Novel MRI-Based Pedicle Bone Quality Score Independently Predicts Pedicle Screw Loosening after Degenerative Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Abstract

Summary: Pedicle screw loosening after posterior lumbar fusion is associated with poor bone quality, which often determines screw pull-out strength, insertion torque, and vertebral body loading characteristics. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score were associated with poor bone quality. Current evidence suggests that pedicle bone quality (PBQ) has a greater impact on screw stability. However, the correlation between MRI-based PBQ score and screw loosening has not been reported.

Purpose: To introduce and evaluate an MRI-based PBQ score to determine its effectiveness in predicting pedicle screw loosening following lumbar fusion surgery.

Methods: The retrospective study analyzed 244 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with pedicle screws between December 2017 and December 2021, with CT and MRI imaging before surgery. Data collected included patient demographics and preoperative radiological data. Radiographic screw loosening was measured at 12 months postoperatively. Clinical assessments included pain visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. The PBQ score was measured using MRI scans. We use univariate analysis for preliminary screening of the risk factors of screw loosening. Subsequent analysis involved multivariate logistic regression to identify independent predictive factors for screw loosening. We constructed the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to ascertain the discriminative capacity of the PBQ score. The area under the curve (AUC) quantified its predictive accuracy. Additionally, we evaluated the association between PBQ score and screw loosening using Spearman’s correlation analysis.

Results: Overall, 244 patients who underwent PLIF with pedicle screw fixation participated in this study, including 35 in the loosening group and 209 in the non-loosening group. PBQ score in the loosening group was significantly higher than that in the non-loosening group. On multivariate logistic regression, the higher PBQ score (OR = 8.481, 95% CI: 3.158–22.774; p < 0.001) and the lower mean Hounsfield unit (HU) value of L1-4 (OR = 0.967, 95% CI 0.951–0.984; p < 0.001) were the variables that significantly predicted screw loosening. The AUC for the PBQ score and HU value were 0.751 (95% CI: 0.673–0.828) and 0.702 (95% CI: 0.612–0.791). The PBQ score optimal cutoff to differentiate patients with loosening and with non-loosening was calculated as 3.045 with a sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 76.9%, while the optimal cutoff of the HU value was 151.5 with a sensitivity of 64.6% and specificity of 89.5%.

Conclusions: The association between the PBQ score and the propensity for lumbar pedicle screw loosening was found to be substantial. As a predictive measure, the PBQ score outperformed the HU value in forecasting the likelihood of screw loosening post-posterior lumbar fusion.

Keywords

Bone Quality / Hounsfield Unit / MRI / Pedicle Bone Quality / Screw Loosening / Vertebral Bone Quality

References

[1] Gengyu H, Jinyue D, Chunjie G, Bo Z, Yu J, Jiaming L, et al. The predictive value of preoperative paraspinal muscle morphometry on complications after lumbar surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2022; 31: 364–379.

[2] Kim DH, Hwang RW, Lee GH, Joshi R, Baker KC, Arnold P, et al. Comparing rates of early pedicle screw loosening in posterolateral lumbar fusion with and without transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2020; 20: 1438–1445.

[3] Aghayev E, Zullig N, Diel P, Dietrich D, Benneker LM. Development and validation of a quantitative method to assess pedicle screw loosening in posterior spine instrumentation on plain radiographs. Eur Spine J. 2014; 23: 689–694.

[4] Chen Z, Lei F, Ye F, Zhang H, Yuan H, Li S, et al. Prediction of pedicle screw loosening using an mri-based vertebral bone quality score in patients with lumbar degenerative disease. World Neurosurg. 2023; 171: e760–e767.

[5] Yuan L, Zhang X, Zeng Y, Chen Z, Li W. Incidence, risk, and outcome of pedicle screw loosening in degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients undergoing long-segment fusion. Global Spine J. 2023; 13: 1064–1071.

[6] Zou D, Muheremu A, Sun Z, Zhong W, Jiang S, Li W. Computed tomography hounsfield unit-based prediction of pedicle screw loosening after surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease. J Neurosurg. 2020; 32: 1–6.

[7] Xu F, Zou D, Li W, Sun Z, Jiang S, Zhou S, et al. Hounsfield units of the vertebral body and pedicle as predictors of pedicle screw loosening after degenerative lumbar spine surgery. Neurosurg Focus. 2020; 49: E10.

[8] Zou D, Sun Z, Zhou S, Zhong W, Li W. Hounsfield units value is a better predictor of pedicle screw loosening than the t-score of dxa in patients with lumbar degenerative diseases. Eur Spine J. 2020; 29: 1105–1111.

[9] Lin M, Ridley L, Seibel MJ. Prediction of low dexa t-scores by routine computed tomography body scans at different kilovoltage peaks. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023; 67: 602–608.

[10] Nagata K, Glassman SD, Dimar JN, et al. Comparison of bone mineral density in children and adolescents on ct versus dexa scan. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2023.

[11] Lalayiannis AD, Crabtree NJ, Ferro CJ, Wheeler DC, Duncan ND, Smith C, et al. Bone mineral density and vascular calcification in children and young adults with ckd 4 to 5 or on dialysis. Kidney Int Rep. 2023; 8: 265–273.

[12] Toussaint ND, Lau KK, Strauss BJ, Polkinghorne KR, Kerr PG. Associations between vascular calcification, arterial stiffness and bone mineral density in chronic kidney disease. Nephrol, Dial, Transplant. 2008; 23: 586–593.

