Design and Biomechanical Finite Element Analysis of Spatial Weaving Infracalcaneal Fixator System

Yong Zhang, Qiuyan Weng, Jianming Chen, Yunfeng Yang

PDF
Orthopaedic Surgery ›› 2024, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (4) : 976-983. DOI: 10.1111/os.14012
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Design and Biomechanical Finite Element Analysis of Spatial Weaving Infracalcaneal Fixator System

Author information +
History +

Abstract

Objective: Traditional internal fixation of calcaneus fractures, involving lateral L-shaped incisions and plate fixation, has disadvantages such as increased operative exposure, eccentric plate fixation, and complications. The aim of this study was to design a Spatial Weaving Intra-calcaneal Fixator System (SWIFS) for the treatment of complex calcaneal fractures and to compare its biomechanical properties with those of traditional calcaneal plates.

Methods: The computed tomography (CT) data of the normal adult calcaneus was used for modeling, and the largest trapezoidal column structure was cut and separated from the model and related parameters were measured. The SWIFS was designed within the target trapezoid, according to the characteristics of the fracture of the calcaneus. The Sanders model classification type IV calcaneal fracture was established in finite element software, and fixation with calcaneal plate and the SWIFS examined. Overall structural strength distribution and displacement in the two groups were compared.

Results: The maximum 3D trapezoidal column in the calcaneus was constructed, and the dimensions were measured. The SWIFS and the corresponding guide device were successfully designed. In the one-legged erect position state, the SWIFS group exhibited a peak von Mises equivalent stress of 96.00 MPa, a maximum displacement of 0.31 mm, and a structural stiffness of 2258.06 N/mm. The conventional calcaneal plate showed a peak von Mises equivalent stress of 228.66 Mpa, a maximum displacement of 1.26 mm, and a structural stiffness of 555.56 N/mm. The SWIFS group exhibited a 75.40% decrease in displacement and a 306.45% increase in stiffness.

Conclusion: Compared with fixation by conventional calcaneal plate, the SWIFS provides better structural stability and effective stress distribution.

Keywords

3D Modeling / Calcaneus / Finite Element Method (FEM) / Internal Fixation / Minimally Invasive

Cite this article

Download citation ▾
Yong Zhang, Qiuyan Weng, Jianming Chen, Yunfeng Yang. Design and Biomechanical Finite Element Analysis of Spatial Weaving Infracalcaneal Fixator System. Orthopaedic Surgery, 2024, 16(4): 976‒983 https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14012

References

[1]
RazikA, HarrisM, TrompeterA. Calcaneal fractures: where are we now? Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2018;13(1):1–11.
[2]
LeiteCBG, MacedoRS, SaitoGH, Sakaki MH, KojimaKE, FernandesTD. Epidemiological study on calcaneus fractures in a tertiary hospital. Rev Bras Ortop. 2018;53(4):472–476.
[3]
GothaHE, ZideJR. Current controversies in Management of Calcaneus Fractures. Orthop Clin North Am. 2017;48(1):91–103.
[4]
PompachM, CardaM, AmlangM, Zwipp H. Treatment of calcaneal fractures with a locking nail(C-nail). Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2016;28(3):218–230.
[5]
KhuranaA, Dhillon MS, PrabhakarS, JohnR. Outcome evaluation of minimally invasive surgery versus extensile lateral approach in management of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a randomised control trial. Foot. 2017;31:23–30.
[6]
GülabiD, Sarı F, SenC, AvcıC, Sağlam F, ErdemM, et al. Mid-term results of calcaneal plating for displaced intraarticular calcaneus fractures. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2013;19(2):145–151.
[7]
ZhangY, WengQ, GuY, ChenJ, YangY. Calcaneal fractures: 3D-printing model to assist spatial weaving of percutaneous screws versus conventional open fixation-a retrospective cohort study. Int Orthop. 2021;45(9):2337–2346.
[8]
YongZ, QiuyanW, YanruZ, Jianming C, YunfengY. Biomechanical comparison of spatial weaving and conventional calcaneal plate fixation for calcaneal fracture. Chin J Orthop. 2023;43(15):1041–1049.
[9]
NiM, WongDW, NiuW, WangY, MeiJ, ZhangM. Biomechanical comparison of modified Calcanail system with plating fixation in intra-articular calcaneal fracture: a finite element analysis. Med Eng Phys. 2019;70:55–61.
[10]
YuJ, WongDW, ZhangH, Luo ZP, ZhangM. The influence of high-heeled shoes on strain and tension force of the anterior talofibular ligament and plantar fascia during balanced standing and walking. Med Eng Phys. 2016;38(10):1152–1156.
[11]
MaxwellAB, OwenJR, GilbertTM, Romash MM, WayneJS, AdelaarRS. Biomechanical performance of lateral versus dual locking plates for calcaneal fractures. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2015;54(5):830–835.
[12]
WongDW, WangY, ChenTL, Leung AK, ZhangM. Biomechanical consequences of subtalar joint arthroereisis in treating posterior tibial tendon dysfunction: a theoretical analysis using finite element analysis. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 2017;20(14):1525–1532.
[13]
RammeltS, Sangeorzan BJ, SwordsMP. Calcaneal fractures - should we or should we not operate? Indian J Orthop. 2018;52(3):220–230.
[14]
KirMC, SemihA, HalukC, Dedeoglu SS, YunusI, BulentK, et al. Mini-plate fixation via sinus tarsi approach is superior to cannulated screw in intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a prospective randomized study. J Orthop Surg. 2018;26(3):230949901879274.
[15]
WagstromEA, DownesJM. Limited approaches to calcaneal fractures. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2018;11(5):485–494.
[16]
CarluzzoF, LongoGF. External fixation vs Orif in the treatment of bilateral Calcaneum fracture. J Orthop Case Rep. 2015;5(3):57–59.
[17]
GeorgiannosD, Lampridis V, BisbinasI. Fragility fractures of the ankle in the elderly: open reduction and internal fixation versus tibio-talo-calcaneal nailing: short-term results of a prospective randomized-controlled study. Injury. 2017;48(2):519–524.
[18]
FalisM, PyszelK. Treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures by intramedullary nail. Preliminary report. Ortop Traumatol Rehabil. 2016;18(2):141–147.
[19]
EisensteinED, MarioR, AbdelgawadAA. New technique for Tibiotalar arthrodesis using a new intramedullary nail device: a cadaveric study. Adv Orthop. 2016;2016:5247647.
[20]
SimonP, Goldzak M, EschlerA, MittlmeierT. Reduction and internal fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures with a locking nail: a prospective study of sixty nine cases. Int Orthop. 2015;39(10):2061–2067.
[21]
ZwippH, Paša L, ŽilkaL, AmlangM, Rammelt S, PompachM. Introduction of a new locking nail for treatment of intraarticular calcaneal fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2016;30:e88–e92.
[22]
FascioneF, Di Mauro M, GuelfiM, MalageladaF, Pantalone A, SaliniV. Surgical treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures by a minimally invasive technique using a locking nail: a preliminary study. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019;25(5):679–683.
[23]
WähnertD, Gehweiler D. Complications of intramedullary nailing-evolution of treatment. Injury. 2017;48:S59–S63.
[24]
ReinhardtS, MartinH, UlmarB, Do?Bele S, ZwippH, RammeltS, et al. Interlocking nailing versus interlocking plating in intra-articular calcaneal fractures: a biomechanical study. Foot Ankle Int. 2016;37:891–897.

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

2024 2024 The Authors. Orthopaedic Surgery published by Tianjin Hospital and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
PDF

Accesses

Citations

Detail

Sections
Recommended

/