Change in Femoral Offset after Closed Reduction and Dynamic Hip Screw Osteosynthesis Via Lateral Approach in Patients with Medial Femoral Neck Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis

Marc-Pascal Meier, , Mark-Tilmann Seitz, , Dominik Saul, , Roland Gera , Paul Jonathan Roch, , Katharina Jäckle, , Wolfgang Lehmann, , Thelonius Hawellek,

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (12) : 3118 -3128.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (12) : 3118 -3128. DOI: 10.1111/os.14220
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Change in Femoral Offset after Closed Reduction and Dynamic Hip Screw Osteosynthesis Via Lateral Approach in Patients with Medial Femoral Neck Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective: Closed reduction and dynamic hip screw (DHS) osteosynthesis are preferred as joint-preserving therapy in case of medial femoral neck fractures (MFNFs). A change in the femoral offset (CFO) can cause gait abnormality, impingement, or greater trochanteric pain syndrome. It is unknown whether the femoral offset (FO) can be postoperatively fully restored. The aim of the study was to investigate the extent of a possible CFO in hip joints after DHS osteosynthesis in the case of an MFNF.

Methods: In this retrospective study, 104 patients (mean age: 71.02 years, men: n = 50, women: n = 54) with MFNF who underwent closed reduction and DHS osteosynthesis were analyzed by postoperative x-rays to assess CFO between the operated (OS) and nonoperated joint side (NOS). The studies covered the time period 2010–2020. A statistical comparison was performed between the mean values of FO between OS and NOS, taking into account patient age, gender, and fracture severity.

Results: All operated hip joints showed a CFO. In 76.0% (79 of 104), the FO decreased (FOD), and in 24.0% (25 of 104), the FO increased (FOI). A critical CFO (>15% CFO) was detected in 52.9% (55 of 104). In hip joints with postoperative FOD, the mean FO between NOS (49.15 mm [±6.56]) and OS (39.32 mm [±7.87]) and in hip joints with postoperative FOI the mean FO between NOS (41.59 [±8.21]) and OS (47.27 [±6.68]) differed significantly (p < 0.001). Preoperative FO (r S: –0.41; p > 0.001) and caput–collum–diaphyseal angle (CCD; r S: 0.34; p > 0.001) correlated with postoperative CFO. FOD was found in hip joints with a preoperative FO >44 mm and CCD <134° vice versa FOI in hip joints with a preoperative FO <44 mm and CCD >134°.

Conclusion: Closed reduction and DHS osteosynthesis in patients with MFNF result in a clustered significant CFO. The individual FO should be taken into account pre- and intraoperatively to avoid a postoperative extensive CFO.

Keywords

Caput–collum–diaphyseal Angle / Closed Reduction / Dynamic Hip Screw / Femoral Neck Fracture / Femoral Offset / Lateral Approach

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Marc-Pascal Meier,, Mark-Tilmann Seitz,, Dominik Saul,, Roland Gera, Paul Jonathan Roch,, Katharina Jäckle,, Wolfgang Lehmann,, Thelonius Hawellek,. Change in Femoral Offset after Closed Reduction and Dynamic Hip Screw Osteosynthesis Via Lateral Approach in Patients with Medial Femoral Neck Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2024, 16(12): 3118-3128 DOI:10.1111/os.14220

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Su Z, Liang L, Hao Y. Medial femoral plate with cannulated screw for Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2021; 34: 169–277.

[2]

Smektala R, Schleiz W, Fischer B, Bonnaire F, Schulze-Raestrup U, Siebert H, et al. Mediale Schenkelhalsfraktur: mögliche Gründe für eine verzögerte operative Versorgung. Teil 2: Ergebnisse der Daten der externen stationären Qualitätssicherung im Rahmen sekundärer Datennutzung. Unfallchirurg. 2014; 117: 128–137.

[3]

Gao Z, Wang M, Shen B, Chu X, Ruan D. Treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture with medial femoral neck support screw: a biomechanical and clinical study. Sci Rep. 2021; 11: 21418.

