Posterior Corrective Surgery for Type II Congenital Kyphosis: SRS-Schwab Grade 4 Osteotomy or Vertebral Column Resection?

Abstract

Objective: Surgical decision-making for congenital kyphosis (CK) with failure of anterior segmentation (type II) has been contradictory regarding the trade-off between the pursuit of correction rate and the inherent risk of the osteotomy procedure. This study was designed to compare the clinical and radiographic measurement in type II CK underwent SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy and vertebral column resection (VCR), the most-adapted osteotomy techniques for CK, and to propose the strategy to select between the two procedures.

Methods: This retrospective observational comparative study evaluated surgical outcomes in type II CK patients underwent VCR or SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy at our institution between January 2015 and January 2020. Patients operated with VCR and SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy were allocated to Group 1 and Group 2 respectively. Radiographic parameters and SRS-22 quality of life metrics were assessed at pre-operation, post-operation, and during follow-up visits for both groups, allowing for a comprehensive comparison of surgical outcomes.

Results: Thirty-one patients (19 patients in Group 1 and 12 patients in Group 2) aged 16.3 ± 10.4 years were recruited. Correction of segmental kyphosis was similar between groups (51.1 ± 17.6° in Group 1 and 48.4 ± 19.8° in Group 2, p = 0.694). Group 1 had significantly longer operation time (365.9 ± 81.2 vs 221.4 ± 78.9, p < 0.001) and more estimated blood loss (975.2 ± 275.8 ml vs 725.9 ± 204.3 mL, p = 0.011). Alert event of intraoperative sensory and motor evoked potential (SEP and MEP) monitoring was observed in 1 patient of Group 2. Both groups had 1 transient post operative neurological deficit respectively.

Conclusion: SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy was suitable for kyphotic mass when its apex is the upper unsegmented vertebrae or the neighboring disc, or when the apical vertebrae with an anterior/posterior (A/P) height ratio of vertebral body higher than 1/3. VCR is suitable when the apex is located within the unsegmented mass with its A/P height ratio lower than 1/3. Proper selection of VCR and SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy according to our strategy, could provide satisfying radiographic and clinical outcomes in type II CK patients during a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Patients undergoing VCR procedure might have longer operation time, more blood loss and higher incidence of peri- and post-operative complications.

Keywords

Congenital kyphosis / Failure of segmentation / SRS-Schwab Grade 4 osteotomy / Vertebral column resection

References

[1] Giampietro PF, Dunwoodie SL, Kusumi K, Pourquié O, Tassy O, Offiah AC, et al. Progress in the understanding of the genetic etiology of vertebral segmentation disorders in humans. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009; 1151: 38–67.

[2] Winter RB, Moe JH, Wang JF. Congenital kyphosis. Its natural history and treatment as observed in a study of one hundred and thirty patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973; 55(2): 223–256.

[3] McMaster MJ, Singh H. Natural history of congenital kyphosis and kyphoscoliosis. A study of one hundred and twelve patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999; 81(10): 1367–1383.

[4] Mayfield JK, Winter RB, Bradford DS, Moe JH. Congenital kyphosis due to defects of anterior segmentation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980; 62(8): 1291–1301.

[5] Chehrassan M, Nikouei F, Shakeri M, Jafari B, Ameri Mahabadi E, Ghandhari H. Perioperative complications of symptomatic congenital kyphosis: a retrospective cohort study. Spine Deform. 2024; 12(1): 181–187.

[6] Lenke LG, Newton PO, Sucato DJ, Shufflebarger HL, Emans JB, Sponseller PD, et al. Complications after 147 consecutive vertebral column resections for severe pediatric spinal deformity: a multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013; 38(2): 119–132.

[7] Li S, Mao S, Ma Y, Zhu Z, Liu Z, Shi B, et al. Posterior 3-column osteotomy for treatment of congenital kyphosis with multiple thoracolumbar/lumbar anterior unsegmented vertebrae: a comparison between patients with increasing number of anterior unsegmented vertebrae. World Neurosurg. 2022; 159: e172–e183.

