Analysis of Failed Posterior Fossa Decompression and an Effective Revision Surgery in Patients with Basilar Invagination and Atlantoaxial Dislocation

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze failed posterior fossa decompression (PFD) in patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation (BI-AAD). Revision surgery in these patients is challenging and has been rarely reported. In addition, the anatomical variations of the vertebral artery increase the risk of revision surgery. Here, we introduce the implementation of a new type of one-stage posterior revision surgery, whose difficulties and effects are summarized.

Methods: A total of 21 patients with BI-AAD who underwent PFD were retrospectively analyzed in our center from November 2017 to April 2021. The revision surgery in all patients was performed through the posterior approach. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and the Short Term 12 (SF-12) score were employed to evaluate the clinical symptoms and health status. The distance from the tip of the odontoid to Chamberlain’s line (DCL), the atlantodental interval (ADI), the clivus-canal angle (CCA), the diameter of the subarachnoid space (DSS), and the craniovertebral junction triangular area (CTA) were assessed radiographically. The pre- and postoperative results were compared by paired t test.

Results: The data of 21 consecutive patients were reviewed, with an average follow-up period of 28 ± 14 months. Postoperative imaging showed effectively reduced compression of BI-AAD. No implant failure or neurovascular injury occurred. Eleven patients had vertebral artery abnormalities, but none had vertebral artery injury. All patients had evidence of bone fusion on the CT scan images within a 12-month follow-up period. The JOA and SF-12 scores were significantly improved 1 year postoperatively (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Posterior surgery using the technique of interarticular distraction, fusion with cage grafting, and fixation is a safe and effective revision surgery to treat patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation who failed PFD, which will result in good outcome.

Keywords

Atlantoaxial Dislocation / Basilar Invagination / Posterior Fossa Decompression / Reduction and Internal Fixation / Revision Surgery

References

[1] Pinter NK, McVige J, Mechtler L. Basilar invagination, basilar impression, and platybasia: Clinical and imaging aspects. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2016; 20(8): 49.

[2] Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Abel MF, Menezes AH. Basilar invagination. Neurosurgery. 2010; 66(3 Suppl): 39–47.

[3] Goel A. Treatment of basilar invagination by atlantoaxial joint distraction and direct lateral mass fixation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004; 1(3): 281–286.

[4] Goel A, Muzumdar D, Desai KI. Tuberculum sellae meningioma: A report on management on the basis of a surgical experience with 70 patients. Neurosurgery. 2002; 51(6): 1358–1363. discussion 1363-4.

[5] Zhu H, Xu R, Wang S, Xia H, Yan Y, Xia Y. C1-2 fusion in atlantoaxial dislocation and basilar invagination with and without Chiari malformation: Clinical/radiological and craniometric results. World Neurosurg. 2023; 175: e1017–e1024.

[6] Shah A, Vutha R, Prasad A, Goel A. Central or axial atlantoaxial dislocation and craniovertebral junction alterations: A review of 393 patients treated over 12 years. Neurosurg Focus. 2023; 54(3): E13.

[7] Chen Z, Duan W, Chou D, Guan J, Liu Z, Jian Q, et al. A safe and effective posterior intra-articular distraction technique to treat congenital atlantoaxial dislocation associated with basilar invagination: Case series and technical nuances. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2021; 20(4): 334–342.

[8] Jian FZ, Chen Z, Wrede KH, Samii M, Ling F. Direct posterior reduction and fixation for the treatment of basilar invagination with atlantoaxial dislocation. Neurosurgery. 2010; 66(4): 678–687. discussion 687.

[9] Yang J, Ma X, Xia H, et al. Transoral anterior revision surgeries for basilar invagination with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation after posterior decompression: A retrospective study of 30 cases. Eur Spine J. 2014; 23(5): 1099–1108.

[10] Du Y, Qiao G, Yin Y, Li T, Yu X. Posterior atlantoaxial facet joint reduction, fixation and fusion as revision surgery for failed suboccipital decompression in patients with basilar invagination and atlantoaxial dislocation: Operative nuances, challenges and outcomes. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020; 194: 105793.

[11] Goel A, Dhar A, Shah A, Rai S, Bakale N, Vaja T. Revision for failed craniovertebral junction stabilization: A report of 30 treated cases. World Neurosurg. 2019; 127: e856–e863.

[12] Tan M, Jiang X, Yi P, Yang F, Tang X, Hao Q, et al. Revision surgery of irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation: A retrospective study of 16 cases. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(12): 2187–2194.

[13] Duan W, Chou D, Jiang B, Liu Z, Zhao X, Xia Z, et al. Posterior revision surgery using an intraarticular distraction technique with cage grafting to treat atlantoaxial dislocation associated with basilar invagination. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019; 31(4): 525–533.

[14] Sindgikar P, Das K, Sardhara J, et al. Craniovertebral junction anomalies: When is resurgery required? Neurol India. 2016; 64(6): 1220–1232.

[15] Salunke P, Sahoo SK. Safeguarding the anomalous vertebral artery while dissecting, drilling, and instrumentation of C1-2 joint for congenital atlantoaxial dislocation: 2-dimensional operative video. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2018; 15(5): E57.

[16] Neo M, Fujibayashi S, Miyata M, Takemoto M, Nakamura T. Vertebral artery injury during cervical spine surgery: A survey of more than 5600 operations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(7): 779–785.

[17] Perrini P, Benedetto N, Guidi E, Di Lorenzo N. Transoral approach and its superior extensions to the craniovertebral junction malformations: Surgical strategies and results. Neurosurgery. 2009; 64(5 Suppl 2): 331–342. discussion 342.

[18] Wang J, Xu T, Pu L, Mai E, Guo H, Sheng J, et al. Release, reduction, and fixation of one-stage posterior approach for basilar invagination with irreducible atlantoaxial dislocation. Br J Neurosurg. 2024; 38(2): 249–255.

[19] Wang J, Yang H, Chen Y, Liu G, Xie N, Zhang S, et al. A method to evaluate the reduction difficulty of atlantoaxial dislocation based on computed tomography quantitative analysis. World Neurosurg. 2024; 185: e283–e290.

[20] Zhao G, Song M, Duan W, Chen Z, Xue Y. Biomechanical investigation of intra-articular cage and cantilever technique in the treatment of congenital basilar invagination combined with atlantoaxial dislocation: A finite element analysis. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2022; 60(8): 2189–2199.

[21] Duan W, Du Y, Qi T, et al. The value and limitation of cervical traction in the evaluation of the reducibility of atlantoaxial dislocation and basilar invagination using the intraoperative O-arm. World Neurosurg. 2019; 132: e324–e332.

[22] Guan J, Chen Z, Wu H, Yao Q, Wang Q, Zhang C, et al. Effectiveness of posterior reduction and fixation in atlantoaxial dislocation: A retrospective cohort study of 135 patients with a treatment algorithm proposal. Eur Spine J. 2019; 28(5): 1053–1063.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.