A review of concrete bridge surface defect detection based on deep learning

Abstract

The detection of surface defects in concrete bridges using deep learning is of significant importance for reducing operational risks, saving maintenance costs, and driving the intelligent transformation of bridge defect detection. In contrast to the subjective and inefficient manual visual inspection, deep learning-based algorithms for concrete defect detection exhibit remarkable advantages, emerging as a focal point in recent research. This paper comprehensively analyzes the research progress of deep learning algorithms in the field of surface defect detection in concrete bridges in recent years. It introduces the early detection methods for surface defects in concrete bridges and the development of deep learning. Subsequently, it provides an overview of deep learning-based concrete bridge surface defect detection research from three aspects: image classification, object detection, and semantic segmentation. The paper summarizes the strengths and weaknesses of existing methods and the challenges they face. Additionally, it analyzes and prospects the development trends of surface defect detection in concrete bridges.

Keywords

A

References

[1] Editorial department of China journal of highway and transport. Review on China’s bridge engineering research: 2021. China journal of highway and transport, 2021, 34(2): 1-97[J]

[2] Ministry of Transport. Statistical bulletin of transport industry development in 2022[N]. China communications news, 2023-06-16(2).

[3] ZhangJ Q, LiP F, DongZ H, et al.. Study on some reliability evaluation problems of existing highway bridges. China civil engineering journal, 2019, 52(S1): 19-173[J]

[4] Ministry of Transport. Code for maintenance of highway bridges and culvers: JTG/H11-2004[S/OL]. [2004-06-28]. http://www.sxhighway.gov.cn.

[5] MaoJ H, CuiL, JinW L, et al.. Experimental research on concrete crack recognizing and monitoring based on distributed fiber sensor. Chinese journal of sensors and actuators, 2014, 27(9): 1298-1304[J]

[6] YeY X, ZhaoX M, WuG, et al.. Application of distributed optical fiber in the monitoring of cracks in concrete structures. Journal of civil and environmental engineering, 2018, 40(1): 24-29[J]

[7] XuY, BaoY, ChenJ, et al.. Surface fatigue crack identification in steel box girder of bridges by a deep fusion convolutional neural network based on consumer grade camera images. Structural health monitoring, 2019, 18(3): 653-674[J]

[8] Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, State Council. Outline of national comprehensive 3D transportation network planning[EB/OL]. (2021-02-24) [2024-05-08]. http://www.gov.cn/zhengce/202102/content_5588654.htm.

[9] GouH Y, YangB, HuaH, et al.. State-of-the-art review of bridge informatization and intelligent bridge in 2019. Journal of civil and environmental engineering, 2020, 42(5): 14-27[J]

[10] AzimiM, DadrasA, PekcanG. Data-driven structural health monitoring and damage detection through deep learning: state-of-the-art review. Sensors, 2020, 20(10): 2278-2312[J]

[11] SunL M, ShangZ Q, XiaY. Development and prospect of bridge structural health monitoring in the context of big data. China journal of highway and transport, 2019, 32(11): 1-20[J]

[12] LeeH, LimJ, KangY, et al.. A comparative study on bridge inspection and performance assessment. Journal of Korean society for advanced composite structures, 2019, 10(6): 91-102[J]

[13] WangX L. The application and development of UAV in bridge inspection. China water transport, 2018, 18(04): 199-207[J]

[14] JungS, ChoiD, SongS, et al.. Bridge inspection using unmanned aerial vehicle based on HG-SLAM: hierarchical graph-based SLAM. Remote sensing, 2020, 12183022[J]

[15] AYELE Y Z, ALIYARI M, GRIFFITHS D, et al. Automatic crack segmentation for UAV-assisted bridge inspection[J]. Energies, 2020, 13(23).

