A Novel Leverage Technique Using Monoaxial Pedicle Screw for Reduction of Thoracolumbar Compression Fractures: Surgical Technique and Analysis of Radiological Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Thoracolumbar compression fractures resulting from high-energy injuries are a common type of spinal fracture. Satisfying reduction of compressive vertebra body is essential for the clinical outcome. However, traditional distraction technique may lead to complications including pedicle screw loosening, pedicle screw breakage, and postoperative back pain because of excessive distraction. In this study, we reported a novel technique for reduction. Additionally, the effect and postoperative radiological parameters of this technique were compared with those of traditional distraction technique.

Methods: The clinical data of 80 patients who had been treated with posterior pedicle screw fixation from January 2019 to December 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. Thirty-six patients were performed with the leverage technique, while 22 patients were treated with the traditional distraction technique. When pedicle screw fixation was performed with either the leverage technique or the traditional distraction technique, fracture reduction was completed with monoaxial pedicle screws using either the leverage maneuver or distraction of adjacent vertebrae. Clinical evaluation, including operation time, hospital stay, blood loss volume, and postoperative complications were collected. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) score for neurological condition and the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain were used to evaluate the patients’ functional outcome. The radiographic analysis included local kyphotic angle (LKA), regional kyphotic angle (RKA), anterior vertebral height (AVH), posterior vertebral height (PVH), and sagittal compression (SC). The student t-test and the χ2-test (or the Fisher exact test) were used to compare the outcome measures between the two groups.

Results: The leverage group comprised 36 patients, while 44 patients were included in the distraction group. No statistically significant differences were found in the demographic data. The VAS score in the leverage group (3.0 ± 0.8) was significantly lower than that in the distraction group (4.2 ± 0.6) on postoperative day 1. Total correction of the LKA in the leverage group (11.5 ± 2.5°) was significantly higher than that in the distraction group (7.1 ± 1.3°) (p = 0.0004). Total correction of the RKA was higher in the leverage group (12.1 ± 4.3°) than in the distraction group (6.1 ± 0.9°) (p = 0.005). The ratio of rear pillar /front pillar correction was 0.35 ± 0.13 and 0.89 ± 0.18 in the leverage and distraction groups, respectively (p = 0.014). Total correction of the upper and lower foraminal height in the leverage group was significantly less than that in the distraction group. The leverage group had significantly higher correction of the upper and lower intervertebral space height than the distraction group.

Conclusions: Our novel leverage technique provided better kyphotic reduction and restoration than compared to conventional distraction technique in the surgical treatment of thoracolumbar compression fractures.

Keywords

Compression Fracture / Fracture Fixation / Leverage Technique / Pedicle Screw

References

[1] Gertzbein SD. Scoliosis Research Society. Multicenter spine fracture study. Spine. 1992; 17(5): 528–540.

[2] Ming Y, Qinpeng Z, Dingjun H, et al. Comparison of clinical results between novel percutaneous pedicle screw and traditional open pedicle screw fixation for thoracolumbar fractures without neurological deficit. Int Orthop. 2019; 43(7): 1749–1754.

[3] Zhi C, Chenyang S, Min C, et al. What are risk factors for subsequent fracture after vertebral augmentation in patients with thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral fractures. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021; 22(1): 1040.

[4] Holmes JF, Miller PQ, Panacek EA, Lin S, Horne NS, Mower WR, et al. Epidemiology of thoracolumbar spine injury in blunt trauma. Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8(9): 866–872.

[5] Diaz JJ Jr, Cullinane DC, Altman DT, Bokhari F, Cheng JS, Como J, et al. Practice management guidelines for the screening of thoracolumbar spine fracture. J Trauma. 2007; 63(3): 709–718.

[6] Hu R, Mustard CA, Burns C. Epidemiology of incident spinal fracture in a complete population. Spine. 1996; 21(4): 492–499.

[7] Wenye Y, Tonghua Z, Kai H, et al. A comparison of monoaxial pedicle screw versus polyaxial pedicle screw in short-segment posterior fixation for the treatment of thoracolumbar fractured vertebra. Ann Transl Med. 2021; 9(8): 669.

