Effect of Distraction Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Ankle Arthritis

Abstract

Objective: Currently, the traditional treatment of moderate-to-severe ankle arthritis is joint fusion or joint replacement. The aim of this article is to explore the clinical efficacy of distraction arthroplasty in the treatment of moderate-to-severe ankle arthritis.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted with a total of 34 cases who were diagnosed with moderate-to-severe ankle arthritis and treated by distraction arthroplasty from January 2007 to November 2021. The average age was 42.3 years. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle–hindfoot score and pain visual analog scale (VAS) were used to evaluate ankle pain and functional improvement before surgery and at the last follow-up. Based on age, the patients were divided into the ≤45-year-old group [young group, 15 cases, age (36.37 ± 4.31) years old] and the >45-year-old group [middle-aged and elderly group, 19 cases, age (53.74 ± 3.17) years old]. The analysis included comparing preoperative and postoperative AOFAS ankle–hindfoot and VAS scores and the influence of age on distraction arthroplasty.

Results: All 34 patients were followed up, and the follow-up time ranged from 13 to 143 months, with an average of 45.3 months. The follow-up times for the young and middle-to-elderly groups were (33.19 ± 21.37) months and (55.63 ± 29.69) months, respectively. At the last follow-up, the AOFAS ankle–hindfoot and VAS scores were significantly improved compared with the preoperative assessment (p < 0.05). According to the etiological analysis, except for Pilon fracture, which showed no differences pre- and postoperation in the AOFAS ankle–hindfoot score and VAS score (p > 0.05), all other patients showed significant differences in these two scores (p < 0.05). The difference in preoperative AOFAS ankle–hindfoot scores between the young and middle-to-elderly groups was statistically significant (t = 3.422, p = 0.021). The preoperative and postoperative comparison of preoperative VAS scores, AOFAS ankle–hindfoot scores, and VAS scores before and after surgery showed no differences (p > 0.05). The joint space width (JSW) of 10 patients who were followed up for more than 5 years was (2.9 ± 0.5) mm. Two patients who were followed up for more than 10 years showed 3.3 and 3.0 mm, respectively, JSW.

Conclusion: Distraction arthroplasty with the Ilizarov external fixator can achieve satisfactory results in the treatment of moderate-to-severe ankle arthritis (except arthritis caused by Pilon fracture surgery). Age has no statistical impact on the efficacy of distraction arthroplasty.

Keywords

Ankle Arthritis / Distraction Arthroplasty / External Fixator

References

[1] Barg A, Saltzman CL. Single-stage supramalleolar osteotomy for coronal plane deformity. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014; 7(4): 277–291.

[2] Valderrabano V, Horisberger M, Russell I, Dougall H, Hintermann B. Etiology of ankleosteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 467(7): 1800–1806.

[3] Barg A, Pagenstert G, Hugle T, Gloyer M, Wiewiorski M, Henninger HB, et al. Ankle osteoarthritis: etiologydiagnostics, and classification. Foot Ankle Clin. 2013; 18(3): 411–426.

[4] Jamjoom BA, Dhar S. Outcomes of revision Total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin. 2024; 29(1): 171–184.

[5] Barg A, Wimmer MD, Wiewiorski M, Wirtz DC, Pagenstert GI, Valderrabano V. Total anklereplacement. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015; 112(11): 177–184.

[6] Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Kumai T, Tamai S. Low tibial osteotomy forosteoarthritis of the ankle: results of a new operation in 18 patients. Bone Joint Sung (Br). 1995; 77(1): 50–54.

[7] Dabash S, Buksbaum JR, Fragomen A, Rozbruch SR. Distractionarthroplasty in osteoarthritis of the foot and ankle. World Orthop. 2020; 11(3): 145–157.

[8] deMeireles AJ, Wulcano E. The role of distraction arthroplasty inmanaging ankle osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Clin. 2022; 27(1): 145158.

[9] Deie M, Ochi M, Adachi N, Kajiwara R, Kanaya A. A new articulated distractionarthroplasty device for treatment of the osteoarthritic knee joint: apreliminary report. Art Ther. 2007; 23(8): 833–838.

[10] Saltzman CL, Hillis SL, Stolley MP, Anderson DD, Amendola A. Motion versus fixeddistraction of the joint in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis: aprospective randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 2012; 94(11): 961–970.

[11] Chan JJ, Garden E, Nordio A, Guzman JZ, Vulcano E. Distraction arthroplasty asacute and definitive treatment for open ankle fracture dislocation. Orthopedics. 2021; 44(1): e148–e150.

