The Effectiveness of Temporary Hemiepiphysiodesis for Non-idiopathic Coronal Angular Deformity of the Knee in Children: A Comparison of Hinge Eight-Plate and Traditional Eight-Plate

Abstract

Objective: Temporary hemiepiphysiodesis (TH) is a very common technique for coronal angular deformity of the knee in children, especially non-idiopathic. However, there is currently a dearth of comparative research on the hinge eight-plate (HEP) and traditional eight-plate (TEP). This study aimed to assess the clinical effectiveness and implant-related complication rates of TH using TEP and HEP for non-idiopathic coronal angular deformity, as well as to identify clinical factors affecting correction velocity.

Methods: We retrospectively observed a consecutive series of patients with non-idiopathic coronal angular deformity of the knee who underwent TH using HEP or TEP and completed the deformity correction process from July 2016 to July 2022. According to the kind of eight plates, we divided those patients into the HEP group and the TEP treatment group. Relevant clinical factors, including the mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), mechanical medial proximal tibial angle (mMPTA), screw divergence angle (SDA), angle of plate and screw (APS), hinge angle of HEP (HA), and the knee zone location of the lower extremity mechanical axis, were documented. Additionally, deformity correction velocity, complications, and clinical efficacy were assessed. Categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-squared test, Fisher exact test, or Wilcoxon test, while continuous variables were evaluated using the t-test or analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results: There were 29 patients in the HEP treatment group (seven girls and 22 boys) and 33 patients (12 girls and 21 boys) in the TEP treatment group. In all, 91.86% (79/86 knees) of the genu angular deformities were completely corrected, 6.98% (6/86 knees) had the overcorrection condition, and 10.47% (9/86 knees) had screw loosening. The swayback HEP rate was 11.29% (7/62 HEPs), which was related to the screw loosening in the HEP group (p < 0.001). The overall correction velocities and screw divergence angle change speeds in the HEP group were all significantly faster than those in the TEP group (p < 0.05). The initial APS of the HEP implanted was higher than that of TEP (p < 0.01), and multisite changes of APS during deformity correction of the HEP group were smaller than that of the TEP group.

Conclusion: HEP proved to be an appropriate device for TH for non-idiopathic coronal angular deformities of the knee with high correction velocity in children. Avoiding the occurrence of the swayback phenomenon may reduce the complications of HEP.

Keywords

Children / Hinge Eight-Plate / Non-Idiopathic Coronal Angular Deformity of the Knee / Temporary Hemiepiphysiodesis

References

[1] Burghardt RD, Specht SC, Herzenberg JE. Mechanical failures of eight-plateguided growth system for temporary hemiepiphysiodesis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2010; 30(6): 594–597.

[2] Zajonz D, Schumann E, Wojan M, Kübler FB, Josten C, Bühligen U, et al. Treatment of genu valgum in children by means of temporary hemiepiphysiodesis using eight-plates: short-term findings. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18(1): 456.

[3] Eltayeby HH, Iobst CA, Herzenberg JE. Hemiepiphysiodesis using tension band plates: does the initial screw angle influence the rate of correction? J Child Orthop. 2019; 13(1): 62–66. Epub 2019/03/07.

[4] Knapik DM, Buschbach J, Sabharwal S, Liu RW. Hemiepiphysiodesis for idiopathic genu valgum using physeal staples versus tension-band plating: a systematic review. Orthopedics. 2019; 42(6): e485–e491.

[5] Fan B, Zhao C, Sabharwal S. Risk factors for failure of temporary hemiepiphysiodesis in Blount disease: a systematic review. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020; 29(1): 65–72.

[6] Jain MJ, Inneh IA, Zhu H, Phillips WA. Tension band plate (TBP)-guided hemiepiphysiodesis in Blount disease: 10-year single-center experience with a systematic review of literature. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020; 40(2): e138–e143.

[7] Baghdadi S, Mortazavi SMJ, Dastoureh K, Moharrami A, Baghdadi T. Middle to long-term results of distal femoral tension band hemiepiphysiodesis in the treatment of idiopathic genu valgum. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2020; 30: 43–47.

[8] Dai Z-Z, Liang Z-P, Li H, Ding J, Wu Z-K, Zhang Z-M, et al. Temporary hemiepiphysiodesis using an eight-plate implant for coronal angular deformity around the knee in children aged less than 10 years: efficacy, complications, occurrence of rebound and risk factors. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1): 53.

[9] Shabtai L, Herzenberg JE. Limits of growth modulation using tension band plates in the lower extremities. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016; 24(10): 691–701.

[10] Kumar S, Sonanis SV. Growth modulation for coronal deformity correction by using eight plates-systematic review. J Orthop. 2018; 15(1): 168–172.

[11] Wu Z, Zhao D, Zhao L, Liu J, Li H, Zhu J, et al. A comparison between a hinged plate and screw system and a conventional tension-band plate and screw system used for correction of an angular deformity of the lower limb: an animal study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015; 10: 57.

