Gradual Transverse Transport of Naturally Tibialized Fibula Using Hexapod Frames to Treat Neglected Type V Tibial Segmental Defects

Abstract

Objective: Although several reconstructive methods have been developed to manage large segmental tibial bone defects including bone transport (distraction osteogenesis), contralateral fibular graft, allograft, tibiofibular synostosis, Masquelet technique, and 3D printed scaffold, neglected large tibial defects in adults remain challenging problems. This study describes gradual transverse transport of naturally tibialized fibula using hexapod frames in management of adult patients with neglected large tibial defects.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed four cases of transverse transport of naturally tibialized fibula from November 2018 to February 2022. We measured the length of the tibial defect and the transported fibular segment, the mid-diaphyseal diameter and cortical thickness of the affected fibula, contralateral fibula, and tibia. The parameters measured both preoperatively and postoperatively were leg length discrepancy, hip-knee-ankle angle, medial proximal tibial angle, posterior proximal tibial angle, lateral distal tibial angle, range of motion of the knee and ankle joints, and Lower Extremity Functional Scores (LEFS). Patients’ satisfaction rates using Likert scale were also recorded.

Results: Among four female patients, three suffered from tibial osteomyelitis, and one was due to congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. The average follow-up time was 2.7 ± 1.4 years. The average length of tibial defect was 14.0 ± 0.8 cm. The average preoperative shortening of the affected leg was 9.0 ± 2.5 cm, which changed to 0.6 ± 0.8 cm postoperatively. The median length of the transported fibular segment was 15.2 cm. Two patients had varus deformity, two had recurvatum, and one had procurvatum preoperatively. Postoperative radiological measurement showed all deformities corrected and no ankle valgus deformity developed during follow-up. All patients achieved union and can fully weight bear on the affected extremity. The average fixator time was 12.9 ± 2.9 months. The average preoperative and postoperative LEFS, respectively, were 53.5 ± 5.0, 70.5 ± 1.3, with a significant difference (p = 0.003). Three patients reported very satisfied with the outcome, and one patient reported satisfied. Three patients had pin tract infections, and one patient had skin necrosis which healed after additional surgery. One patient had surgical release of the hamstring tendons due to flexion contracture of the knee. Two patients had 15° of reduction in ankle range of motion. One patient had transient common peroneal nerve palsy which spontaneously recovered within 6 weeks.

Conclusion: The transverse transport of naturally tibialized fibula was both a safe and effective method to treat the long-standing type V tibial segmental defect.

Keywords

Fibular Transport / Hexapod Frame / Ilizarov Technique / Tibial Defect / Tibialization

References

[1] Campanacci M, Zanoli S. Double tibiofibular synostosis (fibular pro tibia) for non-union and delayed union of the tibia: end 37 result review of one hundred and seventy-one cases. J Bone Joint Surg. 1966; 48A: 44–53.

[2] Mankin HJ, Doppelt S, Tomford W. Clinical experience with 23 allograft implantation: the first ten years. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983; 174: 69–86.

[3] Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth of tissues: part II. The influence of the rate of frequency of distraction. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 239: 263–285.

[4] Ilizarov GA. The tension-stress effect on the genesis and growth 27 of tissues: part I. The influence of stability of fixation and soft tissue preservation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 238: 249–281.

[5] Cech O. Prof. Ilizarov and his contribution to the challenge of limb lengthening. Injury. 1993; 24(Suppl 2): S2–S8.

[6] Tuli SM. Tibialization of the fibula. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 431: 80–84.

[7] Wood MB. Free vascularized fibular grafting-25 years’ experience: tips, techniques, and pearls. Orthop Clin North Am. 2007; 38(1): 1–12. v.

[8] Sun Y, Zhang C, Jin D, Sheng J, Cheng X, Liu X, et al. Free vascularised fibular grafting in the treatment of large skeletal defects due to osteomyelitis. Int Orthop. 2010; 34(3): 425–430.

[9] Gupta SP, Garg G. The Huntington procedure: still a reasonable option for large tibial defects in paediatric patients. J Child Orthop. 2014; 8(5): 413–421.

