Comparative Study of Preoperative Sagittal Spinal Pelvic Alignment in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy, Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament, and Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

Abstract

Objectives: Cervical spondylosis may lead to changes in the sagittal parameters of the neck and trigger compensatory alterations in systemic sagittal parameters. However, there is currently a dearth of comparative research on the changes and compensatory alterations to sagittal parameters resulting from different types of cervical spondylosis. This study compared the preoperative sagittal alignment sequences among patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR), ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) caused by factors resulting from non-OPLL factors.

Materials and Methods: Full length lateral X-ray of the spine and cervical computed tomography (CT) of 256 patients (134 men, 122 women; mean age, 56.9 ± 9.5 years) were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 4096 radiomics features were measured through the lateral X-ray by two spinal surgeons with extensive experience. The clinical symptoms measures were the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, number of hand actions in 10 s, hand-grip strength, visual analog scale (VAS) score. Normally distributed data was compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for parametric variables and χ² test were used to analyze the categorical data.

Results: In the OPLL group, the C2-C7 Cobb angle was greater than in the CSR and CSM groups (19.8 ± 10.4°, 13.3 ± 10.3°, and 13.9 ± 9.9°, respectively, p < 0.001). Additionally, the C7-S1 SVA measure was found to be situated in the anterior portion with regards to the CSM and CSR groups (19.7 ± 58.4°, –6.3 ± 34.3° and –26.3 ± 32.9°, p < 0.001). Moreover, the number of individuals with C7-S1 SVA >50 mm was significantly larger than the CSM group (26/69, 11/83, p < 0.001). In the CSR group, the TPA demonstrated smaller values compared to the OPLL group (8.8 ± 8.5°, 12.7 ± 10.2°, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the SSA was comparatively smaller as opposed to both the OPLL and CSM groups (49.6 ± 11.2°, 54.2 ± 10.8° and 54.3 ± 9.3°, p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Patients with OPLL exhibit greater cervical lordosis than those with CSR and CSM. However, OPLL is more likely to result in spinal imbalance when compared to the CSM group. Furthermore, OPLL and CSM patients exhibit anterior trunk inclination and worse global spine sagittal parameters in comparison to CSR patients.

Keywords

Cervical Spondylosis / Sagittal Position Parameters / Spine / X-ray

References

[1] Theodore N. Degenerative cervical spondylosis. N Engl J Med. 2020; 383: 159–168.

[2] McCormick JR, Sama AJ, Schiller NC, Butler AJ, Donnally CJ III. Cervical Spondylotic myelopathy: a guide to diagnosis and management. J Am Board Fam Med. 2020; 33: 303–313.

[3] Byvaltsev VA, Kalinin AA, Hernandez PA, Shepelev VV, Pestryakov YY, Aliyev MA, et al. Molecular and genetic mechanisms of spinal stenosis formation: systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23: 13479.

[4] Iyer A, Azad TD, Tharin S. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clin Spine Surg. 2016; 29: 408–414.

[5] Abelin-Genevois K. Sagittal balance of the spine. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021; 107: 102769.

[6] Klineberg E, Schwab F, Smith JS, Gupta MC, Lafage V, Bess S. Sagittal spinal pelvic alignment. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2013; 24: 157–162.

[7] Been E, Shefi S, Soudack M. Cervical lordosis: the effect of age and gender. Spine J. 2017; 17: 880–888.

[8] Oh C, Lee M, Hong B, Song BS, Yun S, Kwon S, et al. Association between sagittal cervical spinal alignment and Degenerative cervical Spondylosis: a retrospective study using a new scoring system. J Clin Med. 2022; 11: 1772.

[9] Yukawa Y, Kato F, Suda K, Yamagata M, Ueta T, Yoshida M. Normative data for parameters of sagittal spinal alignment in healthy subjects: an analysis of gender specific differences and changes with aging in 626 asymptomatic individuals. Eur Spine J. 2018; 27: 426–432.

[10] Ye J, Rider SM, Lafage R, Gupta S, Farooqi AS, Protopsaltis TS, et al. Spinopelvic sagittal compensation in adult cervical deformity. J Neurosurg Spine. 2023; 39: 1–10.

