Arthroscopic Capsular Release Versus Manipulation under Anesthesia for Refractory Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Yanmin Zhao, , Ting Yang, , Chenchen Feng, , Lang Li, , Long Pang, , Shuzhen Zhao

Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (7) : 1517 -1529.

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (7) : 1517 -1529. DOI: 10.1111/os.14077
REVIEW ARTICLE

Arthroscopic Capsular Release Versus Manipulation under Anesthesia for Refractory Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Author information +
History +
PDF

Abstract

Objective: Frozen shoulder (FS) is a painful and debilitating condition affecting the shoulder joint. When patients fail to improve after conservative treatments, operative treatments including arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) are recommended. However, the comparison between these two interventions remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ACR and MUA for refractory FS.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies until December 10, 2023. Meta-analyses were conducted using Manager V.5.3.3. Pooled effect sizes were expressed as the weighted mean difference (WMD) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: A total of eight comparative studies with 768 patients were included. Compared with MUA, ACR had statistically better Δ VAS (WMD, –0.44; 95% CI, –0.71 to –0.18; I2 = 6%; p = 0.001) at over 12-month follow-up, which did not reach the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). Other outcomes regarding pain relief, function, and range of motion (ROM) improvements were not statistically different between the two groups at different follow-up timepoints. Compared with the MUA group, the ACR group had a significantly higher rate of severe complications (OR, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.01 to 16.94; I2 = 0%; p = 0.05), but comparable rates of mild complications and additional intervention.

Conclusions: In treating refractory FS, ACR demonstrated comparable pain relief, functional and ROM improvements, rates of mild complications and additional intervention but a higher risk of severe complications to MUA during short-term follow-up periods. Notably, ACR exhibited statistically superior improvement in the long-term pain relief compared to the MUA group, although it did not reach the MCID.

Keywords

Arthroscopic Capsular Release / Frozen Shoulder / Manipulation Under Anesthesia / Meta-analysis / Systematic Review

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yanmin Zhao,, Ting Yang,, Chenchen Feng,, Lang Li,, Long Pang,, Shuzhen Zhao. Arthroscopic Capsular Release Versus Manipulation under Anesthesia for Refractory Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2024, 16(7): 1517-1529 DOI:10.1111/os.14077

登录浏览全文

4963

注册一个新账户 忘记密码

References

[1]

Hand C, Clipsham K, Rees JL, et al. Long-term outcome of frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surge. 2008; 17: 231–236.

[2]

Sarasua SM, Floyd S, Bridges WC, et al. The epidemiology and etiology of adhesive capsulitis in the U.S. Medicare population. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22: 828.

[3]

White D, Choi H, Peloquin C, et al. Secular trend of adhesive capsulitis. Arthritis Care Res. 2011; 63: 1571–1575.

[4]

Kingston K, Curry EJ, Galvin JW, et al. Shoulder adhesive capsulitis: epidemiology and predictors of surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018; 27: 1437–1443.

[5]

Alhashimi RAH. Analytical observational study of frozen shoulder among patients with diabetes mellitus. Joints. 2018; 6: 141–144.

[6]

de la Serna D, Navarro-Ledesma S, Alayón F, et al. A comprehensive view of frozen shoulder: a mystery syndrome. Front Med. 2021; 8: 663703.

[7]

Itoi E, Arce G, Bain GI, et al. Shoulder stiffness: current concepts and concerns. Arthroscopy. 2016; 32: 1402–1414.

[8]

Juel NG, Brox JI, Brunborg C, et al. Very high prevalence of frozen shoulder in patients with type 1 diabetes of ≥45 Years’ duration: the Dialong shoulder study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98: 1551–1559.

[9]

Le HV, Lee SJ, Nazarian A, et al. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: review of pathophysiology and current clinical treatments. Shoulder Elbow. 2017; 9: 75–84.

[10]

Li W, Lu N, Xu H, et al. Case control study of risk factors for frozen shoulder in China. Int J Rheumat Dis. 2015; 18: 508–513.

