The Efficacy of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Peroneus Longus Tendon and its Impact on Ankle Joint Function
Shichao Zhang, Guoping Cai, Zhe Ge
The Efficacy of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Peroneus Longus Tendon and its Impact on Ankle Joint Function
Objective: Peroneus Longus Tendon (PLT), a viable anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft, shares similar biomechanics, making it suitable for reconstruction. Controversy exists over whether PLT transplants affects the donor ankle joint. The purpose of this study was to examine the recovery of knee joint function following arthroscopic ACL restoration using autologous PLT and its influence on the donor ankle joint.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 65 patients with ACL rupture who underwent PLT graft reconstruction in our hospital from January 2016 to December 2021. A three-dimensional gait analysis of the bilateral knee and ankle joints was performed postoperatively using an Opti_Knee three-dimensional motion measurement and analysis system—Yidong Medical Infrared Motion Gait Analyzer. Knee function scores and changes in the range of motion of the bilateral knee and ankle joints were collected. The analysis of preoperative and postoperative joint function scores, bilateral knee and ankle mobility was performed by t-tests.
Results: One year after surgery, the patients' International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOSs), and Lysholm scores were significantly improved compared to preoperative scores, with statistically significant differences (p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference in the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score of the donor ankle joint before and after surgery (p > 0.05). During different gait cycles, there was no statistical difference in knee joint mobility between the affected and healthy sides (p > 0.05), but there was a statistical difference in the inversion and eversion angle of the donor ankle joint during the support phase (p < 0.05).
Conclusion: ACL reconstruction using the PLT can yield satisfactory knee joint function. However, it does affect inversion and eversion in the donor ankle joint, necessitating postoperative exercises. Similar subjective function ratings for both operated and non-operated feet, despite increased inversion-eversion motion in the operated foot, may be influenced by the subjective nature and margin of error in the AOFAS Ankle-hindfoot score, along with the relatively small variation in ankle inversion-eversion angles.
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction / Arthroscopy / Knee function scores / Peroneus longus tendon / Three-dimensional gait analysis
[1] |
MarkatosK, KasetaMK, LallosSN, Korres DS, EfstathopoulosN. The anatomy of the ACL and its importance in ACL reconstruction. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013;23(7):747–752.
|
[2] |
FlemingJD, Ritzmann R, CentnerC. Effect of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture on knee proprioception within 2 years after conservative and operative treatment: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2022;52(5):1091–1102.
|
[3] |
JenkinsSM, GuzmanA, GardnerBB, Bryant SA, Del SolSR, McGahanP, et al. Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament injury: review of current literature and recommendations. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2022;15(3):170–179.
|
[4] |
ZhengSF, HuangHY, ZhangY, Yin QS, DingHW. Comparison of selection and efficacy of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament grafts for reconstruction. Chinese J Bone and Joint Injury. 2009;24(7):592–594.
|
[5] |
WiradiputraAE, FebyanAG. Peroneus longus tendon graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a case report and review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021;83:106028.
|
[6] |
RhatomyS, Hartoko L, SetyawanR, SoekarnoNR, Zainal Asikin AI, PridiantoD, et al. Single bundle ACL reconstruction with peroneus longus tendon graft: 2-years follow-up. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020;11(suppl 3):S332–S336.
|
[7] |
AngthongC, Chernchujit B, ApivatgaroonA, ChaijenkitK, NualonP, Suchao-inK. The anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with the peroneus longus tendon: a biomechanical and clinical evaluation of the donor ankle morbidity. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98(6):555–560.
|
[8] |
GoyalT, PaulS, ChoudhuryAK, Sethy SS. Full-thickness peroneus longus tendon autograft for anterior cruciate reconstruction in multi-ligament injury and revision cases: outcomes and donor site morbidity. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2023;33:21–27.
|
[9] |
ShiFD, HessDE, ZuoJZ, Liu SJ, WangXC, ZhangY, et al. Peroneus longus tendon autograft is a safe and effective alternative for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(8):804–811.
|
[10] |
KunzeKN, Palhares G, UppstromTJ, HinkleyP, RizyM, GomollAH, et al. Establishing minimal detectable change thresholds for the international knee documentation committee and Kujala scores at one and two years after patellofemoral joint arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31:3299–3306.
