Surgical Treatment Outcomes of Anterior-Only Correction and Reconstruction for Severe Cervical Kyphotic Deformity with Neurofibromatosis-1: A Retrospective Study with a 5-Year Follow-Up

Abstract

Objectives: Currently, anterior-only (AO), posterior-only, and combined anterior–posterior spinal fusions are common strategies for treating cervical kyphosis in patients with neurofibromatosis-1 NF-1. Nevertheless, the choice of surgical strategy remains a topic of controversy. The aim of our study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of anterior decompression and spinal reconstruction for the treatment of cervical kyphosis in patients with NF-1.

Methods: Twelve patients with NF-1-associated cervical kyphotic deformity were reviewed retrospectively between January 2010 and April 2020. All patients underwent AO correction and reconstruction. The X-ray was followed up in all these patients to assess the preoperative and postoperative local kyphosis angle (LKA), the global kyphosis angle (GKA), the sagittal vertical axis, and the T1 slope. The visual analog scale score, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and neck disability index (NDI) score were used to evaluate the improvement inclinical symptoms. The results of the difference in improvement from preoperatively to the final follow-up assessment were assessed using a paired t-test or Mann–Whitney U-test.

Results: The LKA and GKA decreased from the preoperative average of 64.42 (range, 38–86) and 35.50 (range, 10–81) to an average of 16.83 (range, –2 to 46) and 4.25 (range, –22 to 39) postoperatively, respectively. The average correction rates of the LKA and GKA were 76.11% and 111.97%, respectively. All patients had achieved satisfactory relief of neurological symptoms (p < 0.01). JOA scores were improved from 10.42 (range, 8–16) preoperatively to 15.25 (range, 11–18) at final follow-up (p < 0.01). NDI scores were decreased from an average of 23.25 (range, 16–34) preoperatively to an average of 7.08 (range, 3–15) at the final follow-up (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: Anterior-only correction and reconstruction is a safe and effective method for correcting cervical kyphosis in NF-1 patients. In fixed cervical kyphosis cases, preoperative skull traction should also be considered.

Keywords

Anterior-only approach / Cervical kyphotic / Fixed / Neurofibromatosis

References

[1] Kodali N, Kumar KD, Schwartz RA. The role of scoliosis on the comorbidity and demographics of neurofibromatosis type 1 patients: a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database. Exp Dermatol. 2024; 33(1): e14996.

[2] Wang D, Zhang BH, Wen X, Chen KH, Xiao HT, Xu XW, et al. Clinical features and surgical treatments of scoliosis in neurofibromatosis type 1: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2024.

[3] Helenius IJ, Sponseller PD, Mackenzie W, Odent T, Dormans JP, Asghar J, et al. Outcomes of spinal fusion for cervical kyphosis in children with neurofibromatosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016; 98: e95.

[4] Kawabata S, Watanabe K, Hosogane N, Ishii K, Nakamura M, Toyama Y, et al. Surgical correction of severe cervical kyphosis in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013; 18: 274–279.

[5] Ma J, Wu Z, Yang X, Xiao J. Surgical treatment of severe cervical dystrophic kyphosis due to neurofibromatosis type 1: a review of 8 cases. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011; 14: 93–98.

[6] Calvert PT, Edgar MA, Webb PJ. Scoliosis in neurofibromatosis. The natural history with and without operation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989; 71: 246–251.

[7] Wang J, Liu C, Wang C, Li J, Lv s, Jiancuo A, et al. Early and midterm outcomes of surgical correction for severe dystrophic cervical kyphosis in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1: a retrospective multicenter study. World Neurosurg. 2019; 127: e1190–e1200.

[8] Lin T, Shao W, Zhang K, Gao R, Zhou X. Comparison of outcomes in 3 surgical approaches for dystrophic cervical kyphosis in patients with neurofibromatosis 1. World Neurosurg. 2018; 111: e62–e71.

[9] Rajasekaran S, Pushpa BT, Anand K, et al. The phenomenon of vertebral body drift in neurofibromatosis and its implications for surgical safety. Eur Spine J. 2022; 31(6): 1343–1348.

[10] Yonezawa I, Arai Y, Tsuji T, Takahashi M, Kurosawa H. Anterior fusion and posterior correction of severe cervical kyphosis using pedicle screw fixation in a patient with neurofibromatosis: a case report. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003; 16: 493–496.

[11] Zhao J, Meng Y, Ma J, Zhou X, Jiang H. Sectional correction technique in dystrophic scoliosis secondary to neurofibromatosis type 1: a comparison with traditional 2-rod correction technique. World Neurosurg. 2022; 167: e507–e514.

[12] Stoker GE, Lenke LG, Dorward IG. Posterior vertebral column resection for the treatment of dystrophic kyphosis associated with type-1 neurofibromatosis: a case report and review of the literature. Spine. 2012; 37: E1659–E1664.

