Biplane Reduction: A Novel Technique for Restoring Fibula Length in Maisonneuve Fracture

Abstract

Objective: Fibular length is important for ankle stability. Failure to adequately restore and stabilize fibula length may result in malunion, hindering postoperative functional exercises and recovery of ankle function. However, there is no unified and effective reduction method for fibular shortening in Maisonneuve fractures. In this study, we introduce the biplane reduction as an effective surgical technique for restoring the length of the fibula in Maisonneuve fractures.

Methods: This retrospective study enrolled 12 patients preoperatively diagnosed with Maisonneuve fractures between June 2019 and June 2022. All patients underwent our biplane reduction technique to restore the length of their fibula. Operation time, hospital stay, complications, FTA (the angle between the fibular tip and the superior articular surface of the talus), visual analog pain score, and the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot score were recorded. An independent sample t-test was used for component comparisons, and a paired sample t-test or one-way analysis of variance was used for intra-group comparisons.

Results: No patient was lost to follow-up and no obvious postoperative complications were observed. After operation, FTA recovered from 37.52 ± 0.37 ° to 40.42 ± 0.43 °, which was significantly improved compared with that before operation (p < 0.01). At the last follow-up, both the VAS and AOFAS scores showed significant improvement compared to pre-surgery scores.

Conclusions: The reduction technique proposed in this study to restore the length of the fibula in Maisonneuve fractures is simple and effective, does not require special equipment, and has the advantage of directly examining the reduction condition.

Keywords

Fibula Length / Fibula Shortening / Maisonneuve Fracture / Reduction

References

[1] Fraissler L, Mattiassich G, Brunnader L, Holzer LA. Arthroscopic findings and treatment of maisonneuve fracture complex. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22: 821.

[2] Fonseca LLD, Nunes IG, Nogueira RR, Martins GEV, Mesencio AC, Kobata SI. Reproducibility of the Lauge-Hansen, Danis-weber, and AO classifications for ankle fractures. Rev Bras Orthop. 2018; 53: 101–106.

[3] Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Tuček M. Maisonneuve fractures of the ankle: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev. 2022; 10(2).

[4] He J, Ma X, Hu Y, Wang S, Cao H, Li N, et al. Investigation of the characteristics and mechanism of interosseous membrane injuries in typical Maisonneuve fracture. Orthop Surg. 2023; 15: 777–784.

[5] Yu GS, Lin YB, Xiong GS, Xu HB, Liu YY. Diagnosis and treatment of ankle syndesmosis injuries with associated interosseous membrane injury: a current concept review. Int Orthop. 2019; 43: 2539–2547.

[6] Riedel MD, Miller CP, Kwon JY. Augmenting suture-button fixation for Maisonneuve injuries with fibular shortening: technique tip. Foot Ankle Int. 2017; 38: 1146–1151.

[7] Thordarson DB, Motamed S, Hedman T, Ebramzadeh E, Bakshian S. The effect of fibular malreduction on contact pressures in an ankle fracture malunion model. J Bone Jt Surg Am. 1997; 79: 1809–1815.

[8] Dattani R, Patnaik S, Kantak A, Srikanth B, Selvan TP. Injuries to the tibiofibular syndesmosis. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2008; 90: 405–410.

[9] Najefi AA, Buraimoh O, Blackwell J, Bing A, Varrall R, Townshend D, et al. Should the tibiotalar angle Be measured using an AP or mortise radiograph? Does it matter. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2019; 58: 930–932.

[10] Asmus A, Vogel K, Vogel A, Eichenauer F, Kim S, Eisenschenk A. Pedicled vascularized iliac bone graft for treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2020; 32: 127–138.

[11] Wu C, Wang X, Zhang H, Xie S, He J. Biomechanical analysis of different internal fixation methods for special Maisonneuve fracture of the ankle joint based on finite element analysis. Injury. 2023; 54: 110917.

[12] Hinds RM, Tran WH, Lorich DG. Maisonneuve-hyperplantarflexion variant ankle fracture. Orthopedics. 2014; 37: e1040–e1044.

[13] Bartoníček J, Rammelt S, Kašper Š, Malík J, Tuček M. Pathoanatomy of Maisonneuve fracture based on radiologic and CT examination. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019; 139: 497–506.

[14] Huang B, Dong Q, Hong DY, Park YW, Kim HN. Fibular lengthening using the elongated combi-hole of a locking compression plate: technical tip. Foot Ankle Int. 2015; 36: 1104–1109.

[15] Fitzpatrick EP, Kwon JY. Use of a pointed reduction clamp placed on the distal fibula to ensure proper restoration of fibular length and rotation and anatomic reduction of the syndesmosis: a technique tip. Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 943–948.

[16] Ye MY, Vaughn J, Briceno J, Kwon JY. Screw distraction technique for gaining fibular length. Injury. 2018; 49: 2322–2325.

[17] Wilson JM, Kukoski NR, Lunati MP, Moore T. Tibial plateau fracture with ipsilateral syndesmotic injury: a previously undescribed Maisonneuve-equivalent injury pattern: a case report. JBJS Case Connect. 2020; 10: e0280.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.