Gender, BMI, and Age-Related Variations in Lower Limb Alignment Parameters and CPAK Phenotypes in Chinese Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis

Abstract

Objectives: Research on the distribution of and the variation in coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) in the Chinese osteoarthritis population is limited. We aimed to establish the CPAK classification based on the characteristics of lower limb alignment in the Chinese osteoarthritis population. We also investigated variations in lower limb alignment parameters and CPAK phenotypes based on gender, body mass index (BMI), and age.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on a total of 944 knees diagnosed with osteoarthritis in 479 patients from January 2017 to December 2023. A scatterplot was used to describe the distribution of the CPAK classification, and the differences in lower limb alignment parameters and the CPAK classification were compared across genders (male, female), ages (middle-aged/<65 years, elderly/≥65 years), and BMI categories (normal/<25 kg/m², overweight and obese/≥25 kg/m²) using the chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test.

Results: The average arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and joint line obliquity (JLO) were –3.03° ± 5.69° and 174.45° ± 4.29°, respectively. There was a higher prevalence of constitutional varus alignment in males and the overweight or obese group, while constitutional valgus alignment was more common in females and the normal BMI group (p < 0.05). Additionally, females had a greater apex distal JLO than males (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in lower limb alignment parameters among different age groups (p > 0.05). Although there were variations in alignment parameters across different genders and BMI categories in the knee osteoarthritis population, the predominant CPAK classifications were type I (38.03%), followed by type II (20.02%) and type IV (17.06%).

Conclusion: The most common CPAK types were I, II, and IV, and they were not influenced by gender, BMI, or age, indicating that the CPAK classification can reliably reflect constitutional alignment. A better understanding of native alignment variability can aid in providing patient-specific recommendations when considering orthopedic alignment strategies.

Keywords

arthroplasty / CPAK / knee alignment / knee osteoarthritis

References

[1] Evans JT, Walker RW, Evans JP, Blom AW, Sayers A, Whitehouse MR. How long does a knee replacement last? A systematic review and meta-analysis of case series and national registry reports with more than 15 years of follow-up. Lancet. 2019; 393: 655–663.

[2] Aglietti P, Buzzi R. Posteriorly stabilised total-condylar knee replacement. Three to eight years’ follow-up of 85 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1988; 70: 211–216.

[3] Scott CE, Howie CR, Macdonald D, Biant LC. Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement: a prospective study of 1217 patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010; 92: 1253–1258.

[4] Nakano N, Shoman H, Olavarria F, Matsumoto T, Kuroda R, Khanduja V. Why are patients dissatisfied following a total knee replacement? A systematic review. Int Orthop. 2020; 44: 1971–2007.

[5] Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J. The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470: 45–53.

[6] MacDessi SJ, Griffiths-Jones W, Harris IA, Bellemans J, Chen DB. Coronal plane alignment of the knee (CPAK) classification. Bone Joint J. 2021; 103-B: 329–337.

[7] Pagan CA, Karasavvidis T, Lebrun DG, Jang SJ, MacDessi SJ, Vigdorchik JM. Geographic variation in knee phenotypes based on the coronal plane alignment of the knee classification: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 2023; 38: 1892–1899.

[8] Gao YH, Qi YM, Huang PH, Zhao XY, Qi X. Distribution of coronal plane alignment of the knee classification in Chinese osteoarthritic and healthy population: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study. Int J Surg. 2024; 110: 2583–2592.

[9] Tarassoli P, Wood JA, Chen DB, Griffiths-Jones W, Bellemans J, MacDessi SJ. Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and stressed hip-knee-ankle angle: equivalent methods for estimating constitutional lower limb alignment in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30: 2980–2990.

[10] Sappey-Marinier E, Batailler C, Swan J, Schmidt A, Cheze L, MacDessi SJ, et al. Mechanical alignment for primary TKA may change both knee phenotype and joint line obliquity without influencing clinical outcomes: a study comparing restored and unrestored joint line obliquity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30: 2806–2814.

