. Yang, Y. Zhang, X. Ma, et al., “Resources Utilisation and Economic Burden of Percuta Eousvertebroplasty or Percutaneous Kyphoplasty for Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures in China: A Retrospective Claim Database Study,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 21, no. 1 (2020): 255.

[2] J. S. Park and Y. S. Park, “Survival Analysis and Risk Factors of New Vertebral Fracture After Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fracture,” Spine Journal 21, no. 8 (2021): 1355–1361.

[3] Y. Y. Kim and K. W. Rhyu, “Recompression of Vertebral Body After Balloon Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotie Vertebral Compression Fracture,” European Spine Journal 19, no. 11 (2010): 1907–1912.

[4] C. H. Su, P. H. Tu, T. C. Yang, and Y. Y. Tseng, “Comparison of the Therapeutic Effect of Teriparatide With That of Combined Vertebroplasty With Antiresorptive Agents for the Treatment of New-Onset Adjacent Vertebral Compression Fracture After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty,” Journal of Spinal Disorders & Techniques 26 (2013): 200–206.

[5] C. Dai, G. Liang, Y. Zhang, et al., “Risk Factors of Vertebral Re-Fracture After PVP or PKP for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures, Especially in Eastern Asia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 17, no. 1 (2022): 161.

[6] H. Abuduwupuer, Y. Alimujiang, L. Hang, and T. Abudurexiti, “Influence of Bone Cement Distribution on Surgical and Adjacent Vertebral Refractures in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty,” Chinese Journal of Tissue Engineering Research 28, no. 29 (2024): 4657–4662.

[7] M. Pengpeng, C. Ming, Z. Chunlin, et al., “Three-Dimensional Finite Element Modelling Analysis of the Effect of Cement Volume on the Occurrence of Adjacent Vertebral Fractures After Vertebroplasty,” Chinese Journal of Medical Physics 15, no. 7 (2020): 92–94.

[8] F. Bereczki, M. Turbucz, R. Kiss, et al., “Stability Evaluation of Different Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Constructs in Normal and Osteoporotic Condition—A Finite Element Based Study,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 9 (2021): 749914.

[9] Y. Peng, X. P. Du, L. H. Huang, et al., “Optimizing Bone Cement Stiffness for Vertebroplasty Through Biomechanical Effects Analysis Based on Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Finite Element Modeling,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 56, no. 11 (2018): 2137–2150.

[10] B. Dai, “Experimental Study and Clinical Evaluation of the Effect of Different Injured Vertebral Pinning Lengths Combined With Transforaminal Bone Grafting on Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures” (Doctoral diss., Soochow University, 2018).

[11] A. Chemmami, B. Aour, S. Zahaf, et al., “Biomechanical Comparison of Three Total Artificial Discs: Sb-CHARITE III^®, PRODISC-L^® and Maverick^® Reinforced by a Posterior Fixation System in the Spinal Column: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis,” Structural Integrity and Life 21, no. 1 (2021): 65–83.

[12] S. Zahaf and S. Kebdani, “Study and Analysis of Mechanical Behavior Between Rigid and Dynamic Fixation Systems Analyzed by the Finite Element Method,” Journal of Biomimetics, Biomaterials and Biomedical Engineering 33 (2017): 12–31.

[13] S. Zahaf, Etude du Comportement Mécanique des Prothèses Discales dans le Rachis Lombaire (Oran, Algeria: Université des Sciences et de la Technologie d’Oran Mohamed-Boudiaf, 2017).

[14] S. Zahaf, S. Kebdani, M. Ghalem, et al., “Biomechanical Evaluation of Two Posterior Lumbar Intervertebral Fusion Surgical Scenarios Reinforced by a Rigid Posterior Fixation System in the Vertebral Column Analyzed by the Finite Element Method,” Nano Biomedicine And Engineering 10, no. 3 (2018): 258–278.

[15] N. Mao, J. Shi, D. He, et al., “Effect of Lordosis Angle Change After Lumbar/Lumbosacral Fusion on Sacrum Angular Displacement: A Finite Element Study,” European Spine Journal 23, no. 11 (2014): 2369–2374.

[16] C. S. Chen, C. K. Cheng, C. L. Liu, and W. H. Lo, “Stress Analysis of the Disc Adjacent to Interbody Fusion in Lumbar Spine,” Medical Engineering & Physics 23, no. 7 (2001): 483–491.

[17] Y. Su, X. Wang, D. Ren, Y. Liu, S. Liu, and P. Wang, “A Finite Element Study on Posterior Short Segment Fixation Combined With Unilateral Fixation Using Pedicle Screws for Stable Thoracolumbar Fracture,” Medicine (Baltimore) 97, no. 34 (August 2018): e12046.

[18] F. Zhou, S. Yang, J. Liu, et al., “Finite Element Analysis Comparing Short-Segment Instrumentation With Conventional Pedicle Screws and the Schanz Pedicle Screw in Lumbar 1 Fractures,” Neurosurgical Review 43, no. 1 (February 2020): 301–312.

