Auxetic Biomedical Metamaterials for Orthopedic Surgery Applications: A Comprehensive Review

Minghao Sun, , Xin Hu, , Leilei Tian, , Xiao Yang, , Li Min,

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (8) : 1801 -1815.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (8) : 1801 -1815. DOI: 10.1111/os.14142
REVIEW ARTICLE

Auxetic Biomedical Metamaterials for Orthopedic Surgery Applications: A Comprehensive Review

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Poisson’s ratio in auxetic materials shifts from typically positive to negative, causing lateral expansion during axial tension. This scale-independent characteristic, originating from tailored architectures, exhibits specific physical properties, including energy adsorption, shear resistance, and fracture resistance. These metamaterials demonstrate exotic mechanical properties with potential applications in several engineering fields, but biomedical applications seem to be one of the most relevant, with an increasing number of articles published in recent years, which present opportunities ranging from cellular repair to organ reconstruction with outstanding mechanical performance, mechanical conduction, and biological activity compared with traditional biomedical metamaterials. Therefore, focusing on understanding the potential of these structures and promoting theoretical and experimental investigations into the benefits of their unique mechanical properties is necessary for achieving high-performance biomedical applications. Considering the demand for advanced biomaterial implants in surgical technology and the profound advancement of additive manufacturing technology that are particularly relevant to fabricating complex and customizable auxetic mechanical metamaterials, this review focuses on the fundamental geometric configuration and unique physical properties of negative Poisson’s ratio materials, then categorizes and summarizes auxetic material applications across some surgical departments, revealing efficacy in joint surgery, spinal surgery, trauma surgery, and sports medicine contexts. Additionally, it emphasizes the substantial potential of auxetic materials as innovative biomedical solutions in orthopedics and demonstrates the significant potential for comprehensive surgical application in the future.

Keywords

Auxetic biomedical metamaterials / Negative Poisson’s ratio / Orthopedics / Surgery

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Minghao Sun,, Xin Hu,, Leilei Tian,, Xiao Yang,, Li Min,. Auxetic Biomedical Metamaterials for Orthopedic Surgery Applications: A Comprehensive Review. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2024, 16(8): 1801-1815 DOI:10.1111/os.14142

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Sanami M. Auxetic materials for sports applications. Procedia Eng. 2015; 72: 453–458.

[2]

Zadpoor AA. Mechanical meta-materials. Mater Horiz. 2016; 3(5): 371–381.

[3]

Veerabagu U, Palza H, Quero F. Review: auxetic polymer-based mechanical metamaterials for biomedical applications. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2022; 8(7): 2798–2824.

[4]

Chen H, Chan CT, Sheng P. Transformation optics and metamaterials. Nat Mater. 2010; 9(5): 387–396.

[5]

Chen H-T, O’Hara JF, Azad AK, Taylor AJ, Averitt RD, Shrekenhamer DB, et al. Experimental demonstration of frequency-agile terahertz metamaterials. Nat Photonics. 2008; 2(5): 295–298.

[6]

Soukoulis CM, Wegener M. Optical metamaterials—more Bulky and Less Lossy. Science. 2010; 330(6011): 1633–1634.

[7]

Valentine J, Zhang S, Zentgraf T, Ulin-Avila E, Genov DA, Bartal G, et al. Three-dimensional optical metamaterial with a negative refractive index. Nature. 2008; 455(7211): 376–379.

[8]

Zhao Y, Belkin MA, Alù A. Twisted optical metamaterials for planarized ultrathin broadband circular polarizers. Nat Commun. 2012; 3(1): 870.

[9]

Zheng X, Lee H, Weisgraber TH, Shusteff M, DeOtte J, Duoss EB, et al. Ultralight, ultrastiff mechanical metamaterials. Science. 2014; 344(6190): 1373–1377.

[10]

Meza LR, Das S, Greer JR. Strong, lightweight, and recoverable three-dimensional ceramic nanolattices. Science. 2014; 345(6202): 1322–1326.

[11]

Rogers ETF, Lindberg J, Roy T, Savo S, Chad JE, Dennis MR, et al. A super-oscillatory lens optical microscope for subwavelength imaging. Nat Mater. 2012; 11(5): 432–435.

