Intentional Dural Resection during en bloc Spinal Resection Could Provide a Secure Surgical Margin for Patients with Recurrent Spinal Tumors

Abstract

Objective: It is always difficult to obtain a comfortable surgical margin for patients with recurrent malignant or invasive benign spinal tumors. Tumor intraspinal invasion and dural adhesion are the essential reasons. There are always residual tumor cells maintained at the edge of dura. Dural resection is a key point to obtain a comfortable surgical margin for such cases. Whether such patients benefit from this risky surgical procedure is unknown. This study aims to understand better the oncological results, associated risks, and neurological function of this risky surgical procedure.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical data from six consecutive patients who registered spinal tumors in our institute and underwent dural resection during en bloc spinal resection from June 2013 to May 2020. The demographic and perioperative data, oncological outcomes, complications, and neurological status were collected and analyzed.

Results: All six patients were followed up for 24 to 46 months (mean follow-up time: 32.8 months). Local recurrence was detected in one patient (1/6, 16.7%) at 36 months postoperatively and in five patients with no evidence of disease at the last follow up (survival rate 83.3%). Eleven complications occurred in four patients (66.7%), and the dural resection-related complications included only four cases of cerebrospinal fluid leakage (CSFL), which accounted for 36.4% (4/11) of all complications. Neurologic status evaluated by the Frankel grade showed improvement of one grade in one case and deterioration of one to two grades in five patients immediately after surgery. All deterioration cases recovered to the preoperative level 6 months after the operation.

Conclusion: Dural resection is significant for patients with dura matter invaded by recurrent primary malignant or invasive benign spinal tumors with the purpose of clinical cure. This study demonstrated that in strictly selected cases, intentional dural resection could provide satisfying local control and long-term disease-free survival with acceptable complications and satisfying neurological function.

Keywords

Cerebrospinal fluid leakage / Complication / Intentional dural resection / Neurological status / Recurrence rate / Recurrent primary spinal tumor

References

[1] Hasegawa K, Homma T, Hirano T, Ogose A, Hotta T, Yajiri Y, et al. Margin-free spondylectomy for extended malignant spine tumors: surgical technique and outcome of 13 cases. Spine. 2007; 32(1): 142–148.

[2] Charest-Morin R, Dirks MS, Patel S, Boriani S, Luzzati A, Fehlings MG, et al. Ewing sarcoma of the spine: prognostic variables for survival and local control in surgically treated patients. Spine. 2018; 43(9): 622–629.

[3] Gokaslan ZL, Zadnik PL, Sciubba DM, Germscheid N, Goodwin CR, Wolinsky JP, et al. Mobile spine chordoma: results of 166 patients from the AOSpine knowledge forum tumor database. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016; 24(4): 644–651.

[4] Krepler P, Windhager R, Bretschneider W, Toma CD, Kotz R. Total vertebrectomy for primary malignant tumours of the spine. J Bone Jt Surg Br. 2002; 84(5): 712–715.

[5] Barber SM, Konakondla S, Nakhla J, Fridley JS, Xia J, Oyelese AA, et al. Spinal dural resection for oncological purposes: a systematic analysis of risks and outcomes in patients with malignant spinal tumors. J Neurosurg Spine. 2019; 1–10: 69–78.

[6] Aryan HE, Acosta FL, Ames CP. Two-level total en bloc lumbar spondylectomy with dural resection for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Neurosci. 2008; 15(1): 70–72.

[7] Biagini R, Casadei R, Boriani S, Erba F, Sturale C, Mascari C, et al. En bloc vertebrectomy and dural resection for chordoma: a case report. Spine. 2003; 28(18): E368–E372.

[8] Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Ishii K, Tsuji T, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, et al. Complicated surgical resection of malignant tumors in the upper cervical spine after failed ion-beam radiation therapy. Spine. 2010; 35(11): E505–E509.

[9] Matsumoto M, Ishii K, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, Morioka H, Chiba K, et al. Extensive total spondylectomy for recurrent giant cell tumor in the thoracic spine: Case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007; 6(6): 600–605.

[10] Bydon M, De la Garza-Ramos R, Suk I, et al. Single-staged multilevel spondylectomy for En bloc resection of an epithelioid sarcoma with intradural extension in the cervical spine: technical case report. Oper Neurosurg. 2015; 11(4): E585–E593.