[19] S. Huang, C. Zhou, X. Zhang, et al., “Biomechanical Analysis of Sandwich Vertebrae in Osteoporotic Patients: Finite Element Analysis,” Frontiers in Endocrinology 14 (2023): 1–10.

[20] M. Alizadeh, M. R. Kadir, M. M. Fadhli, et al., “The Use of X-Shaped Cross-Link in Posterior Spinal Constructs Improves Stability in Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture: A Finite Element Analysis,” Journal of Orthopaedic Research 31, no. 9 (2013): 1447–1454.

[21] H. Xu, X. Wang, Y. Han, et al., “Biomechanical Comparison of Different Prosthetic Reconstructions in Total en Bloc Spondylectomy: A Finite Element Study,” BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 23, no. 1 (2022): 955.

[22] Y. J. Jin, S. H. Yoon, K. W. Park, et al., “The Volumetric Analysis of Cement in Vertebroplasty: Relationship With Clinical Outcome and Complications,” Spine 36, no. 12 (2011): E761–E772.

[23] S. Khalilollah, H. Abdolhoseinpour, E. Rezaei, and M. S. Fakhr, “The Relationship Between Pain Relief and the Amount and Distribution of Injected Cement in Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures,” European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences 27, no. 18 (2023): 8540–8549.

[24] G. Zhao, X. Liu, and F. Li, “Balloon Kyphoplasty Versus Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures (OVCFs),” Osteoporosis International 27, no. 9 (2016): 2823–2834.

[25] M. Morozumi, Y. Matsubara, A. Muramoto, et al., “A Study of Risk Factors for Early-Onset Adjacent Vertebral Fractures After Kyphoplasty,” Global Spine Journal 10, no. 1 (2020): 13–20.

[26] W. S. Lee, K. H. Sung, H. T. Jeong, et al., “Risk Factors of Developing New Symptomatic Vertebral Compression Fractures After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Osteoporotic Patients,” European Spine Journal 15, no. 12 (2006): 1777–1783.

[27] W. Mao, F. Dong, G. Huang, et al., “Risk Factors for Secondary Fractures to Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Systematic Review,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 16, no. 1 (2021): 644.

[28] Y. Jun, “Study Related to Cement Diffusion Distribution and Clinical Efficacy of Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Spinal Fractures,” China Bone Injury 32, no. 12 (2019): 1128–1133.

[29] D. He, C. Lou, W. Yu, et al., “Cement Distribution Patterns Are Associated With Recompression in Cemented Vertebrae After Percutaneous Vertebroplasty: A Retrospective Study,” World Neurosurgery 120 (2018): e1–e7.

[30] L. H. Chen, M. K. Hsieh, J. C. Liao, et al., “Repeated Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Refracture of Cemented Vertebrae,” Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 131, no. 7 (2011): 927–933.

[31] Y. Gong, S. Yixin, M. Li, and B. Cai, “Finite Element Analysis of the Biomechanical Effects of Different Dispersion Modes of Bone Cement After Vertebroplasty,” China Orthopaedic Injury 34, no. 8 (2021): 732–737.

[32] X. Li, Y. Lu, and X. Lin, “Refracture of Osteoporotic Vertebral Body After Treatment by Balloon Kyphoplasty: Three Cases Report,” Medicine 96, no. 49 (2017): 1–5.

[33] L. Hu, H. Sun, H. Wang, et al., “Cement Injection and Postoperative Vertebral Fractures During Vertebroplasty,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 14, no. 1 (2019): 228.

[34] W. Dengzhong, C. Weijian, Z. Yuanhua, et al., “Effect of Cement Distribution Index After Vertebral Body Augmentation on Recurrent Fractures of Operated Vertebrae and Adjacent Vertebrae,” Chinese Journal of Gerontology 43, no. 3 (2022): 1392–1395.

[35] M. Wang, B. Li, Y. Wang, et al., “The Effects of Bone Cement Volume in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Thoracolumbar Junction Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Clinical Comparative Study,” Mediators of Inflammation 2022 (2022): 4230065.

[36] S. Nagaraja, H. Awada, M. Dreher, S. Gupta, and S. Miller, “Vertebroplasty Increases Compression of Adjacent IVDs and Vertebrae in Osteoporotic Spines,” Spine Journal 13, no. 12 (2013): 1872–1880.

[37] H. Dai, Y. Liu, Q. Han, et al., “Biomechanical Comparison Between Unilateral and Bilateral Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Finite Element Analysis,” Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 10 (2022): 978917.

[38] G. Baroud, J. Nemes, P. Heini, and T. Steffen, “Load Shift of the Intervertebral Disc After a Vertebroplasty: A Finite-Element Study,” European Spine Journal 12, no. 4 (2003): 421–426.

[39] Y. Q. Wang, H. Li, B. Wang, et al., “Vertebroplasty Combined With Intravertebral Filling With Cemented Gelatin Sponge Composite for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures With Upper Endplate Injury,” Orthopaedics 14, no. 3 (2023): 260–264.

[40] S. W. Tzeng and C. L. Chen, “Herniated Disc of Lumbar Spine Caused by Bone Cement Leakage After Kyphoplasty—A Case Report and Literature Review,” International Journal of Surgery Case Reports 88 (2021): 106478.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.