[16] HumpeA. Bridge inspection with an off-the-shelf 360° camera drone. Drones, 2020, 4467[J]

[17] WangY F. Design and implementation of two-axis head of bridge detection UAV based on binocular vision. New technology & new products of China, 2017, 24: 41-43[J]

[18] AlzubaidiL, ZhangJ, HumaidiA J, et al.. Review of deep learning: concepts, CNN architectures, challenges, applications, future directions. Journal of big data, 2021, 8: 1-74[J]

[19] HamishebaharY, GuanH, SoS, et al.. A comprehensive review of deep learning-based crack detection approaches. Applied sciences, 2022, 1231374[J]

[20] FlahM, NunezI, Ben ChaabeneW, et al.. Machine learning algorithms in civil structural health monitoring: a systematic review. Archives of computational methods in engineering, 2021, 28: 2621-2643[J]

[21] CuiM DBridge bearings based on image processing, 2018, Nanjing. Southeast University. [D]

[22] XiaoX Y, ZhangX Y, DuX F. A summary of bridge crack detection based on image processing. Electronic test, 2019, 19: 52-53[J]

[23] DengL, ChuH H, LongL Z, et al.. Review of deep learning-based crack detection for civil infrastructures. China journal of highway and transport, 2023, 36(02): 1-21[J]

[24] ZhangJ Q, JinJ, WangY F, et al.. Study progress of intelligent inspection technology and equipment for highway bridge. Journal of highway and transportation research and development, 2023, 40(01): 1-27[J]

[25] KochC, GeorgievaK, KasireddyV, et al.. A review on computer vision based defect detection and condition assessment of concrete and asphalt civil infrastructure. Advanced engineering informatics, 2015, 29(2): 196-210[J]

[26] HU W, WANG W, AI C, et al. Machine vision-based surface crack analysis for transportation infrastructure[J]. Automation in construction, 2021, 132.

[27] ZhaoR G, WangF, WuH Y, et al.. Research review of automatic inspection of bridge defects. Construction technology, 2023, 52(09): 1-6[J]

[28] JiangS H, JiangX H. A review of concrete defect detection based on computer vision. Journal of information technology in civil engineering and architecture, 2023, 15(04): 14-21[J]

[29] LiuX YDetection of the concrete bridge bottom crack based on digital image processing, 2014, Wuhan. Wuhan University of Technology. [D]

[30] KimH, AhnE, ChoS, et al.. Comparative analysis of image binarization methods for crack identification in concrete structures. Cement and concrete research, 2017, 99: 53-61[J]

[31] ZhangW Y, ZhangZ J, QiD P, et al.. Automatic crack detection and classification method for subway tunnel safety monitoring. Sensors, 2014, 14(10): 19307-19328[J]

[32] JiangWThe adaptive threshold segmentation method for pavement crack disease research and implementation, 2019, Nanjing. Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology. [D]

[33] LiW XBridge crack extraction with property matching and its engineering application based on digital image processing, 2019, Xiangtan. Hunan University of Science and Technology. [D]

[34] ZhangLBridge disease image processing and identification, 2018, Liuzhou. Guangxi University of Science and Technology. [D]

[35] XuA H, GaoJ. Cement concrete pavement crack recognition method combining image enhancement and mathematical morphology. Highway, 2015, 60(10): 55-58[J]

[36] LiG Y, WangT. Research on concrete crack detection based on morphological processing an D feature analysis. Building structure, 2020, 50(S2): 529-533[J]

[37] Abdel-QaderI, AbudayyehO, KellyM E. Analysis of edge-detection techniques for crack identification in bridges. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 2003, 17(4): 255-263[J]

[38] MUSTAFA R, MOHAMED E A. Concrete crack detection based multi-block CLBP features and SVM classifier[J]. Journal of theoretical & applied information technology, 2015.

[39] ChandaS, BuG, GuanH, et al.. Automatic bridge crack detection-a texture analysis-based approach. Artificial Neural Networks in Pattern Recognition: 6th IAPR TC 3 International Workshop, October 6–8, 2014, Montreal, Canada, 2014, Heidelberg. Springer International Publishing. 193203[C]

[40] ChenF F, ZhangY F, HanX J. Based on image feature values of the surface of the concrete bridge disease image classification. Structural engineers, 2018, 34(01): 59-63[J]

[41] YeHResearch on bridge defect recognition method based on support vector machine, 2021, Liuzhou. Guangxi University of Science and Technology. [D]

[42] ShiY, CuiL, QiZ, et al.. Automatic road crack detection using random structured forests. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 2016, 17(12): 3434-3445[J]

[43] LoweD G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International journal of computer vision, 2004, 60(2): 91-110[J]

