A Novel Classification of Migrated Lumbar Disk Herniation Based on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Algorithm Recommendations for Full-Endoscopic Discectomy

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective clinical study.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish a novel classification of migrated lumbar disk herniation (LDH) based on magnetic resonance imaging and provide appropriate treatment strategies for each type through algorithms.

Summary of Background Data: Full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy is a surgical technique that has been developed rapidly in recent years. For migrated LDH, few surgeons currently classify it with multiplanar positioning, and there is no consensus on the choice of treatment strategy. Therefore, we established a new multiplanar classification criteria that can localize the lesions more accurately than previous studies.

Methods: A total of 263 eligible patients from March 2017 to March 2022 were included. Protrusions for each patient were located based on our classification and the surgical approach was selected according to our algorithms. The clinical symptoms of all patients before surgery, and at 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery were collected. Evaluations were performed using visual analogue scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and modified MacNab criteria. We used the chi-squared test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and t-test to compare perioperative results and postoperative 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up results.

Results: VAS (low back pain) scores were reduced from 5.33 ± 2.67 to 0.73 ± 0.77 (p < 0.001), and VAS (leg pain) scores were reduced from 7.44 ± 2.21 to 0.37 ± 0.51 (p < 0.001). ODI scores improved from 58.46 ± 8.04 to 12.57 ± 2.51 (p < 0.001). According to the modified MacNab criteria, the excellent and good rate reached 92.78% at the 12-month follow-up. Twenty-six patients developed complications, all of which improved after treatment. Recurrence occurred in 13 patients, and four of them underwent secondary surgery.

Conclusions: This is an innovative classification method using multi-plane positioning, and the algorithm used with it can help surgeons make appropriate choices when using endoscopic technology to treat migrated LDH. Statistical analysis of follow-up data confirmed that this is a safe and effective strategy.

Keywords

algorithm / classification / full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy / migrated lumbar disk herniation

References

[1] Ravindra VM, Senglaub SS, Rattani A, Dewan MC, Härtl R, Bisson E, et al. Degenerative lumbar spine disease: estimating global incidence and worldwide volume. Global Spine J. 2018; 8(8): 784–794.

[2] Wu X, Fan G, He S, Gu X, Yang Y. Comparison of clinical outcomes of two-level PELD and foraminoplasty PELD for highly migrated disc herniations: acomparative study. Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019: 9681424.

[3] Choi KC, Lee JH, Kim JS, Sabal LA, Lee S, Kim H, et al. Unsuccessful percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a single-center experience of 10, 228 cases. Neurosurgery. 2015; 76(4): 372–380. discussion 380-1; quiz 381.

[4] Yeung AT. Minimally invasive disc surgery with the Yeung endoscopic spine system (YESS). Surg Technol Int. 1999; 8: 267–277.

[5] Kim HS, Raorane HD, Wu PH, Yi YJ, Jang IT. Evolution of endoscopic transforaminal lumbar approach for degenerative lumbar disease. J Spine Surg. 2020; 6(2): 424–437.

[6] Huang Z, Zhao P, Zhang C, Wu J, Liu R. Value of imaging examinations in diagnosing lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Surg. 2022; 9: 1020766.

[7] Kim HS, Adsul N, Kapoor A, Choi SH, Kim JH, Kim KJ, et al. A Mobile outside-in technique of transforaminal lumbar endoscopy for lumbar disc herniations. J Vis Exp. 2018; 138: 57999.

[8] Feng WL, Yang JS, Wei D, Gong HL, Xi Y, Lv HQ, et al. Gradient local anesthesia for percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy at the L5/S1 level: a feasibility study. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15(1): 413.

[9] Zhang J, Li Q, Du Y, Yan Z, Chen L, Wang L. Efficacy analysis of percutaneous endoscopic spinal surgery for young patients with discogenic low Back pain. J Pain Res. 2022; 15: 665–674.

[10] Zhou Z, Ni HJ, Zhao W, Gu GF, Chen J, Zhu YJ, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy via transforaminal approach combined with interlaminar approach for L4/5 and L5/S1 two-level disc herniation. Orthop Surg. 2021; 13(3): 979–988.

[11] Kim CH, Chung CK, Woo JW. Surgical outcome of percutaneous endoscopic Interlaminar lumbar discectomy for highly migrated disk herniation. Clin Spine Surg. 2016; 29(5): E259–E266.

[12] Osman SG, Nibu K, Panjabi MM, Marsolais EB, Chaudhary R. Transforaminal and posterior decompressions of the lumbar spine. A comparative study of stability and intervertebral foramen area. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997; 22(15): 1690–1695.

[13] Bernucci C, Giovanelli M. Translaminar microsurgical approach for lumbar herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) in the “hidden zone”: clinical and radiologic results in a series of 24 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(2): 281–284.