[12]

Mei J, Ma G, Yang M, Yang Z, Wen W, Sheng P. Dark acoustic metamaterials as super absorbers for low-frequency sound. Nat Commun. 2012; 3(1): 756.

[13]

Milton GW. Composite materials with poisson’s ratios close to — 1. J Mech Phys Solids. 1992; 40(5): 1105–1137.

[14]

Liu Y, Hu H. A review on auxetic structures and polymeric materials. Sci Res Essays. 2010; 5(10): 1052–1063.

[15]

Evans KE. The design of doubly curved sandwich panels with honeycomb cores. Compos Struct. 1991; 17(2): 95–111.

[16]

Lempriere BM. Poisson’s ratio in orthotropic materials. AIAA J. 1968; 6(11): 2226–2227.

[17]

Wojciechowski WK. Remarks on “poisson ratio beyond the limits of the elasticity theory”. J Physical Soc Japan. 2003; 72(7): 1819–1820.

[18]

Carneiro VH, Meireles J, Puga H. Auxetic materials — a review. Mater Sci-Pol. 2013; 31(4): 561–571.

[19]

Lin C, Zhang L, Liu Y, Liu L, Leng J. 4D printing of personalized shape memory polymer vascular stents with negative Poisson’s ratio structure: a preliminary study. Sci China Technol Sci. 2020; 63(4): 578–588.

[20]

Chansoria P, Blackwell J, Etter EL, Bonacquisti EE, Jasiewicz N, Neal T, et al. Rationally designed anisotropic and auxetic hydrogel patches for adaptation to dynamic organs. Adv Funct Mater. 2022; 32(43): 2207590.

[21]

Knight KM, Moalli PA, Abramowitch SD. Preventing mesh pore collapse by designing mesh pores with auxetic geometries: a comprehensive evaluation via computational modeling. J Biomech Eng. 2018; 140(5): 510051–510058.

[22]

Nappi F, Spadaccio C, Fraldi M, Montagnani S, Fouret P, Chachques JC, et al. A composite semiresorbable armoured scaffold stabilizes pulmonary autograft after the Ross operation: Mr Ross’s dream fulfilled. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016; 151(1): 155–164.

[23]

Grima JN, Farrugia P-S, Gatt R, Attard D. On the auxetic properties of rotating rhombi and parallelograms: a preliminary investigation. Phys Status Solidi (b). 2008; 245(3): 521–529.

[24]

Frenzel T, Kadic M, Wegener M. Three-dimensional mechanical metamaterials with a twist. Science. 2017; 358(6366): 1072–1074.

[25]

Bertoldi K, Vitelli V, Christensen J, Van Hecke M. Flexible mechanical metamaterials. Nat RevMater. 2017; 2(11): 17066.

[26]

Pan F, Li Y, Li Z, Yang J, Liu B, Chen Y. 3D pixel mechanical metamaterials. Adv Mater. 2019; 31(25): 1900548.

[27]

Prawoto Y. Seeing auxetic materials from the mechanics point of view: a structural review on the negative Poisson’s ratio. Comput Mater Sci. 2012; 58: 140–153.

[28]

Schwerdtfeger J, Heinl P, Singer RF, Körner C. Auxetic cellular structures through selective electron-beam melting. Phys Status Solidi (b). 2010; 247(2): 269–272.

[29]

Alderson A. A triumph of lateral thought. Chem Ind. 1999; 10: 384–387.

[30]

Sanami M, Ravirala N, Alderson K, Alderson A. Auxetic materials for sports applications. Procedia Eng. 2014; 72: 453–458.

[31]

Kolken HMA, Garcia AF, Du Plessis A, Rans C, Mirzaali MJ, Zadpoor AA. Fatigue performance of auxetic meta-biomaterials. Acta Biomater. 2021; 126: 511–523.

[32]

Choi HJ, Lee JJ, Lee JB, Sung H-J, Shin J-W, Shin JW, et al. MG-63 cells proliferation following various types of mechanical stimulation on cells by auxetic hybrid scaffolds. Biomater Res. 2016; 20: 32.

[33]

Choi HJ, Lee JJ, Park YJ, Shin J-W, Sung H-J, Shin JW, et al. MG-63 osteoblast-like cell proliferation on auxetic PLGA scaffold with mechanical stimulation for bone tissue regeneration. Biomater Res. 2016; 20: 33.