[44] MccullochW S, PittsW. A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. The bulletin of mathematical biophysics, 1943, 5(4): 115-133[J]

[45] DingS, LiH, SuC, et al.. Evolutionary artificial neuralnetworks: a review. Artificial intelligence review, 2013, 39(3): 251-260[J]

[46] RumelhartD E, HintonG E, WilliamsR J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 1986, 323(6088): 533-536[J]

[47] HintonG E, SalakhutdinovR R. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks. Science, 2006, 313(13): 504-507[J]

[48] HintonG, DengL, YuD, et al.. Deep neural networks for acoustic modeling in speech recognition: the shared views of four research groups. IEEE signal processing magazine, 2012, 29(6): 82-97[J]

[49] KRIZHEVSKY A, SUTSKEVER I, HINTON G E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks[J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2012, 25.

[50] MIKOLOV T, SUTSKEVER I, CHEN K, et al. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality[J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2013, 26.

[51] GOODFELLOW I, POUGET-ABADIE J, MIRZA M, et al. Generative adversarial nets[J]. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2014, 27.

[52] MIKOLOV T, CHEN K, CORRADO G, et al. Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space[EB/OL]. (2013-01-16) [2024-05-08]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1301.3781.

[53] SilverD, HuangA, MaddisonC J, et al.. Mastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search. Nature, 2016, 529(7587): 484-489[J]

[54] HeK, ZhangX, RenS, et al.. Deep residual learning for image recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 27–30, 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2016, New York. IEEE. 770778[C]

[55] DEVLIN J, CHANG M W, LEE K, et al. Bert: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding[EB/OL]. (2019-5-24) [2024-05-08]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1810.04805.

[56] KrizhevskyA, SutskeverI, HintonG E. ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Communications of the ACM, 2017, 60(6): 84-90[J]

[57] DengL, SeltzerM L, YuD, et al.. Binary coding of speech spectrograms using a deep auto-encoder. Eleventh Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, September 26–30, 2010, 2010, Makuhari, Chiba, Japan. ISCA. 16921695[C]

[58] HINTON G E, SRIVASTAVA N, KRIZHEVSKY A, et al. Improving neural networks by preventing co-adaptation of feature detectors[EB/OL]. (2012-07-03) [2024-05-08]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1207.0580.

[59] IoffeS, SzegedyC. Batch normalization: accelerating deep network training by reducing internal covariate shift. International Conference on Machine Learning, December 9–11, 2015, Miami, FL, USA, 2015, New York. ICML. 448456[C]

[60] PakM, KimS. A review of deep learning in image recognition. 2017 4th International Conference on Computer Applications and Information Processing Technology (CAIPT), August 8–10, 2017, Kuta Bali, Indonesia, 2017, New York. IEEE. 13[C]

[61] DengJ, DongW, SocherR, et al.. lmageNet: a largescale hierarchical image database. 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 20–25, 2009, Miami, FL, USA, 2009, New York. IEEE. 248255[C]

[62] LinT Y, MaireM, BelongieS, et al.. Microsoft coco: common objects in context. 13th European Conference on Computer Vision, September 6–12, 2014, Zurich, Switzerland, 2014, Berlin. Springer. 740755[C]

[63] EveringhamM, VanG L, WilliamsC K I, et al.. The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge. International journal of computer vision, 2010, 88: 303-338[J]

[64] HusainS S, OngE J, BoberM. ACTNET: end-to-end learning of feature activations and multi-stream aggregation for effective instance image retrieval. International journal of computer vision, 2021, 129: 1432-1450[J]

[65] ShinH C, RothH R, GaoM, et al.. Deep convolutional neural networks for computer-aided detection: CNN architectures, dataset characteristics and transfer learning. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2016, 35(5): 1285-1298[J]

[66] ZhaoZ Q, ZhengP, XuS, et al.. Object detection with deep learning: a review. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 2019, 30(11): 3212-3232[J]

[67] ZhangL, YangF, ZhangY D, et al.. Road crack detection using deep convolutional neural network. 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), September 25–28, 2016, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 2016, New York. IEEE. 37083712[C]