[4]

Mattisso L, Bojan A, Enocson A. Epidemiology, treatment and mortality of trochanteric and subtrochanteric hip fractures: data from the Swedish fracture register. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018; 19: 369.

[5]

Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA. World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int. 1997; 7: 407–413.

[6]

Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int. 1992; 2: 285–289.

[7]

AO Trauma, AO/OTA fracture and dislocation classification compendium—2018. [cited 12th July 2024] Available from: https://www.aofoundation.org/trauma/clinical-library-and-tools/journals-and-publications/classification

[8]

Braun KF, Hanschen M, Biberthaler . Fracture arthroplasty of femoral neck fractures. Unfallchirurg. 2016; 119: 331–334.

[9]

Saß M, Mittlmeier T. Joint-preserving treatment of medial femoral neck fractures with an angular stable implant. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2016; 28: 291–308.

[10]

Stoffel K, Zderic I, Gras F, Sommer C, Eberli U, Mueller D, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the femoral neck system in unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures: a comparison with the dynamic hip screw and cannulated screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31: 131–137.

[11]

Bonnaire F, Weber A. Se2-Leitlinie Schenkelhalsfraktur des Erwachsenen. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (DGU), Österreichische Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie (ÖGU). 2015. Available from: https://www.awmf.org/uploads/tx_szleitlinien/012-001l_S2e_Schenkelhalsfraktur_2015-10-abgelaufen.pdf

[12]

Nauth A, Creek AT, Zellar A, Lawendy AR, Dowrick A, Gupta A, et al. Fracture fixation in the operative management of hip fractures (FAITH): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017; 389: 1519–1527.

[13]

Bidolegui FM, Pereira S, Vindver G. Treatment of femoral neck fractures with Osteosynthesis. Ten keys to success. Rev Asoc Argent Ortop Traumatol. 2021; 86: 110–121.

[14]

Boukebous B, Guillon P, Vandenbussche E, Rousseau MA. Correlation between femoral offset loss and dynamic hip screw cut-Out complications after Pertrochanteric fractures: a case-control study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015; 28: 1321–1326.

[15]

Suhm N, Kressig RW, Ummenhofer W, Bingisser R, Rikli D, Bally K, et al. Betagte Patienten mit hüftgelenknaher Fraktur. Swiss Medical Forum. 2015; 15: 277–281.

[16]

Choi WK, Cho MR, Kim DY. Proximal femoral shortening after operation with compression hip screws for intertrochanteric fracture in patients under the age of 60 years. Hip Pelvis. 2015; 27: 98–103.

[17]

Lecerf G, Fessy MH, Philippot R, Massin P, Giraud F, Flecher X, et al. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templing and hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009; 95: 210–219.

[18]

Rüdiger HA, Guillemin M, Latypova A, Terrier A. Effect of changes of femoral offset on abductor and joint reaction forces in total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017; 137: 1579–1585.

[19]

Morrey BF. Difficult complications after hip joint replacement. Clin Orthop. 1997; 344: 179–187.

[20]

Der SV. Einfluss des postoperativen femoralen offset auf die Funktion des Hüftgelenks nach trochantärer Femurfraktur und Versorgung mittels intramedullären Marknagels. Marburg: Deutschland; 2016. p. 49–63.

[21]

Haar P. Die Akzeleration des Femoralen Offsets und die Auswirkungen auf die Hüftgelenkprothetik. Deutschland: Rostock; 2007. p. 30–54.

[22]

Zeiler G, Schuh A. Die Arthrodese des Hüftgelenks und Ihre Remobilisation. Orthopade. 2004; 33: 939–958.

[23]

Charles MN, Bourne RB, Davey JR, Greenwald AS, Morrey BF, Rorabeck CH. Soft-tissue balancing of the hip: the role of femoral offset restoration. Instr Courset Lect. 2005; 54: 131–141.

[24]

Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH. Soft tissue balancing: the hip. J Athroplast. 2002; 17: 17–22.

[25]

Pfirrmann CW, Nötzli HP, Dora C, Hodler J, Zanetti M. Abductor tendons and muscles assessed at MR imaging after total hip arthroplasty in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Radiology. 2005; 235: 969–976.

