No Superior Bone Union Outcomes with Allografts Compared to No Grafts and Autografts Following Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Yunhe Mao, Lei Yao, Junqiao Li, Jian Li, Yan Xiong
No Superior Bone Union Outcomes with Allografts Compared to No Grafts and Autografts Following Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Objective:: There has been long-standing debate about whether a medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) gap should be filled with autologous bone graft or any other filler to expedite the healing process. The main purpose of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of MOWHTO with an opening gap ≥10 mm, utilizing autograft, allograft, or no graft at 1 year postoperatively.
Methods:: A total of 68 patients were included in this retrospective study and divided into three treatment groups: Group A (no bone graft), Group B (autologous iliac crest graft), and Group C (allogenous tibia plateau graft). At postoperative 1-year follow-up, the area of callus filling in the most medial side of the knee was measured using anteroposterior radiographs, and a modified van Hemert scoring system was used to evaluate bone union outcomes in five mediolaterally divided zones. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores and relevant complications were assessed. The correlations between the gap width and bone union scores were evaluated.
Results:: Patients in the autograft group demonstrated better bone union progression (p = 0.031) and higher bone union scores (p < 0.01) compared to patients in the allograft or no graft groups. There were no significant differences in terms of postoperative WOMAC scores and incidence of complications among the three groups. No discernible linear relationships between the width of the opening gap and the bone union score were found.
Conclusion:: For MOWHTOs with an average gap opening width of 12.1 mm, autografts resulted in superior bone union outcomes compared to allografts and no graft at 1 year postoperatively. However, no bone graft achieved similar outcomes to allografts, suggesting that routine use of allografts should not be recommended.
Bone union / High tibial osteotomy / Knee osteoarthritis / Osteotomy filler
[1] |
Ollivier B, Berger P, Depuydt C, Vandenneucker H. Good long-term survival and patient-reported outcomes after high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment osteoarthritis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29:3569–3584.
|
[2] |
Yasuda K, Majima T, Tsuchida T, Kaneda K. A ten- to 15-year follow-up observation of high tibial osteotomy in medial compartment osteoarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;( 282):186–195.
|
[3] |
Han JH, Kim HJ, Song JG, Yang JH, Bhandare NN, Fernandez AR, et al. Is bone grafting necessary in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy? A meta-analysis of radiological outcomes. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2015;27:207–220.
|
[4] |
Ren YM, Duan YH, Sun YB, Yang T, Hou WY, Zhu RS, et al. Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy using autograft versus allograft: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg. 2020;33:565–575.
|
[5] |
Slevin O, Ayeni OR, Hinterwimmer S, Tischer T, Feucht MJ, Hirschmann MT. The role of bone void fillers in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016;24:3584–3598.
|
[6] |
Aryee S, Imhoff AB, Rose T, Tischer T. Do we need synthetic osteotomy augmentation materials for opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Biomaterials. 2008;29:3497–3502.
|
[7] |
Bei T, Yang L, Huang Q, Wu J, Liu J. Effectiveness of bone substitute materials in opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med. 2022;54:565–577.
|
[8] |
Sen MK, Miclau T. Autologous iliac crest bone graft: should it still be the gold standard for treating nonunions? Injury. 2007;38(Suppl 1):S75–S80.
|
[9] |
Lash NJ, Feller JA, Batty LM, Wasiak J, Richmond AK. Bone grafts and bone substitutes for opening-wedge osteotomies of the knee: a systematic review. Art Ther. 2015;31:720–730.
|
[10] |
Greenwald AS, Boden SD, Goldberg VM, Khan Y, Laurencin CT, Rosier RN; American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. The Committee on Biological Implants. Bone-graft substitutes: facts, fictions, and applications. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A (Suppl 2 Pt 2):98–103.
|
[11] |
Fucentese SF, Tscholl PM, Sutter R, Brucker PU, Meyer DC, Koch PP. Bone autografting in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy results in improved osseous gap healing on computed tomography, but no functional advantage: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27:2951–2957.
|
[12] |
Haghpanah B, Kaseb MH, Espandar R, Mortazavi SMJ. No difference in union and recurrence rate between iliac crest autograft versus allograft following medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29:3375–3381.
|
[13] |
Kim SC, Kim DH, Lee JI, Kim TW, Lee YS. Comparative analysis of serial union patterns after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with and without bone-void fillers. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021;103:1788–1797.
|
[14] |
Kim SJ, Nguyen LT, Seo YJ, Jung D, Shin YS, Kim J, et al. Bone healing on serial plain radiographs occurs slowly but adequately after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy without bone graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022;30:993–1000.
|
[15] |
Passarelli MC, Filho JRT, Brizzi FAM, Campos GC, Zorzi AR, Miranda JB. Comparison of Puddu osteotomy with or without autologous bone grafting: a prospective clinical trial. Rev Bras Ortop. 2017;52:555–560.