[12] Kadhim M, Gauthier L, Logan K, El-Hawary R, Orlik B. Guided growth for angular correction in children: a comparison of two tension band plate designs. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2018; 27(1): 1–7.

[13] Artioli E, Mazzotti A, Ramacci V, Zielli SO, Digennaro V, Ruffilli A, et al. Indications and timing in isolated medial femoral hemiepiphysiodesis for idiopathic genu valgum: a systematic review. Knee. 2023; 40: 52–62. Epub 2022/11/22.

[14] Stevens PM. Guided growth for angular correction: a preliminary series using a tension band plate. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007; 27(3): 253–259.

[15] Park SS, Kang S, Kim JY. Prediction of rebound phenomenon after removal of hemiepiphyseal staples in patients with idiopathic genu valgum deformity. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B(9): 1270–1275.

[16] Stevens PM, Pease F. Hemiepiphysiodesis for posttraumatic tibial valgus. J Pediatr Orthop. 2006; 26(3): 385–392.

[17] Kulkarni RM, Ilyas Rushnaiwala FM, Kulkarni GS, Negandhi R, Kulkarni MG, Kulkarni SG. Correction of coronal plane deformities around the knee using a tension band plate in children younger than 10 years. Indian J Orthop. 2015; 49(2): 208–218.

[18] Danino B, Rodl R, Herzenberg JE, Shabtai L, Grill F, Narayanan U, et al. Growth modulation in idiopathic angular knee deformities: is it predictable? J Child Orthop. 2019; 13(3): 318–323. Epub 2019/07/18.

[19] Makarov MR, Jackson TJ, Smith CM, Jo CH, Birch JG. Timing of epiphysiodesis to correct leg-length discrepancy: a comparison of prediction methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018; 100(14): 1217–1222. Epub 2018/07/19.

[20] Blount WP, Clarke GR. Control of bone growth by epiphyseal stapling; a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1949; 31A(3): 464–478.

[21] Kang S, Kim JY, Park S-S. Outcomes of Hemiepiphyseal stapling for genu valgum deformities in patients with multiple hereditary exostoses: a comparative study of patients with deformities of idiopathic cause. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017; 37(4): 265–271.

[22] Yilmaz G, Oto M, Thabet AM, Rogers KJ, Anticevic D, Thacker MM, et al. Correction of lower extremity angular deformities in skeletal dysplasia with hemiepiphysiodesis: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop. 2014; 34(3): 336–345.

[23] Sweeney KR, Shi WJ, Gottschalk MB, Kappa JE, Bruce RW Jr, Fletcher ND. Radiographic assessment of guided growth: the correlation between screw divergence and change in anatomic alignment. J Pediatr Orthop. 2017; 37(4): e261–e264. Epub 2017/02/01.

[24] Sinha R, Weigl D, Mercado E, Becker T, Kedem P, Bar-On E. Eight-plate epiphysiodesis: are we creating an intra-articular deformity? Bone Joint J. 2018; 100-b(8): 1112–1116.

[25] Ballhause TM, Stiel N, Breyer S, Stücker R, Spiro AS. Does eight-plate epiphysiodesis of the proximal tibia in treating angular deformity create intra-articular deformity? Bone Joint J. 2020; 102-B(10): 1412–1418.

[26] Burghardt RD, Kanellopoulos AD, Herzenberg JE. Hemiepiphyseal arrest in a porcine model. J Pediatr Orthop. 2011; 31(4): e25–e29. Epub 2011/05/17.

[27] Leveille LA, Razi O, Johnston CE. Rebound deformity after growth modulation in patients with coronal plane angular deformities about the knee: who gets it and how much? J Pediatr Orthop. 2019; 39(7): 353–358. Epub 2019/07/16.

[28] Aksoy T, Bakircioglu S, Ozdemir E, Ramazanov R, Aksoy MC, Yilmaz G. The fate of overcorrection after hemiepiphysiodesis in valgus deformities around the knee. J Pediatr Orthop. 2023; 43(7): e567–e573. Epub 2023/05/12.

[29] Saran N, Rathjen KE. Guided growth for the correction of pediatric lower limb angular deformity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010; 18(9): 528–536. Epub 2010/09/03.

[30] Ko KR, Shim JS, Shin TS, Jang MC. Factors affecting rebound phenomenon after temporary hemiepiphysiodesis and implant removal for idiopathic genu valgum in adolescent patients. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022; 42(4): e336–e342. Epub 2022/02/11.

[31] Ulusaloglu AC, Asma A, Rogers KJ, Thacker MM, Mackenzie WGS, Mackenzie WG. Risk factors for rebound after correction of genu valgum in skeletal dysplasia patients treated by tension band plates. J Pediatr Orthop. 2022; 42(4): 190–194. Epub 2022/01/21.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.