Classification of Emerging Scoliosis in Congenital Scoliosis After Hemivertebra Resection and Short Segmental Fusion

Abstract

Objective: Emerging scoliosis (ES) is a rare phenomenon after hemivertebra (HV) resection and short segmental fusion. Since the introduction of the ES, there have been rare in-depth studies. The aim of the present study was to further analyze the characteristics, risk factors, treatment, and prognosis of ES.

Methods: A retrospective study analyzed patients with congenital scoliosis due to a single HV who underwent posterior correction and short fusion from 2002 to 2022. ES was defined as a Cobb angle ≥20° from its initial value and an apical vertebra located ≥2 levels away from the fusion region. ES patients and non-ES patients were matched at a 1:2 ratio. Both demographics and radiological parameters were compared. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic analysis were used to identify the risk factors of ES.

Results: Among 261 patients, 13 patients (5.0%) experienced ES. There were eight females and five males. The mean age of the ES patients at the time of primary surgery was 6.6 ± 3.7 years old (2.0–13.2 years old), with a mean follow-up of 64.2 ± 47.9 months (12–156 months). The ES could be further divided into three types: balance-related ES, complication-related ES, and separated ES. There were three balance-related ESs, six complication-related ESs, and four separated ESs. At the last follow-up, six patients were under observation, six patients underwent brace treatment, and one patient underwent revision surgery. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that the magnitude of postoperative compensatory curve (CC) was an independent risk factor for ES (OR = 1.172, p = 0.014).

Conclusions: ES is an extraordinary phenomenon after HV resection and short fusion, and it can be divided into three types. The magnitude of postoperative CC was an independent risk factor for ES. According to the severity of ES, observation, brace, or surgery can be chosen.

Keywords

compensatory curve / congenital scoliosis / hemivertebra resection / short fusion

References

[1] Frank S, Piantoni L, Tello CA, Remondino RG, Galaretto E, Falconi BA, et al. Hemivertebra resection in small children. A literature review. Global Spine J. 2023; 13(3): 897–909.

[2] Wang X, Su X, Chen T, Zhou N, Xia L. The clinical and radiologic outcomes of patients with different 3-dimensional hemivertebra morphologies undergoing posterior-only Hemivertebra resection and fusion. World Neurosurg. 2021; 151: e693–e699.

[3] Hu B, Wang L, Song Y, Yang X, Liu L, Zhou C. Multiple Hemivertebrae: the natural history and treatment of 50 patients. Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(6): 1579–1589.

[4] Sebaaly A, Daher M, Salameh B, Ghoul A, George S, Roukoz S. Congenital scoliosis: a narrative review and proposal of a treatment algorithm. EFORT Open Rev. 2022; 7(5): 318–327.

[5] Lin G, Du Y, Wang S, Yang Y, Ye X, Zhao Y, et al. Ten-year trends in surgical management of 1207 congenital scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(7): 2533–2540.

[6] Liu D, Shi B, Li Y, Liu Z, Sun X, Zhu Z, et al. Failure of posterior lower lumbar/lumbosacral hemi-vertebra resection: an analysis of reasons and revision strategies. Orthop Surg. 2022; 14(7): 1413–1419.

[7] Crostelli M, Mazza O, Mariani M, Mascello D, Tundo F, Iorio C. Hemivertebra resection and spinal arthrodesis by single-stage posterior approach in congenital scoliosis and kyphoscoliosis: results at 9.6 years mean follow-up. Int J Spine Surg. 2022; 16(1): 194–201.

[8] Chen Z, Qiu Y, Zhu Z, Li S, Chen X, Xu L, et al. Posterior-only hemivertebra resection for congenital cervicothoracic scoliosis: correcting neck tilt and balancing the shoulders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43(6): 394–401.

[9] Ruiz G, Torres-Lugo NJ, Marrero-Ortiz P, Guzmán H, Olivella G, Ramírez N. Early-onset scoliosis: a narrative review. EFORT Open Rev. 2022; 7(8): 599–610.

[10] Zhang YB, Zhang JG. Treatment of early-onset scoliosis: techniques, indications, and complications. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020; 133(3): 351–357.

[11] Wang C, Meng Z, You DP, Zhu H, Wang F, Liu JH, et al. Individualized study of posterior hemivertebra excision and short-segment pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of congenital scoliosis. Orthop Surg. 2021; 13(1): 98–108.

[12] Du Y, Zhang H, Wang Y. Clinical outcomes and spinal growth after posterior hemivertebra resection and short segment fusion in children. Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1): 2755.

[13] Zarei M, Ghadimi E, Bagheri N, Jamshidi SMMM, Moharrami A, Moosavi M, et al. Posterior hemivertebra resection and short-segment fusion with lateral mass screws in congenital scoliosis: a novel strategy for the resource-limited setting. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16(1): 271.

[14] Li Z, Zhou F, Zhai S, Xia T, Pan S, Zhang F, et al. Congenital cervical scoliosis treated with concave side distraction with three-dimensional printed titanium cage. Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(10): 2709–2715.

[15] Li S, Chen ZH, Qiu Y, Xu L, Chen X, du CZ, et al. Coronal decompensation after posterior-only thoracolumbar hemivertebra resection and short fusion in young children with congenital scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43(9): 654–660.

[16] Xu Y, Li J, Li D, Li P, Kiram A, Xu H, et al. Presence of compensatory curve predicts postoperative curve progression in congenital scoliosis after thoracolumbar hemivertebra resection and short fusion. Eur Spine J. 2024.

[17] Yang X, Song Y, Liu L, Zhou C, Zhou Z, Wang L, et al. Emerging S-shaped curves in congenital scoliosis after hemivertebra resection and short segmental fusion. Spine J. 2016; 16(10): 1214–1220.

[18] Yang X, Song Y, Liu L, Wang L, Zhou C, Feng G, et al. The clinical feature analysis for the emerging scoliosis following resection of congenital hemivertebra. Chin J Spine Spinal Cord. 2018; 28: 586–592.

[19] Wang Y, Liu Z, Du C, Shi B, Sun X, Wang B, et al. The radiological outcomes of one-stage posterior-only hemivertebra resection and short segmental fusion for lumbosacral hemivertebra: a minimum of 5 years of follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14(1): 426.

[20] Nash CL Jr, Moe JH. A study of vertebral rotation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969; 51(2): 223–229.

[21] Lenz M, Oikonomidis S, Harland A, Fürnstahl P, Farshad M, Bredow J, et al. Scoliosis and prognosis—a systematic review regarding patient-specific and radiological predictive factors for curve progression. Eur Spine J. 2021; 30(7): 1813–1822.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.