[68] PaulyL, HoggD, FuentesR, et al.. Deeper networks for pavement crack detection. 34th International Symposium in Automation and Robotics in Construction, June 28–July 1, 2017, 2017, Taipei, China. IAARC. 479485[C]

[69] WangK C, ZhangA, LiJ Q, et al.. Deep learning for asphalt pavement cracking recognition using convolutional neural network. Airfield and highway traffic control, 2017, 12(3): 166-177[J]

[70] EisenbachM, StrickerR, SeichterD, et al.. How to get pavement distress detection ready for deep learning? A systematic approach. 2017 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), May 14–19, 2017, Anchorage, AK, USA, 2017, New York. IEEE. 20392047[C]

[71] SchmuggeS J, RiceL, NguyenN R, et al.. Detection of cracks in nuclear power plant using spatial-temporal grouping of local patches. 2016 IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), March 7–10, 2016, Lake Placid, NY, USA, 2016, New York. IEEE. 17[C]

[72] ChaY J, ChoiW, BüyüköztürkO. Deep learning-based crack damage detection using convolutional neural networks. Computer-aided civil and infrastructure engineering, 2017, 32(5): 361-378[J]

[73] ChenF C, JahanshahiR M R. NB-CNN: deep learning-based crack detection using convolutional neural network and naïve Bayes data fusion. IEEE transactions on industrial electronics, 2018, 65(99): 4392-4400[J]

[74] XuY, BaoY, ChenJ, et al.. Surface fatigue crack identification in steel box girder of bridges by a deep fusion convolutional neural network based on consumer-grade camera images. Structural health monitoring, 2019, 18(3): 653-674[J]

[75] WangL P, GaoR Z, ZhangJ J, et al.. Crack detection of concrete pavement based on convolutional neural network. Computer science, 2019, 46(S2): 584-589[J]

[76] TangW, HuangS, ZhaoQ, et al.. An iteratively optimized patch label inference network for automatic pavement distress detection. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 2021, 23(7): 8652-8661[J]

[77] YangQ, ShiW, ChenJ, et al.. Deep convolution neural network-based transfer learning method for civil infrastructure crack detection. Automation in construction, 2020, 116103199[J]

[78] SilvaW, SchwerzD. Concrete crack detection based on deep learning image classification. Proceedings, 2018, 9(2): 489-495[J]

[79] HuthwohlP, LuR D, BrilakisI. Multi-classifier for reinforced concrete bridge defects. Automation in construction, 2019, 10515[J]

[80] BhattacharyaG, MandalB, PuhanN B. Multi-deformation aware attention learning for concrete structural defect classification. IEEE transactions on circuits and systems for video technology, 2020, 31(9): 3707-3713[J]

[81] GirshickR, DonahueJ, DarrellT, et al.. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 23–28, 2014, Columbus, OH, USA, 2014, New York. IEEE. 580587[C]

[82] RedmonJ, DivvalaS, GirshickR, et al.. You only look once: unified, real-time object detection. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 27–30, 2016, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2016, New York. IEEE. 779788[C]

[83] LiuW, AnguelovD, ErhanD, et al.. SSD: single shot multibox detector. 14th European Conference on Computer Vision, October 11–14, 2016, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2016, Berlin. Springer. 2137[C]

[84] ChaY J, ChoiW, SuhG, et al.. Autonomous structural visual inspection using region-based deep learning for detecting multiple damage types. Computer-aided civil and infrastructure engineering, 2018, 33(9): 731-747[J]

[85] ZhangNStudy on detection algorithm for road surface disease based on faster R-CNN, 2019, Nanchang. East China Jiaotong University. [D]

[86] SongW YResearch on bridge disease identification and classification based on image deep learning, 2020, Beijing. Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications. [D]

[87] NieM, WangK. Pavement distress detection based on transfer learning. 2018 5th International Conference on Systems and Informatics (ICSAI), November 10–12, 2018, Nanjing, China, 2018, New York. IEEE. 435439[C]

[88] GE Z, LIU S, WANG F, et al. YOLOX: exceeding YOLO series in 2021[EB/OL]. (2021-07-18) [2024-05-08]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.08430.

