Comparison between a Novel Knee Arthrometer and Simultaneous Stress Radiography for the Diagnosis of Complete and Partial Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears

Abstract

Objectives: The type of ligamentous tear and the degree of knee laxity have important guiding significance for the diagnosis and management of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears. Instrumental measurement is necessary for ACL tears since physical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) cannot provide an objective and quantitative assessment of knee laxity. This study aimed to compare the application of a novel knee arthrometer and simultaneous stress radiography in differentiating between complete and partial acute ACL tears, and further assess the correlation between the two measurements.

Methods: A total of 106 patients with complete acute ACL tears and 52 patients with partial acute ACL tears were included in the study. Preoperative arthrometry and simultaneous stress radiography were performed using the Ligs arthrometer at 90, 120, and 150 N to assess side-to-side difference (SSD) in anterior knee laxity. The optimal threshold was determined using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was used to assess the diagnostic value of the measurement. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between the two measurements.

Results: The optimal differential SSD thresholds in the Ligs arthrometer were 2.7 mm at 90 N, 3.8 mm at 120 N, and 4.6 mm at 150 N. Similarly, the optimal differential SSD thresholds in simultaneous stress radiography were 3.8 mm at 90 N, 5.1 mm at 120 N, and 5.6 mm at 150 N. The AUC analysis revealed that the Ligs arthrometer was fairly informative at 90 N (AUC = 0.851), 120 N (AUC = 0.878), and 150 N (AUC = 0.884), and simultaneous stress radiography was highly informative at 90 N (AUC = 0.910), 120 N (AUC = 0.925), and 150 N (AUC = 0.948). Moreover, the AUC of the combined measurements was 0.914 at 90 N, 0.931 at 120 N, and 0.951 at 150 N. A significantly strong correlation was found between the two measurements at 90 N (r = 0.743, p < 0.001), 120 N (r = 0.802, p < 0.001), and 150 N (r = 0.823, p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The Ligs arthrometer and simultaneous stress radiography proved to be valid diagnostic tools to differentiate between complete and partial acute ACL tears, with a strong correlation between the two measurements in SSD values. Compared with single instrumental measurement, the combination of the two measurements can further improve the diagnostic value in this regard.

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament / Knee arthrometer / Knee laxity / Stress radiography

References

[1] Mather RC 3rd, Koenig L, Kocher MS, Dall TM, Gallo P, Scott DJ, et al. Societal and economic impact of anterior cruciate ligament tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95(19): 1751–1759.

[2] Dejour D, Ntagiopoulos PG, Saggin PR, Panisset JC. The diagnostic value of clinical tests, magnetic resonance imaging, and instrumented laxity in the differentiation of complete versus partial anterior cruciate ligament tears. Art Ther. 2013; 29(3): 491–499.

[3] Stone AV, Marx S, Conley CW. Management of partial tears of the anterior cruciate ligament: a review of the anatomy, diagnosis, and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021; 29(2): 60–70.

[4] Koch JEJ, Ben-Elyahu R, Khateeb B, Ringart M, Nyska M, Ohana N, et al. Accuracy measures of 1.5-tesla MRI for the diagnosis of ACL, meniscus and articular knee cartilage damage and characteristics of false negative lesions: a level III prognostic study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1): 124.

[5] Shantanu K, Singh S, Srivastava S, Saroj AK. The validation of clinical examination and MRI as a diagnostic tool for cruciate ligaments and meniscus injuries of the knee against diagnostic arthroscopy. Cureus. 2021; 13(6): e15727.

[6] Rohman EM, Macalena JA. Anterior cruciate ligament assessment using arthrometry and stress imaging. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2016; 9(2): 130–138.

[7] Panisset JC, Ntagiopoulos PG, Saggin PR, Dejour D. A comparison of Telos™ stress radiography versus Rolimeter™ in the diagnosis of different patterns of anterior cruciate ligament tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012; 98(7): 751–758.

[8] Svantesson E, Hamrin Senorski E, Webster KE, Karlsson J, Diermeier T, Rothrauff BB, et al. Clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament injury: panther symposium ACL injury clinical outcomes consensus group. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 8(7): 2325967120934751.

[9] Branch TP, Mayr HO, Browne JE, Campbell JC, Stoehr A, Jacobs CA. Instrumented examination of anterior cruciate ligament injuries: minimizing flaws of the manual clinical examination. Art Ther. 2010; 26(7): 997–1004.

