Randomized Controlled Trial of a Novel Cementless vs. Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: Early Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes

Abstract

Objective: Previous cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs faced challenges with insufficient initial fixation on tibial side, resulting in inferior functional outcomes and survival rates. The Zoned Trabecular Bone Cementless Knee is a novel implant designed for cementless TKA which aims to achieve excellent initial fixation, promoting effective osseointegration. The aim of this research was to compare the early clinical and radiographic results of this cementless TKA with cemented TKA.

Methods: Between September 2021 and April 2022, 64 patients (64 knees) were recruited in this prospective randomized controlled trial to receive either cementless 3D-printed trabecular metal TKA or a cemented posterior stabilized TKA. Preoperative and postoperative clinical evaluations, including the range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), and the Reduced Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities Score (WOMAC), were conducted and analyzed for comparison. Radiographs and computed tomography scans were utilized to assess the initial fixation. The complications between the two groups were also recorded and compared. Continuous data were analyzed for significance using independent-samples t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test and categorical data were analyzed using chi-squared or Fisher’s exact test.

Results: Both groups demonstrated significant enhancement at 12 months follow-up in the ROM compared with baseline (ROM: 94.7 ± 23.4 vs. 113.1 ± 12.3 in cementless group and 96.5 ± 14.7 vs. 111.0 ± 12.8 in cemented group, p < 0.05). However, no statistical differences were observed between the two groups in postoperative ROM, KSS, or WOMAC score. The radiographs and computed tomography scans showed similar results, including radiolucent lines and osteolysis in either femoral or tibial. Additionally, there was no statistical difference in the overall complication rate between the two groups. Notably, one patient in the cementless TKA group required revision for periprosthetic infection as the end point.

Conclusions: This novel 3D-printed trabecular metal cementless TKA achieved comparable clinical outcomes and initial fixation to cemented TKA in early stage. Longer-term examination is necessary to validate these results.

Keywords

3D Printing / Cemented / Cementless / Total Knee Arthroplasty / Trabecular Metal Components

References

[1] Dixon P, Parish EN, Chan B, Chitnavis J, Cross MJ. Hydroxyapatite-coated, cementless total knee replacement in patients aged 75 years and over. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2004; 86(2): 200–204.

[2] Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Davey JR, Mahomed NN. Survival and clinical function of cemented and uncemented prostheses in total knee replacement: a meta-analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2009; 91(7): 889–895.

[3] Baker PN, Khaw FM, Kirk LM, Esler CN, Gregg PJ. A randomised controlled trial of cemented versus cementless press-fit condylar total knee replacement: 15-year survival analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2007; 89(12): 1608–1614.

[4] Duffy GP, Berry DJ, Rand JA. Cement versus cementless fixation in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998; 356: 66–72.

[5] McCaskie AW, Deehan DJ, Green TP, Lock KR, Thompson JR, Harper WM, et al. Randomised, prospective study comparing cemented and cementless total knee replacement: results of press-fit condylar total knee replacement at five years. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 1998; 80(6): 971–975.

[6] Illgen R, Tueting J, Enright T, Schreibman K, McBeath A, Heiner J. Hybrid total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes at average 10 years follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(7): 95–100.

[7] Julin J, Jamsen E, Puolakka T, Konttinen YT, Moilanen T. Younger age increases the risk of early prosthesis failure following primary total knee replacement for osteoarthritis. A follow-up study of 32, 019 total knee replacements in the Finnish arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop. 2010; 81(4): 413–419.

[8] Parker DA, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB. Long-term followup of cementless versus hybrid fixation for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001; 388: 68–76.

[9] Carlsson A, Bjorkman A, Besjakov J, Onsten I. Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years. Acta Orthop. 2005; 76(3): 362–369.

[10] Sadoghi P, Leithner A, Weber P, Friesenbichler J, Gruber G, Kastner N, et al. Radiolucent lines in low-contact-stress mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a blinded and matched case control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011; 12: 142.

[11] Ferguson RP, Friederichs MG, Hofmann AA. Comparison of screw and screwless fixation in cementless total knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2008; 31(2): 127.

[12] Dalury DF. Cementless total knee arthroplasty: current concepts review. Bone Jt J. 2016; 98-B(7): 867–873.

[13] Dunbar MJ, Wilson DA, Hennigar AW, Amirault JD, Gross M, Reardon GP. Fixation of a trabecular metal knee arthroplasty component. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2009; 91(7): 1578–1586.

[14] Momose T, Nakamura Y, Nakano M, Maeda T, Morioka S, Sobajima A, et al. Short-to mid-term clinical outcomes of posterior-stabilized Cementless Total knee arthroplasty with trabecular metal components. Ther Clin Risk Manage. 2021; 17: 809–816.

