The Comparison between Spinal Facet Joint Toothed Plate and Traditional Pedicle Screw-rod on Reduction of Thoracolumbar Fracture

Cheng Qiu, , Lin Cheng, , Jingwei Liu, , Zhiguo Ding, , Musen Sun, , Yanyong Yu, , Dingling An, , Lianlei Wang, , Xianlei Gao, , Xin Pan, , Xinyu Liu, , Songgang Wang,

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (7) : 1592 -1602.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (7) : 1592 -1602. DOI: 10.1111/os.14090
CLINICAL ARTICLE

The Comparison between Spinal Facet Joint Toothed Plate and Traditional Pedicle Screw-rod on Reduction of Thoracolumbar Fracture

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective: Thoracolumbar fractures are one of the most common fractures in clinical practice. Surgical intervention is recommended to restore spinal alignment or decompress the nerves when there are unstable fractures or neurological injuries. However, after excessive forward thrust force restoration, facet joint dislocation often occurs between the upper vertebra and the fractured vertebra, which usually leads to unsatisfactory reduction outcomes. Herein, we propose a novel spinal facet joint toothed plate to assist in fracture reduction. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the new spinal facet joint toothed plate in preventing facet joint dislocation, and its advantages compared to traditional pedicle screw-rod decompression.

Methods: A total of 26 patients in the toothed plate group and 93 patients in the traditional group who experienced thoracolumbar fracture with reduction were retrospectively included. Relevant patients’ information and clinical parameters were collected. Furthermore, visual analogue scores (VAS) scores and Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores were also collected. Moreover, imaging parameters were calculated based on radiographs. Correlated data were analyzed by χ2 test and t test.

Results: All patients in this study had no postoperative complications. Postoperative VAS scores and ODI scores (p < 0.001) were statistically significant (p < 0.001) in both groups compared with preoperative scores and further decreased (p < 0.001) at final follow-up. In addition, the postoperative vertebral margin ratio (VMR) (p < 0.001) and vertebral angle of the injured vertebrae (p < 0.001) were significantly improved compared with the preoperative period. There were no significant differences in postoperative VAS scores and ODI scores between the two groups. However, toothed plate reduction significantly improved the VMR (p < 0.05) and vertebral angle (p < 0.05) compared with conventional reduction. Ultimately, the total screw accuracy was 98.72% (sum of levels 0 and I), with 100% screw accuracy in the segment related to the tooth plate in the tooth plate group. The dislocation rate was higher in the conventional group (6.45%) than in the new serrated plate repositioning group (0.00%).

Conclusion: The facet toothed plate assisted reduction method prevents facet joint dislocation and improves fracture reduction compared to traditional reduction technique, hence it could be considered as a novel surgical strategy for thoracolumbar fracture reduction.

Keywords

Facet joint dislocation / Facet joint toothed plate / Pedicle screw fixation / Thoracolumbar fracture

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Cheng Qiu,, Lin Cheng,, Jingwei Liu,, Zhiguo Ding,, Musen Sun,, Yanyong Yu,, Dingling An,, Lianlei Wang,, Xianlei Gao,, Xin Pan,, Xinyu Liu,, Songgang Wang,. The Comparison between Spinal Facet Joint Toothed Plate and Traditional Pedicle Screw-rod on Reduction of Thoracolumbar Fracture. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2024, 16(7): 1592-1602 DOI:10.1111/os.14090

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S. A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J. 1994; 3: 184–201.

[2]

Liu B, Zhu Y, Liu S, Chen W, Zhang F, Zhang Y. National incidence of traumatic spinal fractures in China: Data from China National Fracture Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018; 97: e12190.

[3]

Chen W, Lv H, Liu S, Liu B, Zhu Y, Chen X, et al. National incidence of traumatic fractures in China: a retrospective survey of 512 187 individuals. Lancet Glob Health. 2017; 5: e807–e817.

[4]

Hitchon PW, Abode-Iyamah K, Dahdaleh NS, Shaffrey C, Noeller J, He W, et al. Nonoperative management in neurologically intact thoracolumbar burst fractures: clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016; 41: 483–489.

[5]

Tan T, Huang MS, Rutges J, Marion TE, Fitzgerald M, Hunn MK, et al. Rate and predictors of failure in the conservative management of stable thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Global Spine J. 2022; 12: 1254–1266.

[6]

Li TT, Wei Y, Zhou HS, Xiao QX, Wang C, Xiong LL, et al. The difference of disease injury and postoperative recovery in the occupational characteristics of thoracolumbar fracture patients: a retrospective study. Orthop Surg. 2022; 14: 2059–2072.

[7]

Lazaro B, Sardi JP, Smith JS, Kelly MP, Yanik EL, Dial B, et al. Proximal junctional failure in primary thoracolumbar fusion/fixation to the sacrum/pelvis for adult symptomatic lumbar scoliosis: long-term follow-up of a prospective multicenter cohort of 160 patients. J Neurosurg Spine. 2022; 22: 1–12.