[34]

Lakes R. Foam structures with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Science. 1987; 235(4792): 1038–1040.

[35]

Friis EA, Lakes RS, Park JB. Negative Poisson’s ratio polymeric and metallic foams. J Mater Sci. 1988; 23(12): 4406–4414.

[36]

Lee T, Lakes RS. Anisotropic Polyurethane Foam with Poisson’s Ratio Greater than. Berlin: Springer; 1997.

[37]

Chow L, Kl Y, Wong KH, Leung MS, Sun Y, My K, et al. 3D printing auxetic architectures for hypertrophic scar therapy. Macromol Mater Eng. 2022; 307(5): 2100866.

[38]

Jiang Y, Shi K, Zhou L, He M, Zhu C, Wang J, et al. 3D-printed auxetic-structured intervertebral disc implant for potential treatment of lumbar herniated disc. Bioactive Mater. 2023; 20: 528–538.

[39]

Lai C-W, Yu S-S. 3D printable strain sensors from deep eutectic solvents and cellulose nanocrystals. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020; 12(30): 34235–34244.

[40]

Chen Y-W, Lin Y-H, Lin T-L, Lee K-XA, Yu M-H, Shie M-Y. 3D-biofabricated chondrocyte-laden decellularized extracellular matrix-contained gelatin methacrylate auxetic scaffolds under cyclic tensile stimulation for cartilage regeneration. Biofabrication. 2023; 15(4): 045007.

[41]

Bhullar SK, Rana D, Lekesiz H, Bedeloglu AC, Ko J, Cho Y, et al. Design and fabrication of auxetic PCL nanofiber membranes for biomedical applications. Mater Sci Eng C. 2017; 81: 334–340.

[42]

Zhang SL, Lai YC, He X, Liu R, Zi Y, Wang ZL. Auxetic foam-based contact-mode triboelectric nanogenerator with highly sensitive self-powered strain sensing capabilities to monitor human body movement. Adv Funct Mater. 2017; 27(25): 1606695.

[43]

Li Q, Kuang Y, Zhu M. Auxetic piezoelectric energy harvesters for increased electric power output. AIP Adv. 2017; 7(1): 15104.

[44]

Saxena KK, Das R, Calius EP. Three decades of auxetics research – materials with negative Poisson’s ratio: a review. Adv Eng Mater. 2016; 18(11): 1847–1870.

[45]

Zeng J, Hu H, Zhou L. A study on negative Poisson’s ratio effect of 3D auxetic orthogonal textile composites under compression. Smart Mater Struct. 2017; 26(6): 65014.

[46]

Ma P, Chang Y, Boakye A, Jiang G. Review on the knitted structures with auxetic effect. J Text Inst. 2017; 108(6): 947–961.

[47]

Liaqat M, Samad HA, Hamdani STA, Nawab Y. The development of novel auxetic woven structure for impact applications. J Text Inst. 2016; 108: 1–7.

[48]

Higgins SG, Becce M, Belessiotis-Richards A, Seong H, Sero JE, Stevens MM. High-aspect-ratio nanostructured surfaces as biological metamaterials. Adv Mater. 2020; 32(9): e1903862.

[49]

Kapnisi M, Mansfield C, Marijon C, Guex AG, Perbellini F, Bardi I, et al. Auxetic cardiac patches with tunable mechanical and conductive properties toward treating myocardial infarction. Adv Funct Mater. 2018; 28(21): 1800618.

[50]

Gatt R, Vella Wood M, Gatt A, Zarb F, Formosa C, Azzopardi KM, et al. Negative Poisson’s ratios in tendons: an unexpected mechanical response. Acta Biomater. 2015; 24: 201–208.

[51]

Ahn CB, Kim JH, Lee J-H, Park KY, Son KH, Lee JW. Development of multi-layer tubular vascular scaffold to enhance compliance by exhibiting a negative Poisson’s ratio. Int J Precis Eng Manuf-Green Technol. 2021; 8(3): 841–853.

[52]

Jin Y, Xie C, Gao Q, Zhou X, Li G, Du J, et al. Fabrication of multi-scale and tunable auxetic scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Design. 2021; 197: 109277.