[10] Arneja S, Leith J. Review article: validity of the KT-1000 knee ligament arthrometer. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2009; 17(1): 77–79.

[11] Robert H, Nouveau S, Gageot S, Gagnière B. A new knee arthrometer, the GNRB: experience in ACL complete and partial tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009; 95(3): 171–176.

[12] Beldame J, Mouchel S, Bertiaux S, Adam JM, Mouilhade F, Roussignol X, et al. Anterior knee laxity measurement: comparison of passive stress radiographs Telos(^®) and “Lerat” and GNRB(^®) arthrometer. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012; 98(7): 744–750.

[13] James EW, Williams BT, LaPrade RF. Stress radiography for the diagnosis of knee ligament injuries: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472(9): 2644–2657.

[14] van Eck CF, van den Bekerom MP, Fu FH, Poolman RW, Kerkhoffs GM. Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of physical examinations with and without anaesthesia. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21(8): 1895–1903.

[15] Ryu SM, Na HD, Shon OJ. Diagnostic tools for acute anterior cruciate ligament injury: GNRB, Lachman test, and Telos. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2018; 30(2): 121–127.

[16] van Eck CF, Loopik M, van den Bekerom MP, Fu FH, Kerkhoffs GM. Methods to diagnose acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis of instrumented knee laxity tests. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21(9): 1989–1997.

[17] Li J, Tang J, Yao L, Fu W, Deng Q, Xiong Y, et al. The validity of the Ligs digital arthrometer at different loads to evaluate complete ACL ruptures. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11: 1049100.

[18] Wu D, Wang D, Han Y, Guo L, Wang S. A novel digital arthrometer to measure anterior tibial translation. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1): 101.

[19] Flint JH, Wade AM, Giuliani J, Rue JP. Defining the terms acute and chronic in orthopaedic sports injuries: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2014; 42(1): 235–241.

[20] Lee HJ, Park YB, Kim SH. Diagnostic value of stress radiography and arthrometer measurement for anterior instability in anterior cruciate ligament injured knees at different knee flexion position. Art Ther. 2019; 35(6): 1721–1732.

[21] Li J, Mao Y, Wang D, Fu W, Li Q, Tang X, et al. Correlation between the location and distance of kissing contusions and knee laxity in acute noncontact ACL injury. Am J Sports Med. 2023; 51(12): 3179–3189.

[22] Milano G, Colosio A, Scaini A, Motta M, Raggi A, Zanoni F, et al. A new knee arthrometer demonstrated to be reliable and accurate to assess anterior tibial translation in comparison with stress radiographs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 143(6): 3241–3250.

[23] Bouguennec N, Odri GA, Graveleau N, Colombet P. Comparative reproducibility of TELOS™ and GNRB^® for instrumental measurement of anterior tibial translation in normal knees. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015; 101(3): 301–305.

[24] Mouton C, Theisen D, Meyer T, Agostinis H, Nührenbörger C, Pape D, et al. Combined anterior and rotational knee laxity measurements improve the diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015; 23(10): 2859–2867.

[25] Lefevre N, Bohu Y, Naouri JF, Klouche S, Herman S. Validity of GNRB^® arthrometer compared to Telos™ in the assessment of partial anterior cruciate ligament tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 22(2): 285–290.

[26] Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016; 15(2): 155–163.

[27] Klouche S, Lefevre N, Cascua S, Herman S, Gerometta A, Bohu Y. Diagnostic value of the GNRB^® in relation to pressure load for complete ACL tears: a prospective case-control study of 118 subjects. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2015; 101(3): 297–300.

[28] Wang Q, Li M, Lou EH, Wong MS. Reliability and validity study of clinical ultrasound imaging on lateral curvature of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8): e0135264.

[29] Klasan A, Putnis SE, Kandhari V, Oshima T, Fritsch BA, Parker DA. Healthy knee KT1000 measurements of anterior tibial translation have significant variation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28(7): 2177–2183.

[30] Collette M, Courville J, Forton M, Gagnière B. Objective evaluation of anterior knee laxity; comparison of the KT-1000 and GNRB^® arthrometers. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012; 20(11): 2233–2238.

[31] Zhou L, Xu Y, Zhang J, Guo L, Zhou T, Wang S, et al. Multiplanar knee kinematics-based test battery helpfully guide return-to-sports decision-making after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10: 974724.