|
[11] |
CollinsNJ, Prinsen CA, ChristensenR, BartelsEM, TerweeCB, RoosEM. Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS): systematic review and meta-analysis of measurement properties. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2016;24(8):1317–1329.
|
[12] |
NataliS, Screpis D, PataniaE, De BerardinisL, BenoniA, PiovanG, et al. Efficacy and long-term outcomes of intra-articular autologous micro-fragmented adipose tissue in individuals with Glenohumeral osteoarthritis: a 36-month follow-up study. J Pers Med. 2023;13(9):1309.
|
[13] |
Van LieshoutEM, De Boer AS, MeuffelsDE, Den HoedPT, Van der Vlies CH, TuinebreijerWE, et al. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-Hindfoot score: a study protocol for the translation and validation of the Dutch language version. BMJ Open. 2017;7(2):e012884.
|
[14] |
SandersTL, Maradit KH, BryanAJ, LarsonDR, DahmDL, LevyBA, et al. Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: a 21-year population-based study. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(6):1502–1507.
|
[15] |
NogaroMC, AbramS, AlvandA, Bottomley N, JacksonWFM, PriceA. Paediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Bone Joint J. 2020;102-B(2):239–245.
|
[16] |
MouarbesD, Menetrey J, MarotV, CourtotL, BerardE, CavaignacE. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon-bone and hamstring-tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(14):3531–3540.
|
[17] |
LinKM, BoyleC, MaromN, Marx RG. Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2020;28(2):41–48.
|
[18] |
KeyhaniS, Qoreishi M, MousaviM, RonaghiH, Soleymanha M. Peroneus longus tendon autograft versus hamstring tendon autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparative study with a mean follow-up of two years. Arch Bone Jt Surg. 2022;10(8):695–701.
|
[19] |
AgarwalA, SinghS, SinghA, Tewari P. Comparison of functional outcomes of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using a peroneus longus graft as an alternative to the hamstring tendon graft. Cureus. 2023;15(4):e37273.
|
[20] |
ButtUM, KhanZA, AminA, Shah IA, IqbalJ, KhanZ. Peroneus longus tendon harvesting for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. JBJS Essent Surg Tech. 2022;12(2):e20.00053.
|
[21] |
PearsallAT, HollisJM, RussellGJ, Scheer ZA. A biomechanical comparison of three lower extremity tendons for ligamentous reconstruction about the knee. Art Ther. 2003;19(10):1091–1096.
|
[22] |
DuTS, ZhangCL. Current status of development of autologous peroneal longissimus tendon graft for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament. Chinese J Joint Surgery (Electronic Edition). 2015;9(3):412–415.
|
[23] |
SaeedUB, RamzanA, AnwarM, Tariq H, TariqH, YasinA, et al. Earlier return to sports, reduced donor-site morbidity with doubled peroneus longus versus quadrupled hamstring tendon autograft in ACL reconstruction. JB JS Open Access. 2023;8(4):e23.00051.
|
[24] |
HeJ, TangQ, ErnstS, Linde MA, SmolinskiP, WuS, et al. Peroneus longus tendon autograft has functional outcomes comparable to hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29(9):2869–2879.
|
[25] |
BiM, ZhaoC, ZhangQ, Cao L, ChenX, KongM, et al. All-inside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon autograft. Orthop J Sports Med. 2021;9(6):1813038650.
|
[26] |
de OliveiraDE, HoritaMM, de OliveiraE, SilvaM, SalasVER, JorgePB. Anterior half of the peroneus longus tendon combined with semitendinosus and Gracilis tendons for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an athlete case report. Case Rep Orthop. 2021;2021:9978383.
|
[27] |
SpraggL, ChenJ, MirzayanR, Love R, MaletisG. The effect of autologous hamstring graft diameter on the likelihood for revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44(6):1475–1481.
|
[28] |
MariscalcoMW, Flanigan DC, MitchellJ, PedrozaAD, JonesMH, AndrishJT, et al. The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a multicenter Orthopaedic outcomes network (MOON) cohort study. Art Ther. 2013;29(12):1948–1953.
|
/
〈 | 〉 |