[53]

Kim Y, Son KH, Lee JW. Auxetic structures for tissue engineering scaffolds and biomedical devices. Materials. 2021; 14(22): 6821.

[54]

Wang L, Huang H, Yuan H, Yao Y, Park JH, Liu J, et al. In vitro fatigue behavior and in vivo osseointegration of the auxetic porous bone screw. Acta Biomater. 2023; 170: S1742706123005044–S1742706123005201.

[55]

Rana M, Karmakar S, Bandyopadhyay A, Roychowdhury A. Design and manufacturing of patient-specific Ti6Al4V implants with inhomogeneous porosity. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023; 143: 105925.

[56]

Liu B, Wang H, Zhang M, Li J, Zhang N, Luan Y, et al. Capability of auxetic femoral stems to reduce stress shielding after total hip arthroplasty. J OrthopTranslat. 2023; 38: 220–228.

[57]

Singh AP, Rana M, Pal B, Datta P, Majumder S, Roychowdhury A. Patient-specific femoral implant design using metamaterials for improving load transfer at proximal-lateral region of the femur. Med Eng Phys. 2023; 113: 103959.

[58]

Amin F, Ali MN, Ansari U, Mir M, Minhas MA, Shahid W. Auxetic coronary stent endoprosthesis: fabrication and structural analysis. J Appl Biomater Funct Mater. 2015; 13(2): e127–e135.

[59]

Xue H, Luo Z, Brown T, Beier S. Design of self-expanding auxetic stents using topology optimization. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8: 736.

[60]

Tsegay F, Hisham M, Elsherif M, Schiffer A, Butt H. 3D printing of pH indicator auxetic hydrogel skin wound dressing. Molecules. 2023; 28(3): 1339.

[61]

Goodridge RD, Tuck CJ, Hague RJM. Laser sintering of polyamides and other polymers. Prog Mater Sci. 2012; 57(2): 229–267.

[62]

Kolken HMA, Zadpoor AA. Auxetic mechanical metamaterials. RSC Adv. 2017; 7(9): 5111–5129.

[63]

Melchels FPW, Feijen J, Grijpma DW. A review on stereolithography and its applications in biomedical engineering. Biomaterials. 2010; 31(24): 6121–6130.

[64]

Li Y, Mao Q, Li X, Yin J, Wang Y, Fu J, et al. High-fidelity and high-efficiency additive manufacturing using tunable pre-curing digital light processing. Addit Manuf. 2019; 30: 100889.

[65]

Turner BN, Gold SA. A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: II. Materials, dimensional accuracy, and surface roughness. Rapid Prototyp J. 2015; 21(3): 250–261.

[66]

Mazzoli A. Selective laser sintering in biomedical engineering. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2013; 51(3): 245–256.

[67]

Dalton PD. Melt electrowriting with additive manufacturing principles. Curr Opin Biomed Eng. 2017; 2: 49–57.

[68]

Fereidoonnezhad B, O’Connor C, McGarry JP. A new anisotropic soft tissue model for elimination of unphysical auxetic behaviour. J Biomech. 2020; 111: 110006.

[69]

Hazlehurst KB, Wang CJ, Stanford M. An investigation into the flexural characteristics of functionally graded cobalt chrome femoral stems manufactured using selective laser melting. Mater Design. 2014; 60: 177–183.

[70]

Evans KE, Alderson A. Auxetic materials: functional materials and structures from lateral thinking! Adv Mater. 2000; 12(9): 617–628.

[71]

Masters IG, Evans KE. Models for the elastic deformation of honeycombs. Compos Struct. 1996; 35(4): 403–422.

[72]

Smith CW, Grima JN, Evans KE. A novel mechanism for generating auxetic behaviour in reticulated foams: missing rib foam model. Acta Mater. 2000; 48(17): 4349–4356.

[73]

Li Y, Harrysson O, West H, Cormier D. Compressive properties of Ti–6Al–4V auxetic mesh structures made by electron beam melting. Acta Mater. 2012; 60: 793–802.

[74]

Bückmann T, Stenger N, Kadic M, Kaschke J, FröLich A, Kennerknecht T, et al. Tailored 3D mechanical metamaterials made by dip-in direct-laser-writing optical lithography. Adv Mater. 2012; 24(20): 2710–2714.