[26]

Jasani V, Richards P, Wynn-Jones C. Pain relatet to the psoas muscle after total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002; 84: 991–993.

[27]

Ranawat CS, Dorr LD, Inglis AE. Total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980; 62: 1059–1065.

[28]

Hoffmann M, Runge M, Dufek P, Westphal KC. Posttraumatische Korrekturen und Revision am proximalen Femur. Trauma Berufskrankh. 2016; 18: 479–485.

[29]

Gordon M, Berntsson PO, Sjölund E, Demir Y, Hedbeck CJ, Stark A, et al. Loss of offset after pertrochanteric hip fractures affects hip function one year after surgery with a short intramedullary nail. A prospective cohort study. Int Orthop. 2016; 40: 799–806.

[30]

Yépez AK, Abreu M, Germani B, Galia CR. Prevalence of femoroacetabular impingement morphology in asymptomatic youth soccer players: magnetic resonance imaging study with clinical correlation. Rev Bras Ortop. 2017; 24: 14–20.

[31]

Espinosa N, Beck M, Rothefluh DA, Ganz R, Leunig M. Treatment of femoro-acetanular impingement: preliminary results of labaral refixation. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007; 89: 36–53.

[32]

Sariali E, Klouche S, Mouttet A, Pascal-Moussellard H. The effect of femoral offset modification on gait after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2014; 85: 123–127.

[33]

Flecher X, Ollivier M, Argenson JN. Lower limb length and offset in total hip arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016; 102: 9–20.

[34]

Pianka MA, Serino J, DeFroda SF, Bodendorfer BM. Greater trochanteric pain syndrome: evaluation and management of a wide spectrum pathology. SAGE Open Med. 2021; 9: 205031212110225.

[35]

Bonnaire F, Hellmund R, Lein T. DHS – Stärken und Schwächen der Platten-Schrauben-Kombination. Trauma Berufskrankh. 2003; 5: 162–170.

[36]

Lechler P, Frink M, Gulati A, Murray D, Renkawitz T, Bücking B, et al. The influence of hip rotation on femoral offset in plain radiographs. Acta Orthop. 2014; 85: 389–395.

[37]

Garden RS. Low-angle fixation in fractures of femoral neck. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961; 43: 647–663.

[38]

Der Schenkelhalsbruch PF. Ein mechanisches problem. Br J Surg. 1935; 23: 874.

[39]

Fine MD, Romagnoli M, Toscano A, Bondi A, Nanni M, Zaffagnini S. Is there a role for femoral offset restoration during total hip arthroplasty? A systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017; 103: 349–355.

[40]

Bjørdal F, Bjørgul K. The role of femoral offset and abductor lever arm in total hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol. 2015; 16: 325–330.

[41]

Shi XT, Li CF, Cheng CM, Feng CY, Li SX, Liu JG. Preoperative planning for Total hip arthroplasty for neglected developmental dysplasia of the hip. Orthop Surg. 2019; 11: 348–355.

[42]

Cao Z, Yang W, Yang M, Yang M, Kong X, Wang Y, et al. Application of preoperative digital-template planning in total hip arthroplasty via direct anterior approach. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019; 15: 1374–1378.

[43]

Huang TW, Hsu WH, Peng KT, Lee CY. Effect of integrity of the posterior cortex in displaced femoral neck fractures on outcome after surgical fixation in young adults. Injury. 2011; 42: 217–222.

[44]

Bombah FM, Diawara M, Ekani BY, Nana T, Mikiela A. Complications after dynamic hip screw Osteosynthesis of proximal femoral fractures at Army instructional hospital-Libreville. Case Rep Orthop eCollection. 2021; 2021: 1–6.

[45]

Ceynowa M, Zerdzicki K, Klosowski P, Pankowski R, Rocławski M, Mazurek T. The early failure of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw in femurs with a wide medullary canal. A biomechanical study of intertrochanteric fractures. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2020; 71: 201–207.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

118

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/