Overloaded Vertebral Body Following Consecutive Three-Level Hybrid Surgery Comparing with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Abstract

Objective: Based on the varying number and relative positions of cervical disc replacement (CDR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures, three-segment hybrid surgery (HS) presents a diverse structural approach. Currently, the potential differential effects of HS with different segment combinations and surgical procedures on overloaded vertebral body (OVB) occurrence remain unexplored. The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of HS and ACDF in treating cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD), aiming to provide further insights into OVB.

Methods: This study included patients with three-level CDDD who underwent ACDF or HS at our institution. Eligible patients were divided into three groups: Type I (one-level CDR and two-level ACDF), Type II (two-level CDR and one-level ACDF), and ACDF (three-level ACDF). For radiographic analysis, patients were further divided into the Replacement Segment Group and the Nonreplacement Segment Group based on the presence of replacement segments above and below the OVB. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and neck disability index (NDI) scores. The cervical radiological parameters assessed included (1) vertebral cross-sectional area (CSA), (2) wedge angle (WA), (3) anterior vertebral height (AH), (4) posterior vertebral height (PH), and (5) Hounsfield unit (HU) values. Statistical methods included paired t-test, ANOVA test, and chi-square test. Independent samples t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were used to compare the differences between two groups according to the results of normal distribution test.

Results: A total of 123 patients, evenly distributed among three groups, were included and were well matched in terms of demographic characteristics. The likelihood of vertebral body collapse (VBC) was notably higher in the ACDF group (41.5%) compared with the Type I (17.9%) and Type II (8.9%) groups (p < 0.01). Following surgery, both at 3 and 6 months, the ACDF group demonstrated higher VAS neck scores and NDI scores compared with the Type I and Type II groups (p < 0.01). Additionally, the WA and AH values of the upper and lower adjacent OVB were consistently lower in the ACDF group than in the Type I and Type II groups at 6 and 12 months and at the final follow-up (p < 0.01). Notably, in the Nonreplacement Segment Group, WA significantly decreased at 12 months postoperatively and at the final follow-up compared with the Replacement Segment Group (p < 0.01).

Conclusions: Three levels of HS appear to reduce stress concentrations and alleviate morphological changes in OVB. The occurrence of more VBC patients with OVB was associated with the use of Zero-P or Zero-P VA implants.

Keywords

Clinical Outcomes / Overloaded Vertebral Body / Radiological Outcomes / Three-Level Surgery / Vertebral Body Collapse

References

[1] Chen S, Huang K, Liu H, Wu T, He J, Yao M, et al. Overloaded vertebral body: a unique radiographic phenomenon following multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18: 879.

[2] Sun B, Han Q, Sui FX, Zhang AB, Liu Y, Xia P, et al. Biomechanical analysis of customized cage conforming to the endplate morphology in anterior cervical discectomy fusion: a finite element analysis. Heliyon. 2023; 9: e12923.

[3] Tsuang FY, Li MJ, Chu PH, Tsou NT, Sun JS. Mechanical performance of porous biomimetic intervertebral body fusion devices: an in vitro biomechanical study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18: 71.

[4] Lin H, Zhao W, Wang X, Yan X, Zhu G, Liang D, et al. A new potential complication in 2-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile devices: collapse of the middle cervical vertebra. World Neurosurg. 2022; 165: e175–e190.

[5] Zhang J, Chen W, Weng R, Liang D, Jiang X, Lin H. Biomechanical effect of endplate defects on the intermediate vertebral bone in consecutive two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24: 407.

[6] Hollyer MA, Gill EC, Ayis S, Demetriades AK. The safety and efficacy of hybrid surgery for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurochir. 2020; 162: 289–303.

[7] Li W, Zhan B, Jiang X, Zhou G, Li J, Wang Y. A randomized controlled study of two different fixations in anterior cervical discectomy of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2022; 30: 10225536221118601.

[8] Campion C, Crawford CH, Glassman SD, Berkay F, Mkorombindo T, Carreon LY. Correction and maintenance of cervical alignment: 3-level ACDF versus Corpectomy-ACDF “hybrid” procedures. Clin Spine Surg. 2022; 36: E118–E122.

[9] Takase H, Tayama K, Nakamura Y, Regenhardt RW, Mathew J, Murata H, et al. Anterior cervical decompression and C5 palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of three reconstructive surgeries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020; 45: 1587–1597.

[10] Fay LY, Huang WC, Wu JC, Chang HK, Tsai TY, Ko CC, et al. Arthroplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: similar results to patients with only radiculopathy at 3 years’ follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014; 21: 400–410.

[11] De la Garza-Ramos R, Xu R, Ramhmdani S, Kosztowski T, Bydon M, Sciubba DM, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes following 3-and 4-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016; 24: 885–891.

[12] Tu TH, Wu JC, Cheng H, Mummaneni PV. Hybrid cervical disc arthroplasty. Neurosurg Focus. 2017; 42: V5.