[75]

Critchley R, Corni I, Wharton JA, Walsh FC, Wood RJK, Stokes KR. The preparation of auxetic foams by three-dimensional printing and their characteristics. Adv Eng Mater. 2013; 15(10): 980–985.

[76]

Wang K, Chang YH, Chen YW, Zhang C, Wang B. Designable dual-material auxetic metamaterials using three-dimensional printing. Mater Design. 2015; 67: 159–164.

[77]

Choi JB, Lakes RS. Non-linear properties of polymer cellular materials with a negative Poisson’s ratio. J Mater Sci. 1992; 27: 4678–4684.

[78]

Choi JB, Lakes RS. Non-linear properties of metallic cellular materials with a negative Poisson’s ratio. J Mater Sci. 1992; 27(19): 5375–5381.

[79]

Gibson LJ, Ashby MF, Schajer GS, Robertson CI. The mechanics of two-dimensional cellular materials. Proc R Soc A: Math Phys Eng. 1982; 382: 25–42.

[80]

Yang W, Li ZM, Shi W, Xie BH, Yang MB. Review on auxetic materials. J Mater Sci. 2004; 39(10): 3269–3279.

[81]

Whitty JPM, Nazare F, Alderson A. Effects of density variations on the in-plane poissons ratios and youngs moduli of periodic conventional and re-entrant honeycombs–part 1: rib thickness. Cellular Polym. 2002; 21(2).

[82]

Larsen U, Signund O, Bouwsta S. Design and fabrication of compliant micromechanisms and structures with negative Poisson’s ratio. J Microelectromechanical Syst. 1997; 6(2): 99–106.

[83]

Lim T-C. A 3D auxetic material based on intersecting double arrowheads. Physica Status Solidi. 2016; 253(7): 1252–1260.

[84]

Grima JN, Gatt R, Alderson A, Evans KE. On the potential of connected stars as auxetic systems. Mol Simul. 2005; 31(13): 925–935.

[85]

Gaspar N, Ren XJ, Smith CW, Grima JN, Evans KE. Novel honeycombs with auxetic behaviour. Acta Mater. 2005; 53(8): 2439–2445.

[86]

Theocaris PS, Stavroulakis GE, Panagiotopoulos PD. Negative Poisson’s ratios in composites with star-shaped inclusions: a numerical homogenization approach. Arch Appl Mech. 1997; 67(4): 274–286.

[87]

Lakes R. Deformation mechanisms in negative Poisson’s ratio materials: structural aspects. J Mater Sci. 1991; 26: 2287–2292.

[88]

Alderson A, Alderson KL, Attard D, Evans KE, Gatt R, Grima JN, et al. Elastic constants of 3-, 4-and 6-connected chiral and anti-chiral honeycombs subject to uniaxial in-plane loading. Compos Sci Technol. 2010; 70(7): 1042–1048.

[89]

Prall D, Lakes RS. Properties of a chiral honeycomb with a poisson’s ratio of — 1. Int J Mech Sci. 1997; 39(3): 305–307.

[90]

Lakes R, Ha CS, Plesha ME. Chiral three-dimensional lattices with tunable Poisson’s ratio. Smart Mater Struct. 2016; 25(5): 054005.

[91]

Alderson A, Alderson KL, Chirima G, Ravirala N, Zied KM. The in-plane linear elastic constants and out-of-plane bending of 3-coordinated ligament and cylinder-ligament honeycombs. Compos Sci Technol. 2010; 70(7): 1034–1041.

[92]

Grima JN, Gatt R, Farrugia PS. On the properties of auxetic meta-tetrachiral structures. Physica Status Solidi. 2010; 245(3): 511–520.

[93]

Grima JN, Evans KE. Auxetic behavior from rotating squares. J Mater Sci Lett. 2000; 41: 3193.

[94]

Grima JN, Evans KE. Auxetic behavior from rotating squares. J Mater Sci Lett. 2000; 19(17): 1563–1565.

[95]

Grima JN, Evans KE. Auxetic behavior from rotating triangles. J Mater Sci. 2006; 41(10): 3193–3196.

[96]

Alderson A, Evans KE. Molecular origin of auxetic behavior in tetrahedral framework silicates. Phys Rev Lett. 2002; 89(22): 225503.