[11]

Pietrzak M. Adhesive capsulitis: an age related symptom of metabolic syndrome and chronic low-grade inflammation? Med Hypotheses. 2016; 88: 12–17.

[12]

Schiefer M, Teixeira PFS, Fontenelle C, et al. Prevalence of hypothyroidism in patients with frozen shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017; 26: 49–55.

[13]

Wang JY, Liaw CK, Huang CC, et al. Hyperlipidemia is a risk factor of adhesive capsulitis: real-world evidence using the Taiwanese National Health Insurance Research Database. Orthopaed J Sports Med. 2021; 9: 2325967120986808.

[14]

Robinson CM, Seah KT, Chee YH, et al. Frozen shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94: 1–9.

[15]

Millar NL, Meakins A, Struyf F, et al. Frozen shoulder. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022; 8: 59.

[16]

Reeves B. The natural history of the frozen shoulder syndrome. Scand J Rheumatol. 1975; 4: 193–196.

[17]

Cho CH, Song KS, Kim BS, et al. Biological aspect of pathophysiology for frozen shoulder. BioMed Res Int. 2018; 2018: 7274517.

[18]

Levine WN, Kashyap CP, Bak SF, et al. Nonoperative management of idiopathic adhesive capsulitis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16: 569–573.

[19]

Redler LH, Dennis ER. Treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2019; 27: e544–e554.

[20]

Vastamäki H, Kettunen J, Vastamäki M. The natural history of idiopathic frozen shoulder: a 2-to 27-year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470: 1133–1143.

[21]

Karas V, Riboh JC, Garrigues GE. Arthroscopic Management of the Stiff Shoulder. JBJS Rev. 2016; 4: e21–e27.

[22]

Ramirez J. Adhesive capsulitis: diagnosis and management. Am Family Phys. 2019; 99: 297–300.

[23]

Pandey V, Madi S. Clinical guidelines in the Management of Frozen Shoulder: an update! Indian J Orthop. 2021; 55: 299–309.

[24]

Kraal T, Beimers L, The B, et al. Manipulation under anaesthesia for frozen shoulders: outdated technique or well-established quick fix? EFORT Open Rev. 2019; 4: 98–109.

[25]

Hamdan TA, Al-Essa KA. Manipulation under anaesthesia for the treatment of frozen shoulder. Int Orthop. 2003; 27: 107–109.

[26]

Loew M, Heichel TO, Lehner B. Intraarticular lesions in primary frozen shoulder after manipulation under general anesthesia. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005; 14: 16–21.

[27]

Magnussen RA, Taylor DC. Glenoid fracture during manipulation under anesthesia for adhesive capsulitis: a case report. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011; 20: e23–e26.

[28]

Miyazaki AN, Santos PD, Silva LA, et al. Clinical evaluation of arthroscopic treatment of shoulder adhesive capsulitis. Rev Brasil Ortopedia. 2017; 52: 61–68.

[29]

Nunez FA, Papadonikolakis A, Li Z. Arthroscopic release of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder complicated with shoulder dislocation and brachial plexus injury. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2016; 25: 114–116.

[30]

Dias R, Cutts S, Massoud S. Frozen shoulder. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2005; 331: 1453–1456.

[31]

Grant JA, Schroeder N, Miller BS, et al. Comparison of manipulation and arthroscopic capsular release for adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013; 22: 1135–1145.

[32]

Hwang JT. Arthroscopic capsular release versus manipulation under anesthesia for primary frozen shoulder. Clin Shoulder Elbow. 2020; 23: 167–168.

[33]

Kraal T, Beimers L. Arthroscopic capsular release and manipulation under anaesthesia for frozen shoulders: a hot topic. World J Meta-Anal. 2015; 3: 82–88.

[34]

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2009; 339: b2535.

[35]

Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Porucznik CA, et al. Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009; 18: 927–932.

[36]

Copay AG, Eyberg B, Chung AS, et al. Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the Orthopaedic literature, part II: lower extremity: a systematic review. JBJS Rev. 2018; 6: e1.