[89] WangC Y, BochkovskiyA, LiaoH Y M. YOLOv7: trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectors. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 18–22, 2023, Vancouver, Canada, 2023, New York. IEEE. 74647475[C]

[90] ZhangC, ChangC, JamshidiM. Concrete bridge surface damage detection using a single-stage detector. Computer-aided civil and infrastructure engineering, 2020, 35(4): 389-409[J]

[91] LuoH, JiaC, LiJ. Road surface disease detection algorithm based on improved YOLOv4. Laser & optoelectronics progress, 2021, 58(14): 336-344[J]

[92] ZhouQ S, DongS J, LuoJ Y, et al.. Bridge apparent disease detection based on improved YOLOv3. Journal of Chongqing University, 2022, 45(06): 121-130[J]

[93] LiaoY N, YaoL. Bridge disease detection and recognition based on improved YOLOX algorithm. Journal of applied optics, 2023, 44(04): 792-800[J]

[94] MundtM, MajumderS, MuraliS, et al.. Meta-learning convolutional neural architectures for multi-target concrete defect classification with the concrete defect bridge image dataset. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 15–20, 2019, Long Beach, CA, USA, 2019, New York. IEEE. 1119611205[C]

[95] LongJ, ShelhamerE, DarrellT. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 7–12, 2015, Boston, MA, USA, 2015, New York. IEEE. 34313440[C]

[96] RonnebergerO, FischerP, BroxT. U-net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention-MICCAI 2015, October 5–9, 2015, Munich, Germany, 2015, Berlin. Springer. 234241[C]

[97] HuangH, LinL, TongR, et al.. Unet 3+: a full-scale connected Unet for medical image segmentation. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), May 4–8, 2020, Barcelona, Spain, 2020, New York. IEEE. 10551059[C]

[98] TsaiT H, TsengY W. BiSeNetV3: bilateral segmentation network with coordinate attention for real-time semantic segmentation. Neurocomputing, 2023, 532: 33-42[J]

[99] XuJ C, XiongZ X, BhattacharyyaS P. PIDNet: a real-time semantic segmentation network inspired by PID controllers. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 18–22, 2023, Vancouver, Canada, 2023, New York. IEEE. 1952919539[C]

[100] ChenL C, ZhuY, PapandreouG, et al.. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), September 8–14, 2018, Munich, Germany, 2018, Berlin. Springer. 801818[C]

[101] ZhengS, JayasumanaS, Romera-ParedesB, et al.. Conditional random fields as recurrent neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, December 7–13, 2015, Santiago, Chile, 2015, New York. IEEE. 15291537[C]

[102] ZhaoH, ZhangY, LiuS, et al.. PSANet: point-wise spatial attention network for scene parsing. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), September 8–14, 2018, Munich, Germany, 2018, Berlin. Springer. 267283[C]

[103] FuJ, LiuJ, TianH, et al.. Dual attention network for scene segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 15–20, 2019, Long Beach, CA, USA, 2019, New York. IEEE. 31463154[C]

[104] XieE, WangW, YuZ, et al.. SegFormer: simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers. Advances in neural information processing systems, 2021, 34: 12077-12090[J]

[105] ZhangW, HuangZ, LuoG, et al.. TopFormer: token pyramid transformer for mobile semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 18–24, 2022, New Orleans, LA, USA, 2022, New York. IEEE. 1208312093[C]

[106] WAN Q, HUANG Z, LU J, et al. Seaformer: squeeze-enhanced axial transformer for mobile semantic segmentation[EB/OL]. (2023-02-09) [2024-05-08]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2301.13156.

[107] YangX, LiH, YuY, et al.. Automatic pixel-level crack detection and measurement using fully convolutional network. Computer-aided civil and infrastructure engineering, 2018, 33(12): 1090-1109[J]

[108] LiZ, ZhuH, HuangM. A deep learning-based fine crack segmentation network on full-scale steel bridge images with complicated backgrounds. IEEE access, 2021, 9: 114989-114997[J]

[109] LiuY, YaoJ, LuX, et al.. DeepCrack: a deep hierarchical feature learning architecture for crack segmentation. Neurocomputing, 2019, 338: 139-153[J]

[110] WangS, PanY, ChenM, et al.. FCN-SFW: steel structure crack segmentation using a fully convolutional network and structured forests. IEEE access, 2020, 8: 214358-214373[J]