[97]

Gercek H. Poisson’s ratio values for rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci. 2007; 44(1): 1–13.

[98]

Mizzi L, Salvati E, Spaggiari A, Tan J-C, Korsunsky AM. Highly stretchable two-dimensional auxetic metamaterial sheets fabricated via direct-laser cutting. Int J Mech Sci. 2020; 167: 105242.

[99]

Wu XL, Wen T, Guo HL, Yang S, Xu AW. Biomass-derived sponge-like carbonaceous hydrogels and aerogels for supercapacitors. ACS Nano. 2013; 7(4): 3589–3597.

[100]

Overwelde JTB, Shan S, Bertoldi K. Compaction through buckling in 2D periodic, soft and porous structures: effect of pore shape. Adv Mater. 2012; 24(17): 2337–2342.

[101]

Babaee S, Shim J, Weaver JC, Chen ER, Patel N, Bertoldi K. 3D soft metamaterials with negative Poisson’s ratio. Adv Mater. 2013; 25(36): 5044–5049.

[102]

Dolla WJS, Fricke BA, Becker BR. Structural and drug diffusion models of conventional and auxetic drug-eluting stents. J Med Device. 2006; 1(1): 47–55.

[103]

Meng Z, He J, Cai Z, Wang F, Zhang J, Wang L, et al. Design and additive manufacturing of flexible polycaprolactone scaffolds with highly-tunable mechanical properties for soft tissue engineering. Mater Design. 2020; 189: 108508.

[104]

Wang Q, Yang Z, Lu Z, Li X. Mechanical responses of 3D cross-chiral auxetic materials under uniaxial compression. Mater Design. 2020; 186: 108226.

[105]

Yang DU, Lee S, Huang FY. Geometric effects on micropolar elastic honeycomb structure with negative Poisson’s ratio using the finite element method. Finite Elem Anal Des. 2003; 39(3): 187–205.

[106]

Bezazi A, Scarpa F, Remillat C. A novel centresymmetric honeycomb composite structure. Compos Struct. 2005; 71(3/4): 356–364.

[107]

Mousanezhad D, Haghpanah B, Ghosh R, Hamouda AM, Nayeb-Hashemi H, Vaziri A. Elastic properties of chiral, anti-chiral, and hierarchical honeycombs: a simple energy-based approach -ScienceDirect. Theor Appl Mech Lett. 2016; 6(2): 81–96.

[108]

Gatt R, Attard D, Farrugia PS, Azzopardi KM, Mizzi L, Brincat JP, et al. A realistic generic model for anti-tetrachiral systems. Physica Status Solidi. 2013; 250(10): 2012–2019.

[109]

Gatt R, Brincat JP, Azzopardi KM, Mizzi L, Grima JN. On the effect of the mode of connection between the node and the ligaments in anti-tetrachiral systems. Adv Eng Mater. 2015; 17: 189–198.

[110]

Ha CS, Plesha ME, Lakes RS. Chiral three-dimensional lattices with tunable Poisson’s ratio. Smart Mater Struct. 2016; 25(5): 54005.

[111]

Huang HH, Wong BL, Chou YC. Design and properties of 3D-printed chiral auxetic metamaterials by reconfigurable connections. Physica Status Solidi. 2016; 253: 1557–1564.

[112]

Lorato A, Innocenti P, Scarpa F, Alderson A, Alderson KL, Zied KM, et al. The transverse elastic properties of chiral honeycombs. Compos Sci Technol. 2010; 70(7): 1057–1063.

[113]

Grima JN, Gatt R, Ellul B, Chetcuti E. Auxetic behaviour in non-crystalline materials having star or triangular shaped perforations. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2010; 356:37–40.

[114]

Mizzi L, Azzopardi KM, Attard D, Grima JN, Gatt R. Auxetic metamaterials exhibiting giant negative Poisson’s ratios. Phys Status Solidi -Rapid Res Lett. 2015; 9(7): 425–430.

[115]

Gallo J, Vaculova J, Goodman SB, Konttinen YT, Thyssen JP. Contributions of human tissue analysis to understanding the mechanisms of loosening and osteolysis in total hip replacement. Acta Biomater. 2014; 10(6): 2354–2366.

[116]

Patil S, Garbuz DS, Greidanus NV, Masri BA, Duncan CP. Quality of life outcomes in revision vs primary total hip arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23(4): 550–553.

