Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Conjoined Tendon-Preserving Posterior Approach: The Modified Posterior Approach with a Minimum of 2-Year Follow-Up

Abstract

Purpose: The conjoined tendon-preserving posterior (CPP) approach is a modified posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty (THA) that preserves the short external rotator muscles and most ischiofemoral ligaments. The objective of the present study was to compare the short-term clinical outcomes, complications, and imaging evaluations of CPP and posterior approaches in THA.

Methods: This retrospective study included 83 patients from May 2018 to September 2021: 36 patients with 42 hips who underwent THA with the CPP approach (CPP group) and 47 patients with 60 hips who underwent THA with the standard posterior approach (PA group) with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Assessment tools included operative times, blood loss, preoperative and last follow-up Harris Hip Scores (HHS), postoperative complications, and implant placement angles between the groups. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests and T-tests.

Results: The CPP approach had a significantly longer operative time and greater blood loss compared to the PA group. Preoperative and postoperative HHS were not significantly different between groups. Considering complications, the PA group had one case each of dislocation and infection, and the CPP group had two cases of sciatic nerve palsy, but the difference was not significant. Cup anteversion, inclination and stem anteversion were not significantly different between groups.

Conclusion: Functional outcomes, complication rates, and implant placement angles were comparable with the posterior approach, and the CPP approach has the potential to reduce postoperative dislocations. However, careful attention should be paid to sciatic nerve palsy during early initiation of the CPP approach, and this study did not demonstrate that the CPP approach was clearly superior to the posterior approach.

Keywords

Clinical Outcomes / Conjoint Tendon-Preserving / Posterior Approach / Posterior Approach / Total Hip Arthroplasty

References

[1] Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet. 2007; 370(9597): 1508–1519.

[2] Gwam CU, Mistry JB, Mohamed NS, Thomas M, Bigart KC, Mont MA, et al. Current epidemiology of revision Total hip arthroplasty in the United States: National Inpatient Sample 2009 to 2013. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32(7): 2088–2092.

[3] Hoskins W, Bingham R, Lorimer M, Hatton A, de Steiger RN. Early rate of revision of Total hip arthroplasty related to surgical approach: an analysis of 122, 345 primary Total hip arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2020; 102(21): 1874–1882.

[4] Sheth D, Cafri G, Inacio MC, Paxton EW, Namba RS. Anterior and anterolateral approaches for THA are associated with lower dislocation risk without higher revision risk. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473(11): 3401–3408.

[5] Chechik O, Khashan M, Lador R, Salai M, Amar E. Surgical approach and prosthesis fixation in hip arthroplasty world wide. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2013; 133(11): 1595–1600.

[6] Haynes JA, Hopper RH Jr, Ho H, McDonald JF 3rd, Parks NL, Hamilton WG. Direct anterior approach for primary Total hip arthroplasty lowers the risk of dislocation compared to the posterior approach: a single institution experience. J Arthroplasty. 2022; 37(3): 495–500.

[7] Stähelin T, Vienne P, Hersche O. Failure of reinserted short external rotator muscles after total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2002; 17(5): 604–607.

[8] Minokawa S, Naito M, Shiramizu K, Nakamura Y, Kinoshita K, Minamikawa T, et al. Preservation technique of the piriformis tendon is superior to reattachment technique in terms of contiguity and muscle atrophy: using magnetic resonance imaging. Hip Int. 2018; 28(6): 599–605.

[9] Kim YS, Kwon SY, Sun DH, Han SK, Maloney WJ. Modified posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty to enhance joint stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466(2): 294–299.

[10] Nakamura T, Yamakawa T, Hori J, Goto H, Nakagawa A, Takatsu T, et al. Conjoined tendon preserving posterior approach in hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures: a prospective multicenter clinical study of 322 patients. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2021; 29(3): 23094990211063963.

