Finite Element Analysis of Six Internal Fixations in the Treatment of Pauwels Type III Femoral Neck Fracture

Abstract

Objective: The current investigation sought to utilize finite element analysis to replicate the biomechanical effects of different fixation methods, with the objective of establishing a theoretical framework for the optimal choice of modalities in managing Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures.

Methods: The Pauwels type III fracture configuration, characterized by angles of 70°, was simulated in conjunction with six distinct internal fixation methods, including cannulated compression screw (CCS), dynamic hip screw (DHS), DHS with de-rotational screw (DS), CCS with medial buttress plate (MBP), proximal femoral nail anti-rotation (PFNA), and femoral neck system (FNS). These models were developed and refined using Geomagic and SolidWorks software. Subsequently, finite element analysis was conducted utilizing Ansys software, incorporating axial loading, torsional loading, yield loading and cyclic loading.

Results: Under axial loading conditions, the peak stress values for internal fixation and the femur were found to be highest for CCS (454.4; 215.4 MPa) and CCS + MBP (797.2; 284.2 MPa), respectively. The corresponding maximum and minimum displacements for internal fixation were recorded as 6.65 mm for CCS and 6.44 mm for CCS + MBP. When subjected to torsional loading, the peak stress values for internal fixation were highest for CCS + MBP (153.6 MPa) and DHS + DS (72.8 MPa), while for the femur, the maximum and minimum peak stress values were observed for CCS + MBP (119.3 MPa) and FNS (17.6 MPa), respectively. Furthermore, the maximum and minimum displacements for internal fixation were measured as 0.249 mm for CCS + MBP and 0.205 mm for PFNA. Additionally, all six internal fixation models showed excellent performance in terms of yield load and fatigue life.

Conclusion: CCS + MBP had the best initial mechanical stability in treatment for Pauwels type III fracture. However, the MBP was found to be more susceptible to shear stress, potentially increasing the risk of plate breakage. Furthermore, the DHS + DS exhibited superior biomechanical stability compared to CCS, DHS, and PFNA, thereby offering a more conducive environment for fracture healing. Additionally, it appeared that FNS represented a promising treatment strategy, warranting further validation in future studies.

Keywords

Biomechanical study / Finite element analysis / Internal fixation / Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture

References

[1] Schloemann DT, Ricciardi BF, Thirukumaran CP. Disparities in the epidemiology and Management of Fragility hip Fractures. Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2023; 21: 567–577.

[2] Walter N, Szymski D, Kurtz SM, Lowenberg DW, Alt V, Lau EC, et al. Epidemiology and treatment of proximal femoral fractures in the elderly U.S. population. Sci Rep. 2023; 13: 12734.

[3] Fischer H, Maleitzke T, Eder C, Ahmad S, Stockle U, Braun KF. Management of proximal femur fractures in the elderly: current concepts and treatment options. Eur J Med Res. 2021; 26: 86.

[4] Liporace F, Gaines R, Collinge C, Haidukewych GJ. Results of internal fixation of Pauwels type-3 vertical femoral neck fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008; 90: 1654–1659.

[5] Bartonicek J. Pauwels’ classification of femoral neck fractures: correct interpretation of the original. J Orthop Trauma. 2001; 15: 358–360.

[6] Wang K, Ni M, Liao P, Dou B, Yan X, Lv L, et al. Fracture morphology and biomechanical characteristics of Pauwels III femoral neck fractures in young adults. Injury. 2021; 52: 3227–3238.

[7] Knobe M, Altgassen S, Maier KJ, Gradl-Dietsch G, Kaczmarek C, Nebelung S, et al. Screw-blade fixation systems in Pauwels three femoral neck fractures: a biomechanical evaluation. Int Orthop. 2018; 42: 409–418.

[8] Collinge CA, Finlay A, Rodriguez-Buitrago A, Beltran MJ, Mitchell PM, Mir HR, et al. Treatment failure in femoral neck fractures in adults less than 50 years of age: analysis of 492 patients repaired at 26 north American trauma centers. J Orthop Trauma. 2022; 36: 271–279.

[9] Wang G, Tang Y, Wang B, Yang H. Minimally invasive open reduction combined with proximal femoral hollow locking plate in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. J Int Med Res. 2019; 47: 3050–3060.

[10] Augat P, Bliven E, Hackl S. Biomechanics of femoral neck fractures and implications for fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2019; 33(Suppl 1): S27–S32.

[11] Della Rocca GJ. Gaps and opportunities in the management of the young femoral neck fracture. Injury. 2015; 46: 515–518.