[15] Van Hamersveld KT, Marang-Van De Mheen PJ, Nelissen R, Toksvig-Larsen S. Peri-apatite coating decreases uncemented tibial component migration: long-term RSA results of a randomized controlled trial and limitations of short-term results. Acta Orthop. 2018; 89(4): 425–430.

[16] Bingham JS, Salib CG, Hanssen AD, Taunton MJ, Pagnano MW, Abdel MP. Clinical outcomes and survivorship of contemporary Cementless primary Total knee arthroplasties. JBJS Rev. 2020; 8(8): e2000026.

[17] Mont MA, Pivec R, Issa K, Kapadia BH, Maheshwari A, Harwin SF. Long-term implant survivorship of cementless total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg. 2014; 27(5): 369–376.

[18] Prasad AK, Tan JHS, Bedair HS, Dawson-Bowling S, Hanna SA. Cemented vs. cementless fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EFORT Open Rev. 2020; 5(11): 793–798.

[19] Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD, Scott WN. Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 248: 13–14.

[20] Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988; 15(12): 1833–1840.

[21] Luo Z, Zhou K, Peng L, Shang Q, Pei F, Zhou Z. Similar results with kinematic and mechanical alignment applied in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020; 28(6): 1720–1735.

[22] Mercurio M, Gasparini G, Sanzo V, Familiari F, Castioni D, Galasso O. Cemented Total knee arthroplasty shows less blood loss but a higher rate of aseptic loosening compared with Cementless fixation: an updated meta-analysis of comparative studies. J Arthroplasty. 2022; 37(9): 1879–1887.

[23] Barrack RL, Stanley T, Burt M, Hopkins S. The effect of stem design on end-of-stem pain in revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(7): 119–124.

[24] Ailaney N, Barra MF, Schloemann DT, Thirukumaran CP, Kaplan NB. Short-term (6 months or less) pain in cemented versus Cementless Total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2024; 39(8): 2137–2146.

[25] Costales TG, Chapman DM, Dalury DF. The natural history of Radiolucencies following uncemented Total knee arthroplasty at 9 years. J Arthroplasty. 2020; 35(1): 127–131.

[26] Oh SM, Bin SI, Kim JY, Lee BS, Kim JM. Impact of preoperative varus deformity on postoperative mechanical alignment and long-term results of “mechanical” aligned total knee arthroplasty. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019; 105(6): 1061–1066.

[27] Frazer A, Lim JBT, Teeter MG, Howard J, Vasarhelyi EM, Lanting BA. Gap patterns and radiographic follow-up of newer-generation cementless total knee arthroplasty designs. Can J Surg. 2024; 67(2): E85–E90.

[28] Desmarais J, Dalury D, Bernasek TL, Fisher DA, Nunley RM, Fickenscher MC, et al. A short-term multicenter analysis of radiolucent lines in a single uncemented rotating platform implant for Total knee arthroplasty. Arthroplasty Today. 2022; 15: 34–39.

[29] Ritter MA, Meneghini RM. Twenty-year survivorship of cementless anatomic graduated component total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2010; 25(4): 507–513.

[30] Comfort T, Baste V, Froufe MA, Namba R, Bordini B, Robertsson O, et al. International comparative evaluation of fixed-bearing non-posterior-stabilized and posterior-stabilized total knee replacements. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2014; 96(1): 65–72.

[31] Catani F, Leardini A, Ensini A, Cucca G, Bragonzoni L, Toksvig-Larsen S, et al. The stability of the cemented tibial component of total knee arthroplasty: posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized design. J Arthroplasty. 2004; 19(6): 775–782.

[32] Nivbrant NO, Khan RJK, Fick DP, Haebich S, Smith E. Cementless versus cemented tibial fixation in posterior stabilized Total knee replacement: a randomized trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2020; 102(12): 1075–1082.

[33] Wojtowicz R, Henricson A, Nilsson KG, Crnalic S. Uncemented monoblock trabecular metal posterior stabilized high-flex total knee arthroplasty: similar pattern of migration to the cruciate-retaining design—a prospective radiostereometric analysis (RSA) and clinical evaluation of 40 patients (49 knees) 60 years or younger with 9 years’ follow-up. Acta Orthop. 2019; 90(5): 460–466.

[34] Mikashima Y, Imamura H, Shirakawa Y, Yano K, Ikari K, Okazaki K. Modern cementless posterior stabilized mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty shows comparable clinical and radiographical results to its cemented predecessor at 1-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(9): 3131–3137.

[35] Mohammad HR, Judge A, Murray DW. A matched comparison of the long-term outcomes of cemented and Cementless Total knee replacements: an analysis from the National Joint Registry of England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 2021; 103(24): 2270–2280.

[36] Netravali NA, Shen F, Park Y, Bargar WL. A perspective on robotic assistance for knee arthroplasty. Adv Orthop. 2013; 2013: 970703.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.