[11] Tetsunaga T, Yamada K, Sanki T, Kawamura Y, Ozaki T. Bipolar hip arthroplasty using a conjoined tendon-preserving posterior approach in geriatric patients. Acta Med Okayama. 2021; 75(1): 25–30.

[12] Van Arkel RJ, Amis AA, Cobb JP, Jeffers JR. The capsular ligaments provide more hip rotational restraint than the acetabular labrum and the ligamentum teres: an experimental study. Bone Joint J. 2015; 97-B(4): 484–491.

[13] D’Arrigo C, Speranza A, Monaco E, Carcangiu A, Ferretti A. Learning curve in tissue sparing total hip replacement: comparison between different approaches. J Orthop Traumatol. 2009; 10: 47–54.

[14] Singh JA, Schleck C, Harmsen S, Lewallen D. Clinically important improvement thresholds for Harris hip score and its ability to predict revision risk after primary total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016; 17: 256.

[15] Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, Compere CL, Zimmerman JR. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978; 60(2): 217–220.

[16] Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013; 48(3): 452–458.

[17] Tan BKL, Khan RJK, Haebich SJ, Maor D, Blake EL, Breidahl WH. Piriformis-sparing minimally invasive versus the standard posterior approach for Total hip arthroplasty: a 10-year follow-up of a randomized control trial. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34(2): 319–326.

[18] Tanaka H, Yamada N, Kurishima H, Mori Y, Sakamoto T, Oyama M. The intraoperative hip range of motion in total hip arthroplasty predicts postoperative patient’s satisfaction for cutting toenails and putting on sock. J Orthop Sci. 2021; S0949-2658(21): 199–208.

[19] Melman WP, Mollen BP, Kollen BJ, Verheyen CC. First experiences with the direct anterior approach in lateral decubitus position: learning curve and 1 year complication rate. Hip Int. 2015; 25(3): 251–257.

[20] Kong X, Grau L, Ong A, Yang C, Chai W. Adopting the direct anterior approach: experience and learning curve in a Chinese patient population. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019; 14(1): 218.

[21] Foissey C, Fauvernier M, Fary C, Servien E, Lustig S, Batailler C. Total hip arthroplasty performed by direct anterior approach -does experience influence the learning curve? SICOT J. 2020; 6: 15.

[22] Reichert JC, Wassilew GI, von Rottkay E, Noeth U. Compared learning curves of the direct anterior and anterolateral approach for minimally invasive hip replacement. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2022; 14(3): 37500.

[23] Laffosse JM, Chiron P, Molinier F, Bensafi H, Puget J. Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement. Early results. Int Orthop. 2007; 31(5): 597–603.

[24] Rasuli KJ, Gofton W. Percutaneously assisted total hip (PATH) and Supercapsular percutaneously assisted total hip (SuperPATH) arthroplasty: learning curves and early outcomes. Ann Transl Med. 2015; 3(13): 179.

[25] Brooks PJ. Dislocation following total hip replacement: causes and cures. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95-B(11 Suppl A): 67–69.

[26] Tanino H, Nishida Y, Mitsutake R, Ito H. Portable accelerometer-based navigation system for cup placement of Total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35(1): 172–177.

[27] Khan RJ, Fick D, Khoo P, Yao F, Nivbrant B, Wood D. Less invasive total hip arthroplasty: description of a new technique. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21(7): 1038–1046.

[28] Roger DJ, Hill D. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a transpiriformis approach: a preliminary report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470(8): 2227–2234.

[29] Hanly RJ, Sokolowski S, Timperley AJ. The SPAIRE technique allows sparing of the piriformis and obturator internus in a modified posterior approach to the hip. Hip Int. 2017; 27(2): 205–209.

[30] Kwon MS, Kuskowski M, Mulhall KJ, Macaulay W, Brown TE, Saleh KJ. Does surgical approach affect total hip arthroplasty dislocation rates? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 447: 34–38.

[31] Masonis JL, Bourne RB. Surgical approach, abductor function, and total hip arthroplasty dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002; 405: 46–53.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.