|
[16] |
Zorzi AR, da Silva HG, Muszkat C, Marques LC, Cliquet A, de Miranda JB. Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy with and without bone graft. Artif Organs. 2011;35:301–307.
|
[17] |
Sasaki S, Maeyama A, Kiyama T, Kamada S, Kobayashi T, Ishii S, et al. Combined use of beta-tricalcium phosphate with different porosities can accelerate bone remodelling in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol. 2022;29:30–34.
|
[18] |
Mao Y, You M, Zhang L, Li J, Fu W. Lack of efficacy of bone void filling materials in medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Art Ther. 2022;39:1735–1757.
|
[19] |
Yang JC, Chen CF, Luo CA, et al. Clinical experience using a 3D-printed patient-specific instrument for medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:9246529.
|
[20] |
Mao Y, Xiong Y, Li Q, Chen G, Fu W, Tang X, et al. 3D-printed patient-specific instrumentation technique vs. conventional technique in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy: a prospective comparative study. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:1923172.
|
[21] |
Nha KW, Oh SM, Ha YW, Nikumbha VP, Seo JH, Oh MJ, et al. A retrospective comparison of union rates after open wedge high Tibial osteotomies with and without synthetic bone grafts (hydroxyapatite and β-tricalciumphosphate) at 2 years. Art Ther. 2018;34:2621–2630.
|
[22] |
Brosset T, Pasquier G, Migaud H, Gougeon F. Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy performed without filling the defect but with locking plate fixation (TomoFix™) and early weight-bearing: prospective evaluation of bone union, precision and maintenance of correction in 51 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97:705–711.
|
[23] |
van Hemert WL, Willems K, Anderson PG, van Heerwaarden RJ, Wymenga AB. Tricalcium phosphate granules or rigid wedge preforms in open wedge high tibial osteotomy: a radiological study with a new evaluation system. Knee. 2004;11:451–456.
|
[24] |
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833–1840.
|
[25] |
Jung WH, Takeuchi R, Kim DH, Nag R. Faster union rate and better clinical outcomes using autologous bone graft after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:1380–1387.
|
[26] |
Miltenberg B, Puzzitiello RN, Ruelos VCB, Masood R, Pagani NR, Moverman MA, et al. Incidence of complications and revision surgery after high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med. 2023:3635465221142868.
|
[27] |
Hernán MA. Causal analyses of existing databases: no power calculations required. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022;144:203–205.
|
[28] |
Kim MS, Koh IJ, Choi KY, Sung YG, Park DC, Lee HJ, et al. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the WOMAC and factors related to achievement of the MCID after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for knee osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2021;49:2406–2415.
|
[29] |
Van Genechten W, Van den Bempt M, Van Tilborg W, et al. Structural allograft impaction enables fast rehabilitation in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a consecutive case series with one year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2020;28:3747–3757.
|
[30] |
Samsell B, Softic D, Qin X, McLean J, Sohoni P, Gonzales K, et al. Preservation of allograft bone using a glycerol solution: a compilation of original preclinical research. Biomater Res. 2019;23:5.
|
[31] |
Pinkowski JL, Reiman PR, Chen SL. Human lymphocyte reaction to freeze-dried allograft and xenograft ligamentous tissue. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17:595–600.
|
[32] |
Burchardt H, Jones H, Glowczewskie F, Rudner C, Enneking WF. Freeze-dried allogeneic segmental cortical-bone grafts in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:1082–1090.
|
[33] |
Kuremsky MA, Schaller TM, Hall CC, Roehr BA, Masonis JL. Comparison of autograft vs allograft in opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. J Arthroplasty. 2010;25:951–957.
|
[34] |
Lee SC, Jung KA, Nam CH, Jung SH, Hwang SH. The short-term follow-up results of open wedge high tibial osteotomy with using an Aescula open wedge plate and an allogenic bone graft: the minimum 1-year follow-up results. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010;2:47–54.
|
[35] |
Kim MK, Ha JK, Lee DW, Nam SW, Kim JG, Lee YS. No correction angle loss with stable plates in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23:1999–2006.
|
[36] |
Goshima K, Sawaguchi T, Shigemoto K, Iwai S, Nakanishi A, Inoue D, et al. Large opening gaps, unstable hinge fractures, and osteotomy line below the safe zone cause delayed bone healing after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019;27:1291–1298.
|
[37] |
Dornacher D, Leitz F, Kappe T, Reichel H, Faschingbauer M. The degree of correction in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy compromises bone healing: a consecutive review of 101 cases. Knee. 2021;29:478–485.
|
[38] |
Miller BS, Dorsey WO, Bryant CR, Austin JC. The effect of lateral cortex disruption and repair on the stability of the medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1552–1557.
|
/
〈 | 〉 |