[8]

Morrissey PB, Shafi KA, Wagner SC, Butler JS, Kaye ID, Sebastian AS, et al. Surgical management of thoracolumbar burst fractures: surgical decision-making using the AOSpine thoracolumbar injury classification score and thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score. Clin Spine Surg. 2021; 34: 4–13.

[9]

Dong H, Hu L, Ruan B, Yu H, Xu X, Sun H, et al. Clinical outcomes of thoracolumbar burst fracture treated by trans-Kambin triangle versus transpedicular bone grafting combined with posterior internal fixation. World Neurosurg. 2021; 156: e130–e138.

[10]

Dick W, Kluger P, Magerl F, Woersdörfer O, Zäch G. A new device for internal fixation of thoracolumbar and lumbar spine fractures: the ‘fixateur interne’. Paraplegia. 1985; 23: 225–232.

[11]

Roy-Camille R, Saillant G, Mazel C. Plating of thoracic, thoracolumbar, and lumbar injuries with pedicle screw plates. Orthop Clin North Am. 1986; 17: 147–159.

[12]

Marco RA, Meyer BC, Kushwaha VP. Thoracolumbar burst fractures treated with posterior decompression and pedicle screw instrumentation supplemented with balloon-assisted vertebroplasty and calcium phosphate reconstruction. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010; 92(Suppl 1 Pt 1): 67–76.

[13]

Mittal S, Rana A, Ahuja K, Ifthekar S, Yadav G, Sudhakar PV, et al. Outcomes of anterior decompression and anterior instrumentation in thoracolumbar burst fractures-a prospective observational study with mid-term follow-up. J Orthop Trauma. 2022; 36: 136–141.

[14]

Kapoen C, Liu Y, Bloemers FW, Deunk J. Pedicle screw fixation of thoracolumbar fractures: conventional short segment versus short segment with intermediate screws at the fracture level-a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2020; 29: 2491–2504.

[15]

Zou P, Yang JS, Wang XF, Wei JM, Liu P, Chen H, et al. Comparison of clinical and radiologic outcome between mini-open Wiltse approach and fluoroscopic-guided percutaneous pedicle screw placement: a randomized controlled trial. World Neurosurg. 2020; 144: e368–e375.

[16]

Norton RP, Milne EL, Kaimrajh DN, Eismont FJ, Latta LL, Williams SK. Biomechanical analysis of four-versus six-screw constructs for short-segment pedicle screw and rod instrumentation of unstable thoracolumbar fractures. Spine J. 2014; 14: 1734–1739.

[17]

Gellhorn AC, Katz JN, Suri P. Osteoarthritis of the spine: the facet joints. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2013; 9: 216–224.

[18]

Ye B, Ye Z, Yan M, Huang P, Tu Z, Wang Z, et al. Effection of monoplanar pedicle screw on facet joint degeneration in thoracolumbar vertebral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23: 407.

[19]

Zheng Z, Zhang L, Zhu Y, Chen J, Zhang X, Xia T, et al. Percutaneous cortical bone trajectory screw fixation versus traditional open pedicle screw fixation for type A thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit. J Robot Surg. 2022; 17: 233–241.

[20]

Wen Z, Mo X, Zhao S, Lin W, Chen Z, Huang Z, et al. Comparison of percutaneous Kyphoplasty and pedicle screw fixation for treatment of thoracolumbar severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture with kyphosis. World Neurosurg. 2021; 152: e589–e596.

[21]

Wang L, Li C, Wang Z, Li D, Tian Y, Yuan S, et al. Comparison of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: 2-year follow-up. J Robot Surg. 2022; 17: 473–485.

[22]

Zhao Y, Yuan S, Tian Y, Wang L, Liu X. Uniplanar cannulated pedicle screws in the correction of Lenke type 1 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. World Neurosurg. 2021; 149: e785–e793.

[23]

Kalichman L, Li L, Kim DH, Guermazi A, Berkin V, O’Donnell CJ, et al. Facet joint osteoarthritis and low back pain in the community-based population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33: 2560–2565.

[24]

Wood KB, Li W, Lebl DR, Ploumis A. Management of thoracolumbar spine fractures. Spine J. 2014; 14: 145–164.

[25]

Oda T, Panjabi MM. Pedicle screw adjustments affect stability of thoracolumbar burst fracture. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26: 2328–2333.

[26]

Lainé G, Mezjan I, Masson D, Civit T, Mansouri N. Risk factors for kyphosis recurrence after implant removal in percutaneous osteosynthesis for post-traumatic thoracolumbar fracture. Eur Spine J. 2024; 33: 1597–1606.

[27]

Eubanks JD, Lee MJ, Cassinelli E, Ahn NU. Prevalence of lumbar facet arthrosis and its relationship to age, sex, and race: an anatomic study of cadaveric specimens. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32: 2058–2062.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

190

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/