Preliminary Application of Bilateral Submandibular Horizontal Incision in the Treatment of Upper Cervical Tumors

Abstract

The upper cervical spine has a complex anatomical structure, making anterior surgical approaches challenging and prone to complications. This study aims to explore the use of bilateral submandibular incisions to provide safer and more convenient exposure of the upper cervical spine and to assess the feasibility of this approach for anterior surgical treatment of complex upper cervical diseases. From November 2019 to August 2021, three patients with malignant tumors of the upper cervical spine were subjected to an anterior–posterior combined approach for cervical tumor resection. The cohort consisted of one male and two females, aged between 41 and 51 years. The anterior approach began with a submandibular incision, followed by blunt dissection through the prevertebral muscles to expose the diseased vertebra. Subsequently, the diseased vertebra was excised, and either a titanium cage or a pre-customized 3D-printed artificial vertebral body was implanted anteriorly. Then, posterior fixation of the cervical spine was performed using pedicle screws to provide additional stability. Follow-up ranged from 8 to 34 months. All patients experienced varying degrees of pain relief within 24 hours post-operation. Frankel grading showed improvement by at least one grade in all three cases. Regular X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging examinations revealed no tumor recurrence or involvement of adjacent vertebrae in the surgical area. The anterior bilateral submandibular horizontal incision approach offers comprehensive exposure of the anatomical structures of the upper cervical spine. This approach introduces a new option for the anterior treatment of upper cervical spine diseases.

Keywords

bilateral submandibular horizontal incision / reconstruction / tumor / upper cervical spine

References

[1] Li W, Wang B, Feng X, Hua W, Yang C. Preoperative management and postoperative complications associated with transoral decompression for the upper cervical spine. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23(1): 128.

[2] Chen H, Zhu C, Yi H, Sun H, Ma X, Wang J, et al. Incidence and management of surgical site infection in the cervical spine following a transoral approach. Int Orthop. 2022; 46(10): 2329–2337.

[3] Steinberger J, Skovrlj B, Lee NJ, et al. Surgical morbidity and mortality associated with transoral approach to the cervical spine. Spine(Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41(9): E535–E540.

[4] Zhong N, Yang M, Ma X, Gao X, Ye C, Yang J, et al. Early major complications after radical resection of primary C2-involved upper cervical chordoma through the combined anterior retropharyngeal-posterior approach: incidence and risk factors. World Neurosurg. 2021; 154: e790–e796.

[5] Dekhou AS, Morrison RJ, Gemechu JM. The superior laryngeal nerve and its vulnerability in surgeries of the neck. Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(7): 1243.

[6] Choy W, Garcia J, Safaee MM, Rubio RR, Loftus PA, Clark AJ. Superior laryngeal nerve palsy after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion: a case report and cadaveric description. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2022; 23(2): e152–e155.

[7] Girolami M, Griffoni C, Asunis E, Falzetti L, Bandiera S, Barbanti Brodano G, et al. Custom-made 3D-printed implants for anterior column reconstruction in the upper cervical spine after Intralesional extracapsular excision-report of 2 cases and literature review. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(20): 6058.

[8] Puttlitz CM, Harms J, Xu Z, et al. A biomechanical analysis of C2 corpectomy constructs. Spine J. 2007; 7(2): 210–215.

[9] Wang Y, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Zhang H, Sun H, Hao D. One-stage posterior en-bloc spondylectomy following reconstruction with individualized 3D printed artificial vertebrae for multi-segment thoracolumbar metastases: case report and literature review. Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(1): 115–123.

[10] Wang X, Xu H, Han Y, Wu J, Song Y, Jiang Y, et al. Biomechanics of artificial pedicle fixation in a 3D-printed prosthesis after total en bloc spondylectomy: a finite element analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16(1): 213.

[11] Zhou H, Liu S, Li Z, Liu X, Dang L, Li Y, et al. 3D-printed vertebral body for anterior spinal reconstruction in patients with thoracolumbar spinal tumors. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022; 37(2): 274–282.

[12] Cheng H, Luo G, Xu D, Li Y, Wang Z, Yang H, et al. Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes of 3D-printed artificial vertebral body with titanium mesh cage in single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: a meta-analysis. Front Surg. 2023; 9: 1077551.

[13] Hu X, Kenan S, Cheng M, Cai W, Huang W, Yan W. 3D-printed patient-customized artificial vertebral body for spinal reconstruction after total En bloc spondylectomy of complex multi-level spinal tumors. Int J Bioprint. 2022; 8(3): 576.

[14] Hu J, Song G, Chen H, Xu H, Wang A, Wang X, et al. Surgical outcomes and risk factors for surgical complications after en bloc resection following reconstruction with 3D-printed artificial vertebral body for thoracolumbar tumors. World J Surg Oncol. 2023; 21(1): 385.

[15] Lin M, Paul R, Liao X, Doulgeris J, Menzer EL, Dhar UK, et al. A new method to evaluate pressure distribution using a 3D-printed C2–C3 cervical spine model with an embedded sensor array. Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(23): 9547.

[16] Hu P, Du S, Wei F, et al. Reconstruction after resection of C2 vertebral tumors: a comparative study of 3D-printed vertebral body versus titanium mesh. Front Oncol. 2022; 12: 1065303.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.