A Modified Arthroscopic Triple-row Repair Technique for L-shaped Delaminated Rotator Cuff Tears

Abstract

Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of a modified arthroscopic triple-row (TR) repair technique with the suture bridge (SB) repair technique in treating L-shaped delaminated rotator cuff tears. Various surgical techniques for L-shaped delaminated rotator cuff tears have been reported, many of which aid in increasing the contact area and pressure of the rotator cuff. However, there is still debate over which technique yields superior results.

Methods: From January 2017 to March 2020, 61 cases of L-shaped delaminated rotator cuff tears were included in this study. Of these, 34 cases underwent the modified arthroscopic triple-row repair technique, while 27 cases were addressed with the suture bridge repair technique. Functional assessment was conducted using the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder score, the Constant score (CS), and the visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) assessments for rotator cuff healing were performed at the 24-month postoperative mark. Statistical evaluations were conducted using SPSS for Windows (Version 25.0, IBM, Armonk, NY, USA), employing the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare preoperative and postoperative data and ROM differences, and the Mann–Whitney U test for statistical differences in clinical outcome scores between the two groups. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Comparative analysis of the preoperative and final follow-up scores revealed a substantial enhancement in shoulder function, as indicated by the ASES, UCLA, CS, and VAS scores, with statistical significance (p < 0.001). At both the preoperative stage and final follow-up, no notable differences were observed in ASES, UCLA, CS, and VAS scores between the two groups. However, the TR repair group exhibited lower VAS scores than the SB group at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Active range of motion (ROM) showed significant improvement in both groups. No significant differences in ROM were noted between the two groups either before the surgery or at the final follow-up.

Conclusion: The study demonstrates that both the modified arthroscopic TR and SB techniques for L-shaped delaminated cuff tears yield satisfactory outcomes, with no significant differences in overall clinical performance. Notably, early postoperative pain management appears more effective with the modified TR technique, suggesting its potential for enhanced early recovery experiences. This technique's design, promoting securer fixation and optimal contact conditions, is implied to facilitate superior long-term healing, warranting further investigation into its long-term benefits.

Keywords

Triple-row / L-shaped / Delaminated rotator cuff tears / Separate repair / En masse repair

References

[1] ChooHJ, LeeSJ, KimJH, Kim DW, ParkYM, KimOH, et al. Delaminated tears of the rotator cuff: prevalence, characteristics, and diagnostic accuracy using indirect MR arthrography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;204:360–366.

[2] HanY, ShinJH, SeokCW, Lee CH, KimSH. Is posterior delamination in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair hidden to the posterior viewing portal? Art Ther. 2013;29:1740–1747.

[3] MacDougalGA, Todhunter CR. Delamination tearing of the rotator cuff: prospective analysis of the influence of delamination tearing on the outcome of arthroscopically assisted mini open rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19:1063–1069.

[4] NeytonL, Godenèche A, Nové-JosserandL, CarrillonY, Cléchet J, HardyMB. Arthroscopic suture-bridge repair for small to medium size supraspinatus tear: healing rate and retear pattern. Art Ther. 2013;29:10–17.

[5] ParkJY, LheeSH, OhKS, MoonSG, HwangJT. Clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes of arthroscopic suture bridge repair for massive rotator cuff tear. Art Ther. 2013;29:280–289.

[6] SonnabendDH, YuY, HowlettCR, Harper GD, WalshWR. Laminated tears of the human rotator cuff: a histologic and immunochemical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001;10:109–115.

[7] BoileauP, Brassart N, WatkinsonDJ, CarlesM, Hatzidakis AM, KrishnanSG. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1229–1240.

[8] LiangJ, LiangQ, WangX, Yang Z, LiuT, ZhangB, et al. Delamination of rotator cuff tears impairs healing after repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023;31:5255–5269.

[9] ChoiS, KimMK, KimGM, Roh YH, HwangIK, KangH. Factors associated with clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with a suture bridge technique in medium, large, and massive tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23:1675–1681.

[10] HeppP, EngelT, OsterhoffG, Marquass B, JostenC. Knotless anatomic double-layer double-row rotator cuff repair: a novel technique re-establishing footprint and shape of full-thickness tears. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129:1031–1036.

[11] KimKC, RheeKJ, ShinHD, Kim PS. Arthroscopic footprint reconstruction of bursal-side delaminated rotator cuff tears using the suture-bridge technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:840–843.

[12] KimSJ, ChoiYR, LeeHH, Chun YM. Surgical results of delaminated rotator cuff repair using suture-bridge technique with all-layers or bursal layer-only repair. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:468–473.

[13] KimYK, JungKH, ParkCK, Yun SB. Morphologic factors related to repair outcomes for delaminated rotator cuff tears: a minimum 2-year retrospective comparison study. Art Ther. 2019;35:332–340.

[14] MoriD, Funakoshi N, YamashitaF. Arthroscopic lamina-specific double-row fixation for large delaminated rotator cuff tears. Arthrosc Tech. 2014;3:e667–e671.

[15] NakamizoH, HorieR. Comparison of En masse versus dual-layer suture bridge procedures for delaminated rotator cuff tears. Art Ther. 2018;34:3150–3156.

[16] OpsomerGJ, GuptaA, HaeniDL, Schubert T, LejeuneE, PetkinK, et al. Arthroscopic double-layer lasso loop technique to repair delaminated rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy: the journal of Arthroscopic & Related. Surgery. 2018;34:2943–2951.

