Clinical Outcome of an All Arthroscopic ‘Whole Layer’ Rotator Cuff Repair Technique with Simultaneous Biceps Tenodesis

Abstract

Objective: To retrospectively evaluate clinical outcomes, including function and pain, of patients after our all arthroscopic “whole layer” rotator cuff repair technique with simultaneous biceps tenodesis procedure; factors influencing results were also evaluated. Given the frequent association of rotator cuff tear with long head of biceps lesion and the need for effective combined treatment strategies, this study aims to evaluate the efficacy of our technique and compare it with established methods. We hypothesized that our technique would significantly improve function and reduce pain in patients with rotator cuff tears and biceps pathology.

Methods: This is a retrospective study that included patients older than 20 years who underwent all arthroscopic “whole layer” rotator cuff repair technique with simultaneous biceps tenodesis procedures for concomitant rotator cuff tear and long head biceps pathology, from 2016 to 2020. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores paired t-tests were used for analysis and statistical significance was set at p < 0.05(two-tailed). The satisfaction rate and complications were also evaluated.

Results: After an average follow-up of 2.3 years, 118 patients demonstrated significant improvement in both the ASES score (from 36.13 to 95.01, p < 0.001) and VAS score (from 6.81 to 0.89, p < 0.001). Ninety-four percent of the patients reported satisfaction with the surgical outcome. No complications related to Popeye deformity, biceps cramping pain, or ipsilateral shoulder reoperation were observed. Factors such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, alcohol consumption, hypertension, and diabetes did not influence the results. Patients showed significant improvement in both the ASES and VAS scores (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: At a mean follow-up time of 2.3 years, the all arthroscopic “whole layer” rotator cuff repair technique with simultaneous biceps tenodesis is a therapeutic and efficient procedure. The procedure revealed a satisfactory functional outcome, reduced pain, and minimal complications and reoperations.

Keywords

Arthroscopic surgery / Rotator cuff tears / Shoulder impingement / SLAP tear / Supraspinatus

References

[1] Gerhardt C, Hug K, Pauly S, Marnitz T, Scheibel M. Arthroscopic single-row modified mason-allen repair versus double-row suture bridge reconstruction for supraspinatus tendon tears: a matched-pair analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(12): 2777–2785.

[2] Klinger HM, Steckel H, Spahn G, Buchhorn GH, Baums MH. Biomechanical comparison of double-loaded suture anchors using arthroscopic Mason-Allen stitches versus traditional transosseous suture technique and modified Mason-Allen stitches for rotator cuff repair. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007; 22(1): 106–111.

[3] Lee KW, Yang DS, Lee GS, Ma CH, Choy WS. Clinical outcomes and repair integrity after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: suture-bridge versus double-row modified Mason-Allen technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27(11): 1953–1959.

[4] Lapner P, Henry P, Athwal GS, Moktar J, McNeil D, MacDonald P. Treatment of rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022; 31(3): e120–e129.

[5] Hein J, Reilly JM, Chae J, Maerz T, Anderson K. Retear rates after arthroscopic single-row, double-row, and suture bridge rotator cuff repair at a minimum of 1 year of imaging follow-up: a systematic review. Art Ther. 2015; 31(11): 2274–2281.

[6] Genuario JW, Donegan RP, Hamman D, Bell JE, Boublik M, Schlegel T, et al. The cost-effectiveness of single-row compared with double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2012; 94(15): 1369–1377.

[7] Nelson CO, Sileo MJ, Grossman MG, Serra-Hsu F. Single-row modified mason-allen versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical and surface area comparison. Art Ther. 2008; 24(8): 941–948.

[8] Chillemi C, Mantovani M. Arthroscopic trans-osseous rotator cuff repair. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2017; 7(1): 19–25.

[9] Ditsios K, Agathangelidis F, Boutsiadis A, Karataglis D, Papadopoulos P. Long head of the biceps pathology combined with rotator cuff tears. Adv Orthop. 2012; 2012: 405472.

[10] Mardani-Kivi M, Keyhani S, Ebrahim-Zadeh MH, Hashemi-Motlagh K, Saheb-Ekhtiari K. Rotator cuff tear with concomitant long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) degeneration: what is the preferred choice? Open subpectoral versus arthroscopic intraarticular tenodesis. J Orthop Traumatol. 2019; 20(1): 26.

[11] Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A, Nové-Josserand L, Neyton L, Szabo I. Arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: clinical and radiographic results of 307 cases. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14(3): 238–246.

[12] Gill TJ, McIrvin E, Mair SD, Hawkins RJ. Results of biceps tenotomy for treatment of pathology of the long head of the biceps brachii. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001; 10(3): 247–249.

[13] Mazzocca AD, McCarthy MB, Ledgard FA, Chowaniec DM, McKinnon WJ Jr, Delaronde S, et al. Histomorphologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon in common shoulder pathologies. Arthroscopy. 2013; 29(6): 972–981.

[14] Hufeland M, Wicke S, Verde PE, Krauspe R, Patzer T. Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy in isolated LHB lesions: a prospective randomized clinical trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019; 139(7): 961–970.

[15] MacDonald P, Verhulst F, McRae S, Old J, Stranges G, Dubberley J, et al. Biceps tenodesis versus tenotomy in the treatment of lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a prospective double-blinded randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2020; 48(6): 1439–1449.