[37]

Sterne JA, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ (Clin Res Ed). 2019; 366:l4898.

[38]

Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, et al. Methodological index for non-randomized studies (minors): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. 2003; 73: 712–716.

[39]

Bhamare D, Nagarjun KC, Sirasala SK, et al. A study comparing the efficacy of a combination of arthroscopic capsular release with sub acromial decompression, rotator interval release along with manipulation under general anesthesia and only manipulation under general anesthesia in the treatment of shoulder primary adhesive capsulitis. J Indian J Orthop. 2020; 6: 336–340.

[40]

Corbacho B, Brealey S, Keding A, et al. Cost-effectiveness of surgical treatments compared with early structured physiotherapy in secondary care for adults with primary frozen shoulder: an economic evaluation of the UK FROST trial. Bone Joint Open. 2021; 2: 685–695.

[41]

Massoud SN, Pearse EO, Levy O, et al. Operative management of the frozen shoulder in patients with diabetes. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002; 11: 609–613.

[42]

O’Donnell EA. In primary frozen shoulder, arthroscopic capsular release improved function and reduced pain compared with manipulation under anesthesia or early physiotherapy with steroid injection at 1 year, but changes were not clinically important. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021; 103: 1555.

[43]

Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Biggs DJ, Fitsialos DP, MacKay M. The resistant frozen shoulder. Manipulation versus arthroscopic release. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995; 319: 238–248.

[44]

Ari B, Altunkiliç T. A comparison of two surgical methods in the treatment of shoulder adhesive capsulitis. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023; 27: 467–475.

[45]

El Aziz SEA, Ahmed HH, Bassiooni HA. MUA versus arthroscopic capsular release of idiopathic frozen shoulder. Benha J Appl Sci. 2022; 7: 133–140.

[46]

Kim DH, Song KS, Min BW, et al. Early clinical outcomes of manipulation under anesthesia for refractory adhesive capsulitis: comparison with arthroscopic capsular release. Clin Orthop Surg. 2020; 12: 217–223.

[47]

Lee SJ, Jang JH, Hyun YS. Can manipulation under anesthesia alone provide clinical outcomes similar to arthroscopic circumferential capsular release in primary frozen shoulder (FS)?: the necessity of arthroscopic capsular release in primary FS. Clin Shoulder Elbow. 2020; 23: 169–177.

[48]

Rangan A, Brealey SD, Keding A, et al. Management of adults with primary frozen shoulder in secondary care (UK FROST): a multicentre, pragmatic, three-arm, superiority randomised clinical trial. Lancet (London, England). 2020; 396: 977–989.

[49]

Schoch B, Huttman D, Syed UA, et al. Surgical treatment of adhesive capsulitis: a retrospective comparative study of manipulation under anesthesia and/or capsular release. Cureus. 2020; 12: e9032.

[50]

Sundararajan SR, Dsouza T, Rajagopalakrishnan R, et al. Arthroscopic capsular release versus manipulation under anaesthesia for treating frozen shoulder -a prospective randomised study. Int Orthop. 2022; 46: 2593–2601.

[51]

Uluyardimci E, Ocguder DA. Comparison of short-term clinical outcomes of manipulation under anesthesia and arthroscopic capsular release in treating frozen shoulder. Med J Islamic World Acad Sci. 2020; 28: 55–60.

[52]

Uppal HS, Evans JP, Smith C. Frozen shoulder: a systematic review of therapeutic options. World J Orthop. 2015; 6: 263–268.

[53]

Xiao RC, Walley KC, DeAngelis JP, et al. Corticosteroid injections for adhesive capsulitis: a review. Clin J Sport Med. 2017; 27: 308–320.

[54]

Takahashi R, Iwahori Y, Kajita Y, et al. Clinical results and complications of shoulder manipulation under ultrasound-guided cervical nerve root block for frozen shoulder: a retrospective observational study. Pain Ther. 2019; 8: 111–120.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.

AI Summary AI Mindmap
PDF

210

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

Sections
Recommended

AI思维导图

/