[14] Khandge AV, Kim JS. Modified interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy for highly Upmigrated disc herniation: aproctorship description of the technique via translaminar route. Neurospine. 2020; 17(suppl 1): S66–S73.

[15] Raorane HD, Kim H, Doshi R, Doshi K. Full endoscopic translaminar approach using 7 mm working endoscope for high up migrated disc herniation with severely collapsed disc space: technical note. J Minim Invasive Spine Surg Tech. 2023; 8(1): 120–124.

[16] Lee S, Kim SK, Lee SH, Kim WJ, Choi WC, Choi G, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for migrated disc herniation: classification of disc migration and surgical approaches. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(3): 431–437.

[17] Mysliwiec LW, Cholewicki J, Winkelpleck MD, Eis GP. MSU classification for herniated lumbar discs on MRI: toward developing objective criteria for surgical selection. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19(7): 1087–1093.

[18] Pan Z, Ha Y, Yi S, Cao K. Efficacy of transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) technique in treating lumbar disc herniation. Med Sci Monit. 2016; 22: 530–539.

[19] Hofstetter CP, Ahn Y, Choi G, Gibson JNA, Ruetten S, Zhou Y, et al. AOSpine consensus paper on nomenclature for working-channel endoscopic spinal procedures. Global Spine J. 2020; 10(2 suppl): 111S–121S.

[20] Kang T, Park SY, Park GW, Lee SH, Park JH, Suh SW. Biportal endoscopic discectomy for high-grade migrated lumbar disc herniation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2020; 1-6: 360–365.

[21] Gadjradj PS, Harhangi BS, Amelink J, van Susante J, Kamper S, van Tulder M, et al. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy versus open microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation: asystematic review and meta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021; 46(8): 538–549.

[22] Yuan S, Mei Y, Zang L, Lu X, Fan N, Du P. Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation versus lower lumbar disc herniation: clinical outcomes and technical consideration. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1): 470.

[23] Compagnone D, Mandelli F, Ponzo M, Langella F, Cecchinato R, Damilano M, et al. Complications in endoscopic spine surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2024; 33(2): 401–408.

[24] Lee CH, Choi M, Ryu DS, Choi I, Kim CH, Kim HS, et al. Efficacy and safety of full-endoscopic decompression via Interlaminar approach for central or lateral recess spinal stenosis of the lumbar spine: ameta-analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43(24): 1756–1764.

[25] Birjandian Z, Emerson S, Telfeian AE, Hofstetter CP. Interlaminar endoscopic lateral recess decompression-surgical technique and early clinical results. J Spine Surg. 2017; 3(2): 123–132.

[26] Meng S, Xu D, Han S, Li G, Wang Y, Shen Y, et al. Fully endoscopic 360° decompression for central lumbar spinal stenosis combined with disc herniation: technical note and preliminary outcomes of 39 cases. J Pain Res. 2022; 15: 2867–2878.

[27] Ruetten S, Komp M, Godolias G. An extreme lateral access for the surgery of lumbar disc herniations inside the spinal canal using the full-endoscopic uniportal transforaminal approach-technique and prospective results of 463 patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30(22): 2570–2578.

[28] Li XF, Jin LY, Lv ZD, Su XJ, Wang K, Shen HX, et al. Efficacy of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic decompression treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis in elderly patients. Exp Ther Med. 2020; 19(2): 1417–1424.

[29] Yuan AL, Shen X, Chen B. Treatment of calcified lumbar disc herniation by intervertebral foramen remolding: aretrospective study. J Pain Res. 2022; 15: 1719–1728.

[30] Cheng Y, Zhang Q, Li Y, Chen X, Wu H. Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy for L5-S1 calcified lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study. Front Surg. 2022; 9: 998231.

[31] Shin SH, Bae JS, Lee SH, Keum HJ, Jang WS. Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for hard or calcified lumbar disc herniation: anew surgical technique and clinical outcomes. World Neurosurg. 2020; 143: e224–e231.

[32] Quillo-Olvera J, Akbary K, Kim JS. Percutaneous endoscopic transpedicular approach for high-grade down-migrated lumbar disc herniations. Acta Neurochir. 2018; 160(8): 1603–1607.

[33] Lin GX, Park CW, Suen TK, Kotheeranurak V, Jun SG, Kim JS. Full endoscopic technique for high-grade up-migrated lumbar disk herniation via a translaminar keyhole approach: preliminary series and technical note. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg. 2020; 81(5): 379–386.

[34] Patgaonkar P, Datar G, Agrawal U, Palanikumar C, Agrawal A, Goyal V, et al. Suprailiac versus transiliac approach in transforaminal endoscopic discectomy at L5-S1: a new surgical classification of L5-iliac crest relationship and guidelines for approach. J Spine Surg. 2020; 6(Suppl 1): S145–S154.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.