How to Set Working Cannula in Endoscopic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Morphometric Analysis Based on Computed Tomography

Abstract

Objectives: There is a high risk of nerve root injury during endoscopic-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF). This study used computed tomography (CT) imaging to assess the relationship between the exiting nerve root and its surroundings, and the corresponding intervertebral disc. We also measured the approximate position and angle for the placement of the working cannula to reduce the risk of nerve root injury during Endo-TLIF procedures in the Chinese population.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at our institution between December 2021 and December 2022. A total of 115 patients suffering from low back pain were recruited for the study. For each participant, three-dimensional (3D) vertebral models of the lumbar segments from L3 to S1 were constructed based on their CT images. The nerve root–disc distance, cannula insertion bypass distance and angle, foraminal height and width, exiting nerve root height, and nerve root–pedicle distance were measured. A paired t-test was used to compare measurements between the left and right sides, while inter- and intraobserver reproducibility was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: From L3/4 to L5/S1 segments, the ideal cannula insertion distance range was 37.51 ± 4.91–120.38 ± 37.71 mm at L3/4; 42.38 ± 5.29–116.25 ± 27.22 mm at L4/5; and 37.78 ± 4.86–69.26 ± 12.64 mm at L5/S1. The appropriate cannula insertion angle range was 30.86° ± 5.05°–62.59° ± 6.66° at L3/4; 34.30° ± 4.73°–60.88° ± 7.34° at L4/5; and 35.89° ± 4.18°–47.65° ± 7.38° at L5/S1. The height of the intervertebral foramen (IVF) gradually decreased, and the width steadily increased. The exiting nerve root height and the nerve root–pedicle distance slightly decreased caudally.

Conclusion: From L3/4 to L5/S1, the range of working cannula insertion distance and angle gradually decreased, and the exiting nerve root height occupying the IVF gradually increased. Our measurement can reduce the risk of nerve root injury caused by inserting the working cannula during Endo-TLIF.

Keywords

Computed Tomography / Endoscopic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (Endo-TLIF) / Exiting Nerve Root / Intervertebral Foramen / Three-Dimensional Reconstruction

References

[1] Zhang KH, Zhang WH, Xu BS, Dong XM, Guo L, du LL, et al. CT-based morphometric analysis of approach of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Surg. 2019; 11(2): 212–220.

[2] Tormenti MJ, Maserati MB, Bonfield CM, Gerszten PC, Moossy JJ, Kanter AS, et al. Perioperative surgical complications of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a single-center experience. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012; 16(1): 44–50.

[3] Foley KT, Holly LT, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(15 Suppl): S26–S35.

[4] Guan J, Bisson EF, Dailey AT, Hood RS, Schmidt MH. Comparison of clinical outcomes in the National Neurosurgery Quality and outcomes database for open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41(7): E416–E421.

[5] Heemskerk JL, Oluwadara Akinduro O, Clifton W, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Abode-Iyamah KO. Long-term clinical outcome of minimally invasive versus open single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis. Spine J. 2021; 21(12): 2049–2065.

[6] Jasper GP, Francisco GM, Telfeian AE. Endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for an extruded lumbar disc herniation. Pain Physician. 2013; 16(1): E31–E35.

[7] Lv Y, Chen M, Wang SL, Qin RJ, Ma C, Ding QR, et al. Endo-TLIF versus MIS-TLIF in 1-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective randomized pilot study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2022; 212: 107082.

[8] Zhao XB, Ma HJ, Geng B, Zhou HG, Xia YY. Early clinical evaluation of percutaneous full-endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw insertion for treating degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Orthop Surg. 2021; 13(1): 328–337.

[9] Wu W, Yang S, Diao W, Wang D, Guo Y, Yan M, et al. Analysis of clinical efficacy of endo-LIF in the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative diseases. J Clin Neurosci. 2020; 71: 51–57.

[10] Shi L, Ding T, Shi Y, Wang F, Wu C. Comparison of the outcomes of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative diseases: a retrospective matched case-control study. World Neurosurg. 2022; 167: e1231–e1240.

[11] Ge M, Zhang Y, Ying H, Feng C, Li Y, Tian J, et al. Comparison of hidden blood loss and clinical efficacy of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Int Orthop. 2022; 46(9): 2063–2070.

[12] Ahn Y, Youn MS, Heo DH. Endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a comprehensive review. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2019; 16(5): 373–380.

[13] Lee SH, Kang HS, Choi G, Kong BJ, Ahn Y, Kim JS, et al. Foraminoplastic ventral epidural approach for removal of extruded herniated fragment at the L5-S1 level. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2010; 50(12): 1074–1078.

[14] Hirayama J, Hashimoto M, Sakamoto T. Clinical outcomes based on preoperative Kambin’s triangular working zone measurements on 3D CT/MR fusion imaging to determine optimal approaches to transforaminal endoscopic lumbar Diskectomy. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2020; 81(4): 302–309.

[15] Fujiwara A, An HS, Lim TH, Haughton VM. Morphologic changes in the lumbar intervertebral foramen due to flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation: an in vitro anatomic and biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(8): 876–882.

[16] Torun F, Dolgun H, Tuna H, Attar A, Uz A, Erdem A. Morphometric analysis of the roots and neural foramina of the lumbar vertebrae. Surg Neurol. 2006; 66(2): 148–151. discussion 151.

[17] Evins AI, Banu MA, Njoku I Jr, Elowitz EH, Härtl R, Bernado A, et al. Endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy. J Clin Neurosci. 2015; 22(4): 730–734.

[18] Arslan M, Comert A, Acar HI, Ozdemir M, EIhan A, Tekdemir I, et al. Nerve root to lumbar disc relationships at the intervertebral foramen from a surgical viewpoint: An anatomical study. Clin Anat. 2012; 25(2): 218–223.

[19] Arslan M, Comert A, Acar HI, Ozdemir M, EIhan A, Tekdemir I, et al. Neurovascular structures adjacent to the lumbar intervertebral discs: an anatomical study of their morphometry and relationships. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011; 14(5): 630–638.

[20] Hurday Y, Xu B, Guo L, Cao Y, Wan Y, Jiang H, et al. Radiographic measurement for transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic approach (PELD). Eur Spine J. 2017; 26(3): 635–645.

[21] Modi HN, Suh SW, Song HR, Yang JH. Lumbar nerve root occupancy in the foramen in achondroplasia: a morphometric analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(4): 907–913.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.