Is Aggressive Surgery Always Necessary for Suspected Early-Onset Surgical Site Infection after Lumbar Surgery? A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis

Abstract

Objective: Surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal surgery is still a persistent worldwide health concern as it is a worrying and devastating complication. The number of samples in previous studies is limited and the role of conservative antibiotic therapy has not been established. This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and feasibility of empirical antibiotic treatment for suspected early-onset deep spinal SSI.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study to identify all cases with suspected early-onset deep SSI after lumbar instrumented surgery between January 2009 and December 2018. We evaluated the potential risks for antibiotic treatment, examined the antibiotic treatment failure rate, and applied logistic regression analysis to assess the risk factors for empirical antibiotic treatment failure.

Results: Over the past 10 years, 45 patients matched the inclusion criteria. The success rate of antibiotic treatment was 62.2% (28/45). Of the 17 patients who failed antibiotic treatment, 16 were cured after a debridement intervention and the remaining one required removal of the internal fixation before recovery. On univariate analysis, risk factors for antibiotic treatment failure included age, increasing or persisting back pain, wound dehiscence, localized swelling, and time to SSI (cut-off: 10 days). Multivariate analysis revealed that infection occurring 10 days after primary surgery and wound dehiscence were independent risk factors for antibiotic treatment failure.

Conclusion: Appropriate antibiotic treatment is an alternative strategy for suspected early-onset deep SSI after lumbar instrumented surgery. Antibiotic treatment for suspected SSI occurring within 10 days after primary surgery may improve the success rate of antibiotic intervention. Patients with wound dehiscence have a significantly higher likelihood of requiring surgical intervention.

Keywords

Early-Onset Infection / Empirical Antibiotic Treatment / Posterior Lumbar Instrumented Surgery / Surgical Intervention / Suspected Surgical Site Infection

References

[1] Bosch-Nicolau P, Rodríguez-Pardo D, Pigrau C, Pellisé F, Haddad S, Lung M, et al. Acute spinal implant infection treated with debridement: does extended antibiotic treatment improve the prognosis? Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019; 38: 951–958.

[2] Nota SP, Braun Y, Ring D, Schwab JH. Incidence of surgical site infection after spine surgery: what is the impact of the definition of infection? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015; 473: 1612–1619.

[3] Maciejczak A, Wolan-Nieroda A, Wałaszek M, Kołpa M, Wolak Z. Antibiotic prophylaxis in spine surgery: a comparison of single-dose and 72-hour protocols. J Hosp Infect. 2019; 103: 303–310.

[4] Saruwatari R, Yamada K, Sato K, Yokosuka K, Yoshida T, Nakae I, et al. Risk factors for surgical site infection in spinal surgery and interventions: a retrospective study. Spine J. 2020; 35(6): e1593–e1600.

[5] Aleem IS, Tan LA, Nassr A, Riew KD. Surgical site infection prevention following spine surgery. Global Spine J. 2020; 10: 92S–98S.

[6] Pumberger M. Editorial on postoperative spinal implant infection (PSII). J Spine Surg. 2020; 6(Suppl 1): S52–S56.

[7] Núñez-Pereira S, Pellisé F, Rodríguez-Pardo D, Pigrau C, Bagó J, Villanueva C, et al. Implant survival after deep infection of an instrumented spinal fusion. Bone Joint J. 2013; 95B: 1121–1126.

[8] Kowalski TJ, Berbari EF, Huddleston PM, Steckelberg JM, Mandrekar JN, Osmon DR. The management and outcome of spinal implant infections: contemporary retrospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis. 2007; 44: 913–920.

[9] Fernandez-Gerlinger M, Arvieu R, Lebeaux D, Rouis K, Guigui P, Mainardi J, et al. Successful 6-week antibiotic treatment for early surgical-site infections in spinal surgery. Clin Infect Dis. 2019; 68(11): 1856–1861.