[12] Luttrell K, Beltran M, Collinge CA. Preoperative decision making in the treatment of high-angle “vertical” femoral neck fractures in young adult patients. An expert opinion survey of the Orthopaedic trauma Association’s (OTA) membership. J Orthop Trauma. 2014; 28: e221–e225.

[13] Nan C, Ma L, Liang Y, Li Y, Ma Z. Mechanical effects of sagittal variations on Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures treated with femoral neck system(FNS). BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23: 1045.

[14] Li J, Wang M, Li L, Zhang H, Hao M, Li C, et al. Finite element analysis of different configurations of fully threaded cannulated screw in the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018; 13: 272.

[15] Jiang D, Zhan S, Wang L, Shi LL, Ling M, Hu H, et al. Biomechanical comparison of five cannulated screw fixation strategies for young vertical femoral neck fractures. J Orthop Res. 2021; 39: 1669–1680.

[16] Li J, Yin P, Zhang L, Chen H, Tang P. Medial anatomical buttress plate in treating displaced femoral neck fracture a finite element analysis. Injury. 2019; 50: 1895–1900.

[17] Kim JW, Oh CW, Kim BS, Jeong SL, Jung GH, Lee DH. Structure-mechanical analysis of various fixation constructs for basicervical fractures of the proximal femur and clinical implications; finite element analysis. Injury. 2023; 54: 370–378.

[18] Chen WP, Tai CL, Shih CH, Hsieh PH, Leou MC, Lee MS. Selection of fixation devices in proximal femur rotational osteotomy: clinical complications and finite element analysis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2004; 19: 255–262.

[19] Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87: 2432–2438.

[20] Bal BS, Haltom D, Aleto T, Barrett M. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006; 88(Suppl 1 Pt 2): 221–233.

[21] Wang J, Ma JX, Lu B, Bai HH, Wang Y, Ma XL. Comparative finite element analysis of three implants fixing stable and unstable subtrochanteric femoral fractures: proximal femoral nail Antirotation (PFNA), proximal femoral locking plate (PFLP), and reverse less invasive stabilization system (LISS). Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2020; 106: 95–101.

[22] Wang J, Jia H, Ma X, Ma J, Lu B, Bai H, et al. Biomechanical study of intramedullary versus Extramedullary implants for four types of subtrochanteric femoral fracture. Orthop Surg. 2022; 14: 1884–1891.

[23] Oken OF, Soydan Z, Yildirim AO, Gulcek M, Ozlu K, Ucaner A. Performance of modified anatomic plates is comparable to proximal femoral nail, dynamic hip screw and anatomic plates: finite element and biomechanical testing. Injury. 2011; 42: 1077–1083.

[24] Duffin M, Pilson HT. Technologies for Young Femoral Neck Fracture Fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2019; 33(Suppl 1): S20–S26.

[25] Samsami S, Saberi S, Sadighi S, Rouhi G. Comparison of three fixation methods for femoral neck fracture in young adults: experimental and numerical investigations. J Med Biol Eng. 2015; 35: 566–579.

[26] Warschawski Y, Sharfman ZT, Berger O, Steinberg EL, Amar E, Snir N. Dynamic locking plate vs. simple cannulated screws for nondisplaced intracapsular hip fracture: a comparative study. Injury. 2016; 47: 424–427.

[27] Selvan VT, Oakley MJ, Rangan A, Al-Lami MK. Optimum configuration of cannulated hip screws for the fixation of intracapsular hip fractures: a biomechanical study. Injury. 2004; 35: 136–141.

[28] Schottel PC, Blankstein M, Sprague S, Swiontkowski M, Bzovsky S, Bhandari M, et al. Optimal technical factors during operative Management of low-Energy Femoral Neck Fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2021; 35: 92–99.

[29] Lin S, Shang J, Xing B, Wu B, Peng R, Wang G, et al. Modified F configuration in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: a finite element analysis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22: 758.

[30] Lim EJ, Shon HC, Cho JW, Oh JK, Kim J, Kim CH. Dynamic hip screw versus cannulated cancellous screw in Pauwels type II or type III femoral neck fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Pers Med. 2021; 11: 11.

[31] Stoffel K, Zderic I, Gras F, Sommer C, Eberli U, Mueller D, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of the femoral neck system in unstable Pauwels III femoral neck fractures: a comparison with the dynamic hip screw and cannulated screws. J Orthop Trauma. 2017; 31: 131–137.

[32] Florschutz AV, Langford JR, Haidukewych GJ, Koval KJ. Femoral neck fractures: current management. J Orthop Trauma. 2015; 29: 121–129.