[117]

Chatterjee S, Roy S, Majumder S, RoyChowdhury A. Biomechanical analysis to probe role of bone condition and subject weight in stiffness customization of femoral stem for improved periprosthetic biomechanical response. J Biomech Eng. 2020; 142: 101002.

[118]

Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Bennett D, Delanois RE, Saleh KJ, Thongtrangan I, et al. Total hip arthroplasties: what are the reasons for revision? Int Orthop. 2008; 32(5): 597–604.

[119]

Huiskes R, Weinans H, Van Rietbergen B. The relationship between stress shielding and bone resorption around total hip stems and the effects of flexible materials. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; 274: 124–134.

[120]

Kolken HMA. Rationally designed meta-implants: a combination of auxetic and conventional meta-biomaterials. Mater Horiz. 2017; 5: 28–35.

[121]

Liu B, Feng J, Lin Z, He Y, Fu J. Controllable three-dimension auxetic structure design strategies based on triply periodic minimal surfaces and the application in hip implant. Virtual Phys Prototyp. 2023; 18(1): e2170890.

[122]

Eldesouky I, El-Hofy H. Design and prototyping of a novel low stiffness cementless hip stem. Int J Biomed Eng Technol. 2020; 32: 228–244.

[123]

Ghavidelnia N, Bodaghi M, Hedayati R. Femur auxetic meta-implants with tuned micromotion distribution. Materials. 2020; 14(1): 114.

[124]

Jiang Y, Wang J, Wu R, Qi L, Huang L, Wang J, et al. Bioinspired construction of annulus fibrosus implants with a negative Poisson’s ratio for intervertebral disc repair and restraining disc herniation. Bioconjug Chem. 2023; 34(4): 789–798.

[125]

Baker CE. Auxetic spinal implants: consideration of negative Poisson’s ratio in the design of an artificial intervertebral disc. 2011.

[126]

Lvov VA, Senatov FS, Shinkaryov AS, Chernyshikhin SV, Gromov AA, Sheremetyev VA. Experimental 3D printed re-entrant auxetic and honeycomb spinal cages based on Ti-6Al-4 V: computer-aided design concept and mechanical characterization. Compos Struct. 2023; 310: 116766.

[127]

Verma P, Ubaid J, Varadarajan KM, Wardle BL, Kumar S. Synthesis and characterization of carbon nanotube-doped thermoplastic nanocomposites for the additive manufacturing of self-sensing Piezoresistive materials. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022; 14(6): 8361–8372.

[128]

Dehaghani MR, Nourani A, Arjmand N. Effects of auxetic shoe on lumbar spine kinematics and kinetics during gait and drop vertical jump by a combined in vivo and modeling investigation. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1): 18326.

[129]

Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Murray CJL, Jamison DT. The Global Burden of Disease and Risk Factors. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.

[130]

Mathew G, Hanson B. Global burden of trauma: need for effective fracture therapies. Indian J Orthop. 2009; 43(2): 111–116.

[131]

Peden M, Mcgee K, Sharma K. The Injury Chart Book: A Graphical Overview of the Global Burden of Injuries. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.

[132]

Furlow B. Bone fracture fixation. Radiol Technol. 2000; 71(6): 543–558.

[133]

Vaishya R, Chauhan M, Vaish A. Bone cement. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2013; 4(4): 157–163.

[134]

Seo JH, Ju CI, Kim SW, Kim JK, Shin H. Clinical efficacy of bone cement augmented screw fixation for the severe osteoporotic spine. Korean J Spine. 2012; 9(2): 79–84.

[135]

Kim Y-Y, Choi W-S, Rhyu K-W. Assessment of pedicle screw pullout strength based on various screw designs and bone densities—an ex vivo biomechanical study. Spine J. 2012; 12(2): 164–168.

[136]

Wang T, Boone C, Behn AW, Ledesma JB, Bishop JA. Cancellous screws are biomechanically superior to cortical screws in metaphyseal bone. Orthopedics. 2016; 39(5): e828–e832.

[137]

Simon JA, Ricci JL, Cesare PED. Bioresorbable fracture fixation in orthopedics: a comprehensive review. Part II. Clinical studies. Am J Orthop. 1997; 26(11): 754–762.