[13] Brotzki C, Petridis AK, Steiger HJ, Bostelmann T, Bostelmann R. Comparison of different hybrid techniques for the treatment of multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease-analysis of prospectively collected clinical, radiologic, and psychological parameters. World Neurosurg. 2020; 140: e112–e120.

[14] Xiong Y, Xu L, Yu X, Yang Y, Zhao D, Hu Z, et al. Comparison of 6-year follow-up result of hybrid surgery and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of contiguous two-segment cervical degenerative disc diseases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43: 1418–1425.

[15] Michalopoulos GD, Bhandarkar AR, Jarrah R, Yolcu YU, Alvi MA, Ghaith AK, et al. Hybrid surgery: a comparison of early postoperative outcomes between anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and cervical disc arthroplasty. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022; 36: 575–584.

[16] Zhang J, Meng F, Ding Y, Li J, Han J, Zhang X, et al. Comprehensive analysis of hybrid surgery and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in cervical diseases: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99: e19055.

[17] Huang K, Liu H, Wang B, Wu T, Ding C, He J, et al. Cervical disc arthroplasty combined with two-level ACDF for the treatment of contiguous three-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a comparative study. J Orthop Res. 2023; 41: 1105–1114.

[18] Wu TK, Wang BY, Cheng D, Rong X, Lou JG, Hong Y, et al. Clinical and radiographic features of hybrid surgery for the treatment of skip-level cervical degenerative disc disease: a minimum 24-month follow-up. J Clin Neurosci. 2017; 40: 102–108.

[19] Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res. 1993; 8: 1137–1148.

[20] Abudouaini H, Wu T, Liu H, Wang B, Chen H. The predictive value of Hounsfield units for titanium mesh cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. Front Surg. 2022; 9: 1012364.

[21] Cheng XJ, Jin L, Wang X, Zhang W, Shen Y. Predictors of poor outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy patients underwent anterior hybrid approach: focusing on change of local kyphosis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15: 369.

[22] Tu TH, Wang CY, Chen YC, Wu JC. Multilevel cervical disc arthroplasty: a review of optimal surgical management and future directions. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023; 38: 372–381.

[23] Kim KD, Coric D, Khachatryan A, Brady BL, Lillehaugen T, McCormack M, et al. A real-world analysis of hybrid CDA and ACDF compared to multilevel ACDF. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24: 191.

[24] Lee NJ, Lehman RA. Current evidence for hybrid constructs: simultaneous ACDF/arthroplasty and arthroplasty adjacent to previous ACDF. Clin Spine Surg. 2023; 36: 398–403.

[25] Wong CE, Hu HT, Hsieh MP, Huang KY. Optimization of three-level cervical hybrid surgery to prevent adjacent segment disease: a finite element study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8: 154.

[26] Xu S, Liang Y, Yu G, Zhu Z, Wang K, Liu H. Exploration on sagittal alignment and clinical outcomes after consecutive three-level hybrid surgery and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a minimum of a 5-year follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15: 79.

[27] Jang SR, Lee SB, Cho KS. A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus fusion combined with artificial disc replacement for treating 3-level cervical Spondylotic disease. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017; 60: 676–683.

[28] Hassanabadi N, Berger C, Papaioannou A, Cheung AM, Rahme E, Leslie WD, et al. Variation in bone mineral density and fractures over 20 years among Canadians: a comparison of the Canadian multicenter osteoporosis study and the Canadian longitudinal study on aging. Osteoporos Int. 2023; 34: 357–367.

[29] Wang M, Meng X, Li Y, Feng Y, Chang Z, Hai Y. Effects of anti-osteoporosis treatment in the elderly with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2016; 50: 186–190.

[30] Mao Y, Jindong Z, Zhaohui F. Is brace necessary after cervical surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101: e29791.

[31] Yao M, Wu T, Liu H, Huang K, He J, Chen S, et al. More anterior bone loss in middle vertebra after contiguous two-segment cervical disc arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19: 234.

[32] Lovecchio F, Ang B, Louie PK, Chaudary C, Shah SP, Punyala A, et al. Bone density distribution in the cervical spine. Global Spine J. 2024; 14: 169–176.

[33] Lee HJ, You ST, Kim JH, Kim IS, Sung JH, Hong JT. Significance of cervical spine computed tomography Hounsfield units to predict bone mineral density and the subsidence after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Clin Spine Surg. 2021; 34: E450–e457.

[34] Ji C, Yu S, Yan N, Wang J, Hou F, Hou T, et al. Risk factors for subsidence of titanium mesh cage following single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020; 21: 32.

[35] Wang Z, Mei J, Feng X, Deng C, Tian X, Lv J, et al. Low cervical vertebral CT value increased early subsidence of titanium mesh cage after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022; 17: 355.

[36] Huang W, Tian Y, Wang H, Zou F, Ma X, Jiang J, et al. Comparative analysis of the biomechanics of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with multiple segmental plates fixation versus single multilevel plate fixation: a finite element study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23: 848.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.