[11] Li XY, Wang Y, Zhu WG, Kong C, Lu SB. Impact of cervical and global spine sagittal alignment on cervical curvature changes after posterior cervical laminoplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022; 17: 521.

[12] Sakai K, Yoshii T, Hirai T, Arai Y, Shinomiya K, Okawa A. Impact of the surgical treatment for degenerative cervical myelopathy on the preoperative cervical sagittal balance: a review of prospective comparative cohort between anterior decompression with fusion and laminoplasty. Eur Spine J. 2017; 26: 104–112.

[13] Patwardhan AG, Khayatzadeh S, Havey RM, Voronov LI, Smith ZA, Kalmanson O, et al. Cervical sagittal balance: a biomechanical perspective can help clinical practice. Eur Spine J. 2018; 27: 25–38.

[14] Steinmetz MP, Stewart TJ, Kager CD, Benzel EC, Vaccaro AR. Cervical deformity correction. Neurosurgery. 2007; 60: S90–S97.

[15] Machino M, Yukawa Y, Imagama S, Ito K, Katayama Y, Matsumoto T, et al. Age-related and Degenerative changes in the osseous anatomy, alignment, and range of motion of the cervical spine: a comparative study of radiographic data from 1016 patients with cervical Spondylotic myelopathy and 1230 asymptomatic subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41: 476–482.

[16] Xing R, Liu W, Li X, Jiang L, Yishakea M, Dong J. Characteristics of cervical sagittal parameters in healthy cervical spine adults and patients with cervical disc degeneration. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018; 19: 37.

[17] Li H, Ma Z, Wang X, Yuan S, Tian Y, Wang L, et al. Comparative study of preoperative sagittal alignment between patients with multisegment cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J. 2023; 23: 1667–1673.

[18] Kim BJ, Cho SM, Hur JW, Cha J, Kim SH. Kinematics after cervical laminoplasty: risk factors for cervical kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty. Spine J. 2021; 21: 1822–1829.

[19] Liu T, Tian S, Zhang J, He M, Deng L, Ding W, et al. Comparison of cervical sagittal parameters among patients with neck pain and patients with cervical Spondylotic radiculopathy and cervical Spondylotic myelopathy. Orthop Surg. 2024; 16: 329–336.

[20] Kim B, Yoon DH, Ha Y, Yi S, Shin DA, Lee CK, et al. Relationship between T1 slope and loss of lordosis after laminoplasty in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J. 2016; 16: 219–225.

[21] Yoshida G, Alzakri A, Pointillart V, Boissiere L, Obeid I, Matsuyama Y, et al. Global spinal alignment in patients with cervical Spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43: E154–E162.

[22] Truumees E, Herkowitz HN. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy. Instr Course Lect. 2000; 49: 339–360.

[23] le Huec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A. Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J. 2019; 28: 1889–1905.

[24] Yuk CD, Kim TH, Park MS, Kim SW, Chang HG, Kim JH, et al. Cervical cord compression and whole-spine sagittal balance: retrospective study using whole-spine magnetic resonance imaging and cervical cord compression index. World Neurosurg. 2019; 130: e709–e714.

[25] Protopsaltis T, Schwab F, Bronsard N, Smith JS, Klineberg E, Mundis G, et al. TheT1 pelvic angle, a novel radiographic measure of global sagittal deformity, accounts for both spinal inclination and pelvic tilt and correlates with health-related quality of life. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96: 1631–1640.

[26] Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20(Suppl 5): 609–618.

[27] Caffard T, Arzani A, Verna B, Tripathi V, Chiapparelli E, Medina SJ, et al. Association between cervical sagittal alignment and subaxial Paraspinal muscle parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024; 49: 621–629.

[28] Naghdi N, Elliott JM, Weber MH, Fehlings MG, Fortin M. Cervical muscle morphometry and composition demonstrate prognostic value in degenerative cervical myelopathy outcomes. Front Neurol. 2023; 14: 1209475.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.