Association between Adverse Psychological Emotions and Postoperative Brace for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Prospective Cohort Study with Propensity Score Matching

Ying Yang, , Haoran Zhang, , Xue Tian, , Shengru Wang, , Yaping Chen, , Jianguo Zhang,

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (8) : 1920 -1928.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (8) : 1920 -1928. DOI: 10.1111/os.14129
CLINICAL ARTICLE

Association between Adverse Psychological Emotions and Postoperative Brace for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Prospective Cohort Study with Propensity Score Matching

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective: Although the advantages of postoperative braces have been verified in many fields, it is not clear whether postoperative braces can help reduce patients’ adverse psychological emotions such as kinesiophobia, anxiety, and depression. This study aims to analyze whether the use of a postoperative brace helps reduce adverse psychological emotions in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients undergoing spinal deformity surgeries.

Methods: All consecutive patients who underwent spinal corrective surgeries at our institution between April 2023 and July 2023 formed the prospective cohort. Outcome measures were collected in the preoperative period, 3 months after surgery, and 6 months after surgery. All patients were assessed using the Tampa scale for kinesiophobia (TSK), the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), and the numerical rating scale (NRS). A statistical model of propensity score matching was used to eliminate potential selection bias and maintain comparability. Multivariate linear regression models were used to determine the relationship between postoperative brace and adverse psychological emotions.

Results: After propensity score matching, this study ultimately enrolled 150 patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic and perioperative variables. The fully adjusted model showed that the TSK scores of the non-brace group at the 3-month (β = 2.50, 95% CI 0.80–4.20, p = 0.005) and 6-month follow-up (β = 2.75, 95% CI 0.75–4.74, p = 0.007) were significantly higher than those of the brace group. The HADS score of the non-brace group at the 3-month follow-up was significantly higher than that of the brace group (β = 1.75, 95% CI 0.28–3.22, p = 0.019). The NRS score of the non-brace group at the 3-month follow-up was significantly higher than that of the brace group (β = 0.69, 95% CI 0.05–1.33, p = 0.034). At the 6-month follow-up, there were no significant difference for HADS score or NRS score between the two groups.

Conclusion: In the early postoperative period, the postoperative brace could provide AIS patients with psychological supports and help them reduce the frequency of adverse psychological emotions. The postoperative brace could continuously improve the fear of movement within 6 months after surgery, and help reduce anxiety, depression, and pain within 3 months after surgery.

Keywords

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis / Adverse psychological emotions / Brace / Corrective surgery / Spinal deformity

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Ying Yang,, Haoran Zhang,, Xue Tian,, Shengru Wang,, Yaping Chen,, Jianguo Zhang,. Association between Adverse Psychological Emotions and Postoperative Brace for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A Prospective Cohort Study with Propensity Score Matching. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2024, 16(8): 1920-1928 DOI:10.1111/os.14129

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Tsirikos AI, Mataliotakis G, Bounakis N. Posterior spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using a convex pedicle screw technique: a novel concept of deformity correction. Bone Joint J. 2017; 99-b: 1080–1087.

[2]

Smals L, Hulsbosch M, de Faber S, Arts JJC, van Rhijn LW, Willems PC. Post-marketing surveillance on safety and efficacy of posterior spinal correction and fusion with the CD horizon solera instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A retrospective cohort study. N Am Spine Soc J. 2021; 8: 100085.

[3]

Rohlmann A, Zander T, Graichen F, Bergmann G. Effect of an orthosis on the loads acting on a vertebral body replacement. Clin Biomech. 2013; 28(5): 490–494.

[4]

Vander Kooi D, Abad G, Basford JR, Maus TP, Yaszemski MJ, Kaufman KR. Lumbar spine stabilization with a thoracolumbosacral orthosis: evaluation with video fluoroscopy. Spine. 2004; 29(1): 100–104.

[5]

Skoch J, Zoccali C, Zaninovich O, Martirosyan N, Walter CM, Maykowski P, et al. Bracing after surgical stabilization of thoracolumbar fractures: a systematic review of evidence, indications, and practices. World Neurosurg. 2016; 93: 221–228.

[6]

Gadiya AD, Koch JEJ, Patel MS, Shafafy M, Grevitt MP, Quraishi NA. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS): a meta-analysis and systematic review. Spine Deform. 2021; 9(4): 893–904.

[7]

Sinha S, Caplan I, Schuster J, et al. Evaluation of lumbar spine bracing as a postoperative adjunct to single-level posterior lumbar spine surgery. Asian J Neurosurg. 2020; 15(2): 333–337.

[8]

Block AR, Ben-Porath YS, Marek RJ. Psychological risk factors for poor outcome of spine surgery and spinal cord stimulator implant: a review of the literature and their assessment with the MMPI-2-RF. Clin Neuropsychol. 2013; 27(1): 81–107.

[9]

Cleland JA, Fritz JM, Childs JD. Psychometric properties of the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire and Tampa scale of Kinesiophobia in patients with neck pain. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 87(2): 109–117.

[10]

Haddas R, Lieberman IH, Block A. The relationship between fear-avoidance and neuromuscular measures of function in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis. Spine. 2018; 43(23): E1412–E1421.