[33] Ma J, Zhao Z, Zhi X, Wang H, Wang W. Finite element comparative analysis of three different internal fixation methods in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23: 1030.

[34] Freitas A, Toledo Junior JV, Ferreira Dos Santos A, Aquino RJ, Leao VN, Pericles de Alcantara W. Biomechanical study of different internal fixations in Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture -a finite elements analysis. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2021; 14: 145–150.

[35] Li L, Zhao X, Yang X, Tang X, Liu M. Dynamic hip screws versus cannulated screws for femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020; 15: 352.

[36] Zhang YL, Chen S, Ai ZS, Gao YS, Mei J, Zhang CQ. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head, nonunion and potential risk factors in Pauwels grade-3 femoral neck fractures: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95: e3706.

[37] Xia Y, Zhang W, Zhang Z, Wang J, Yan L. Treatment of femoral neck fractures: sliding hip screw or cannulated screws? A Meta-Analysis J Orthop Surg Res. 2021; 16: 54.

[38] Tianye L, Peng Y, Jingli X, QiuShi W, GuangQuan Z, Wei H, et al. Finite element analysis of different internal fixation methods for the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. Biomed Pharmacother. 2019; 112: 108658.

[39] Giordano V, Alves DD, Paes RP, Amaral AB, Giordano M, Belangero W, et al. The role of the medial plate for Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: a comparative mechanical study using two fixations with cannulated screws. J Exp Orthop. 2019; 6: 18.

[40] Ma C, Liu Y, Liu J, Chen L, Huang J, Luo X, et al. The role of the medial buttress plate in the treatment of Pauwels type II and III femoral neck fracture in nonelderly patients: a retrospective study and preliminary results. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022; 23: 100.

[41] Lazaro LE, Sculco PK, Pardee NC, Klinger CE, Dyke JP, Helfet DL, et al. Assessment of femoral head and head-neck junction perfusion following surgical hip dislocation using gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: e1821–e1828.

[42] Putnam SM, Collinge CA, Gardner MJ, Ricci WM, McAndrew CM. Vascular anatomy of the medial femoral neck and implications for surface plate fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2019; 33: 111–115.

[43] Teng Y, Zhang Y, Guo C. Finite element analysis of femoral neck system in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101: e29450.

[44] Li M, Ren C, Ma T, Li Z, Xu Y, Sun L, et al. Comparison of cannulated screw combined with medial femoral plate and simple cannulated screw in the treatment of Pauwels type III femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2023; 33: 792–798.

[45] Cui H, Wei W, Shao Y, Du K. Finite element analysis of fixation effect for femoral neck fracture under different fixation configurations. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2022; 25: 132–139.

[46] Roderer G, Moll S, Gebhard F, Claes L, Krischak G. Side plate fixation vs. intramedullary nailing in an unstable medial femoral neck fracture model: a comparative biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2011; 26: 141–146.

[47] Guo J, Dong W, Yin B, Jin L, Lin Z, Hou Z, et al. Intramedullary nails with cannulated screw fixation for the treatment of unstable femoral neck fractures. J Int Med Res. 2019; 47: 557–568.

[48] Zhou Y, Li Z, Lao K, Wang Z, Zhang L, Dai S, et al. Femoral neck system vs. cannulated screws on treating femoral neck fracture: a meta-analysis and system review. Front Surg. 2023; 10: 1224559.

[49] Zhang YZ, Lin Y, Li C, Yue XJ, Li GY, Wang B, et al. A comparative analysis of femoral neck system and three cannulated screws fixation in the treatment of femoral neck fractures: a six-month follow-up. Orthop Surg. 2022; 14: 686–693.

[50] Patel S, Kumar V, Baburaj V, Dhillon MS. The use of the femoral neck system (FNS) leads to better outcomes in the surgical management of femoral neck fractures in adults compared to fixation with cannulated screws: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023; 33: 2101–2109.

[51] Niemann M, Maleitzke T, Jahn M, Salmoukas K, Braun KF, Graef F, et al. Restoration of hip geometry after femoral neck fracture: a comparison of the femoral neck system (FNS) and the dynamic hip screw (DHS). Life (Basel). 2023; 13: 2073.

[52] Xia Y, Zhang W, Hu H, Yan L, Zhan S, Wang J. Biomechanical study of two alternative methods for the treatment of vertical femoral neck fractures -a finite element analysis. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021; 211: 106409.

[53] Jiang D, Zhan S, Hai H, Wang L, Zhao J, Zhu Z, et al. What makes vertical femoral neck fracture with posterior inferior comminution different? An analysis of biomechanical features and optimal internal fixation strategy. Injury. 2023; 54: 110842.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.