[32] Beldame J, Bertiaux S, Roussignol X, Lefebvre B, Adam JM, Mouilhade F, et al. Laxity measurements using stress radiography to assess anterior cruciate ligament tears. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011; 97(1): 34–43.

[33] Jorn LP, Fridén T, Ryd L, Lindstrand A. Simultaneous measurements of sagittal knee laxity with an external device and radiostereometric analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998; 80(1): 169–172.

[34] Stäubli HU, Jakob RP. Anterior knee motion analysis. Measurement and simultaneous radiography. Am J Sports Med. 1991; 19(2): 172–177.

[35] Granberry WM, Noble PC, Woods GW. Evaluation of an electrogoniometric instrument for measurement of laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990; 72(9): 1316–1322.

[36] Wirz P, von Stokar P, Jakob RP. The effect of knee position on the reproducibility of measurements taken from stress films: a comparison of four measurement methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2000; 8(3): 143–148.

[37] Lee YS, Han SH, Jo J, Kwak KS, Nha KW, Kim JH. Comparison of 5 different methods for measuring stress radiographs to improve reproducibility during the evaluation of knee instability. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(6): 1275–1281.

[38] Dejour H, Bonnin M. Tibial translation after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Two radiological tests compared. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994; 76(5): 745–749.

[39] Lerat JL, Moyen BL, Cladière F, Besse JL, Abidi H. Knee instability after injury to the anterior cruciate ligament. Quantification of the Lachman test. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000; 82(1): 42–47.

[40] Lerat JL, Moyen B, Jenny JY, Perrier JP. A comparison of pre-operative evaluation of anterior knee laxity by dynamic X-rays and by the arthrometer KT 1000. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1993; 1(1): 54–59.

[41] Fleming BC, Brattbakk B, Peura GD, Badger GJ, Beynnon BD. Measurement of anterior-posterior knee laxity: a comparison of three techniques. J Orthop Res. 2002; 20(3): 421–426.

[42] Franklin JL, Rosenberg TD, Paulos LE, France EP. Radiographic assessment of instability of the knee due to rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. A quadriceps-contraction technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73(3): 365–372.

[43] Murgier J, Béranger JS, Boisrenoult P, Steltzlen C, Pujol N. Prospective comparative study of knee laxity with four different methods in anterior cruciate ligament tears. Int Orthop. 2018; 42(8): 1845–1851.

[44] Noh JH, Nam WD, Roh YH. Anterior tibial displacement on preoperative stress radiography of ACL-injured knee depending on knee flexion angle. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2019; 31(1): 14.

[45] Rai SK, Gupta TP, Singh VB, Kale A, Vij V, Shaki O. Retrospective analysis and risk of progression of partial anterior cruciate ligament injuries in a young population. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 143(4): 2063–2071.

[46] Diermeier TA, Rothrauff BB, Engebretsen L, Lynch A, Svantesson E, Hamrin Senorski EA, et al. Treatment after ACL injury: panther symposium ACL treatment consensus group. Br J Sports Med. 2021; 55(1): 14–22.

[47] Park YG, Ha CW, Park YB, Na SE, Kim M, Kim TS, et al. Is it worth to perform initial non-operative treatment for patients with acute ACL injury?: a prospective cohort prognostic study. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2021; 33(1): 11.

[48] Moon HS, Choi CH, Kim S, Yoo JH, Jung M, Kwon HJ, et al. Outpatient-based diagnostic criteria for partial ACL injury: clinical outcomes of non-operative treatment and radiographic predictor. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 143(4): 2027–2036.

[49] Blanke F, Trinnes K, Oehler N, Prall WC, Lutter C, Tischer T, et al. Spontaneous healing of acute ACL ruptures: rate, prognostic factors and short-term outcome. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023; 143(7): 4291–4298.

[50] Guenoun D, Le Corroller T, Amous Z, Pauly V, Sbihi A, Champsaur P. The contribution of MRI to the diagnosis of traumatic tears of the anterior cruciate ligament. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2012; 93(5): 331–341.

[51] Phelan N, Rowland P, Galvin R, O’Byrne JM. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of MRI for suspected ACL and meniscal tears of the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016; 24(5): 1525–1539.

[52] Runer A, Roberti di Sarsina T, Starke V, Iltchev A, Felmet G, Braun S, et al. The evaluation of Rolimeter, KLT, KiRA and KT-1000 arthrometer in healthy individuals shows acceptable intra-rater but poor inter-rater reliability in the measurement of anterior tibial knee translation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 29(8): 2717–2726.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.