Treatment of Ulnar Coronoid Process Fracture Using the Anterior Neurovascular Interval Approach: A Retrospective Clinical Study with Short- to Mid-term Follow-up

Abstract

Objective: Numerous surgical techniques for addressing ulnar coronoid process fractures are available; however, a consensus on the optimal approach remains elusive. This study aimed to use the anterior neurovascular interval approach for the surgical management of ulnar coronoid process fractures and to evaluate its clinical outcomes over short- to mid-term follow-up.

Methods: This retrospective clinical study included 20 patients with ulnar coronoid process fractures who were treated using the anterior neurovascular interval approach between January 2018 and December 2022. Participants comprised 16 males and four females, aged between 20 and 64 years (mean, 34.3 ± 12.44 years). Clinical and radiological evaluations were based on elbow joint range of motion (ROM), Visual analogue scale (VAS), and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS). A paired t-test was used to compare the pre-operative and final follow-up VAS and MEPS scores.

Results: The follow-up duration for all patients was at least 12 months (average, 12.65 ± 1.60 months). At the final follow-up, measurements of elbow ROM included a mean extension of 2.85 ± 3.17°, mean flexion of 135 ± 7.25°, mean pronation of 86.4 ± 4.56°, and mean supination of 84.85 ± 5.54°. All participants reached their target MEPS, with an average score of 97.25 ± 4.72 points, and the final mean VAS score was 0.2 ± 0.52 points. The VAS score was significantly lower and MEPS score was higher at the final follow-up than those before surgery (p < 0.05). Throughout the follow-up period, all the fractures united, and the stability of the affected elbows was satisfactory.

Conclusion: Employing the anterior neurovascular interval approach for open reduction and internal fixation to manage coronoid process fractures effectively facilitates anatomical restoration and robust fixation of ulnar coronoid process fractures.

Keywords

Anterior approach / Coronoid process / Elbow fracture / Internal fixation

References

[1] Labronici PJ, Belangero WD, Zublin CM, Gonçalves LBJ, Fajardo H, Pires RE, et al. Morphological characteristics of proximal ulna fractures: a proposal for a new classification and agreement for validation. Healthcare. 2023; 11(5): 693.

[2] Shen JJ, Qiu QM, Gao YB, Tong SL, Huang JF. Direct anterior approach for mini plate fixation of Regan-Morrey type II comminuted ulnar coronoid process fracture. J Orthop Surg. 2019; 27(1): 2309499018825223.

[3] Regan W, Morrey B. Fractures of the coronoid process of the ulna. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71(9): 1348–1354.

[4] O’Driscoll SW, Jupiter JB, Cohen MS, Ring D, McKee M. Difficult elbow fractures: pearls and pitfalls. Instr Course Lect. 2003; 52: 113–134.

[5] Zhang HL, Lin KJ, Lu Y. Prediction of the size of the fragment in comminuted coronoid fracture using the contralateral side: an analysis of similarity of bilateral ulnar coronoid morphology. Orthop Surg. 2020; 12(5): 1495–1502.

[6] Reichel LM, Milam GS, Reitman CA. Anterior approach for operative fixation of coronoid fractures in complex elbow instability. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2012; 16(2): 98–104.

[7] Heim U, Bühler M. Kombinierte verletzungen von radius und ulna im proximalen unterarmsegment. In: U Holz, KE Rehm, editors. 57. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Unfallchirurgie e.V. Berlin Heidelberg GmbH: Springer-Verlag; 1994. p. 61–79.

[8] Rausch V, Jettkant B, Lotzien S, Rosteius T, Mempel E, Schildhauer TA, et al. Biomechanical comparison of screw osteosyntheses and anatomical plating for coronoid shear fractures of the ulna. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 141(9): 1509–1515.

[9] Zhao S, Zeng C, Yuan S, Li R. Reconstruction of coronoid process of the ulna: a literature review. J Int Med Res. 2021; 49(4): 3000605211008323.

[10] Jo SW, Shin DJ. The novel hooked Kirschner wire technique for ulna coronoid process fractures. Clin Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(1): 127–134.

[11] Garrigues GE, Wray WH 3rd, Lindenhovius AL, et al. Fixation of the coronoid process in elbow fracture-dislocations. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93(20): 1873–1881.

[12] Chemama B, Bonnevialle N, Peter O, Mansat P, Bonnevialle P. Terrible triad injury of the elbow: how to improve outcomes? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2010; 96(2): 147–154.

[13] Aggarwal S, Paknikar K, Sinha J, Compson J, Reichert I. Comprehensive review of surgical approaches to the elbow. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021; 20: 101482.

[14] Ni Q, Yang X, Pan Z, Wang J. The pronator teres and the flexor carpi radialis interval approach for operative fixation of ulna coronoid process fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021; 107(2): 102610.

[15] Orbay JL, Heifner JJ, Gray RRL, Rubio F, Hoekzema NA, Mercer DM. A medial approach that provides ample exposure of the coronoid for fracture management. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg. 2023; 27(4): 214–219.

[16] Yang XH, Wei C, Li GP, Wang JJ, Zhao HT, Shi LT, et al. Anatomical study of the anterior neurovascular interval approach to the elbow: observation of the neurovascular interval and relevant branches. Folia Morphol. 2020; 79(2): 387–394.

[17] Sukegawa K, Suzuki T, Ogawa Y, Ueno K, Kiuchi H, Kanazuka A, et al. Anatomic cadaveric study of the extensile extensor digitorum communis splitting approach for exposing the ulnar coronoid process. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016; 25(8): 1268–1273.

[18] Desloges W, Louati H, Papp SR, Pollock JW. Objective analysis of lateral elbow exposure with the extensor digitorum communis split compared with the Kocher interval. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014; 96(5): 387–393.

[19] Li D, Song D, Ni J, Tang S, Gao Z, Li P, et al. Single modified posterior approach through the space of the proximal radioulnar joint for terrible triad injury: a comparative study. Orthop Surg. 2022; 14(9): 2159–2169.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.