[10] Li Z, Liu P, Zhang C, Xu G, Zhang Y, Chang Y, et al. Incidence, prevalence, and analysis of risk factors for surgical site infection after lumbar fusion surgery: ≥2-year follow-up retrospective study. World Neurosurg. 2019; 131: 460–467.

[11] Fanous AA, Kolcun JPG, Brusko GD, Paci M, Ghobrial GM, Nakhla J, et al. Surgical site infection as a risk factor for longterm instrumentation failure in patients with spinal deformity: a retrospective cohort study. World Neurosurg. 2019; 132: 514–519.

[12] Tsantes AG, Papadopoulos DV, Lytras T, Tsantes AE, Mavrogenis AF, Koulouvaris P, et al. Association of malnutrition with surgical site infections following spinal surgeries: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect. 2020; 104(1): 111–119.

[13] Hong HS, Chang MC, Liu CL, Chen TH. Is aggressive surgery necessary for acute postoperative deep spinal wound infection? Spine. 2008; 33: 2473–2478.

[14] Atkinson RA, Jones A, Ousey K, Stephenson J. Management and cost of surgical site infection in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastasis. J Hosp Infect. 2017; 95: 148–153.

[15] Wiley AM, Trueta J. The vascular anatomy of the spine and its relationship to pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1959; 41B: 796–809.

[16] Vraney RT, Phillips FM, Wetzel FT, Brustein M. Peridiscal vascular anatomy of the lower lumbar spine: an endoscopic perspective. Spine. 1999; 24: 2183–2187.

[17] Maruo K, Berven SH. Outcome and treatment of postoperative spine surgical site infections: predictors of treatment success and failure. J Orthop Sci. 2014; 19: 398–404.

[18] Tsubouchi N, Fujibayashi S, Otsuki B, Izeki M, Kimura H, Ota M, et al. Risk factors for implant removal after spinal surgical site infection. Eur Spine J. 2018; 27: 2481–2490.

[19] Wille H, Dauchy FA, Desclaux A, Dutronc H, Vareil MO, Dubois V, et al. Efficacy of debridement, antibiotic therapy and implant retention within three months during postoperative instrumented spine infections. Infect Dis (Lond). 2017; 49: 261–267.

[20] Norisyam Y, Sm S, Foo CH, Zairul Anuar KB. Methylene blue adjunct debridement for postoperative spinal infection. Surg Res. 2023; 10(1): 123–130.

[21] Kim DC, Carlson BC, Shafa E, Mehbod A. Vacuum-assisted wound closure management for posterior lumbar spine infections. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022; 30(9): 395–399.

[22] Shapovalov V, Gritsaev IE, Tayursky DA. Experience in the treatment of implant-associated wound complications after spinal surgery. Innovative Med. 2022; 25(3): 64–70.

[23] Chen SH, Lee CH, Huang KC, Hsieh PH, Tsai SY. Postoperative wound infection after posterior spinal instrumentation: analysis of long-term treatment outcomes. Eur Spine J. 2015; 24: 561–570.

[24] Vande Kerckhove M, Fiére V, Vieira TD, Bahroun S, Szadkowski M, d’Astorg H. Postoperative pain due to an occult spinal infection: a case report. World J Clin Cases. 2021; 9(15): 3637–3643.

[25] Lee JC, Baek MJ, Choi SW, Kwon SH, Kim KH, Park SY, et al. Retrospective analysis of culture-negative versus culture-positive postoperative spinal infections. Medicine. 2018; 97: e10643.

[26] Trampuz A, Piper KE, Jacobson MJ, Hanssen AD, Unni KK, Osmon DR, et al. Sonication of removed hip and knee prostheses for diagnosis of infection. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 654–663.

[27] Ying H, Luo ZW, Peng A, Yang QK, Wu X, Chen XY, et al. Incidences and reasons of postoperative surgical site infection after lumbar spinal surgery: a large population study. Eur Spine J. 2021; 69: 1–12.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.