Peritendinous Submembrane Access Technique for Management of Acute Ruptures of the Achilles Tendon: A Retrospective Study of 249 Cases

Abstract

Objective: Percutaneous repair is an alternative to open surgical repair of the Achilles tendon with comparable, functional results and low re-rupture and infection rates; however, sural nerve injury is a known complication. The purpose of this study is to design a new surgical procedure, the minimally invasive peritendinous submembrane access technique (MIS-PSAT). It offers optimal results, with excellent functional outcomes, and with minimal soft tissue complications and sural nerve injury.

Methods: This retrospective study included 249 patients with acute closed Achilles tendon ruptures treated at our institution between 2009 and 2019. All patients underwent MIS-PSAT at our institution and were followed up for 8–48 months. Functional evaluation was based on the Achilles tendon total rupture score (ATRS) and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale (AOFAS-AHS), associated with local complications and isokinetic tests.

Results: None of the patients had infection, necrosis, or sural nerve injury. Re-rupture occurred in two cases. The average times to return to work and sports was 10.4 and 31.6 weeks, respectively. The average ATRS and AOFAS-AHS scores were 90.2 and 95.7, respectively, with an excellent rate of 99.5%. Isokinetic tests showed that ankle function on the affected side was comparable with that on the healthy side (p > 0.05).

Conclusion: The MIS-PSAT for acute Achilles tendon rupture is easy to perform with few complications. Importantly, the surgical technique reduces the risk of sural nerve injuries. Patients have high postoperative satisfaction, low re-rupture rates, and muscle strength, and endurance can be restored to levels similar to those on the healthy side.

Keywords

Achilles Tendon / Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures / Sural Nerve Injury / Tendon Injuries

References

[1] Lemme NJ, Li NY, DeFroda SF, Kleiner J, Owens BD. Epidemiology of Achilles tendon ruptures in the United States: athletic and nonathletic injuries from 2012 to 2016. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018; 6(11): 1809855662.

[2] Wu Y, Lin L, Li H, Zhao Y, Liu L, Jia Z, et al. Is surgical intervention more effective than non-surgical treatment for acute Achilles tendon rupture? A systematic review of overlapping meta-analyses. Int J Surg. 2016; 36: 305–311.

[3] Karaaslan F, Mermerkaya MU, Çıraklı A, Karaoğlu S, Duygulu F. Surgical versus conservative treatment following acute rupture of the Achilles tendon: is there a pedobarographic difference? Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2016; 12: 1311–1315.

[4] Lantto I, Heikkinen J, Flinkkila T, Ohtonen P, Siira P, Laine V, et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing surgical and nonsurgical treatments of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Am J Sports Med. 2016; No. 9: 2406–2414.

[5] Gatz M, Driessen A, Eschweiler J, Tingart M, Migliorini F. Open versus minimally-invasive surgery for Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 141(3): 383–401.

[6] Ma GW, Griffith TG. Percutaneous repair of acute closed ruptured achilles tendon: a new technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1977; 128: 247–255.

[7] Delponte P, Potier L, de Poulpiquet P, Buisson P. Traitement des ruptures sous-cutanées du tendon d’Achille par ténorraphie percutanée./[treatment of subcutaneous ruptures of the Achilles tendon by percutaneous tenorraphy]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 1992; No. 6: 404–407.

[8] Qi H, Ji X, Cui Y, Wang L, Chen H, Tang P. Comparison of channel-assisted minimally invasive repair and 3 common Achilles tendon restoration techniques. Exp Ther Med. 2019; 17(2): 1426–1434.

[9] Kakiuchi M. A combined open and percutaneous technique for repair of tendo Achillis. Comparison with open repair. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995; 77(1): 60–63.

[10] Chen H, Ji X, Zhang Q, Liang X, Tang P. Channel-assisted minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015; 10(1): 167.

[11] Aibinder WR, Patel A, Arnouk J, el-Gendi H, Korshunov Y, Mitgang J, et al. The rate of sural nerve violation using the Achillon device: a cadaveric study. Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34(6): 870–875.

[12] Liu JY, Duan WF, Shen S, Ye Y, Sun YQ, He W. Achillon versus modified minimally invasive repair treatment in acute Achilles tendon rupture. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2020; 28(1): 616568642.

[13] Daghino W, Enrietti E, Sprio AE, di Prun NB, Berta GN, Massè A. Subcutaneous Achilles tendon rupture: a comparison between open technique and mini-invasive tenorrhaphy with Achillon^® suture system. Injury. 2016; 47(11): 2591–2595.

[14] Lacoste S, Feron JM, Cherrier B. Percutaneous Tenolig^® repair under intra-operative ultrasonography guidance in acute Achilles tendon rupture. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014; 100(8): 925–930.

[15] Assal M, Jung M, Stern R, Rippstein P, Delmi M, Hoffmeyer P. Limited open repair of Achilles tendon ruptures: a technique with a new instrument and findings of a prospective multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84(2): 161–170.

[16] Hockenbury RT, Johns JC. A biomechanical in vitro comparison of open versus percutaneous repair of tendon Achilles. Foot Ankle. 1990; 11(2): 67–72.

[17] Oliva F, Marsilio E, Asparago G, Giai Via A, Biz C, Padulo J, et al. Achilles tendon rupture and dysmetabolic diseases: a multicentric, epidemiologic study. J Clin Med. 2022; 11(13): 3698.

[18] Nilsson-Helander K, Thomeé R, Grävare-Silbernagel K, Thomeé P, Faxén E, Eriksson BI, et al. The Achilles tendon Total rupture score (ATRS): development and validation. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(3): 421–426.

[19] Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating Systems for the Ankle-Hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994; 15(7): 349–353.

[20] Ochen Y, Beks RB, van Heijl M, Hietbrink F, Leenen LPH, van der Velde D, et al. Operative treatment versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2019; 364: k5120.

[21] Wong J, Barrass V, Maffulli N. Quantitative review of operative and nonoperative management of achilles tendon ruptures. Am J Sports Med. 2002; 30(4): 565–575.

[22] Maes R, Copin G, Averous C. Is percutaneous repair of the Achilles tendon a safe technique? A study of 124 cases. Acta Orthop Belg. 2006; 72(2): 179–183.

[23] Biz C, Cerchiaro M, Belluzzi E, Bragazzi NL, de Guttry G, Ruggieri P. Long term clinical-functional and ultrasound outcomes in recreational athletes after Achilles tendon rupture: Ma and Griffith versus Tenolig. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021; 57(10): 1073.

[24] Taglialavoro G, Biz C, Mastrangelo G, Aldegheri R. The repair of the Achilles tendon rupture: comparison of two percutaneous techniques. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2011; 6(3): 147–154.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.