Cervical Alignment and Range of Motion Change after Anterior 3-Level Hybrid Surgery Compared with Cervical Laminoplasty: A Matched Cohort Study

Abstract

Objectives: Cervical alignment and range of motion (ROM) changes after cervical spine surgery are related to cervical biomechanical and functions. Few studies compared these parameters between posterior laminoplasty and anterior 3-level hybrid surgery incorporating anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with cervical disc replacement (CDR). This study is aimed to detect the differences of cervical alignment and ROM changes of the two surgeries in a matched-cohort study.

Methods: From January 2018 and May 2020, 51 patients who underwent 3-level hybrid surgery incorporating ACDF with ACDR were included. A 1:1 match of the patients who underwent cervical laminoplasty based on age, gender, duration of symptoms, body mass index, and cervical alignment type was utilized as control group. General data (operative time, blood loss, etc.), Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, VAS (Visual Analog Score), NDI (The Neck Disability Index), cervical sagittal alignment, and cervical range of motion (ROM) were recorded and compared.

Results: Both groups gained significant improvement in JOA, VAS, NDI scores postoperatively (p < 0.05). Cervical alignment significantly increased in hybrid group and decreased in control group after surgeries (p < 0.001). ROM decrease was similar in two groups. For cervical lordosis, though cervical alignment angle in control group decreased, the final follow-up cervical alignment and cervical alignment changes were not significantly different between hybrid and control groups. For cervical non-lordosis, cervical alignment decreased in control group while increased in hybrid group. At final follow-up, cervical alignment and the changes between the two groups were significantly different. Both control group and hybrid group had similar ROM decrease after the surgery no matter whether there was cervical lordosis or non-lordosis. Hybrid surgery showed cervical alignments significantly improved and similar ROM preservation compared with control group at final follow-up both for 1-level and 2-level disc replacement subgroups.

Conclusions: The hybrid surgery demonstrated advantages of preserving cervical alignment and gaining similar cervical ROM preservation compared with cervical laminoplasty, especially for cervical non-lordosis. Given the importance of restoring lordotic cervical alignment, hybrid surgery may be preferred over laminoplasty to treat multilevel cervical disc herniation.

Keywords

Anterior Hybrid Surgery / Cervical Spine Alignment / Laminoplasty / Non-Lordosis / ROM

References

[1] Scheer JK, Tang JA, Smith JS, Protopsaltis TS, Blondel B, Bess S, et al. Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 19(2): 141–159.

[2] Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer JK, Schwab FJ, le Huec JC, Massicotte EM, et al. Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(22 Suppl 1): S149–S160.

[3] Tundo F, Avila MJ, Willard L, Fanous S, Curri C, Hussain I, et al. Spinal alignment, surgery, and outcomes in cervical deformity: a practical guide to aid the spine surgeon. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019; 185: 105496.

[4] Shin JJ. Comparison of adjacent segment degeneration, cervical alignment, and clinical outcomes after one-and multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Neurospine. 2019; 16(3): 589–600.

[5] Qi C, Cao J, Xia H, Miao D, Liu Y, Guo J, et al. Does cervical curvature affect neurological outcome after incomplete spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality (SCIWORA): 1-year follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res. 2022; 17(1): 361.

[6] Villavicencio AT, Babuska JM, Ashton A, Busch E, Roeca C, Nelson EL, et al. Prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical study evaluating the correlation of clinical outcomes and cervical sagittal alignment. Neurosurgery. 2011; 68(5): 1309–1316.

[7] Tang JA, Scheer JK, Smith JS, Deviren V, Bess S, Hart RA, et al. The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery. 2012; 71(3): 662–669.

[8] Nakagawa H, Okazaki T, Saito K. Surgical strategies in Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. World Neurosurg. 2015; 84: 220–221.

[9] Chen H, Liu H, Zou L, Li T, Gong Q, Song Y, et al. Effect of mini-plate fixation on hinge fracture and bony fusion in unilateral open-door cervical expansive laminoplasty. Clin Spine Surg. 2016; 29: E288–E295.

[10] Jia Z, Mo Z, Ding F, He Q, Fan Y, Ruan D. Hybrid surgery for multilevel cervical degenerative disc diseases: a systematic review of biomechanical and clinical evidence. Eur Spine J. 2014; 23: 1619–1632.

[11] Lee JJ, Lee N, Oh SH, Shin DA, Yi S, Kim KN, et al. Clinical and radiological outcomes of multilevel cervical laminoplasty versus three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2020; 10(11): 2112–2124.

[12] Chen H, Liu H, Meng Y, Wang B, Gong Q, Song Y. Short-term outcomes of anterior fusion-nonfusion hybrid surgery versus posterior cervical laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical Spondylotic myelopathy. World Neurosurg. 2018; 116: e1007–e1014.

[13] Huang K, Wang H, Liu H, Meng Y, Ding C, Wang B, et al. Classification of three-level hybrid surgery for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease: a retrospective study of 108 patients. BMC Surg. 2022; 22(1): 179.

[14] Wang H, Huang K, Liu H, Meng Y, Wang X, Ding C, et al. Is cervical disc replacement valuable in 3-level hybrid surgery compared with 3-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? World Neurosurg. 2021; 146: e151–e160.

[15] Chiba K, Toyama Y, Watanabe M, Maruiwa H, Matsumoto M, Hirabayashi K. Impact of longitudinal distance of the cervical spine on the results of expansive open-door laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(22): 2893–2898.

[16] Chen H, Deng Y, Li T, Gong Q, Song Y, Liu H. Clinical and radiography results of mini-plate fixation compared to suture suspensory fixation in cervical laminoplasty: a five-year follow-up study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2015; 138: 188–195.

[17] Alam I, Sharma R, Borkar SA, Goda R, Katiyar V, Kale SS. Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: a critical review. J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2020; 11(3): 163–168.

[18] Katsuura Y, Lemons A, Lorenz E, Swafford R, Osborn J, Cason G. Radiographic analysis of cervical and spinal alignment in multilevel ACDF with lordotic interbody device. Int J Spine Surg. 2017; 11(2): 13.

[19] Cabraja M, Abbushi A, Koeppen D, Kroppenstedt S, Woiciechowsky C. Comparison between anterior and posterior decompression with instrumentation for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: sagittal alignment and clinical outcome. Neurosurg Focus. 2010; 28: E15.

[20] Hirai T, Okawa A, Arai Y, Takahashi M, Kawabata S, Kato T, et al. Middle-term results of a prospective comparative study of anterior decompression with fusion and posterior decompression with laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine. 2011; 36: 1940–1947.

[21] Shin DA, Yi S, Yoon DH, Kim KN, Shin HC. Artificial disc replacement combined with fusion versus two-level fusion in cervical two-level disc disease. Spine. 2009; 34: 1153–1159; discussion 60–61.

[22] Kang L, Lin D, Ding Z, Liang B, Lian K. Artificial disk replacement combined with midlevel ACDF versus multilevel fusion for cervical disk disease involving 3 levels. Orthopedics. 2013; 36: e88–e94.

[23] Fang Z, Tian R, Sun TW, Yadav SK, Hu W, Xie SQ. Expansion open-door laminoplasty with foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for coexisting multilevel cervical myelopathy and unilateral radiculopathy. Clin Spine Surg. 2016; 29: E21–E27.

[24] Kim BJ, Cho SM, Hur JW, Cha J, Kim SH. Kinematics after cervical laminoplasty: risk factors for cervical kyphotic deformity after laminoplasty. Spine J. 2021; 21(11): 1822–1829.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.