[12] Volkov MV, Oganesian OV. Restoration offunction in the knee12and elbow with a hinge-distractor apparatus. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 1975; 57(5): 591–600.

[13] Judet R, Judet T. The use ofa hinge distraction apparatus afterarthrolysis and arthroplasty (author’s transl). Rev Chir OrthopReparatrice Appar Mot. 1978; 64(5): 353–365.

[14] van Valburg AA, van Roermund PM, Lammens J, van Melkebeek J, Verbout AJ, Lafeber EP, et al. CanIlizarov joint distraction delay the need for an arthrodesis of theankle? A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995; 77(5): 720–725.

[15] Sagray BA, Levitt BA, Zgonis T. Ankle arthrodiastasis and15interpositional ankle exostectomy. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2012; 29(4): 501–507.

[16] Maffulli N, Longo UG, Locher J, Romeo G, Salvatore G, Denaro V. Outcome of ankle arthrodesis and ankle prosthesis: a review of the current status. Br Med Bull. 2017; 124(1): 91–112.

[17] Fukawa T, Yamaguchi S, Akatsu Y, Yamamoto Y, Akagi R, Sasho T. Safety and efficacy of intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma in patients with ankle osteoarthritis. Foot Ankle Int. 2017; 38(6): 596–604.

[18] Giannini S, Buda R, Faldini C, Vannini F, Romagnoli M, Grandi G, et al. The treatment of severeposttraumatic arthritis of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 2007; 89(Supp1 3): 15–28.

[19] Cheng YM, Huang P, Hong SH, Lin SY, Liao CC, Chiang HC, et al. Low tibial osteotomy formoderate ankle arthritis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2001; 121(6): 355–358.

[20] Thomas R, Daniels TR, Parker K. Gait analysis and functionaoutcomes following ankle arthrodesis for isolated ankle arthritis. Bonejoint Surg(Am). 2006; 88(3): 526–535.

[21] Tanaka Y, Takakura Y, Hayashi K, Taniguchi A, Kumai T, Sugimoto K. Low tibial osteotomy forvarus-type osteoarthritis of the ankle. J Bone Joint Surg (Br). 2006; 88(7): 909–913.

[22] Takakura Y, Takaoka T, Tanaka Y, Yajima H, Tamai S. Results of opening-wedgeosteotomy for the treatment of a post-traumatic varus deformity olthe ankle. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80(2): 213–218.

[23] Ploegmakers JJW, van Roermund PM, van Melkebeek I, Lammens J, Bijlsma JWJ, Lafeber FPJG, et al. Prolonged clinical benefit from joint distraction in the treatment otankle osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2005; 13(7): 582–588.

[24] Buda R, Castagnini F, Cavallo M, Ramponi L, Vannini F, Giannini S. “One step” bone marrowderived cells transplantation and joint debridement forosteochondral lesions of the talus in ankle osteoarthritis: clinicaand radiological outcomes at 36 months. Arch Orthop Traumasurg. 2016; 136(1): 107–116.

[25] Saltzman CL, Hillis SL, Stolley MP, Anderson DD, Amendola A. Motion versus fixed distraction of the joint in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012; 94(11): 961–970.

[26] Yang Z, Cui L, Tao S, Zhao J, Wang L, Zhang F, et al. Comparisons between ankle distractionarthroplasty and supramalleolar osteotomy for treatment of post.Traumatic varus ankle osteoarthritis. BMC Surg. 2022; 22(1): 178.

[27] Nguyen MP, Pedersen DR, Gao Y, Saltzman CL, Amendola A. Intermediate term followup after ankle distraction for treatment of end stage osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am). 2015; 97(7): 590–596.

[28] Marijnissen AC, Vincken KL, Viergever MA, van Roy HL, Van Roermund PM, Lafeber FP, et al. Ankle imagesdigital analysis (AIDA): digital measurement of joint space widthand subch ondral sclerosis on standard radiographs. OsteoarthritisCartilage. 2001; 9(3): 264–272.

[29] Zhao H, Qu W, Li Y, Liang X, Ning N, Zhang Y, et al. Functional analysis of distractionarthroplasty in the treatment of ankle osteoarthritis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017; 12(1): 18.

[30] Fragomen AT, McCoy TH, Meyers KN, Rozbruch SR. Minimum distractiongap: how much ankle joint space is enough in ankle distractionarthroplasty? HSS J. 2014; 10(1): 6–12.

[31] Liu XN, Chang F, Zhang HY, Zhong Z, Xue P, Huang BZ. Ankle distraction arthroplastyfor the treatment of severe ankle arthritis: case report, technicalnote, and literature review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2020; 99(39): e22330.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.