[11] Senel A, Eren M, Sert S, Gurpinar T, Carkci E, Polat B. Phenotyping of the Turkish population according to Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification: a retrospective cross-sectional study. Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2024; 35: 194–201.

[12] Toyooka S, Osaki Y, Masuda H, Arai N, Miyamoto W, Ando S, et al. Distribution of coronal plane alignment of the knee classification in patients with knee osteoarthritis in Japan. J Knee Surg. 2023; 36: 738–743.

[13] Mulpur P, Desai KB, Mahajan A, Masilamani A, Hippalgaonkar K, Reddy A. Radiological evaluation of the phenotype of Indian osteoarthritic knees based on the coronal plane alignment of the knee classification (CPAK). Indian J Orthop. 2022; 56: 2066–2076.

[14] Hovinga KR, Lerner AL. Anatomic variations between Japanese and Caucasian populations in the healthy young adult knee joint. J Orthop Res. 2009; 27: 1191–1196.

[15] Hsu CE, Chen CP, Wang SP, Huang JT, Tong KM, Huang KC. Validation and modification of the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee classification in the Asian population. Bone Jt Open. 2022; 3: 211–217.

[16] Liu, L., Lei, K., Du, D., Lin, Y., Pan, Z., & Guo, L. (2024). Functional knee phenotypes appear to be more suitable for the Chinese OA population compared with CPAK classification: A study based on 3D CT reconstruction models. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 32(5), 1264–1274. Portico.

[17] MacDessi SJ, Griffiths-Jones W, Harris IA, Bellemans J, Chen DB. The arithmetic HKA (aHKA) predicts the constitutional alignment of the arthritic knee compared to the normal contralateral knee: a matched-pairs radiographic study. Bone Jt Open. 2020; 1: 339–345.

[18] Matassi F, Pettinari F, Frascona F, Innocenti M, Civinini R. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Orthop Traumatol. 2023; 24: 24.

[19] Huber S, Mitterer JA, Vallant SM, Simon S, Hanak-Hammerl F, Schwarz GM, et al. Gender-specific distribution of knee morphology according to CPAK and functional phenotype classification: analysis of 8739 osteoarthritic knees prior to total knee arthroplasty using artificial intelligence. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31: 4220–4230.

[20] Steele JR, Jang SJ, Brilliant ZR, Mayman DJ, Sculco PK, Jerabek SA, et al. Deep learning phenotype automation and cohort analyses of 1946 knees using the coronal plane alignment of the knee classification. J Arthroplasty. 2023; 38: S215–S221.

[21] Eastwood DM, Sanghrajka AP. Guided growth: recent advances in a deep-rooted concept. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011; 93: 12–18.

[22] Saran N, Rathjen KE. Guided growth for the correction of pediatric lower limb angular deformity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010; 18: 528–536.

[23] Willy C, Schneider P, Engelhardt M, Hargens AR, Mubarak SJ. Richard von Volkmann: surgeon and Renaissance man. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466: 500–506.

[24] Lu Y, Zheng ZL, Lv J, Hao RZ, Yang YP, Zhang YZ. Relationships between morphological changes of lower limbs and gender during medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Orthop Surg. 2019; 11: 835–844.

[25] Jiang L, Tian W, Wang Y, Rong J, Bao C, Liu Y, et al. Body mass index and susceptibility to knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Joint Bone Spine. 2012; 79: 291–297.

[26] Haddad FS. How critical is body mass index, and who decides? Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B: 721–722.

[27] Hwang D, Wook CM, Kim SH, et al. Age and sex differences in coronal lower extremity alignment in a healthy Asian population. Knee. 2023; 45: 198–206.

[28] Do S, Lee CG, Kim DH, et al. Factors related to femoral bowing among Korean female farmers: a cross-sectional study. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2020; 32: e23.

[29] Nomoto K, Hanada M, Hotta K, Matsuyama Y. Distribution of coronal plane alignment of the knee classification does not change as knee osteoarthritis progresses: a longitudinal study from the Toei study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31: 5507–5513.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.