[11] Simonin A, Gonzalez M, Levivier M, Duff J. Letter to the editor: dural reconstruction with a vascularised pleural flap following en bloc resection of a thoracic epithelioid sarcoma: technical note. Acta Neurochir. 2014; 156(6): 1223–1224.

[12] Zhu Q, Zhang J, Xiao J. Primary dumbbell-shaped Ewing’s sarcoma of the cervical vertebra in adults: four case reports and literature review. Oncol Lett. 2012; 3(3): 721–725.

[13] Fisher CG, Keynan O, Boyd MC, Dvorak MF. The surgical management of primary tumorsof the spine: initial results of an ongoing prospective cohort study. Spine. 2005; 30(16): 1899–1908.

[14] Krepler P, Windhager R, Toma CD, Kitz K, Kotz R. Dura resection in combination with en bloc spondylectomy for primary malignant tumors of the spine. Spine. 2003; 28(17): E334–E338.

[15] Bailey CS, Fisher CG, Boyd MC, Dvorak MF. En bloc marginal excision of a multilevel cervical chordoma: Case report. J Neurosurg Spine. 2006; 4(5): 409–414.

[16] Chi JH, Sciubba DM, Rhines LD, Gokaslan ZL. Surgery for primary vertebral tumors: en bloc versus intralesional resection. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2008; 19(1): 111–117.

[17] Boriani S, Bandiera S, Donthineni R, Amendola L, Cappuccio M, de Iure F, et al. Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine. Eur Spine J. 2010; 19(2): 231–241.

[18] Boriani S, Weinstein JN, Biagini R. Primary bone tumors of the spine. Terminology and surgical staging. Spine. 1997; 22(9): 1036–1044.

[19] Walsh GL, Gokaslan ZL, McCutcheon IE, et al. Anterior approaches to the thoracic spine in patients with cancer: indications and results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1997; 64(6): 1611–1618.

[20] Dekutoski MB, Clarke MJ, Rose P, Luzzati A, Rhines LD, Varga PP, et al. Osteosarcoma of the spine: prognostic variables for local recurrence and overall survival, a multicenter ambispective study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016; 25(1): 59–68.

[21] Tomita K, Kawahara N, Baba H, Tsuchiya H, Fujita T, Toribatake Y. Total en bloc spondylectomy. A new surgical technique for primary malignant vertebral tumors. Spine. 1997; 22(3): 324–333.

[22] Wittekind C, Compton CC, Greene FL, Sobin LH. TNM residual tumor classification revisited. Cancer. 2002; 94(9): 2511–2516.

[23] Boriani S, Biagini R, De Iure F, et al. En bloc resections of bone tumors of the thoracolumbar spine. A preliminary report on 29 patients. Spine. 1996; 21(16): 1927–1931.

[24] Barber SM, Fridley JS, Konakondla S, Nakhla J, Oyelese AA, Telfeian AE, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid leaks after spine tumor resection: avoidance, recognition and management. Ann Transl Med. 2019; 7(10): 217.

[25] Jenkinson MD, Simpson C, Nicholas RS, Miles J, Findlay GF, Pigott TJ. Outcome predictors and complications in the management of intradural spinal tumours. Eur Spine J. 2006; 15(2): 203–210.

[26] Street J, Fisher C, Sparkes J, Boyd M, Kwon B, Paquette S, et al. Single-stage posterolateral vertebrectomy for the management of metastatic disease of the thoracic and lumbar spine: a prospective study of an evolving surgical technique. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007; 20(7): 509–520.

[27] Wang JC, Boland P, Mitra N, Yamada Y, Lis E, Stubblefield M, et al. Single-stage posterolateral transpedicular approach for resection of epidural metastatic spine tumors involving the vertebral body with circumferential reconstruction: results in 140 patients. Invited submission from the joint section meeting on disorders of the spine and peripheral nerves, march 2004. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004; 1(3): 287–298.

[28] Yokogawa N, Murakami H, Demura S, Kato S, Yoshioka K, Hayashi H, et al. Perioperative complications of total en bloc spondylectomy: adverse effects of preoperative irradiation. PLoS One. 2014; 9(6): e98797.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Author(s). Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.