[13] Choksey KR, Modi JV. Are two surgeries necessary for correction of 1 deformity-cervical kyphosis in neurofibromatosis?-A rare case report. J Orthop Case Rep. 2015; 5: 60–62.

[14] Yifei G, Xiaolong S, Yang L, Peng C, Wen Y. Clinical outcomes of anterior correction and reconstruction for neurofibromatosis-associated severe cervical kyphotic deformity. Int Orthop. 2019; 43: 639–646.

[15] Ly KI, Blakeley JO. The diagnosis and management of neurofibromatosis type 1. Med Clin North Am. 2019; 103: 1035–1054.

[16] Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Anderson M. Neurofibromatosis hyperkyphosis: a review of 33 patients with kyphosis of 80 degrees or greater. J Spinal Disord. 1988; 1: 39–49.

[17] Murlidharan S, Singh PK, Chandra PS, Agarwal D, Kale SS. Surgical challenges and functional outcomes in dystrophic cervical kyphosis in neurofibromatosis –1: an institutional experience. Spine Deform. 2022; 10: 697–707.

[18] Vigneswaran K, Sribnick EA, Reisner A, Chern J. Correction of progressive severe cervical kyphosis in a 21-month-old patient with nf1: surgical technique and review of literature. Oper Neurosurg. 2018; 15: 46–53.

[19] Zhang H, Deng A, Guo C, Zhou Z, Xiao L. Halo traction combined with posterior-only approach correction for cervical kyphosis with neurofibromatosis-1: minimum 2 years follow-up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22: 973.

[20] Mehrpour S, Sorbi R, Rezaei R, Mazda K. Posterior-only surgery with preoperative skeletal traction for management of severe scoliosis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017; 137: 457–463.

[21] Laohacharoensombat W, Wajanavisit W, Woratanarat P. Cervical neurofibromatosis with quadriparesis: management by fibular strut graft. Indian J Orthop. 2010; 44: 95–97.

[22] Wu J, Tao Z, Jiang H, Lin T, Ma J, Zhou X, et al. A novel hybrid technique in the treatment of dystrophic scoliosis secondary to neurofibromatosis type 1 lacking pedicles in the apical area. World Neurosurg. 2023; 169: e171–e180.

[23] Han K, Lu C, Li J, Xiong GZ, Wang B, Lv GH, et al. Surgical treatment of cervical kyphosis. Eur Spine J. 2011; 20: 523–536.

[24] Neifert SN, Khan HA, Kurland DB, Kim NC, Yohay K, Segal D, et al. Management and surgical outcomes of dystrophic scoliosis in neurofibromatosis type 1: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2022; 52(5): E7.

[25] Liang M, Cao J, Zhang X, Guo D, Yao Z, Gao R, et al. Safety and effectiveness of halo gravity traction combined with traditional growing rods in severe early-onset scoliosis with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2024.

[26] Wu F, Zhang L, Liu Z, Sun Y, Li F, Wang S, et al. Cervical neurofibromatosis with tetraplegia: management by cervical suspensory traction. Spine. 2012; 37: E858–E862.

[27] Ferch RD, Shad A, Cadoux-Hudson TA, et al. Anterior correction of cervical kyphotic deformity: effects on myelopathy, neck pain, and sagittal alignment. J Neurosurg. 2004; 100: 13–19.

[28] Rhodes SD, Yang FC. Aberrant myeloid differentiation contributes to the development of osteoporosis in neurofibromatosis type 1. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2016; 14: 10–15.

[29] Li H, Zhang W, Yao Z, Guo R, Hao C, Zhang X. Genotypes and clinical intervention of patients with neurofibromatosis type 1 associated dystrophic scoliosis. Front Pediatr. 2022; 10: 918136.

[30] Stevenson DA, Moyer-Mileur LJ, Murray M, Slater H, Sheng X, Carey JC, et al. Bone mineral density in children and adolescents with neurofibromatosis type 1. J Pediatr. 2007; 150: 83–88.

[31] Lammert M, Kappler M, Mautner VF, Lammert K, Störkel S, Friedman JM, et al. Decreased bone mineral density in patients with neurofibromatosis 1. Osteoporos Int. 2005; 16: 1161–1166.

[32] Benlidayi IC, Ortac EA, Kozanoglu E. Risedronate therapy for neurofibromatosis type 1-related low bone mass: a stitch in time saves nine. Acta Clin Belg. 2015; 70: 130–132.

[33] Sirois JR, Drennan JC. Dystrophic spinal deformity in neurofibromatosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 1990; 10: 522–526.

[34] Passias PG, Naessig S, Sagoo N, Passfall L, Ahmad W, Lafage R, et al. Establishment of an individualized distal junctional kyphosis risk index following the surgical treatment of adult cervical deformities. Spine. 2023; 48: 49–55.

[35] Passias PG, Horn SR, Oh C, Lafage R, Lafage V, Smith JS, et al. Predicting the occurrence of postoperative distal junctional kyphosis in cervical deformity patients. Neurosurgery. 2020; 86: E38–E46.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.