[11]

Julien-Marsollier F, Michelet D, Assaker R, Doval A, Louisy S, Madre C, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgical correction of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Paediatr Anaesth. 2020; 30(10): 1068–1076.

[12]

Yang YJ, Huang X, Gao XN, Xia B, Gao JB, Wang C, et al. An optimized enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway improved patient Care in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Surgery: a retrospective cohort study. World Neurosurg. 2021; 145: e224–e232.

[13]

Wei X, Xu X, Zhao Y, Hu W, Bai Y, Li M. The Chinese version of the Tampa scale for Kinesiophobia was cross-culturally adapted and validated in patients with low back pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015; 68(10): 1205–1212.

[14]

Li Q, Lin Y, Hu C, Xu Y, Zhou H, Yang L, et al. The Chinese version of hospital anxiety and depression scale: psychometric properties in Chinese cancer patients and their family caregivers. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2016; 25: 16–23.

[15]

de la Vega R, Sakulsriprasert P, Miró J, Jensen MP. Optimizing pain intensity assessment in clinical trials: how many ratings are needed to best balance the need for validity and to minimize assessment burden? J Pain. 2024; 15: 104474.

[16]

Gallant JN, Morgan CD, Stoklosa JB, Gannon SR, Shannon CN, Bonfield CM. Psychosocial difficulties in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: body image, eating behaviors, and mood disorders. World Neurosurg. 2018; 116: 421–432.e1.

[17]

Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf BAR, Yarmolinsky J, Davies NM, Swanson SA, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomization: the STROBE-MR statement. JAMA. 2021; 326(16): 1614–1621.

[18]

Zhu MP, Tetreault LA, Sorefan-Mangou F, Garwood P, Wilson JR. Efficacy, safety, and economics of bracing after spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Spine J. 2018; 18(9): 1513–1525.

[19]

Nasi D, Dobran M, Pavesi G. The efficacy of postoperative bracing after spine surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review. Eur Spine J. 2020; 29(2): 321–331.

[20]

Pathak N, Scott MC, Galivanche AR, et al. Postoperative bracing practices after elective lumbar spine surgery: a questionnaire study of U.S. spine surgeons. N Am Spine Soc J. 2021; 5: 100055.

[21]

Connolly PJ, Grob D. Controversy: bracing of patients after fusion for degenerative problems of the lumbar spine-yes or No? Spine. 1998; 23(12): 1426–1428.

[22]

Archer KR, Seebach CL, Mathis SL, Riley LH 3rd, Wegener ST. Early postoperative fear of movement predicts pain, disability, and physical health six months after spinal surgery for degenerative conditions. Spine J. 2014; 14(5): 759–767.

[23]

Figueras C, Matamalas A, Pizones J, Moreno-Manzanaro L, Betegón J, Bagó J. The relationship of Kinesiophobia with pain and quality of life in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine. 2021; 46(21): 1455–1460.

[24]

Riddle DL, Wade JB, Jiranek WA, Kong X. Preoperative pain catastrophizing predicts pain outcome after knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468(3): 798–806.

[25]

Sullivan M, Tanzer M, Stanish W, Fallaha M, Keefe FJ, Simmonds M, et al. Psychological determinants of problematic outcomes following Total knee arthroplasty. Pain. 2009; 143(1–2): 123–129.

[26]

den Boer JJ, Oostendorp RA, Beems T, Munneke M, Evers AW. Reduced work capacity after lumbar disc surgery: the role of cognitive-behavioral and work-related risk factors. Pain. 2006; 126(1–3): 72–78.

[27]

Mannion AF, Elfering A, Staerkle R, Junge A, Grob D, Dvorak J, et al. Predictors of multidimensional outcome after spinal surgery. Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(6): 777–786.

[28]

Sinikallio S, Aalto T, Airaksinen O, Herno A, Kröger H, Viinamäki H. Depressive burden in the preoperative and early recovery phase predicts poorer surgery outcome among lumbar spinal stenosis patients: a one-year prospective follow-up study. Spine. 2009; 34(23): 2573–2578.

[29]

Sinikallio S, Aalto T, Airaksinen O, Lehto SM, Kröger H, Viinamäki H. Depression is associated with a poorer outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a two-year prospective follow-up study. Spine. 2011; 36(8): 677–682.

[30]

Bussières A, Hancock MJ, Elklit A, Ferreira ML, Ferreira PH, Stone LS, et al. Adverse childhood experience is associated with an increased risk of reporting chronic pain in adulthood: a stystematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2023; 14(2): 2284025.

[31]

Dear BF, Scott AJ, Fogliati R, Gandy M, Karin E, Dudeney J, et al. The chronic conditions course: a randomised controlled trial of an internet-delivered transdiagnostic psychological intervention for people with chronic health conditions. Psychother Psychosom. 2022; 91(4): 265–276.

[32]

Johnson E, Corrick S, Isley S, Vandermeer B, Dolgoy N, Bates J, et al. Mind-body internet and mobile-based interventions for depression and anxiety in adults with chronic physical conditions: a systematic review of RCTs. PLoS Digit Health. 2024; 3(1): e0000435.

[33]

Dahmani D, Taik FZ, Berrichi I, Fourtassi M, Abourazzak FE. Impact of central sensitization on pain, disability and psychological distress in patients with knee osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1): 877.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

156

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/