[8] Shi B, Zhao Q, Xu L, Liu Z, Sun X, Zhu Z, et al. SRS-Schwab grade 4 osteotomy for congenital thoracolumbar kyphosis: a minimum of 2 years follow-up study. Spine J. 2018; 18(11): 2059–2064.

[9] Qiao J, Xiao L, Sun X, Shi B, Liu Z, Xu L, et al. Vertebral subluxation during three-column osteotomy in surgical correction of adult spine deformity: incidence, risk factors, and complications. Eur Spine J. 2018; 27(3): 630–635.

[10] Liu D, Shi B, Shi B, Li Y, Xia S, Liu Z, et al. Partial Hemivertebra resection (grade 4 osteotomy) for congenital scoliosis: a comparison with radical Hemivertebra resection. World Neurosurg. 2019; 130: e1028–e1033.

[11] Passias PG, Naessig S, Para A, Pierce K, Ahmad W, Diebo BG, et al. External validation of the European spine study group-international spine study group calculator utilizing a single institutional experience for adult spinal deformity corrective surgery. Int J Spine Surg. 2022; 16(4): 760–766.

[12] Marques MF, Fiere V, Obeid I, Charles YP, el-Youssef K, Lahoud A, et al. Pseudarthrosis in adult spine deformity surgery: risk factors and treatment options. Eur Spine J. 2021; 30: 3225–3232.

[13] Sun X, Zhu ZZ, Chen X, Liu Z, Wang B, Qiu Y. Posterior double vertebral column resections combined with satellite rod technique to correct severe congenital angular kyphosis. Orthop Surg. 2016; 8(3): 411–414.

[14] Garg B, Bansal T, Mehta N. Clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes of posterior-only three-column osteotomy in congenital kyphosis: a minimum of two years’ follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2021; 103: 1309–1316.

[15] Vialle Rapha L. Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery American. 2005; 87(2): 260.

[16] Hengwei F, Xueshi L, Zifang H, Wenyuan S, Chuandong L, Jingfan Y, et al. Is vertebral column resection (VCR) necessary in correcting severe and rigid thoracic kyphoscoliosis—a single-institution surgical experience. World Neurosurg. 2018;116:e1-e8.

[17] Singleton M, Ghisi D, Memtsoudis S. Perioperative management in complex spine surgery. Minerva Anestesiol. 2022; 88(5): 396–406.

[18] Tarawneh AM, Venkatesan M, Pasku D, Singh J, Quraishi NA. Impact of pedicle subtraction osteotomy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) measures in patients undergoing surgery for adult spinal deformity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2020; 1-7: 2953–2959.

[19] Chau LTC, Hu Z, Ko KSY, Man GCW, Yeung KH, Law YY, et al. Global sagittal alignment of the spine, pelvis, lower limb after vertebral compression fracture and its effect on quality of life. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1): 476.

[20] Zeng Y, Chen Z, Qi Q, Guo Z, Li W, Sun C, et al. The posterior surgical correction of congenital kyphosis and kyphoscoliosis: 23 cases with minimum 2 years follow-up. Eur Spine J. 2013; 22(2): 372–378.

[21] Soliman HAG. Health-related quality of life of adolescents with severe untreated congenital kyphosis and Kyphoscoliosis in a developing country. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018; 43(16): E942–e948.

[22] Hwang CJ, Lenke LG, Sides BA, Blanke KM, Kelly MP. Comparison of single-level versus multilevel vertebral column resection surgery for pediatric patients with severe spinal deformities. Spine. 2019; 44: E664–E670.

[23] Smith JS, Wang VY, Ames CP. Vertebral column resection for rigid spinal deformity. Neurosurgery. 2008; 63(3 suppl): 177–182.

[24] Cao Z, Cong Y, Yin C, Wang Y, Wang Z, Liu XW, et al. A review and summary of patients with symptomatic postoperative Discal Pseudocysts of the lumbar spine. Orthop Surg. 2023; 15(5): 1256–1263.

[25] Xu S, Guo C, Liang Y, Zhu Z, Liu H. Sagittal parameters of spine-pelvis-hip joints in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Orthop Surg. 2022; 14(11): 2854–2862.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.