[138]

van Arkel RJ, Ghouse S, Milner PE, Jeffers JRT. Additive manufactured push-fit implant fixation with screw-strength pull out. J Orthop Res. 2018; 36(5): 1508–1518.

[139]

Vijayavenkataraman S. A new design of 3D-printed orthopedic bone plates with auxetic structures to mitigate stress shielding and improve intra-operative bending. Bio-Design Manuf. 2020; 3(3):98–108.

[140]

Yao Y, Wang L, Li J, Tian S, Zhang M, Fan Y. A novel auxetic structure based bone screw design: tensile mechanical characterization and pullout fixation strength evaluation. Mater Design. 2020; 188: 108424.

[141]

Yao Y, Yuan H, Huang H, Liu J, Wang L, Fan Y. Biomechanical design and analysis of auxetic pedicle screw to resist loosening. Comput Biol Med. 2021; 133: 104386.

[142]

Barnett E, Fletcher J, Gill HS, Pegg EC, Loukaides EG. Auxetic fixation devices can achieve superior pullout performances compared to standard fixation concepts. Smart Mater Struct. 2024; 33: 65010.

[143]

Nippert AH, Smith AM. Psychologic stress related to injury and impact on sport performance. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2008; 19(2): 399–418.

[144]

Tarantino D, Palermi S, Sirico F, Corrado B. Achilles tendon rupture: mechanisms of injury, principles of rehabilitation and return to play. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2020; 5(4): 95.

[145]

Cheatham SW, Baker RT, Abdenour T. Kinesiology tape: a descriptive survey of healthcare professionals in the United States. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2021; 16(3): 778–796.

[146]

Nelson NL. Kinesio taping for chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2016; 20: 672–681.

[147]

Craighead DH, Shank SW, Volz KM, Alexander LM. Kinesiology tape modestly increases skin blood flow regardless of tape application technique. J Perform Health Res. 2017; 1. https://www.scilit.net/article/e1fb961c060ad960d985a412149b412147b414488f

[148]

Ristow O, Hohlweg-Majert B, Kehl V, Koerdt S, Hahnefeld L, Pautke C. Does elastic therapeutic tape reduce postoperative swelling, pain, and trismus after open reduction and internal fixation of mandibular fractures? J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2013; 71(8): 1387–1396.

[149]

González-Iglesias J, Fernández-de-Las-Peñas C, Cleland JA, Huijbregts P, Del Rosario G-VM. Short-term effects of cervical kinesio taping on pain and cervical range of motion in patients with acute whiplash injury: a randomized clinical trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009; 39(7): 515–521.

[150]

Meeusen L, Candidori S, Micoli LL, Guidi G, Stanković T, Graziosi S. Auxetic structures used in kinesiology tapes can improve form-fitting and personalization. Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1): 13509.

[151]

Hedayati R, Yousefi A, Dezaki ML, Bodaghi M. Analytical relationships for 2D Re-entrant auxetic metamaterials: an application to 3D printing flexible implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2023; 143: 105938.

[152]

Kwan MY. Ergonomic design of textile orthoses for patients with hallux valgus. 2024.

[153]

Ding J, Zhuang X, Chen X. Evaluation of absorbable composite polylactide–hydroxyapatite bone fixation devices: a cohort study. Lancet. 2016; 388: S30.

[154]

Huo S, Wang F, Lyu Z, Hong Q, Be N, Wei J, et al. Dual-functional polyetheretherketone surface modification for regulating immunity and bone metabolism. Chem Eng J. 2021; 426: 130806.

[155]

Liu Z, Zhang J, Fu C, Ding J. Osteoimmunity-regulating biomaterials promote bone regeneration. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2023; 18(1): 100774.

[156]

Zhang J, Tong D, Song H, Ruan R, Sun Y, Lin Y, et al. Osteoimmunity-regulating biomimetically hierarchical scaffold for augmented bone regeneration. Adv Mater. 2022; 34(36): 2202044.

[157]

Pal S, Su Y-Z, Chen Y-W, Yu C-H, Kung C-W, Yu S-S. 3D printing of metal–organic framework-based Ionogels: wearable sensors with colorimetric and mechanical responses. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022; 14(24): 28247–28257.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

139

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/