[10] Alford AI, Nicolaou D, Hake M, McBride-Gagyi S. Masquelet’s induced membrane technique: review of current concepts and future directions. J Orthop Res. 2021; 39(4): 707–718.

[11] McClure PK, Abouei M, Conway JD. Reconstructive options for tibial bone defects. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2021; 29(21): 901–909.

[12] Laubach M, Suresh S, Herath B, Wille M-L, Delbrück H, Alabdulrahman H, et al. Clinical translation of a patient-specific scaffold-guided bone regeneration concept in four cases with large long bone defects. J Orthop Transl. 2022; 34: 73–84.

[13] Huntington TW. VI. Case of bone transference: use of a segment of fibula to supply a defect in the tibia. Ann Surg. 1905; 41(2): 249–251.

[14] Catagni MA, Camagni M, Combi A, Ottaviani G. Medial fibula transport with the Ilizarov frame to treat massive tibial bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006; 448: 208–216.

[15] Frost HM. A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff’s law for clinicians. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74(1): 3–15.

[16] Prabhat V, Vargaonkar GS, Mallojwar SR, Kumar R. Natural tibialization of fibula in non-union tibia: two cases. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016; 7(Suppl 1): 121–124.

[17] Qin SH, Guo BF, Peng AM, Zheng XJ, Jiao SF, Zang JC, et al. New classification and treatment strategy of bone transport of tibial defect in adults: a report of 58 cases. Chin J Bone Joint Surg. 2020; 13(5): 402–408.

[18] Rahimnia A, Fitoussi F, Pennecot G, Mazda K. Treatment of segmental loss of the tibia by tibialisation of the fibula: a review of the literature. Trauma Mon. 2012; 16(4): 154–159.

[19] Kumar N, Chaudhry A. Correction of limb length discrepancy after tibialization of the fibula. Curr Orthop Pract. 2018; 29(1): 90–92.

[20] Song HR, Cho SH, Koo KH, Jeong ST, Park YJ, Ko JH. Tibial bone defects treated by internal bone transport using the Ilizarov method. Int Orthop. 1998; 22(5): 293–297.

[21] Shiha AE, Khalifa AR, Assaghir YM, Kenawey MO. Medial transport of the fibula using the Ilizarov device for reconstruction of a massive defect of the tibia in two children. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008; 90(12): 1627–1630.

[22] Shafi R, Fragomen AT, Rozbruch SR. Ipsilateral fibular transport using Ilizarov-Taylor spatial frame for a limb salvage reconstruction: a case report. HSS J. 2009; 5(1): 31–39.

[23] Al-Sayyad M. Ipsilateral medial fibular transport using a circular external fixator for reconstruction of massive tibial bone defects in children and adolescents. Egypt Orthop J. 2015; 50: 25–30.

[24] Yin P, Zhang L, Li T, Xie Y, Li J, Li Z, et al. Ipsilateral fibula transport for the treatment of massive tibial bone defects. Injury. 2015; 46(11): 2273–2277.

[25] Atiq Uz Z, Javed S, Ahmad A, Aziz A. Massive segmental bone loss due to pantibial osteomyelitis in children reconstructed by medial fibular transport with Ilizarov frame. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2017; 12(5): 418–423.

[26] Meselhy MA, Singer MS, Halawa AM, Hosny GA, Adawy AH, Essawy OM. Gradual fibular transfer by ilizarov external fixator in post-traumatic and post-infection large tibial bone defects. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018; 138(5): 653–660.

[27] Parmaksizoglu F, Cansu E, Unal MB, Yener IA. Acute emergency tibialization of the fibula: reconstruction of a massive tibial defect in a type IIIC open fracture. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2013; 8(2): 127–131.

[28] El-Gammal TA, Ali AE, Kotb MM, Saleh WR, Ragheb YF, Refai OA, et al. Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: long-term outcome of treatment with intramedullary vascularized fibular graft combined with Ilizarov distraction. J Pediatr Orthop. 2023; 43(6): e487–e492.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.