[111] TabernikD, SelaS, SkvarcJ, et al.. Segmentation-based deep-learning approach for surface-defect detection. Journal of intelligent manufacturing, 2020, 31(3): 759-776[J]

[112] ZhangK, ZhangY, ChengH D. Self-supervised structure learning for crack detection based on cycle-consistent generative adversarial networks. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 2020, 34304020004[J]

[113] AlipourM, HarrisD K, MillerG R. Robust pixel-level crack detection using deep fully convolutional neural networks. Journal of computing in civil engineering, 2019, 33604019040[J]

[114] FanZ, LiC, ChenY, et al.. Automatic crack detection on road pavements using encoder-decoder architecture. Materials, 2020, 13132960[J]

[115] YangF, ZhangL, YuS, et al.. Feature pyramid and hierarchical boosting network for pavement crack detection. IEEE transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 2019, 21(4): 1525-1535[J]

[116] KönigJ, JenkinsM D, MannionM, et al.. Optimized deep encoder-decoder methods for crack segmentation. Digital signal processing, 2021, 108102907[J]

[117] ZhuS Y, DuJ C, LiY S, et al.. Method for bridge crack detection based on the U-Net convolutional networks. Journal of Xidian University, 2019, 46(04): 35-42[J]

[118] YangG J, QiY H, ShiX M. Review of bridge crack detection based on digital image technology. Journal of Jilin University (engineering and technology edition), 2024, 54(02): 313-332[J]

[119] LiG, GaoZ Y, ZhangX C, et al.. Improved global convolutional network for pavement crack detection. Laser & optoelectronics progress, 2020, 57(08): 111-119[J]

[120] YuJ Y, LiuB L, YinD, et al.. Intelligent identification and measurement of bridge cracks based on YOLOv5 and U-Net3+. Journal of Hunan University (natural sciences), 2023, 50(05): 65-73[J]

[121] DOSOVITSKIY A, BEYER L, KOLESNIKOV A, et al. An image is worth 16×16 words: transformers for image recognition at scale[EB/OL]. (2023-06-03) [2024-05-08]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.11929.

[122] ZhengS, LuJ, ZhaoH, et al.. Rethinking semantic segmentation from a sequence-to-sequence perspective with transformers. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 10–25, 2021, Nashville, TN, USA, 2021, New York. IEEE. 68816890[C]

[123] LiuH, MiaoX, MertzC, et al.. Crackformer: transformer network for fine-grained crack detection. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, October 10–17, 2021, Montreal, Canada, 2021, New York. IEEE. 37833792[C]

[124] GuoJ M, MarkoniH. Transformer based refinement network for accurate crack detection. 2021 International Conference on System Science and Engineering (ICSSE), August 26–28, 2021, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 2021, New York. IEEE. 442446[C]

[125] ChuH H, YuanH Q, LongL Z, et al.. A transformer-based cascade method for segmenting bridge cracks from high-resolution images. China journal of highway and transport, 2024, 37(02): 65-76[J]

[126] HOSKERE V, NARAZAKI Y, HOANG T, et al. Vision-based structural inspection using multiscale deep convolutional neural networks[EB/OL]. (2021-06-03) [2024-05-08]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.11929.

[127] SunS Q. Multiple disease detection of concrete structures based on deep learning. Building structure, 2021, 51(S2): 1439-1445[J]

[128] ZhangH YResearch on intelligent diagnosis technology of bridge damages in dry and cold regions of northwest China, 2023, Lanzhou. Lanzhou Jiaotong University. [D]

[129] LiaoY N, HuangC Y, YinY F. Segmentation of apparent multi-defect images of concrete bridges based on PID encoder and multi-feature fusion. Buildings, 2024, 1451463[J]

[130] ZhouS, SongW. Deep learning-based roadway crack classification using laser scanned range images: a comparative study on hyperparameter selection. Automation in construction, 2020, 1141103171[J]

[131] DorafshanS, ThomasR, MaguireM. SDNET2018: an annotated image dataset for noncontact concrete crack detection using deep convolutional neural networks. Data in brief, 2018, 21(1): 1664-1668[J]

RIGHTS & PERMISSIONS

Tianjin University of Technology