[16] Zhou P, Liu J, Deng X, Li Z. Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis for lesions of the long head of the biceps tendon: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine. 2021; 100(3): e23993.

[17] Wittstein JR, Queen R, Abbey A, Toth A, Moorman CT 3rd. Isokinetic strength, endurance, and subjective outcomes after biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a postoperative study. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(4): 857–865.

[18] Hsu AR, Ghodadra NS, Provencher MT, Lewis PB, Bach BR. Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis: a review of clinical outcomes and biomechanical results. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20(2): 326–332.

[19] Deng ZJ, Yin C, Cusano J, Abdul-Rassoul H, Curry EJ, Novikov D, et al. Outcomes and complications after primary arthroscopic Suprapectoral versus open subpectoral biceps tenodesis for superior labral anterior-posterior tears or biceps abnormalities: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 8(8): 2325967120945322.

[20] Forsythe B, Berlinberg EJ, Diaz CC, Korrapati A, Agarwalla A, Patel HH, et al. No difference in clinical outcomes for arthroscopic Suprapectoral versus open subpectoral biceps tenodesis at midterm follow-up: a randomized prospective analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2022; 50(6): 1486–1494.

[21] Gombera MM, Kahlenberg CA, Nair R, Saltzman MD, Terry MA. All-arthroscopic suprapectoral versus open subpectoral tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii. Am J Sports Med. 2015; 43(5): 1077–1083.

[22] Levy JC. Simultaneous rotator cuff repair and arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using lateral row anchor. Arthrosc Tech. 2012; 1(1): e1–e4.

[23] Meghpara MB, Schulz W, Buerba RA, Golan EJ, Vyas D. Clinical outcomes of an all-arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using the anterolateral anchor during concomitant double-row rotator cuff repair. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020; 8(10): 2325967120959142.

[24] Hagan DP, Hao KA, King JJ, Srinivasan RC, Wright TW, Moser MW, et al. Outcomes of biceps tenodesis variations with concomitant rotator cuff repair: a multicenter database analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023; 11(6): 23259671231180173.

[25] Yeung M, Shin JJ, Lesniak BP, Lin A. Complications of arthroscopic versus open biceps tenodesis in the setting of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: an analysis of the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2020; 28(3): 113–120.

[26] Dhawan A, Ghodadra N, Karas V, Salata MJ, Cole BJ. Complications of bioabsorbable suture anchors in the shoulder. Am J Sports Med. 2012; 40(6): 1424–1430.

[27] Ihsan Kilic A, Hapa O, Ozmanevra R, Demirhan Demirkiran N, Gursan O. Biceps tenodesis combined with rotator cuff repair increases functional status and elbow strength. J Orthop Surg. 2021; 29(3): 23094990211056978.

[28] George MS. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis incorporated into rotator cuff repair using suture anchors. Orthopedics. 2008; 31(6): 552–555.

[29] Checchia SL, Doneux PS, Miyazaki AN, Silva LA, Fregoneze M, Ossada A, et al. Biceps tenodesis associated with arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14(2): 138–144.

[30] Park JY, Lee JH, Oh KS, Chung SW, Bang JY, Noh YM. Bridge tenodesis: a secure fixation technique for biceps long head tendinopathy during arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture-bridge technique. Arthrosc Tech. 2016; 5(5): e1077–e1081.

[31] DeVito P, Judd H, Wodicka R, Moor M, Malarkey A, Disla S, et al. Case-control comparison of “in-the-groove” and lateral-row arthroscopic biceps tenodesis with concomitant rotator cuff repair. JSES Open Access. 2019; 3(4): 333–337.

[32] Veenstra JM, Geeslin AG, Uggen CW. Proximal biceps tenodesis incorporated into supraspinatus repair: a case series and technical description. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021; 9(1): 2325967120975354.

[33] Wang W, Kang H, Li H, Li J, Meng Y, Li P. Comparative efficacy of 5 suture configurations for arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair: a network meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16(1): 714.

[34] Gu Z, Wu S, Yang Y, Ren T, Zhang KW. Comparison of arthroscopic single-row and double-row repair for rotator cuff injuries with different tear sizes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023; 11(8): 23259671231180854.

[35] Mihata T, Watanabe C, Fukunishi K, Ohue M, Tsujimura T, Fujiwara K, et al. Functional and structural outcomes of single-row versus double-row versus combined double-row and suture-bridge repair for rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2011; 39(10): 2091–2098.

[36] Fox MA, Hughes JD, Drain NP, Wagala N, Patel N, Nazzal E, et al. Knotted and knotless double row transosseous equivalent repair techniques for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair demonstrate comparable post-operative outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(5): 1919–1924.

[37] Tanaka M, Hanai H, Kotani Y, Kuratani K, Koizumi K, Hayashida K. Triple-row technique confers a lower Retear rate than standard suture bridge technique in arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. Arthroscopy. 2021; 37(10): 3053–3061.

[38] Jordan RW, Bentick K, Saithna A. Transtendinous repair of partial articular sided supraspinatus tears is associated with higher rates of stiffness and significantly inferior early functional scores than tear completion and repair: a systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018; 104(6): 829–837.

[39] Chen JJ, Ye Z, Liang JW, Xu YJ. Arthroscopic repair of partial articular supraspinatus tendon avulsion lesions by conversion to full-thickness tears through a small incision. Chin J Traumatol. 2020; 23(6): 336–340.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.