[8] Wu A-M, Zheng Y-J, Lin Y, Wu YS, Mao FM, Ni WF, et al. Transforaminal decompression and interbody fusion in the treatment of thoracolumbar fracture and dislocation with spinal cord injury. PLoS One. 2017; 9(8): 9.

[9] Hsu JM, Joseph T, Ellis AM. Thoracolumbar fracture in blunt trauma patients: guidelines for diagnosis and imaging. Injury. 2003; 34(6): 426–433.

[10] McLain RF. Functional outcomes after surgery for spinal fractures: return to work and activity. Spine. 2004; 29(4): 470–477.

[11] Yanjie H, Bo Z, Abulimiti A, et al. Rapid efficacy of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) in treating thoracolumbar fractures in elderly patients. Am J Transl Res. 2021; 13(4): 2662–2669.

[12] Patel P, Ajudiya A. Outcomes of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures managed with pedicular screw fixation system: a study of 25 cases. Int J Orthop Sci. 2019; 5(4): 417–420.

[13] Baaj AA, Reyes PM, Yaqoobi AS, Uribe JS, Vale FL, Theodore N, et al. Biomechanical advantage of the index-level pedicle screw in unstable thoracolumbar junction fractures. J Neurosurg Spine. 2011; 14(2): 192–197.

[14] Dick JC, Jones MP, Zdeblick TA, Kunz DN, Horton WC, et al. A biomechanical comparison evaluating the use of intermediate screws and cross-linkage in lumbar pedicle fixation. J Spinal Disord. 1994; 7(5): 402–407.

[15] Sun C, Guan G, Liu X, Zhang H, Wang B. Comparison of short-segment pedicle fixation with versus without inclusion of the fracture level in the treatment of mild thoracolumbar burst fractures. Int J Surg. 2016; 36: 352–357.

[16] Klaudia S, Rafał Z. A comparative biomechanical analysis of the impact of different configurations of pedicle-screw-based fixation in thoracolumbar compression fracture. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022; 2022: 3817097.

[17] Park Y, Ha JW. Comparison of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion performed with a minimally invasive approach or a traditional open approach. Spine. 2007; 32(5): 537–543.

[18] Song X, Ren D, Zhang F, Han S, Wu D, Wang J. Percutaneous versus open posterior stabilization and decompression in AOSpine-type A3 thoracolumbar fractures with neurological deficit. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023; 24(1): 385.

[19] Trungu S, Ricciardi L, Forcato S, Piazza A, D’Andrea G, Polli FM, et al. Percutaneous pedicle screw fixation without arthrodesis of 368 thoracolumbar fractures: long-term clinical and radiological outcomes in a single institution. Eur Spine J. 2023; 32(1): 75–83.

[20] Vaccaro AR, Lambrechts MJ, Karamian BA, Canseco JA, Oner C, Vialle E, et al. AO Spine upper cervical injury classification system: a description and reliability study. Spine J. 2022; 22(12): 2042–2049.

[21] Lee JY, Vaccaro AR, Lim MR, Öner FC, John Hulbert R, Hedlund R, et al. Thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score: a new paradigm for the treatment of thoracolumbar spine trauma. J Orthop Sci. 2005; 10(6): 671–675.

[22] Minawaer A, Xueyi C, Xiangyu K, et al. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; 6(6): CD005079.

[23] Yuan C, Chen K, Zhang H, Zhang H, He S. Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis of complication and fusion rate. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014; 117: 28–32.

[24] Mehmanparast H, Petit Y, Mac-Thiong JM. Comparison of pedicle screw loosening mechanisms and the effect on fixation strength. J Biomech Eng. 2015; 137(12): 121003.

[25] Tsouknidas A. The effect of pedicle screw implantation depth and angle on the loading and stiffness of a spinal fusion assembly. Biomed Mater Eng. 2015; 25(4): 425–433.

[26] Jendoubi K, Khadri Y, Bendjaballah M, Slimane N. Effects of the insertion type and depth on the pedicle screw pullout strength: a finite element study. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2018; 2018: 1460195.

[27] Ding S, Lu X, Liu Z, Wang Y. Reduce the fractured central endplate in thoracolumbar fractures using percutaneous pedicle screws and instrumentational maneuvers: technical strategy and radiological outcomes. Injury. 2021; 52(4): 1060–1064.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.