[13] Chan MY, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV. Bone mineral density and association of osteoarthritis with fracture risk. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2014; 22: 1251–1258.

[14] Huang Y, Chen Q, Liu L, Feng G. Vertebral bone quality score to predict cage subsidence following oblique lumbar interbody fusion. J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18: 258.

[15] Liu D, Kadri A, Hernando D, Binkley N, Anderson PA. Mri-based vertebral bone quality score: relationship with age and reproducibility. Osteoporos Int. 2023; 34: 2077–2086.

[16] Soliman M, Aguirre AO, Kuo CC, et al. Vertebral bone quality score independently predicts cage subsidence following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2022; 22: 2017–2023.

[17] Salzmann SN, Okano I, Jones C, Zhu J, Lu S, Onyekwere I, et al. Preoperative mri-based vertebral bone quality (vbq) score assessment in patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion. Spine J. 2022; 22: 1301–1308.

[18] Mierke A, Ramos O, Macneille R, Chung JH, Wycliffe N, Cheng W, et al. Intra-and inter-observer reliability of the novel vertebral bone quality score. Eur Spine J. 2022; 31: 843–850.

[19] Wang H, Zou D, Sun Z, Wang L, Ding W, Li W. Hounsfield unit for assessing vertebral bone quality and asymmetrical vertebral degeneration in degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Spine. 2020; 45: 1559–1566.

[20] Li W, Zhu H, Hua Z, Miao D, Wang F, Tong T, et al. Vertebral bone quality score as a predictor of pedicle screw loosening following surgery for degenerative lumbar disease. Spine. 2023; 48: 1635–1641.

[21] Weiser L, Huber G, Sellenschloh K, Viezens L, Püschel K, Morlock MM, et al. Insufficient stability of pedicle screws in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical correlation of bone mineral density and pedicle screw fixation strength. Eur Spine J. 2017; 26: 2891–2897.

[22] Muellner M, Chiapparelli E, Haffer H, Dodo Y, Salzmann SN, Adl Amini D, et al. The association between paraspinal muscle parameters and vertebral pedicle microstructure in patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. Int Orthop. 2023; 47: 1051–1060.

[23] Guo HZ, Tang YC, Guo DQ, Ma YH, Yuan K, Li YX, et al. Pedicle screw fixation in single-level, double-level, or multilevel posterior lumbar fusion for osteoporotic spine: a retrospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up. World Neurosurg. 2020; 140: e121–e128.

[24] Ehresman J, Pennington Z, Schilling A, Lubelski D, Ahmed AK, Cottrill E, et al. Novel mri-based score for assessment of bone density in operative spine patients. Spine J. 2020; 20: 556–562.

[25] Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Oda H, Uei H. Clinical course and significance of the clear zone around the pedicle screws in the lumbar degenerative disease. Spine. 2008; 33: 903–908.

[26] Zhou X, Cheung CL, Karasugi T, Karppinen J, Samartzis D, Hsu YH, et al. Trans-ethnic polygenic analysis supports genetic overlaps of lumbar disc degeneration with height, body mass index, and bone mineral density. Front Genet. 2018; 9: 267.

[27] Muraki S, Yamamoto S, Ishibashi H, Horiuchi T, Hosoi T, Orimo H, et al. Impact of degenerative spinal diseases on bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in elderly women. Osteoporos Int. 2004; 15: 724–728.

[28] Du SY, Dai J, Zhou ZT, et al. Size selection and placement of pedicle screws using robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-guided techniques for thoracolumbar fractures: possible implications for the screw loosening rate. BMC Surg. 2022; 22: 365.

[29] Mikula AL, Lakomkin N, Pennington Z, Pinter ZW, Nassr A, Freedman B, et al. Association between lower hounsfield units and proximal junctional kyphosis and failure at the upper thoracic spine. J Neurosurg. 2022; 37: 1–9.

[30] Weinstein JN, Rydevik BL, Rauschning W. Anatomic and technical considerations of pedicle screw fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; 284: 34–46.

[31] Defino HL, Vendrame JR. Role of cortical and cancellous bone of the vertebral pedicle in implant fixation. Eur Spine J. 2001; 10: 325–333.

[32] Zhao H, Wang YJ, Wang RG, Liu D, Duan YQ, Liu YJ, et al. Three-dimensional hounsfield units measurement of pedicle screw trajectory for predicating screw loosening in lumbar fusion surgery. Clin Interv Aging. 2023; 18: 485–493.

[33] Meunier P, Aaron J, Edouard C, et al. Osteoporosis and the replacement of cell populations of the marrow by adipose tissue. A quantitative study of 84 iliac bone biopsies. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1971; 80: 147–154.

[34] Bloem JL, Reijnierse M, Huizinga T, et al. Mr signal intensity: staying on the bright side in mr image interpretation. RMD Open. 2018; 4: e728.

[35] Pu X, Wang X, Ran L, Xie T, Li Z, Yang Z, et al. Comparison of predictive performance for cage subsidence between ct-based hounsfield units and mri-based vertebral bone quality score following oblique lumbar interbody fusion. Eur Radiol. 2023; 33: 8637–8644.

[36] Ai Y, Chen Q, Huang Y, Ding H, Wang J, Zhu C, et al. Mri-based vertebral bone quality score for predicting cage subsidence by assessing bone mineral density following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective analysis. Eur Spine J. 2023; 32: 3167–3175.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.