[17] PauzenbergerL, Heuberer PR, DyrnaF, ObopilweE, Kriegleder B, AnderlW, et al. Double-layer rotator cuff repair: anatomic reconstruction of the superior capsule and rotator cuff improves biomechanical properties in repairs of delaminated rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2018;46:3165–3173.

[18] SugayaH, MaedaK, MatsukiK, Moriishi J. Repair integrity and functional outcome after arthroscopic double-row rotator cuff repair. A prospective outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:953–960.

[19] KimYS, LeeHJ, JinHK, Kim SE, LeeJW. Conventional En masse repair versus separate double-layer double-row repair for the treatment of delaminated rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2016;44:1146–1152.

[20] IdeJ, Karasugi T, OkamotoN, TaniwakiT, OkaK, MizutaH. Functional and structural comparisons of the arthroscopic knotless double-row suture bridge and single-row repair for anterosuperior rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24:1544–1554.

[21] InoueA, ChosaE, GotoK, Tajima N. Nonlinear stress analysis of the supraspinatus tendon using three-dimensional finite element analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:1151–1157.

[22] ClarkJM, Harryman DT. Tendons, ligaments, and capsule of the rotator cuff. Gross and microscopic anatomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:713–725.

[23] MochizukiT, SugayaH, UomizuM, et al. Humeral insertion of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus. New anatomical findings regarding the footprint of the rotator cuff. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(Suppl 2 Pt 1):1–7.

[24] SlagmolenP, ScheysL, D'HoogeJ, Suetens P, PeersK, DebeerP, et al. In regard to: “in vivo strain analysis of the intact supraspinatus tendon by ultrasound speckles tracking imaging” (journal of Orthopaedic research, Vol. 29, No. 12, pp. 1931–1937, May 2011). J Orthop Res. 2012;30:2054–2056; author reply 2056–2057.

[25] BurkhartSS, Hartzler RU. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: how to avoid Retear. Art Ther. 2019;35:12–13.

[26] HeubererPR, Pauzenberger L, SmolenD, OstermannRC, AnderlW. An arthroscopic knotless technique for anatomical restoration of the rotator cuff and superior capsule: the double-layer cinch bridge. Arthrosc Tech. 2018;7:e7–e12.

[27] QuanX, WuJ, LiuZ, LiX, XiaoY, Shu H, et al. Outcomes after double-layer repair versus En masse repair for delaminated rotator cuff injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2023;11(10):23259671231206183.

[28] MoezziD. Editorial commentary: restoration of rotator cuff footprint anatomy is all that matters, No matter how we get there. Art Ther. 2018;34:3157–3158.

[29] IwashitaS, Hashiguchi H, OkuboA, YonedaM, TakaiS. Characteristics of the patients with delaminated rotator cuff tear. SICOT J. 2018;4:28.

[30] DavidsonJ, Burkhart SS. The geometric classification of rotator cuff tears: a system linking tear pattern to treatment and prognosis. Art Ther. 2010;26:417–424.

[31] SallayPI, HunkerPJ, LimJK. Frequency of various tear patterns in full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. Art Ther. 2007;23:1052–1059.

[32] MillettPJ, WarthRJ. Posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: classification, pattern recognition, and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014;22:521–534.

[33] SanoH, HattaT, YamamotoN, Itoi E. Stress distribution within rotator cuff tendons with a crescent-shaped and an L-shaped tear. Am J Sports Med. 2013;41:2262–2269.

[34] OstranderRV, SmithJ, SaperM. Triple-row modification of the suture-bridge technique for arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthrosc Tech. 2016;5:e1007–e1013.

[35] OstranderRV, Andrews J. Arthroscopic triple-row rotator cuff repair: a modified suture-bridge technique. Orthopedics. 2009;32:566.

[36] ParkMC, Elattrache NS, AhmadCS, TiboneJE. “Transosseous-equivalent” rotator cuff repair technique. Art Ther. 2006;22(1360):e1361–e1365.

[37] ParkMC, ElAttrache NS, TiboneJE, AhmadCS, JunBJ, LeeTQ. Part I: footprint contact characteristics for a transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:461–468.

[38] ParkMC, TiboneJE, ElAttracheNS, AhmadCS, JunBJ, LeeTQ. Part II: biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:469–476.

[39] OstranderRV, McKinney BI. Evaluation of footprint contact area and pressure using a triple-row modification of the suture-bridge technique for rotator cuff repair. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21:1406–1412.

[40] BuckupJ, SmolenD, HessF, Sternberg C, LeuzingerJ. The arthroscopic triple-row modified suture bridge technique for rotator cuff repair: functional outcome and repair integrity. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020;29:308–315.

[41] MorsyMG, GawishHM, GalalMA, Waly AH. Arthroscopic linked triple row repair for large and massive rotator cuff tears. Arthrosc Tech. 2021;10:e117–e125.

[42] MorsyMG, GawishHM, GalalMA, Waly AH. Outcomes of the star repair for large and massive rotator cuff tears: a modified triple-row technique. Orthop J Sports Med. 2020;8(9):2325967120952998.

[43] TanakaM, HanaiH, KotaniY, Kuratani K, KoizumiK, HayashidaK. Triple-row technique confers a lower Retear rate than standard suture bridge technique in arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery. 2021;37:3053–3061.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.